Race and IQ

[Donut section]

Wait is it high iq track an field or low iq swimming and a marathon?

[Salandriagado]

Hanson K. The Food Assistance National Input-Output Multiplier (FANIOM) Model and Stimulus Effects of SNAP. 2010, USDA. The Benefits of Increasing the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance (SNAP) Program Participation in Your State. 2011.

It's very telling you failed to provide a direct link or even cite the relevant parts. Even further, food stamp benefits does not equal the totality of welfare benefits at all.

Ah, so you didn't bother to read it, excellent.

Really, what degree am I suggesting now?

I believe that's for you to answer, given I can't possibly know what exactly goes on in that head of yours.

You're the one that just claimed to be able to read my mind so go on, tell me, what am I suggesting?

[Oil exporting People]

Ah, so you didn't bother to read it, excellent.

You didn't give anything to read, you just gave a title; your continued refusal to offer the data is extremely telling.

You're the one that just claimed to be able to read my mind so go on, tell me, what am I suggesting?

Logical fallacy of shifting the burden of proof is your entire argument at this point, fam.

[Catalonya]

I want you to prove that it's being forced by policies intended to wipe out the White race.

99% of the capital that Europe & N America owns, is not possessed by 99% of whites, which would've disproved poverty.

99% of whites only have 1% of the capital, proving whites are extremely poor. That 50% of the world's capital is not owned by them

They own 1% of it, which is 0,5% of the world's capital.

Simple logic: If 8% of the world's population owns 0.5% of the world's capital, are they not the poorest people alive overall?

Compared to both other races who own 50% of the world's capital, while being 92% of the population. That's 2/1 ratio vs. 16/1

99% of whites in Europe and North America own 8 times less wealth than the non-white population of the world.

Just because i have the same skin tone as Donald Trump, doesn't mean i'm a billionaire.

Unless you are going to argue with immovable maths, or your own facts, i suggest you drop this dead topic.

Most of capital in white countries does not belong to the majority. We're not in some awful marxist hell.

We live in the real world, where meritocracy and industriousness allows the best to accumulate vastly more capital than others

This is not capitalism, that's ignorant. This is fairness. People should be allowed to become vastly richer than others, no matter the skin color.

But for their numbers, all but 1% of whites own barely 1% of capital in our countries. Which mean white countries are the poorest per capita

When counting the real citizens who are not wealthy, and constitute the normal white civilian. Excluding the elites who basically own almost 50%

of the world's capital, which only speaks to their merit and credit for intelligence or skill. Not to that of the white race around them which is

the poorest group in the world. Because our countries only have policies making life expensive for poor people, so whites can't overbreed out of control

And change or overthrow the political regimes treating them like herd animals. Good for work, good for being consumers, bad in large numbers or rich

She is British, I am Polish and virtually 100% white.

At least I am safe

Me too. Though they're still on my continent, so i am still very worried about their existence here. Hopefully Trump bans visas from certain euro countries for hosting muslims or terrorists or any pretext on that note.
You don't want our pathological cases

[Vassenor]

I want you to prove that it's being forced by policies intended to wipe out the White race.

99% of the capital that Europe & N America owns, is not possessed by 99% of whites, which would've disproved poverty.

99% of whites only have 1% of the capital, proving whites are extremely poor. That 50% of the world's capital is not owned by them

They own 1% of it, which is 0,5% of the world's capital.

Simple logic: If 8% of the world's population owns 0.5% of the world's capital, are they not the poorest people alive overall?

Compared to both other races who own 50% of the world's capital, while being 92% of the population. That's 2/1 ratio vs. 16/1

99% of whites in Europe and North America own 8 times less wealth than the non-white population of the world.

Just because i have the same skin tone as Donald Trump, doesn't mean i'm a billionaire.

Unless you are going to argue with immovable maths, or your own facts, i suggest you drop this dead topic.

Most of capital in white countries does not belong to the majority. We're not in some awful marxist hell.

We live in the real world, where meritocracy and industriousness allows the best to accumulate vastly more capital than others

This is not capitalism, that's ignorant. This is fairness. People should be allowed to become vastly richer than others, no matter the skin color.

But for their numbers, all but 1% of whites own barely 1% of capital in our countries. Which mean white countries are the poorest per capita

When counting the real citizens who are not wealthy, and constitute the normal white civilian. Excluding the elites who basically own almost 50%

of the world's capital, which only speaks to their merit and credit for intelligence or skill. Not to that of the white race around them which is

the poorest group in the world. Because our countries only have policies making life expensive for poor people, so whites can't overbreed out of control

And change or overthrow the political regimes treating them like herd animals. Good for work, good for being consumers, bad in large numbers or rich

At least I am safe

Me too. Though they're still on my continent, so i am still very worried about their existence here. Hopefully Trump bans visas from certain euro countries for hosting muslims or terrorists or any pretext on that note.
You don't want our pathological cases

Let's see your supporting data. Just saying a thing does not make it true.

[USS Monitor]

I want you to prove that it's being forced by policies intended to wipe out the White race.

99% of the capital that Europe & N America owns, is not possessed by 99% of whites, which would've disproved poverty.

