How did we go from urban/city folk and rural/farming to talking about gay marriage? Y'all drinking too much moonshine or did you get into some really good stuff.
Advertisement

by Gig em Aggies » Tue Jan 02, 2018 3:48 pm

by San Lumen » Tue Jan 02, 2018 3:49 pm
Gig em Aggies wrote:Telconi wrote:
How wouldn't it work, they stop being married in the county that prevents them from being married. Really simple really.
How did we go from urban/city folk and rural/farming to talking about gay marriage? Y'all drinking too much moonshine or did you get into some really good stuff.

by San Lumen » Tue Jan 02, 2018 3:51 pm
The East Marches II wrote:San Lumen wrote:But certain votes count more than others which isnt fair.
so us urban folk get little to no representatives and some farms choice for governor always wins? Thats not democratic or fair. And if a farmer believes i shouldnt be allowed to marry or adopt children or date a black man oh well?
Of course it's not democratic, fair however is a matter of debate. You could easily avoid that fate by buying a farm and preventing that. This could all be avoided if you just give them those subsidies. The cities on the coasts are too affected by Nautical Materialism to be allowed to vote in the first place. Even coastal farms should be suspect.

by The East Marches II » Tue Jan 02, 2018 3:52 pm
San Lumen wrote:The East Marches II wrote:
Of course it's not democratic, fair however is a matter of debate. You could easily avoid that fate by buying a farm and preventing that. This could all be avoided if you just give them those subsidies. The cities on the coasts are too affected by Nautical Materialism to be allowed to vote in the first place. Even coastal farms should be suspect.
Well I dont want to own a farm nor do I own property does that mean I and many others shouldnt be allowed to vote? You want dictatorship and the worst kind tyranny of the minority.

by The Two Jerseys » Tue Jan 02, 2018 3:52 pm
San Lumen wrote:Gig em Aggies wrote:How did we go from urban/city folk and rural/farming to talking about gay marriage? Y'all drinking too much moonshine or did you get into some really good stuff.
I was giving Telconi an example of how his policy of counties and towns choosing which state laws they will follow wouldn't work.

by San Lumen » Tue Jan 02, 2018 3:55 pm
The East Marches II wrote:San Lumen wrote:Well I dont want to own a farm nor do I own property does that mean I and many others shouldnt be allowed to vote? You want dictatorship and the worst kind tyranny of the minority.
Then that's on you when those things get passed. Even worse is your terrible characterization of them as 50s Southern segregationists. That was impressive.

by Oil exporting People » Tue Jan 02, 2018 3:56 pm
San Lumen wrote:And whose going to pass something like that only to get stuck down in court immediately?

by Telconi » Tue Jan 02, 2018 3:57 pm
San Lumen wrote:Gig em Aggies wrote:How did we go from urban/city folk and rural/farming to talking about gay marriage? Y'all drinking too much moonshine or did you get into some really good stuff.
I was giving Telconi an example of how his policy of counties and towns choosing which state laws they will follow wouldn't work.

by San Lumen » Tue Jan 02, 2018 3:59 pm
Telconi wrote:San Lumen wrote:I was giving Telconi an example of how his policy of counties and towns choosing which state laws they will follow wouldn't work.
Easy peasy, just don't move to the no gay couples county if you're gay and married. Don't move to a county dowe stream from place's that use pesticides. There's no reason why it wouldn't work, there's all kinds of different laws in different jurisdictions.

by Telconi » Tue Jan 02, 2018 4:02 pm
San Lumen wrote:Telconi wrote:
Easy peasy, just don't move to the no gay couples county if you're gay and married. Don't move to a county dowe stream from place's that use pesticides. There's no reason why it wouldn't work, there's all kinds of different laws in different jurisdictions.
Why should a county be able to pick and choose what laws it follows?
I suggest you read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nullification_Crisis

by San Lumen » Tue Jan 02, 2018 4:03 pm
Telconi wrote:San Lumen wrote:
Why should a county be able to pick and choose what laws it follows?
I suggest you read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nullification_Crisis
Because awful people write laws.
And I'm fully aware of what happened, I don't see a problem with that.

