NATION

PASSWORD

Separating urban and rural America.

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Gig em Aggies
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7709
Founded: Aug 15, 2009
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Gig em Aggies » Tue Jan 02, 2018 3:48 pm

Telconi wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
Your just stalling now. Who says it has to effect you? I gave you an example of how it wouldn't work and that's all you have to say?


How wouldn't it work, they stop being married in the county that prevents them from being married. Really simple really.

How did we go from urban/city folk and rural/farming to talking about gay marriage? Y'all drinking too much moonshine or did you get into some really good stuff.
“One of the serious problems of planning against Aggie doctrine is that the Aggies do not read their manuals nor do they feel any obligations to follow their doctrine.”
“The reason that the Aggies does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the Aggies practices chaos on a daily basis.”
“If we don’t know what we are doing, the enemy certainly can’t anticipate our future actions!”

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81228
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue Jan 02, 2018 3:49 pm

Gig em Aggies wrote:
Telconi wrote:
How wouldn't it work, they stop being married in the county that prevents them from being married. Really simple really.

How did we go from urban/city folk and rural/farming to talking about gay marriage? Y'all drinking too much moonshine or did you get into some really good stuff.

I was giving Telconi an example of how his policy of counties and towns choosing which state laws they will follow wouldn't work.

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81228
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue Jan 02, 2018 3:51 pm

The East Marches II wrote:
San Lumen wrote:But certain votes count more than others which isnt fair.

so us urban folk get little to no representatives and some farms choice for governor always wins? Thats not democratic or fair. And if a farmer believes i shouldnt be allowed to marry or adopt children or date a black man oh well?


Of course it's not democratic, fair however is a matter of debate. You could easily avoid that fate by buying a farm and preventing that. This could all be avoided if you just give them those subsidies. The cities on the coasts are too affected by Nautical Materialism to be allowed to vote in the first place. Even coastal farms should be suspect.

Well I dont want to own a farm nor do I own property does that mean I and many others shouldnt be allowed to vote? You want dictatorship and the worst kind tyranny of the minority.
Last edited by San Lumen on Tue Jan 02, 2018 3:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The East Marches II
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18033
Founded: Mar 11, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby The East Marches II » Tue Jan 02, 2018 3:52 pm

San Lumen wrote:
The East Marches II wrote:
Of course it's not democratic, fair however is a matter of debate. You could easily avoid that fate by buying a farm and preventing that. This could all be avoided if you just give them those subsidies. The cities on the coasts are too affected by Nautical Materialism to be allowed to vote in the first place. Even coastal farms should be suspect.

Well I dont want to own a farm nor do I own property does that mean I and many others shouldnt be allowed to vote? You want dictatorship and the worst kind tyranny of the minority.


Then that's on you when those things get passed. Even worse is your terrible characterization of them as 50s Southern segregationists. That was impressive.

User avatar
The Two Jerseys
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19610
Founded: Jun 07, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Two Jerseys » Tue Jan 02, 2018 3:52 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Gig em Aggies wrote:How did we go from urban/city folk and rural/farming to talking about gay marriage? Y'all drinking too much moonshine or did you get into some really good stuff.

I was giving Telconi an example of how his policy of counties and towns choosing which state laws they will follow wouldn't work.

Tell it to your urbanites and their sanctuary cities.
"The Duke of Texas" is too formal for regular use. Just call me "Your Grace".
"If I would like to watch goodness, sanity, God and logic being fucked I would watch Japanese porn." -Nightkill the Emperor
"This thread makes me wish I was a moron so that I wouldn't have to comprehend how stupid the topic is." -The Empire of Pretantia
Head of State: HM King Louis
Head of Government: The Rt. Hon. James O'Dell MP, Prime Minister
Ambassador to the World Assembly: HE Sir John Ross "J.R." Ewing II, Bt.
Join Excalibur Squadron. We're Commandos who fly Spitfires. Chicks dig Commandos who fly Spitfires.

