It worls alright.
Advertisement
by Jerzylvania » Fri Dec 29, 2017 5:58 pm
by Thermodolia » Fri Dec 29, 2017 6:00 pm
Painisia wrote:Well, if the Democrats wins a majority, will impeachment processes begin?
by Valrifell » Fri Dec 29, 2017 6:01 pm
by Ifreann » Fri Dec 29, 2017 6:03 pm
by Thermodolia » Fri Dec 29, 2017 6:05 pm
by Thermodolia » Fri Dec 29, 2017 6:06 pm
by Shofercia » Fri Dec 29, 2017 6:17 pm
by Ifreann » Fri Dec 29, 2017 6:34 pm
by Jerzylvania » Fri Dec 29, 2017 7:12 pm
by Senkaku » Fri Dec 29, 2017 11:00 pm
by Shofercia » Sat Dec 30, 2017 12:06 am
FBI Agent Strzok Changed Comey's Clinton Language From "Grossly Negligent" To "Extremely Careless"
LAURA JARETT, CNN JUSTICE REPORTER: Well, Jake, sources we have learned from tell us that the electronic records show that Peter Strzok changed former FBI Director James Comey earlier draft language describing Clinton's actions in handling classified materials from, quote, "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless". Now, this entire drafting process was a team effort at the FBI, we're told. As we reported last month, after the news surfaced that the language had, in fact, been softened, that Comey and his colleagues had been playing with the language for some time. But that identity of the person who actually made the change had not been known until now.
by Shofercia » Sat Dec 30, 2017 12:09 am
Senkaku wrote:Shofercia wrote:
If.
Thus far the only evidence I've seen points to Clinton's guilt. And some people were fired/resigned.
"the evidence i've seen so far from the investigation into the trump campaign points to hillary having been the one who conspired to push them to victory"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mrxCAt5CGp0
TONY PODESTA, CLINTON CAMPAIGN MANAGER'S BROTHER, QUITS LOBBYING GROUP AMID MUELLER'S RUSSIA PROBE
by Grossteutschland » Sat Dec 30, 2017 1:08 am
by Xanadaria » Sat Dec 30, 2017 2:17 am
Grossteutschland wrote:Liberals found a new weapon versus their political enemies: paying women to invent sexual assaults politicians allegedly have commited. The non-free-thinking majority of public believes it without any proof and thus liberals are more likely to win than their enemies. This fraud is a world-wide phenomenon and started in the 2016 U.S. presidential election, attacking Trump. Thank God he won anyway. I'm sure liberals will once again invent sexual assaults by several Republicans candidating for Congress in 2018. People of America, please don't believe that nonsense! Liberals realized their fate and try their last, honorless weapon. So don't be fools, citizens of America! Those women aren't even very cunning and reveal themselves: they say the identical sentence about several politicians, e.g. "He had his arms everywhere" was told about both Donald Trump and Peter Pilz.
by Potenco » Sat Dec 30, 2017 2:32 am
Grossteutschland wrote:Liberals found a new weapon versus their political enemies: paying women to invent sexual assaults politicians allegedly have commited. The non-free-thinking majority of public believes it without any proof and thus liberals are more likely to win than their enemies. This fraud is a world-wide phenomenon and started in the 2016 U.S. presidential election, attacking Trump. Thank God he won anyway. I'm sure liberals will once again invent sexual assaults by several Republicans candidating for Congress in 2018. People of America, please don't believe that nonsense! Liberals realized their fate and try their last, honorless weapon. So don't be fools, citizens of America! Those women aren't even very cunning and reveal themselves: they say the identical sentence about several politicians, e.g. "He had his arms everywhere" was told about both Donald Trump and Peter Pilz.
by Insaeldor » Sat Dec 30, 2017 3:15 am
Grossteutschland wrote:Liberals found a new weapon versus their political enemies: paying women to invent sexual assaults politicians allegedly have commited. The non-free-thinking majority of public believes it without any proof and thus liberals are more likely to win than their enemies. This fraud is a world-wide phenomenon and started in the 2016 U.S. presidential election, attacking Trump. Thank God he won anyway. I'm sure liberals will once again invent sexual assaults by several Republicans candidating for Congress in 2018. People of America, please don't believe that nonsense! Liberals realized their fate and try their last, honorless weapon. So don't be fools, citizens of America! Those women aren't even very cunning and reveal themselves: they say the identical sentence about several politicians, e.g. "He had his arms everywhere" was told about both Donald Trump and Peter Pilz.
by Grossteutschland » Sat Dec 30, 2017 3:32 am
by Insaeldor » Sat Dec 30, 2017 3:39 am
Grossteutschland wrote:I also mentioned a partial liberal: Peter Pilz. The establishment simply seeks to defame those who're a threat to it. Peter Pilz left the Green Party and founded another Green one (which is partially right-of-center and a bit anti-establishment) and thus divided the green-liberal camp. So the establishment invented Pilz to have done sexual assaults and prevented him to enter parliament again, a successful green revenge. People shouldn't believe automatically such "Me-too"-accusations.
by Valrifell » Sat Dec 30, 2017 6:49 am
Grossteutschland wrote:Liberals found a new weapon versus their political enemies: paying women to invent sexual assaults...
by Trumptonium » Sat Dec 30, 2017 7:39 am
Major-Tom wrote:Trumptonium wrote:My opinion75% chance Pennsylvania going GOP
75% chance Wisconsin going GOP
75% chance North Dakota going GOP
50% chance Ohio going GOP
50% chance West Virginia going GOP
50% chance Montana going GOP
50% chance Florida going GOP
25% chance Michigan going GOP
25% chance Indiana going GOP
25% chance Missouri going GOP
15% chance Connecticut going GOP
as for Dems
75% chance Nevada going Dem
50% chance Arizona going Dem
15% chance Tennessee going Dem
rest stays as-is
All in all, my final guess is that GOP increases their majority by 2. 3 is an insurance option.
