The State of the Democratic Party II

[Kramanica]

Better than gun grabbers, I'd say.

Until one is pointing one at you.

And the other wants to rob me of my right to defend myself.

[The Black Forrest]

Until one is pointing one at you.

And the other wants to rob me of my right to defend myself.

Where is that right listed?

[Telconi]

People who vote for gun grabbers are as insane to me as people who vote for literal Nazis. In the end, if those are my two choices, I'm picking the bigot not intent on destroying my way of life.

>Society where one of the binary options is a literal Nazi
>Still voting

You can return to 4chan now...

[Kramanica]

And the other wants to rob me of my right to defend myself.

Where is that right listed?

You don't believe that people should be able to defend themselves?

[Telconi]

And the other wants to rob me of my right to defend myself.

Where is that right listed?

Right next to 'right to be a Jew'

[Crockerland]

And the other wants to rob me of my right to defend myself.

Where is that right listed?

Basic rights of literally all living creatures without exception.

[Sovaal]

People who vote for gun grabbers are as insane to me as people who vote for literal Nazis. In the end, if those are my two choices, I'm picking the bigot not intent on destroying my way of life.

>Society where one of the binary options is a literal Nazi
>Still voting

Eww, greentext.

[Post War America]

Where is that right listed?

Right next to 'right to be a Jew'

I mean if we really want to get technical about it, the 2nd Amendment doesn't state that citizens have a right to defend themselves with borne arms, merely that they can bear them. Just as the 1st Amendment technically only prevents congress from forbidding religious worship, but technicalities are stupid as fuck.

[The Black Forrest]

Where is that right listed?

Right next to 'right to be a Jew'

Hmmm The gun stroker argument of if the Jews had guns?

[The Black Forrest]

Where is that right listed?

You don't believe that people should be able to defend themselves?

We talking constitution or opinions?

[Telconi]

Right next to 'right to be a Jew'

Hmmm The gun stroker argument of if the Jews had guns?

No, I was referencing the fact that they are literally right next to one another in the Bill of Rights.

[The Black Forrest]

Hmmm The gun stroker argument of if the Jews had guns?

No, I was referencing the fact that they are literally right next to one another in the Bill of Rights.

You in a well regulated militia?

[Kramanica]

Right next to 'right to be a Jew'

Hmmm The gun stroker argument of if the Jews had guns?

Well, the Nazis did outlaw guns for Jews.

Let's play a basic thought experiment. Which populace is easier to control? One that is armed or one that isn't armed?

[Telconi]

No, I was referencing the fact that they are literally right next to one another in the Bill of Rights.

You in a well regulated militia?

Yes, also not relevant.

[Kramanica]

You don't believe that people should be able to defend themselves?

We talking constitution or opinions?

I didn't specifically mention the Constitution. So you tell me.

[The Black Forrest]

Hmmm The gun stroker argument of if the Jews had guns?

Well, the Nazis did outlaw guns for Jews.

Let's play a basic thought experiment. Which populace is easier to control? One that is armed or one that isn't armed?

For the Nazis? It didn't matter.

[Washington Resistance Army]

No, I was referencing the fact that they are literally right next to one another in the Bill of Rights.

You in a well regulated militia?

Yes actually he is.

[The Black Forrest]

We talking constitution or opinions?

I didn't specifically mention the Constitution. So you tell me.

Usually "right" mentioned here is the Constitution but whatever......

[The Black Forrest]

You in a well regulated militia?

Yes, also not relevant.

Oh. Not an origianalist?

[The Black Forrest]

You in a well regulated militia?

Yes actually he is.

I admit lack of knowledge of militias but how exactly to they regulate them?

[Washington Resistance Army]

Yes, also not relevant.

Oh. Not an origianalist?

The idea of needing to be in a militia to exercise the right to bear arms is a modern invention that arose in 1939.

[Telconi]

Yes, also not relevant.

Oh. Not an origianalist?

Eh, sorta.

[Washington Resistance Army]

Yes actually he is.

I admit lack of knowledge of militias but how exactly to they regulate them?

That's not what the 2A means lol

[Post War America]

Oh. Not an origianalist?

The idea of needing to be in a militia to exercise the right to bear arms is a modern invention that arose in 1939.

Except its explicitly in the original language of the United States Constitution:

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

This is literally the exact text emphasis mine.

[The Black Forrest]

I admit lack of knowledge of militias but how exactly to they regulate them?

That's not what the 2A means lol

*shrugs* your interpretation.

But this discussion really doesn't have anything to do with he state of the Democratic Party II so I will back away from this tangent.....