NATION

PASSWORD

The State of the Democratic Party II

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Who are your preferred potential 2020 Democratic contenders?

Bernie Sanders
150
29%
Joe Biden
99
19%
Elizabeth Warren
77
15%
Martin O'Malley
32
6%
Cory Booker
34
7%
Kirsten Gillibrand
23
4%
Kamala Harris
42
8%
Andrew Cuomo
15
3%
Chris Murphy
13
3%
Sherrod Brown
28
5%
 
Total votes : 513

User avatar
Corrian
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 73684
Founded: Mar 19, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Corrian » Wed Jan 31, 2018 12:45 pm

Thermodolia wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:Gabbard would be alright imo.

Gabbard/Brown or Biden/Gabbard. That’s who I’d want to see run.

I've talked about this with my dad recently, but I really don't see that big of a problem with someone old running for President, as long as we're not, you know, talking freaking Arpaio old. All they need is a young VP. Yes, it would be a sad state of things if our President died of old age in office, but so what? Just get them a young VP.
My Last.FM and RYM

RP's hosted by me: The Last of Us RP's

Look on the bright side, one day you'll be dead~Street Sects

User avatar
Jordkloden
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1098
Founded: Oct 18, 2014
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Jordkloden » Wed Jan 31, 2018 12:45 pm

Thermodolia wrote:I honestly don’t know much about Gilibrand. I would love for Gabbard to run though

I think she's a good senator and very anti-trump but that's also somewhat of a hindrance because she seems to oppose everything he does no matter what it is. And hell yes Gabbard, would love for that.
I’m a communist. Not much else to say.

User avatar
Jordkloden
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1098
Founded: Oct 18, 2014
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Jordkloden » Wed Jan 31, 2018 12:46 pm

Corrian wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:Gabbard/Brown or Biden/Gabbard. That’s who I’d want to see run.

I've talked about this with my dad recently, but I really don't see that big of a problem with someone old running for President, as long as we're not, you know, talking freaking Arpaio old. All they need is a young VP. Yes, it would be a sad state of things if our President died of old age in office, but so what? Just get them a young VP.

That was often my response to people who criticized Bernie for being too old. The office of the Vice-President exists for a reason.
I’m a communist. Not much else to say.

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76327
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Wed Jan 31, 2018 12:47 pm

Corrian wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:Gabbard/Brown or Biden/Gabbard. That’s who I’d want to see run.

I've talked about this with my dad recently, but I really don't see that big of a problem with someone old running for President, as long as we're not, you know, talking freaking Arpaio old. All they need is a young VP. Yes, it would be a sad state of things if our President died of old age in office, but so what? Just get them a young VP.

And that’s why I think a Biden/Gabbard or a Biden/Booker ticket would work wonderfully.
Male, State Socialist, Cultural Nationalist, Welfare Chauvinist lives somewhere in AZ I'm GAY! Disabled US Military Veteran
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
>Xovland: I keep getting ads for printer ink. Sometimes, when you get that feeling down there, you have to look at some steamy printer pictures.
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Jordkloden
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1098
Founded: Oct 18, 2014
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Jordkloden » Wed Jan 31, 2018 12:51 pm

Thermodolia wrote:And that’s why I think a Biden/Gabbard or a Biden/Booker ticket would work wonderfully.

Biden/Booker rolls off the tongue marvelously. I like that quite a bit.
I’m a communist. Not much else to say.

User avatar
USS Monitor
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 30410
Founded: Jul 01, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby USS Monitor » Wed Jan 31, 2018 2:00 pm

Thermodolia wrote:
Corrian wrote:I've talked about this with my dad recently, but I really don't see that big of a problem with someone old running for President, as long as we're not, you know, talking freaking Arpaio old. All they need is a young VP. Yes, it would be a sad state of things if our President died of old age in office, but so what? Just get them a young VP.

And that’s why I think a Biden/Gabbard or a Biden/Booker ticket would work wonderfully.


I really dislike Gabbard, even as a VP. She's flaky and obnoxious.