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81228
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue Jan 02, 2018 3:55 pm

The East Marches II wrote:
San Lumen wrote:Well I dont want to own a farm nor do I own property does that mean I and many others shouldnt be allowed to vote? You want dictatorship and the worst kind tyranny of the minority.


Then that's on you when those things get passed. Even worse is your terrible characterization of them as 50s Southern segregationists. That was impressive.

And whose going to pass something like that only to get stuck down in court immediately?

User avatar
Oil exporting People
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8281
Founded: Jan 31, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Oil exporting People » Tue Jan 02, 2018 3:56 pm

San Lumen wrote:And whose going to pass something like that only to get stuck down in court immediately?


Did we not go over this what, 45 minutes ago?
National Syndicalist
“The blood of the heroes is closer to God than the ink of the philosophers and the prayers of the faithful.” - Julius Evola
Endorsing Greg "Grab 'em by the Neck" Gianforte and Brett "I Like Beer" Kavanaugh for 2020

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Tue Jan 02, 2018 3:57 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Gig em Aggies wrote:How did we go from urban/city folk and rural/farming to talking about gay marriage? Y'all drinking too much moonshine or did you get into some really good stuff.

I was giving Telconi an example of how his policy of counties and towns choosing which state laws they will follow wouldn't work.


Easy peasy, just don't move to the no gay couples county if you're gay and married. Don't move to a county dowe stream from place's that use pesticides. There's no reason why it wouldn't work, there's all kinds of different laws in different jurisdictions.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81228
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue Jan 02, 2018 3:59 pm

Telconi wrote:
San Lumen wrote:I was giving Telconi an example of how his policy of counties and towns choosing which state laws they will follow wouldn't work.


Easy peasy, just don't move to the no gay couples county if you're gay and married. Don't move to a county dowe stream from place's that use pesticides. There's no reason why it wouldn't work, there's all kinds of different laws in different jurisdictions.


Why should a county be able to pick and choose what laws it follows?

I suggest you read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nullification_Crisis

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Tue Jan 02, 2018 4:02 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Telconi wrote:
Easy peasy, just don't move to the no gay couples county if you're gay and married. Don't move to a county dowe stream from place's that use pesticides. There's no reason why it wouldn't work, there's all kinds of different laws in different jurisdictions.


Why should a county be able to pick and choose what laws it follows?

I suggest you read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nullification_Crisis


Because awful people write laws.

And I'm fully aware of what happened, I don't see a problem with that.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81228
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue Jan 02, 2018 4:03 pm

Telconi wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
Why should a county be able to pick and choose what laws it follows?

I suggest you read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nullification_Crisis


Because awful people write laws.

And I'm fully aware of what happened, I don't see a problem with that.

Then vote them out. Its called an election.

Why don't you see a problem with it?

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Tue Jan 02, 2018 4:04 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Telconi wrote:
Because awful people write laws.

And I'm fully aware of what happened, I don't see a problem with that.

Then vote them out. Its called an election.

Why don't you see a problem with it?


Awful people make up the majority of the voter base...

Because nothing bad happened?
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
The Great-German Empire
Diplomat
 
Posts: 514
Founded: Nov 25, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby The Great-German Empire » Tue Jan 02, 2018 4:04 pm

Telconi wrote:
Because awful people write laws.

And I'm fully aware of what happened, I don't see a problem with that.


Well, there are also times when a succession of awful people "disregard" sensible laws - like Californian politicians with immigration laws.
IC Name: Empire of Germany
Just your friendly neighborhood Weltmacht. Und Doch Gang | NS Stats are not used. Q&A if you need it!
Pro/Anti, 8Values and other tests: Here
Unapologetic libertarian populist monarchism

Vossische Zeitung: The Chancellor, Baron Hartmann, announced in a rally that he will 'work tirelessly against the formation of a society of control' | Hungary edges out Germany 4-3 in Euro Cup final; Kaiser personally congratulates Hungarians for an 'exceptional' game | According to survey, 73% of Germans oppose an introduction of speed limits on major Autobahns

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81228
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue Jan 02, 2018 4:06 pm

Telconi wrote:
San Lumen wrote:Then vote them out. Its called an election.