99% of whites only have 1% of the capital, proving whites are extremely poor. That 50% of the world's capital is not owned by them

They own 1% of it, which is 0,5% of the world's capital.

Simple logic: If 8% of the world's population owns 0.5% of the world's capital, are they not the poorest people alive overall?

Compared to both other races who own 50% of the world's capital, while being 92% of the population. That's 2/1 ratio vs. 16/1

99% of whites in Europe and North America own 8 times less wealth than the non-white population of the world.

Just because i have the same skin tone as Donald Trump, doesn't mean i'm a billionaire.

Unless you are going to argue with immovable maths, or your own facts, i suggest you drop this dead topic.

Most of capital in white countries does not belong to the majority. We're not in some awful marxist hell.

We live in the real world, where meritocracy and industriousness allows the best to accumulate vastly more capital than others

This is not capitalism, that's ignorant. This is fairness. People should be allowed to become vastly richer than others, no matter the skin color.

But for their numbers, all but 1% of whites own barely 1% of capital in our countries. Which mean white countries are the poorest per capita

When counting the real citizens who are not wealthy, and constitute the normal white civilian. Excluding the elites who basically own almost 50%

of the world's capital, which only speaks to their merit and credit for intelligence or skill. Not to that of the white race around them which is

the poorest group in the world. Because our countries only have policies making life expensive for poor people, so whites can't overbreed out of control

And change or overthrow the political regimes treating them like herd animals. Good for work, good for being consumers, bad in large numbers or rich

That's not how math works. If you exclude the wealthy elites when looking at white countries, you need to also exclude the wealthy elites in non-white countries to make it a fair comparison. I've lived in both the US and China, and working class Americans live better than working class Chinese.

[Salandriagado]

Ah, so you didn't bother to read it, excellent.

You didn't give anything to read, you just gave a title; your continued refusal to offer the data is extremely telling.

I literally gave you a peer reviewed paper on the topic. If you can't be bothered to read it, that's not my problem.

You're the one that just claimed to be able to read my mind so go on, tell me, what am I suggesting?

Logical fallacy of shifting the burden of proof is your entire argument at this point, fam.

... you aren't even reading your own posts, are you? Or are you just forgetting their content between posts?

[Catalonya]

That's not how math works. If you exclude the wealthy elites when looking at white countries, you need to also exclude the wealthy elites in non-white countries to make it a fair comparison. I've lived in both the US and China, and working class Americans live better than working class Chinese.

Very true, indeed.

But we shouldn't forget that America is America, Land of the Free who won the Cold War

And China is a worse dictatorship than NK, with capitalists ruling as totalitarian gods....

Their 1 BN population had to be restrained legally from growing, by the 1-child-per-fam rule
Because the more citizens there are, the less capital they own because it's distributed to more people

If US has population of one third of China, that means Americans per average are three times poorer than average Chinese
but the illusion of the same capital not being divided by 3 in China's case, gives the impression Americans are 3 times richer

That means the effect of this impression makes Americans appears 9 times richer than the Chinese, simply because of less population.

If Chinese had same pop as America, they would be much richer on average, and this would be visible, and not distorted by illusions
caused by population/capital ratios.

If America had China's population, they'd have less capital per capita, and appear poorer than Chinese, which they kinda are

China is renowned for exploiting their working class in an authoritarian ultracapitalist regime whose motto is "WORK WORK WORK ... FOR US"

America is renowned for corrupt politicians who impose drastic repressive regulations on it's own businesses, essentially dismantling capitalism before it has a chance to thrive into a free market paradise (like my nation is).

This is how math works.....against the Chinese Capitalist Regime

[The Conez Imperium]

And China is a worse dictatorship than NK, with capitalists ruling as totalitarian gods....

It's difficult to objectively define "worse dicatorships" but last time I checked, the Chinese people weren't eating bark off the tree or mowing grass to feed their family.

[Oil exporting People]

If US has population of one third of China, that means Americans per average are three times poorer than average Chinese
but the illusion of the same capital not being divided by 3 in China's case, gives the impression Americans are 3 times richer

That means the effect of this impression makes Americans appears 9 times richer than the Chinese, simply because of less population.

If Chinese had same pop as America, they would be much richer on average, and this would be visible, and not distorted by illusions
caused by population/capital ratios.

What the absolute fuck are you talking about? We have GDP by purchasing power parity for a reason son, and it doesn't show what you claim.

[Phoenicaea]

classical argument against racism: have a look at highest empires in history, Rome and victorian Uk, which they were not racist
(each people could be enslaved because of debts, and whole public encouraged stepping up of humble people, to the highest roles),
same time some of worst cases, Spain and Austria-Hungary at last, the first is an unique case in history: it didn t collapsed, it disappeared. The second (Austria-Hungary) seems to be made for this explanation: it was powerfull when not racist, and the decline matches with class-races divide.

*nowadays, a further example. Usa has been in Rome's role for a twenty years, after the Ussr fall, and even before since the WWII. Its decline as unique power,
(we have nowadays a scattered map, China as first then Usa France India, each one looks at its sub-continent however) its decline (as unique power) matches with "permanent occupation" military doctrine (what a surprise, since Egypt Babylon Persia Assyria Ottomans Caliphate German Reich again?) and race bla bla mewolf propaganda and endless superiority speeches.