Trump MAGAThread XI: Button, Button, Who's Got The Button?

[Petrasylvania]

I don't remember pictures of sailors on submarines tbh.

That story was kinda absurd. A sailor on a sub taking pictures while onboard for his family and he got dishonorably discharged and a year in prison or some shit.

Aren't nuclear subs highly restricted with communications especially if they haul nuclear SLBMs?

[Washington Resistance Army]

That story was kinda absurd. A sailor on a sub taking pictures while onboard for his family and he got dishonorably discharged and a year in prison or some shit.

Aren't nuclear subs highly restricted with communications especially if they haul nuclear SLBMs?

It was still in port I think, been a while since I read the story though.

[The Flutterlands]

https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politi ... story.html

Do states have to rebel against the feds even more? I think so and protect their weed at all fucking costs.

[Ifreann]

Today's dose of middle school geopolitics.

Bonus points for the video that played that had Haley saying that the sky is still up three days after the announcement so there's nothing to worry about.

I'm beginning to think that the GOP philosophy doesn't account for things that don't happen instantaneously.

Saying things like that will get you banned from the Friends Of The US cool kids table.

---

In another extraordinary section, Wolff writes: “Trump liked to say that one of the things that made life worth living was getting your friends’ wives into bed.” To that end, the book claims, Trump would invite the friend to his office and engage in “more or less constant sexual banter”.

The book goes on to say that, with the friend’s wife on speakerphone, listening to the conversation, Trump would allegedly ask the friend: “‘Do you still like having sex with your wife? How often? You must have had a better fuck than your wife? Tell me about it. I have girls coming in from Los Angeles at three o’clock. We can go upstairs and have a great time.”

Classy.. it's odd that Trump goes primarily after Bannon and not the book itself, you'd think a better strategy would be to denounce the book entirely as fake rather than attack Bannon, thus implying a lot of the book is true.

This is the man who was chosen by God to lead America.

[Uxupox]

Aren't nuclear subs highly restricted with communications especially if they haul nuclear SLBMs?

It was still in port I think, been a while since I read the story though.

Photo's of restricted areas of a inside a nuclear submarine are illegal. Doesn't matter if it's on port or off-port.

[Vassenor]

https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2018/01/04/sessions-will-rescind-policy-that-allowed-legal-marijuana-flourish-without-federal-intervention/P0ZtSj2hFAjktCFME4iJmJ/story.html

Do states have to rebel against the feds even more? I think so and protect their weed at all fucking costs.

So where is the crowd that crime STATES RIGHTS over gay marriage now? Or are they under the same rock that they hide under when states write their own gun laws?

[The Flutterlands]

https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2018/01/04/sessions-will-rescind-policy-that-allowed-legal-marijuana-flourish-without-federal-intervention/P0ZtSj2hFAjktCFME4iJmJ/story.html

Do states have to rebel against the feds even more? I think so and protect their weed at all fucking costs.

So where is the crowd that crime STATES RIGHTS over gay marriage now? Or are they under the same rock that they hide under when states write their own gun laws?

Smoking weed =/= denying gay marriage

[Ifreann]

https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2018/01/04/sessions-will-rescind-policy-that-allowed-legal-marijuana-flourish-without-federal-intervention/P0ZtSj2hFAjktCFME4iJmJ/story.html

Do states have to rebel against the feds even more? I think so and protect their weed at all fucking costs.

Yes, protect that sweet, sweet ganje, no matter how many people die. To arms, and let the feds fear our mighty battle cry "SMOKE WEED EVERY DAY"

[The Knockout Gun Gals]

We should bomb North Korea.

That is all.

Yeah, his neighbors won't do nothing about it.

https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2018/01/04/sessions-will-rescind-policy-that-allowed-legal-marijuana-flourish-without-federal-intervention/P0ZtSj2hFAjktCFME4iJmJ/story.html

Do states have to rebel against the feds even more? I think so and protect their weed at all fucking costs.

Second American Civil War, anyone?

[The Flutterlands]

We should bomb North Korea.

That is all.

Yeah, his neighbors won't do nothing about it.

https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2018/01/04/sessions-will-rescind-policy-that-allowed-legal-marijuana-flourish-without-federal-intervention/P0ZtSj2hFAjktCFME4iJmJ/story.html

Do states have to rebel against the feds even more? I think so and protect their weed at all fucking costs.

Second American Civil War, anyone?

Over weed, net neutrality and other progressive rights? Maybe... Let's see what happens in 2018 and 2020 first.

Still, what is so wrong with defying the government on these things? They don't hurt people or the environment...

[Corrian]

Cant stand the people who are acting like trump single handedly won the fucking war against isis. Load of wank.

Yeah, I knew they were going to be annoying about this. ISIS was dying during the Obama era. They were being "Bombed the shit out of". Trump is just continuing to finish them off. I guarantee they'd be dying just as much under Obama right now if he was still President.

[Corrian]

https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2018/01/04/sessions-will-rescind-policy-that-allowed-legal-marijuana-flourish-without-federal-intervention/P0ZtSj2hFAjktCFME4iJmJ/story.html

Do states have to rebel against the feds even more? I think so and protect their weed at all fucking costs.

Oh, I think some states are ready to sue on that too actually.

This is something that should piss off both sides, since even if it was just medically, even heavily Republican states supported legalization.

[Corrian]

Yeah, his neighbors won't do nothing about it.



Second American Civil War, anyone?

Over weed, net neutrality and other progressive rights? Maybe... Let's see what happens in 2018 and 2020 first.

Still, what is so wrong with defying the government on these things? They don't hurt people or the environment...

Civil war over weed? Really?