Biden/Booker isn't my dream ticket, but it's something I could vote for without any major reservations.
Don't take life so serious... it isn't permanent... RIP Dyakovo and Ashmoria
19th century steamships may be harmful or fatal if swallowed. In case of accidental ingestion, please seek immediate medical assistance.
༄༅། །འགྲོ་བ་མི་རིགས་ག་ར་དབང་ཆ་འདྲ་མཉམ་འབད་སྒྱེཝ་ལས་ག་ར་གིས་གཅིག་གིས་གཅིག་ལུ་སྤུན་ཆའི་དམ་ཚིག་བསྟན་དགོས།

User avatar
Hakons
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5619
Founded: Jul 14, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Hakons » Wed Jan 31, 2018 2:48 pm

If Democrats choose Joe Biden as their candidate, I might vote for them. I can't justify a vote for Trump. I'm either voting for the Democrat or not voting in the presidential category.
“All elements of the national life must be made to drink in the Life which proceedeth from Him: legislation, political institutions, education, marriage and family life, capital and labour.” —Pope Leo XIII

User avatar
Major-Tom
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15690
Founded: Mar 09, 2016
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Major-Tom » Wed Jan 31, 2018 2:48 pm

USS Monitor wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:And that’s why I think a Biden/Gabbard or a Biden/Booker ticket would work wonderfully.


I really dislike Gabbard, even as a VP. She's flaky and obnoxious.

Biden/Booker isn't my dream ticket, but it's something I could vote for without any major reservations.


Booker, given where he is at, would make a good VP as opposed to a POTUS I think. Biden/Warren too. I've said it before, Warren gets a lot of flak from the right and even some voices on the moderate left such as myself, but I really find myself admiring her persistence and willingness to look out for consumers.

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Wed Jan 31, 2018 2:51 pm

Hakons wrote:If Democrats choose Joe Biden as their candidate, I might vote for them. I can't justify a vote for Trump. I'm either voting for the Democrat or not voting in the presidential category.


Yeah, I like third party votes. Just because I see third party votes as basically an "I am dissatisfied with both parties".
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Hakons
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5619
Founded: Jul 14, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Hakons » Wed Jan 31, 2018 2:58 pm

Telconi wrote:
Hakons wrote:If Democrats choose Joe Biden as their candidate, I might vote for them. I can't justify a vote for Trump. I'm either voting for the Democrat or not voting in the presidential category.


Yeah, I like third party votes. Just because I see third party votes as basically an "I am dissatisfied with both parties".


To be honest, I view the Libertarian Party as worse than the Democratic Party. They have the selfish individualism of modern conservatism with the secularism of modern liberalism.

The Green Party doesn't even get on the ballot in Indiana. :p
“All elements of the national life must be made to drink in the Life which proceedeth from Him: legislation, political institutions, education, marriage and family life, capital and labour.” —Pope Leo XIII

User avatar
USS Monitor
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 30410
Founded: Jul 01, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby USS Monitor » Wed Jan 31, 2018 3:07 pm

Major-Tom wrote:
USS Monitor wrote:
I really dislike Gabbard, even as a VP. She's flaky and obnoxious.

Biden/Booker isn't my dream ticket, but it's something I could vote for without any major reservations.


Booker, given where he is at, would make a good VP as opposed to a POTUS I think. Biden/Warren too. I've said it before, Warren gets a lot of flak from the right and even some voices on the moderate left such as myself, but I really find myself admiring her persistence and willingness to look out for consumers.


That persistence and willingness to look out for people is why I support Warren. She's a bit to the left of me on some stuff, but I can live with that because she's quite honorable and good at her work.
Don't take life so serious... it isn't permanent... RIP Dyakovo and Ashmoria
19th century steamships may be harmful or fatal if swallowed. In case of accidental ingestion, please seek immediate medical assistance.
༄༅། །འགྲོ་བ་མི་རིགས་ག་ར་དབང་ཆ་འདྲ་མཉམ་འབད་སྒྱེཝ་ལས་ག་ར་གིས་གཅིག་གིས་གཅིག་ལུ་སྤུན་ཆའི་དམ་ཚིག་བསྟན་དགོས།

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Wed Jan 31, 2018 3:08 pm

Hakons wrote:
Telconi wrote:
Yeah, I like third party votes. Just because I see third party votes as basically an "I am dissatisfied with both parties".


To be honest, I view the Libertarian Party as worse than the Democratic Party. They have the selfish individualism of modern conservatism with the secularism of modern liberalism.

The Green Party doesn't even get on the ballot in Indiana. :p


I'm not a big fan of the LP either, I just tend to think of them as a "none of the above" option.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Major-Tom
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15690
Founded: Mar 09, 2016
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Major-Tom » Wed Jan 31, 2018 3:23 pm

USS Monitor wrote:
Major-Tom wrote:
Booker, given where he is at, would make a good VP as opposed to a POTUS I think. Biden/Warren too. I've said it before, Warren gets a lot of flak from the right and even some voices on the moderate left such as myself, but I really find myself admiring her persistence and willingness to look out for consumers.


That persistence and willingness to look out for people is why I support Warren. She's a bit to the left of me on some stuff, but I can live with that because she's quite honorable and good at her work.