Why don't you see a problem with it?


Awful people make up the majority of the voter base...

Because nothing bad happened?

Oh so its the people fault now? Only the people you like should be allowed to vote got it. Better why not just have a government like Eritrea where there are no elections at all and there is one party rule.

User avatar
The Great-German Empire
Diplomat
 
Posts: 514
Founded: Nov 25, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby The Great-German Empire » Tue Jan 02, 2018 4:08 pm

Telconi wrote:
Awful people make up the majority of the voter base...

Because nothing bad happened?


Exactly what's wrong with today's society. People have the gall to think that everyone else is wrong and immoral when it comes to subjective political opinions.
IC Name: Empire of Germany
Just your friendly neighborhood Weltmacht. Und Doch Gang | NS Stats are not used. Q&A if you need it!
Pro/Anti, 8Values and other tests: Here
Unapologetic libertarian populist monarchism

Vossische Zeitung: The Chancellor, Baron Hartmann, announced in a rally that he will 'work tirelessly against the formation of a society of control' | Hungary edges out Germany 4-3 in Euro Cup final; Kaiser personally congratulates Hungarians for an 'exceptional' game | According to survey, 73% of Germans oppose an introduction of speed limits on major Autobahns

User avatar
Gig em Aggies
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7709
Founded: Aug 15, 2009
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Gig em Aggies » Tue Jan 02, 2018 4:09 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Telconi wrote:
Easy peasy, just don't move to the no gay couples county if you're gay and married. Don't move to a county dowe stream from place's that use pesticides. There's no reason why it wouldn't work, there's all kinds of different laws in different jurisdictions.


Why should a county be able to pick and choose what laws it follows?

I suggest you read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nullification_Crisis


To be fair isn't that what a lot of counties and cities in blue states are doing by defying federal authorities when they requested people to be held for immigration authorities or the fact that blue state leaders continue doing things to spite the Feds?
“One of the serious problems of planning against Aggie doctrine is that the Aggies do not read their manuals nor do they feel any obligations to follow their doctrine.”
“The reason that the Aggies does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the Aggies practices chaos on a daily basis.”
“If we don’t know what we are doing, the enemy certainly can’t anticipate our future actions!”

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Tue Jan 02, 2018 4:11 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Telconi wrote:
Awful people make up the majority of the voter base...

Because nothing bad happened?

Oh so its the people fault now? Only the people you like should be allowed to vote got it. Better why not just have a government like Eritrea where there are no elections at all and there is one party rule.


Only the people that are going to leave me alone. But that doesn't happen, instead he people elect bigots that force their prejudiced stupidity upon people who just want to be left alone.

So remind me again why this system is good?
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Tue Jan 02, 2018 4:15 pm

The Great-German Empire wrote:
Telconi wrote:
Awful people make up the majority of the voter base...

Because nothing bad happened?


Exactly what's wrong with today's society. People have the gall to think that everyone else is wrong and immoral when it comes to subjective political opinions.


If you force other people to practice your subjective opinions, you are wrong and immoral.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81228
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue Jan 02, 2018 4:16 pm

Gig em Aggies wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
Why should a county be able to pick and choose what laws it follows?

I suggest you read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nullification_Crisis


To be fair isn't that what a lot of counties and cities in blue states are doing by defying federal authorities when they requested people to be held for immigration authorities or the fact that blue state leaders continue doing things to spite the Feds?

Do you even know the definition of sanctuary city?
Telconi wrote:
San Lumen wrote:Oh so its the people fault now? Only the people you like should be allowed to vote got it. Better why not just have a government like Eritrea where there are no elections at all and there is one party rule.


