Because he's rather politically biased? Not that being biased on the Supreme Court is a surprise anymore, but I'd rather not.
Advertisement

by Corrian » Wed Jan 31, 2018 2:16 pm

by Washington Resistance Army » Wed Jan 31, 2018 2:17 pm

by Petrasylvania » Wed Jan 31, 2018 2:20 pm
The Parkus Empire wrote:San Lumen wrote:There were things called literacy tests and poll taxes.
Poll taxes were the main source of state revenue since before the Revolution, they were not created to stop people from voting even if they incidentally caused it. I am not sure you really know what they are, though.
Illiterate people should not be voting on a ballot, obviously. The issue is ensuring literacy tests m are on the level

by Telconi » Wed Jan 31, 2018 2:20 pm

by The Black Forrest » Wed Jan 31, 2018 2:21 pm
Washington Resistance Army wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
He is rather hard core on issues....well nothing found on drugs yet.
Besides now that the repubs opened this door.
RBG should be replaced with an ideologue liberal.
Kennedy should be replaced with a centrist.
Almost certainly not gonna happen if the GOP has the White House and the Senate. The Court has probably shifted towards the originalist direction for a few decades because of 2016.

by Thermodolia » Wed Jan 31, 2018 2:25 pm

by The Parkus Empire » Wed Jan 31, 2018 2:25 pm
Petrasylvania wrote:The Parkus Empire wrote:Poll taxes were the main source of state revenue since before the Revolution, they were not created to stop people from voting even if they incidentally caused it. I am not sure you really know what they are, though.
Illiterate people should not be voting on a ballot, obviously. The issue is ensuring literacy tests m are on the level
Apologism for both poll taxes and literacy tests. Just..
wow.

by Telconi » Wed Jan 31, 2018 2:25 pm

by Petrasylvania » Wed Jan 31, 2018 2:26 pm
The Black Forrest wrote:Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Almost certainly not gonna happen if the GOP has the White House and the Senate. The Court has probably shifted towards the originalist direction for a few decades because of 2016.
Oh I am not foolish to believe it. Repubs used that bullshit with Gorsuch and it resonated with the simple people of the land.

by Washington Resistance Army » Wed Jan 31, 2018 2:26 pm

by The Black Forrest » Wed Jan 31, 2018 2:26 pm
Telconi wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
He is rather hard core on issues....well nothing found on drugs yet.
Besides now that the repubs opened this door.
RBG should be replaced with an ideologue liberal.
Kennedy should be replaced with a centrist.
He seems somewhat moderate on drugs. He's stated that he doesn't support recreational marijuana use. But he''s pushed for re-scheduling.

by The Black Forrest » Wed Jan 31, 2018 2:28 pm

by Corrian » Wed Jan 31, 2018 2:28 pm
Washington Resistance Army wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
He is rather hard core on issues....well nothing found on drugs yet.
Besides now that the repubs opened this door.
RBG should be replaced with an ideologue liberal.
Kennedy should be replaced with a centrist.
Almost certainly not gonna happen if the GOP has the White House and the Senate. The Court has probably shifted towards the originalist direction for a few decades because of 2016.

by Petrasylvania » Wed Jan 31, 2018 2:29 pm

by Telconi » Wed Jan 31, 2018 2:30 pm
The Black Forrest wrote:Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Almost certainly not gonna happen if the GOP has the White House and the Senate. The Court has probably shifted towards the originalist direction for a few decades because of 2016.
Oh I am not foolish to believe it. Repubs used that bullshit with Gorsuch and it resonated with the simple people of the land.
-edit-
Originalist? Call it what it is. Conservative interpretation of the Constitution. Not worried about it. These things are a pendulum It will swing back.

by Thermodolia » Wed Jan 31, 2018 2:30 pm

by Petrasylvania » Wed Jan 31, 2018 2:31 pm

by Telconi » Wed Jan 31, 2018 2:32 pm

by Washington Resistance Army » Wed Jan 31, 2018 2:33 pm
The Black Forrest wrote:Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Almost certainly not gonna happen if the GOP has the White House and the Senate. The Court has probably shifted towards the originalist direction for a few decades because of 2016.
Oh I am not foolish to believe it. Repubs used that bullshit with Gorsuch and it resonated with the simple people of the land.
-edit-
Originalist? Call it what it is. Conservative interpretation of the Constitution. Not worried about it. These things are a pendulum It will swing back.

by The Black Forrest » Wed Jan 31, 2018 2:34 pm
Telconi wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
Oh I am not foolish to believe it. Repubs used that bullshit with Gorsuch and it resonated with the simple people of the land.
-edit-
Originalist? Call it what it is. Conservative interpretation of the Constitution. Not worried about it. These things are a pendulum It will swing back.
I highly doubt that foolish 'like for like' idea resonated with anyone. They didn't want Garland, and they wanted Trump's pick. The momentarily convenient rhetoric was exactly that, momentarily convenient rhetoric.
Oh come on, if '"liberal" interpretation of the constitution' can be sold as 'Living document' theory, then turnabout's fair play.

by Telconi » Wed Jan 31, 2018 2:37 pm
The Black Forrest wrote:Telconi wrote:
I highly doubt that foolish 'like for like' idea resonated with anyone. They didn't want Garland, and they wanted Trump's pick. The momentarily convenient rhetoric was exactly that, momentarily convenient rhetoric.
Oh come on, if '"liberal" interpretation of the constitution' can be sold as 'Living document' theory, then turnabout's fair play.
Sure it was. I remember that asshole from kentucky making that noise. A few others did as well.
Garland showed the republicans war on drugs is bullshit.
Garland was Obamas pick. You know if the demos somehow delayed the replacement into the next administration; the repubs and simple people of the land would go berserk.

by The Black Forrest » Wed Jan 31, 2018 2:40 pm
Washington Resistance Army wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
Oh I am not foolish to believe it. Repubs used that bullshit with Gorsuch and it resonated with the simple people of the land.
-edit-
Originalist? Call it what it is. Conservative interpretation of the Constitution. Not worried about it. These things are a pendulum It will swing back.
There are liberal originalists. Hell, a very famous liberal originalist named Akhil Amar has had his work cited by the court dozens of times.

by San Lumen » Wed Jan 31, 2018 4:09 pm

by Valrifell » Wed Jan 31, 2018 4:59 pm
Washington Resistance Army wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
Oh I am not foolish to believe it. Repubs used that bullshit with Gorsuch and it resonated with the simple people of the land.
-edit-
Originalist? Call it what it is. Conservative interpretation of the Constitution. Not worried about it. These things are a pendulum It will swing back.
There are liberal originalists. Hell, a very famous liberal originalist named Akhil Amar has had his work cited by the court dozens of times.

by The Flutterlands » Wed Jan 31, 2018 4:59 pm
San Lumen wrote:So the President of Pennsylvania Senate has said he will not abide by the order to redraw the congressional map claiming the State Supreme Court usurped its authority
https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/def ... -Order.pdf
Its rather frighting when you have members of a political party who dont seem to believe in the rule of law or the independence of courts. I hope he is held in contempt of court.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Elejamie, Ifreann, James_xenoland, Lativs, Point Blob, Sorcery, Transitional Global Authority
Advertisement