If the Dems deem her to be "not electable enough for the top of the ticket" or some crap, I'd hope they consider her for VP.

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76327
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Wed Jan 31, 2018 3:24 pm

Speaking of Biden if the election was held today Biden would win big time. Current polling puts him at 59% to Trump’s 37% with a 1% undecided.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_ ... tion,_2020
Male, State Socialist, Cultural Nationalist, Welfare Chauvinist lives somewhere in AZ I'm GAY! Disabled US Military Veteran
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
>Xovland: I keep getting ads for printer ink. Sometimes, when you get that feeling down there, you have to look at some steamy printer pictures.
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Major-Tom
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15690
Founded: Mar 09, 2016
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Major-Tom » Wed Jan 31, 2018 3:25 pm

Thermodolia wrote:Speaking of Biden if the election was held today Biden would win big time. Current polling puts him at 59% to Trump’s 37% with a 1% undecided.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_ ... tion,_2020


Republicans I talk to seem to admire Biden, as well. He's certainly electable, I would be more concerned about his age and the potential for a cognitive decline as he finishes up his first term or so.

User avatar
Improved werpland
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1109
Founded: May 02, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Improved werpland » Wed Jan 31, 2018 3:29 pm

Thermodolia wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:Gabbard would be alright imo.

Gabbard/Brown or Biden/Gabbard. That’s who I’d want to see run.

*status quo shill mode activates*

I like Brown, but don't fall for Gabbard. She has outright praised Chris Butler (also known as Guru Dev Srila Siddhaswarupananda Paramahamsa) on a few occasions, but continues to keep quiet about her beliefs in public. If this were a Republican Congressperson, one who legitimized foreign far-right politicians and strongmen, and obscured their financial and spiritual ties to an estranged Christian group, would there be the same reaction?
Last edited by Improved werpland on Wed Jan 31, 2018 3:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Major-Tom
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15690
Founded: Mar 09, 2016
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Major-Tom » Wed Jan 31, 2018 3:33 pm

Improved werpland wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:Gabbard/Brown or Biden/Gabbard. That’s who I’d want to see run.

*status quo shill mode activates*

I like Brown, but don't fall for Gabbard. She has outright praised Chris Butler (also known as Guru Dev Srila Siddhaswarupananda Paramahamsa) on a few occasions, but continues to keep quiet about her beliefs in public. If this were a Republican Congressperson, one who legitimized foreign far-right politicians and strongmen, and obscured their financial and spiritual ties to an estranged Christian group, would there be the same reaction?


I think those who give Gabbard adoration and those who hate Gabbard are both missing the point. She's a fairly good congresswoman, one with some weird ties to certain weird religious organizations. Honestly, I don't like that, but I don't dislike her for that alone. She has some bad policy positions, some really good ones, and some decent ones.

I think, though, we should keep Gabbard in the House, where she has the ability to get some good work done.

User avatar
Improved werpland
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1109
Founded: May 02, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Improved werpland » Wed Jan 31, 2018 3:40 pm

Major-Tom wrote:
Improved werpland wrote:*status quo shill mode activates*

I like Brown, but don't fall for Gabbard. She has outright praised Chris Butler (also known as Guru Dev Srila Siddhaswarupananda Paramahamsa) on a few occasions, but continues to keep quiet about her beliefs in public. If this were a Republican Congressperson, one who legitimized foreign far-right politicians and strongmen, and obscured their financial and spiritual ties to an estranged Christian group, would there be the same reaction?


I think those who give Gabbard adoration and those who hate Gabbard are both missing the point. She's a fairly good congresswoman, one with some weird ties to certain weird religious organizations. Honestly, I don't like that, but I don't dislike her for that alone. She has some bad policy positions, some really good ones, and some decent ones.

I think, though, we should keep Gabbard in the House, where she has the ability to get some good work done.

I dislike her very much for her foreign policy positions. We used to have Dennis Kucinich cozying up with the international crypto-fascist left and Iran, but imo it was clear what he was doing was genuine and caused by ideological blinders. Gabbard is not the same though. I think there's something fishy with her and her popularity is irritating.

User avatar
Senkaku
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25687
Founded: Sep 01, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Senkaku » Wed Jan 31, 2018 5:30 pm

Major-Tom wrote:
Improved werpland wrote:*status quo shill mode activates*

I like Brown, but don't fall for Gabbard. She has outright praised Chris Butler (also known as Guru Dev Srila Siddhaswarupananda Paramahamsa) on a few occasions, but continues to keep quiet about her beliefs in public. If this were a Republican Congressperson, one who legitimized foreign far-right politicians and strongmen, and obscured their financial and spiritual ties to an estranged Christian group, would there be the same reaction?