Only the people that are going to leave me alone. But that doesn't happen, instead he people elect bigots that force their prejudiced stupidity upon people who just want to be left alone.

So remind me again why this system is good?
'
Well when you reside in a democracy thats the trade off. But i wouldn't say the people are electing bigots forcing their prejudiced stupidity on you. In what way are you being oppressed by the federal and state and local government ?

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Tue Jan 02, 2018 4:24 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Gig em Aggies wrote:
To be fair isn't that what a lot of counties and cities in blue states are doing by defying federal authorities when they requested people to be held for immigration authorities or the fact that blue state leaders continue doing things to spite the Feds?

Do you even know the definition of sanctuary city?
Telconi wrote:
Only the people that are going to leave me alone. But that doesn't happen, instead he people elect bigots that force their prejudiced stupidity upon people who just want to be left alone.

So remind me again why this system is good?
'
Well when you reside in a democracy thats the trade off. But i wouldn't say the people are electing bigots forcing their prejudiced stupidity on you. In what way are you being oppressed by the federal and state and local government ?


Trade offs require that I gain something...

Image


That's how...
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81228
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue Jan 02, 2018 4:27 pm

Telconi wrote:
San Lumen wrote:Do you even know the definition of sanctuary city? '
Well when you reside in a democracy thats the trade off. But i wouldn't say the people are electing bigots forcing their prejudiced stupidity on you. In what way are you being oppressed by the federal and state and local government ?


Trade offs require that I gain something...

Image


That's how...

So its all about your guns right? That's all you care about? Pathetic.
Last edited by San Lumen on Tue Jan 02, 2018 4:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Oil exporting People
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8281
Founded: Jan 31, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Oil exporting People » Tue Jan 02, 2018 4:28 pm

LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:Why, then, should rural districts be entitled to urban money after screwing over urban America? Is there any way to rearrange the USA so as to treat rural America as a new country and urban America as a collection of city-states?


An interesting suggestion; perhaps Federalizing the cities? I.e. they get treated like D.C.?
National Syndicalist
“The blood of the heroes is closer to God than the ink of the philosophers and the prayers of the faithful.” - Julius Evola
Endorsing Greg "Grab 'em by the Neck" Gianforte and Brett "I Like Beer" Kavanaugh for 2020

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Tue Jan 02, 2018 4:29 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Telconi wrote:
Trade offs require that I gain something...

Image


That's how...

So its all about your guns right? That's all you care about? Pathetic.


Says the guy who wants to marry another dude...
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81228
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue Jan 02, 2018 4:32 pm

Oil exporting People wrote:
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:Why, then, should rural districts be entitled to urban money after screwing over urban America? Is there any way to rearrange the USA so as to treat rural America as a new country and urban America as a collection of city-states?


An interesting suggestion; perhaps Federalizing the cities? I.e. they get treated like D.C.?

No its not possible. D.C is unique as specified in the constitution as federal district not part of of any state. Their ability to pass laws is subject to approval by Congress but rarely are they overturned. Trying to do something like that for other places would probably violate state sovereignty and more likely the constitution.

User avatar
Oil exporting People
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8281
Founded: Jan 31, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Oil exporting People » Tue Jan 02, 2018 4:34 pm

San Lumen wrote:No its not possible. D.C is unique as specified in the constitution as federal district not part of of any state. Their ability to pass laws is subject to approval by Congress but rarely are they overturned. Trying to do something like that for other places would probably violate state sovereignty and more likely the constitution.


Hence why we would do a Constitutional movement; we've already been over this and this discussion is about policy ideas.
National Syndicalist
“The blood of the heroes is closer to God than the ink of the philosophers and the prayers of the faithful.” - Julius Evola
Endorsing Greg "Grab 'em by the Neck" Gianforte and Brett "I Like Beer" Kavanaugh for 2020

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Picairn, Settentrionalia, Washington Resistance Army, Wizlandia

Advertisement

Remove ads