We'd be too high to do anything.

[Liriena]

We should bomb North Korea.

That is all.

Talk about a shitty take.

[Liriena]

Cant stand the people who are acting like trump single handedly won the fucking war against isis. Load of wank.

Yeah, I knew they were going to be annoying about this. ISIS was dying during the Obama era. They were being "Bombed the shit out of". Trump is just continuing to finish them off. I guarantee they'd be dying just as much under Obama right now if he was still President.

It never ceased to amaze me how the stupid fucking warhawks kept crying for a "real president" who'd bomb the crap out of ISIS while Obama was doing exactly that. It's the sort of collective idiocy/insanity that makes the optimist in me feel a bit concerned about the future.

[The Knockout Gun Gals]

Yeah, his neighbors won't do nothing about it.



Second American Civil War, anyone?

Over weed, net neutrality and other progressive rights? Maybe... Let's see what happens in 2018 and 2020 first.

Still, what is so wrong with defying the government on these things? They don't hurt people or the environment...

Well, weeds hurt corporations. There have been numerous cases of weeds curing illnesses, right?

Net neutrality hurts corporations.

Progressive rights...well, let just say we cannot appease everyone.

[Liriena]

https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2018/01/04/sessions-will-rescind-policy-that-allowed-legal-marijuana-flourish-without-federal-intervention/P0ZtSj2hFAjktCFME4iJmJ/story.html

Do states have to rebel against the feds even more? I think so and protect their weed at all fucking costs.

Oh, I think some states are ready to sue on that too actually.

This is something that should piss off both sides, since even if it was just medically, even heavily Republican states supported legalization.

Polling has shown that Republicans will often "follow the leader" and collectively change their minds on an issue at a neckbreaking pace.

You don't have to be ideologically consistent when your one guiding principle is authoritarianism.

[Ifreann]

Yeah, his neighbors won't do nothing about it.



Second American Civil War, anyone?

Over weed, net neutrality and other progressive rights? Maybe... Let's see what happens in 2018 and 2020 first.

Still, what is so wrong with defying the government on these things? They don't hurt people or the environment...

Whether or not they hurt people is beside the point. It is wrong to fight the government on smoking weed "at all fucking costs" because the Devil's lettuce is not worth "all fucking costs".

[Liriena]

Over weed, net neutrality and other progressive rights? Maybe... Let's see what happens in 2018 and 2020 first.

Still, what is so wrong with defying the government on these things? They don't hurt people or the environment...

Well, weeds hurt corporations. There have been numerous cases of weeds curing illnesses, right?

Net neutrality hurts corporations.

Progressive rights...well, let just say we cannot appease everyone.

Yeah. The whole tax bill debate showed that Republican leadership (and likely several in the Democratic leadership) are more concerned about appeasing corporate interests than alienating their voters.

[The Flutterlands]

Oh, I think some states are ready to sue on that too actually.

This is something that should piss off both sides, since even if it was just medically, even heavily Republican states supported legalization.

Polling has shown that Republicans will often "follow the leader" and collectively change their minds on an issue at a neckbreaking pace.

You don't have to be ideologically consistent when your one guiding principle is authoritarianism.

We must rebel against authoritarianism...

Over weed, net neutrality and other progressive rights? Maybe... Let's see what happens in 2018 and 2020 first.

Still, what is so wrong with defying the government on these things? They don't hurt people or the environment...

Well, weeds hurt corporations. There have been numerous cases of weeds curing illnesses, right?

Net neutrality hurts corporations.

Progressive rights...well, let just say we cannot appease everyone.

I don't care if they hurt Corporations. They can go fuck themselves. Consumer rights, progressive rights, and the environment should trump Corporate needs and Authoritarianism at all costs.

[Liriena]

Over weed, net neutrality and other progressive rights? Maybe... Let's see what happens in 2018 and 2020 first.

Still, what is so wrong with defying the government on these things? They don't hurt people or the environment...

Whether or not they hurt people is beside the point. It is wrong to fight the government on smoking weed "at all fucking costs" because the Devil's lettuce is not worth "all fucking costs".

If they come for our McDonald's Szechuan sauce, though... gawd help us all.

[Vassenor]

So where is the crowd that crime STATES RIGHTS over gay marriage now? Or are they under the same rock that they hide under when states write their own gun laws?

Smoking weed =/= denying gay marriage

I think you completely missed the point there.

[Petrasylvania]

https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2018/01/04/sessions-will-rescind-policy-that-allowed-legal-marijuana-flourish-without-federal-intervention/P0ZtSj2hFAjktCFME4iJmJ/story.html

Do states have to rebel against the feds even more? I think so and protect their weed at all fucking costs.

So where is the crowd that crime STATES RIGHTS over gay marriage now? Or are they under the same rock that they hide under when states write their own gun laws?

There's nothing that States' Rights Republicans won't impose overrides on if it lets them flex the guns of their morality muscles. Look at how North Carolina overrode cities and imposed the Dickstapo Bill.

[The Flutterlands]

Smoking weed =/= denying gay marriage

I think you completely missed the point there.

No. I do. Just because I think we should Rebel against pot bans doesn't mean others can rebel against equal rights.

[Ifreann]

Oh, I think some states are ready to sue on that too actually.

This is something that should piss off both sides, since even if it was just medically, even heavily Republican states supported legalization.

Polling has shown that Republicans will often "follow the leader" and collectively change their minds on an issue at a neckbreaking pace.

You don't have to be ideologically consistent when your one guiding principle is authoritarianism.

Barely related, those most read stories down the side.
"10. Alex Jones Says Trump Doesn't Have a Small Penis, Okay?"
What