I think those who give Gabbard adoration and those who hate Gabbard are both missing the point. She's a fairly good congresswoman, one with some weird ties to certain weird religious organizations. Honestly, I don't like that, but I don't dislike her for that alone. She has some bad policy positions, some really good ones, and some decent ones.

I think, though, we should keep Gabbard in the House, where she has the ability to get some good work done.

Gabbard has had weirder and weirder stuff come out about her since her time in the sun when everything thought she might be like the heir apparent/young female version of Bernie or whatever. Let's go with Booker as a safer alternative- or, if you want a female veteran of color, Duckworth.
agreed honey. send bees

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Wed Jan 31, 2018 5:32 pm

Major-Tom wrote:
Improved werpland wrote:*status quo shill mode activates*

I like Brown, but don't fall for Gabbard. She has outright praised Chris Butler (also known as Guru Dev Srila Siddhaswarupananda Paramahamsa) on a few occasions, but continues to keep quiet about her beliefs in public. If this were a Republican Congressperson, one who legitimized foreign far-right politicians and strongmen, and obscured their financial and spiritual ties to an estranged Christian group, would there be the same reaction?


I think those who give Gabbard adoration and those who hate Gabbard are both missing the point. She's a fairly good congresswoman, one with some weird ties to certain weird religious organizations. Honestly, I don't like that, but I don't dislike her for that alone. She has some bad policy positions, some really good ones, and some decent ones.

I think, though, we should keep Gabbard in the House, where she has the ability to get some good work done.

lol in what way

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Wed Jan 31, 2018 5:37 pm

I dunno if this has been posted yet, but about a week ago Ryan Grim and Lee Fang dropped a piece about how Dem party establishment groups like DCCC and Emily's List stonewall new, progressive candidates, instead favoring much wealthier and more conservative candidates, many of whom have been failures in the past.

https://theintercept.com/2018/01/23/dccc-democratic-primaries-congress-progressives/

User avatar
Valrifell
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31063
Founded: Aug 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Valrifell » Wed Jan 31, 2018 5:38 pm

MERIZoC wrote:I dunno if this has been posted yet, but about a week ago Ryan Grim and Lee Fang dropped a piece about how Dem party establishment groups like DCCC and Emily's List stonewall new, progressive candidates, instead favoring much wealthier and more conservative candidates, many of whom have been failures in the past.

https://theintercept.com/2018/01/23/dccc-democratic-primaries-congress-progressives/


Okay
HAVING AN ALL CAPS SIG MAKES ME FEEL SMART

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Wed Jan 31, 2018 5:42 pm

Senkaku wrote:
Major-Tom wrote:
I think those who give Gabbard adoration and those who hate Gabbard are both missing the point. She's a fairly good congresswoman, one with some weird ties to certain weird religious organizations. Honestly, I don't like that, but I don't dislike her for that alone. She has some bad policy positions, some really good ones, and some decent ones.

I think, though, we should keep Gabbard in the House, where she has the ability to get some good work done.

Gabbard has had weirder and weirder stuff come out about her since her time in the sun when everything thought she might be like the heir apparent/young female version of Bernie or whatever. Let's go with Booker as a safer alternative- or, if you want a female veteran of color, Duckworth.


Or we could avoid that path like the plague it is...
Last edited by Telconi on Wed Jan 31, 2018 5:45 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Senkaku
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25687
Founded: Sep 01, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Senkaku » Wed Jan 31, 2018 5:44 pm

Telconi wrote:
Senkaku wrote:Gabbard has had weirder and weirder stuff come out about her since her time in the sun when everything thought she might be like the heir apparent/young female version of Bernie or whatever. Let's go with Booker as a safer alternative- or, if you want a female veteran of color, Duckworth.


Or we could avoid that path like the plague it is...

What's wrong with Duckworth? She's hardly an ideologue, and being a veteran is always a boost.

Oh, is it the "woman of color" bit you have an issue with? Makes sense.
agreed honey. send bees

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Wed Jan 31, 2018 5:46 pm

Senkaku wrote:
Telconi wrote:
Or we could avoid that path like the plague it is...

What's wrong with Duckworth? She's hardly an ideologue, and being a veteran is always a boost.

Oh, is it the "woman of color" bit you have an issue with? Makes sense.


"W-Well you're the real racist and sexist for pointing out that racism and sexism is bad!"

Yeah, okay...
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Achan, Albaaa, Australian rePublic, Dimetrodon Empire, El Lazaro, Hirota, Nantoraka, The marxist plains

Advertisement

Remove ads