I think it'll look something like this
(Image)
ignore hawaii, my mistake
....How does PA, WI, places with popular Democratic incumbents have higher chances of takeover than states like Missouri where the Democrats are polling far far behind?
by Ifreann » Sat Dec 30, 2017 7:58 am
by Jerzylvania » Sat Dec 30, 2017 8:15 am
Grossteutschland wrote:Liberals found a new weapon versus their political enemies: paying women to invent sexual assaults politicians allegedly have commited. The non-free-thinking majority of public believes it without any proof and thus liberals are more likely to win than their enemies. This fraud is a world-wide phenomenon and started in the 2016 U.S. presidential election, attacking Trump. Thank God he won anyway. I'm sure liberals will once again invent sexual assaults by several Republicans candidating for Congress in 2018. People of America, please don't believe that nonsense! Liberals realized their fate and try their last, honorless weapon. So don't be fools, citizens of America! Those women aren't even very cunning and reveal themselves: they say the identical sentence about several politicians, e.g. "He had his arms everywhere" was told about both Donald Trump and Peter Pilz.
by Collatis » Sat Dec 30, 2017 10:53 am
Arlenton wrote:Trumptonium wrote:My opinion
75% chance Pennsylvania going GOP
75% chance Wisconsin going GOP
75% chance North Dakota going GOP
50% chance Ohio going GOP
50% chance West Virginia going GOP
50% chance Montana going GOP
50% chance Florida going GOP
25% chance Michigan going GOP
25% chance Indiana going GOP
25% chance Missouri going GOP
15% chance Connecticut going GOP
as for Dems
75% chance Nevada going Dem
50% chance Arizona going Dem
15% chance Tennessee going Dem
rest stays as-is
All in all, my final guess is that GOP increases their majority by 2. 3 is an insurance option.
I think it'll look something like this
(Image)
ignore hawaii, my mistake
I...
Ngelmish wrote:I really do believe that people here are either underrating Joe Donnelly's political talent (I am myself am not a fervent supporter or admirer of the man, but he threads the needle well and had the right political instincts to see an opening in 2012, even before Lugar was knocked off in the primary) or underestimating his personal brand in the state. His numbers in both parties, for a generic Democrat in a red state are better than they have any right to be, and unlike the Bayh retread effort last year, he's in office right now. He may be at a generic disadvantage, but it's a small handicap.
Trumptonium wrote:I'm influenced by anecdotes, I don't pay much attention to polls (Especially if close) or American politics in general.
PRO: social democracy, internationalism, progressivism, democracy,
republicanism, human rights, democratic socialism, Keynesianism,
EU, NATO, two-state solution, Democratic Party, Bernie Sanders
CON: conservatism, authoritarianism, totalitarianism, neoliberalism,
death penalty, Marxism-Leninism, laissez faire, reaction, fascism,
antisemitism, isolationism, Republican Party, Donald Trump
Voting Through The Ages | Voter Guide | The Presidents | Voting Without Borders
by San Lumen » Sat Dec 30, 2017 10:56 am
Trumptonium wrote:Major-Tom wrote:
....How does PA, WI, places with popular Democratic incumbents have higher chances of takeover than states like Missouri where the Democrats are polling far far behind?
I'm influenced by anecdotes, I don't pay much attention to polls (Especially if close) or American politics in general.
I have family in Morris County NJ and Philly.
As for Wisconsin, I'm going by voter trends over the years tbh, along with some input from news articles and approval ratings. Approval ratings of Trump are higher in Wisconsin than nationwide. They're equivalent to Georgia and Arizona, and higher than Texas, North Carolina, Florida... that's not irrelevant.
I keep to my prediction of Nevada going blue and ND/Florida/Pennsylvania going red.
by Washington Resistance Army » Sat Dec 30, 2017 10:56 am
San Lumen wrote:Trumptonium wrote:
I'm influenced by anecdotes, I don't pay much attention to polls (Especially if close) or American politics in general.
I have family in Morris County NJ and Philly.
As for Wisconsin, I'm going by voter trends over the years tbh, along with some input from news articles and approval ratings. Approval ratings of Trump are higher in Wisconsin than nationwide. They're equivalent to Georgia and Arizona, and higher than Texas, North Carolina, Florida... that's not irrelevant.
I keep to my prediction of Nevada going blue and ND/Florida/Pennsylvania going red.
I have my doubts but you'd predict a red wave even if polls showed a 20 percent lead they are biased right?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: New Temecula, Pasong Tirad, Soviet Haaregrad, The Xenopolis Confederation, UMi-NazKapp Group
Advertisement