by Telconi » Tue Jan 02, 2018 4:04 pm

by The Great-German Empire » Tue Jan 02, 2018 4:04 pm
Telconi wrote:
Because awful people write laws.
And I'm fully aware of what happened, I don't see a problem with that.
Vossische Zeitung: The Chancellor, Baron Hartmann, announced in a rally that he will 'work tirelessly against the formation of a society of control' | Hungary edges out Germany 4-3 in Euro Cup final; Kaiser personally congratulates Hungarians for an 'exceptional' game | According to survey, 73% of Germans oppose an introduction of speed limits on major Autobahns

by San Lumen » Tue Jan 02, 2018 4:06 pm

by The Great-German Empire » Tue Jan 02, 2018 4:08 pm
Vossische Zeitung: The Chancellor, Baron Hartmann, announced in a rally that he will 'work tirelessly against the formation of a society of control' | Hungary edges out Germany 4-3 in Euro Cup final; Kaiser personally congratulates Hungarians for an 'exceptional' game | According to survey, 73% of Germans oppose an introduction of speed limits on major Autobahns

by Gig em Aggies » Tue Jan 02, 2018 4:09 pm
San Lumen wrote:Telconi wrote:
Easy peasy, just don't move to the no gay couples county if you're gay and married. Don't move to a county dowe stream from place's that use pesticides. There's no reason why it wouldn't work, there's all kinds of different laws in different jurisdictions.
Why should a county be able to pick and choose what laws it follows?
I suggest you read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nullification_Crisis

by Telconi » Tue Jan 02, 2018 4:11 pm
San Lumen wrote:
Oh so its the people fault now? Only the people you like should be allowed to vote got it. Better why not just have a government like Eritrea where there are no elections at all and there is one party rule.

by Telconi » Tue Jan 02, 2018 4:15 pm

by San Lumen » Tue Jan 02, 2018 4:16 pm
Gig em Aggies wrote:San Lumen wrote:
Why should a county be able to pick and choose what laws it follows?
I suggest you read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nullification_Crisis
To be fair isn't that what a lot of counties and cities in blue states are doing by defying federal authorities when they requested people to be held for immigration authorities or the fact that blue state leaders continue doing things to spite the Feds?
'Telconi wrote:San Lumen wrote:Oh so its the people fault now? Only the people you like should be allowed to vote got it. Better why not just have a government like Eritrea where there are no elections at all and there is one party rule.
Only the people that are going to leave me alone. But that doesn't happen, instead he people elect bigots that force their prejudiced stupidity upon people who just want to be left alone.
So remind me again why this system is good?

by Telconi » Tue Jan 02, 2018 4:24 pm
San Lumen wrote:Gig em Aggies wrote:
To be fair isn't that what a lot of counties and cities in blue states are doing by defying federal authorities when they requested people to be held for immigration authorities or the fact that blue state leaders continue doing things to spite the Feds?
Do you even know the definition of sanctuary city?'Telconi wrote:
Only the people that are going to leave me alone. But that doesn't happen, instead he people elect bigots that force their prejudiced stupidity upon people who just want to be left alone.
So remind me again why this system is good?
Well when you reside in a democracy thats the trade off. But i wouldn't say the people are electing bigots forcing their prejudiced stupidity on you. In what way are you being oppressed by the federal and state and local government ?


by San Lumen » Tue Jan 02, 2018 4:27 pm
Telconi wrote:San Lumen wrote:Do you even know the definition of sanctuary city? '
Well when you reside in a democracy thats the trade off. But i wouldn't say the people are electing bigots forcing their prejudiced stupidity on you. In what way are you being oppressed by the federal and state and local government ?
Trade offs require that I gain something...
That's how...

by Oil exporting People » Tue Jan 02, 2018 4:28 pm
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:Why, then, should rural districts be entitled to urban money after screwing over urban America? Is there any way to rearrange the USA so as to treat rural America as a new country and urban America as a collection of city-states?

by Telconi » Tue Jan 02, 2018 4:29 pm

by San Lumen » Tue Jan 02, 2018 4:32 pm
Oil exporting People wrote:LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:Why, then, should rural districts be entitled to urban money after screwing over urban America? Is there any way to rearrange the USA so as to treat rural America as a new country and urban America as a collection of city-states?
An interesting suggestion; perhaps Federalizing the cities? I.e. they get treated like D.C.?

by Oil exporting People » Tue Jan 02, 2018 4:34 pm
San Lumen wrote:No its not possible. D.C is unique as specified in the constitution as federal district not part of of any state. Their ability to pass laws is subject to approval by Congress but rarely are they overturned. Trying to do something like that for other places would probably violate state sovereignty and more likely the constitution.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Picairn, Settentrionalia, Washington Resistance Army, Wizlandia
Advertisement