Advertisement
by Corrian » Thu Dec 21, 2017 8:38 pm
by Corrian » Thu Dec 21, 2017 8:40 pm
Collatis wrote:But the Democratic giddiness came to an abrupt end when the judges declared that one uncounted ballot should go to David Yancey, the Republican incumbent. That decision left both candidates with 11,608 votes: a tie.
But here is where things get really interesting: Virginia law says the state election board shall "determine by lot which of the candidates shall be declared elected." And it gets even better: Whoever is the loser after the lots are drawn could potentially then ask for another recount of the original ballots.
In other words, it appears likely that control of Virginia's House of Delegates will come down to a game of chance.
This entire thing is just crazy.
by The Liberated Territories » Thu Dec 21, 2017 9:01 pm
by Corrian » Thu Dec 21, 2017 9:36 pm
The Liberated Territories wrote:Out of all the examples above, Andrew Jackson. He may have murdered thousands, but he'd never sell my children into generational debt. ;-)
by San Lumen » Thu Dec 21, 2017 9:39 pm
by San Lumen » Thu Dec 21, 2017 9:40 pm
Corrian wrote:I've noticed Democrats seem confused between "Republicans are acting like they're no longer going to have free and fair elections" and "There will be a blue tsunami in 2018". Not sure how we have a blue tsunami if the elections aren't fair anymore
Or how a Democrat wins in Alabama for that matter.
by USS Monitor » Fri Dec 22, 2017 12:28 am
The original area near the mouth of the James River was first referred to as Newportes Newes as early as 1621.[5]
The source of the name "Newport News" is not known with certainty. Several versions are recorded, and it is the subject of popular speculation locally. Probably the best-known explanation holds that when an early group of Jamestown colonists left to return to England after the Starving Time during the winter of 1609–1610 aboard a ship of Captain Christopher Newport, they encountered another fleet of supply ships under the new Governor Thomas West, 3rd Baron De La Warr in the James River off Mulberry Island with reinforcements of men and supplies. The new governor ordered them to turn around, and return to Jamestown. Under this theory, the community was named for Newport's "good news". Another possibility is that the community may have derived its name from an old English word "news" meaning "new town". At least one source claims that the "New" arose from the original settlement's being rebuilt after a fire.[6]
Another source gave the original name as New Port Newce, named for a person with the name Newce and the town's place as a new seaport. The namesake, Sir William Newce, was an English soldier and originally settled in Ireland. There he had established Newcestown near Bandon, County Cork. He sailed to Virginia with Sir Francis Wyatt in October 1621 and was granted 2,500 acres (1,012 ha) of land. He died two days later. His brother, Capt. Thomas Newce, was given "600 acres at Kequatan, now called Elizabeth Cittie." A partner Daniel Gookin completed founding the settlement.[7]
In his 1897 two-volume work Old Virginia and her Neighbors, American historian John Fiske writes:
... several old maps where the name is given as Newport Ness, being the mariner's way of saying Newport Point.[8]
The fact that the name formerly appeared as "Newport's News" is verified by numerous early documents and maps, and by local tradition. The change to Newport News came about through usage, for by 1851 the Post Office Department sanctioned "New Port News" (three words) as the name of the first post office. In 1866 it approved the name as "Newport News", the current form.[6]
by Corrian » Sat Dec 23, 2017 5:17 am
San Lumen wrote:Corrian wrote:I've noticed Democrats seem confused between "Republicans are acting like they're no longer going to have free and fair elections" and "There will be a blue tsunami in 2018". Not sure how we have a blue tsunami if the elections aren't fair anymore
Or how a Democrat wins in Alabama for that matter.
well you did just have a blatant power grab in Virginia when republicans had judges count what should have been a discarded ballot.
San Lumen wrote:I work the polls every November and I can tell you that is clearly an over vote not to mention the voter intent isn't clear. That ballot should not have been counted. If you made and error ask for a new ballot. I dont know how the law is in Virginia but in my state every voter gets three chances to vote in other words three ballots.
by Collatis » Wed Dec 27, 2017 7:42 am
PRO: social democracy, internationalism, progressivism, democracy,
republicanism, human rights, democratic socialism, Keynesianism,
EU, NATO, two-state solution, Democratic Party, Bernie Sanders
CON: conservatism, authoritarianism, totalitarianism, neoliberalism,
death penalty, Marxism-Leninism, laissez faire, reaction, fascism,
antisemitism, isolationism, Republican Party, Donald Trump
Voting Through The Ages | Voter Guide | The Presidents | Voting Without Borders
by Petrasylvania » Wed Dec 27, 2017 9:59 am
by San Lumen » Wed Dec 27, 2017 10:47 am
Corrian wrote:San Lumen wrote:well you did just have a blatant power grab in Virginia when republicans had judges count what should have been a discarded ballot.
Which is it, though? Blue tsunami or no more fair elections? You can't have both.San Lumen wrote:I work the polls every November and I can tell you that is clearly an over vote not to mention the voter intent isn't clear. That ballot should not have been counted. If you made and error ask for a new ballot. I dont know how the law is in Virginia but in my state every voter gets three chances to vote in other words three ballots.
Here they tell you what to do if you accidentally wrote the wrong person or changed your mind, so you don't even need to ask for a new one. But you also don't even need to leave your house, so...
by Masuicca » Wed Dec 27, 2017 11:46 am
by Blakk Metal » Wed Dec 27, 2017 11:47 am
San Lumen wrote:Corrian wrote:Which is it, though? Blue tsunami or no more fair elections? You can't have both.
Here they tell you what to do if you accidentally wrote the wrong person or changed your mind, so you don't even need to ask for a new one. But you also don't even need to leave your house, so...
I would love to know what is wrong with the judges that ruled that ballot was valid. Or have judges become to partisan to care about the law?
by Major-Tom » Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:40 pm
by Major-Tom » Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:45 pm
Masuicca wrote:OOH, I love a good questionnaire!Is there a blue wave mounting in 2018, and is Doug Jones's breathtaking victory in Alabama indicative of one?
I think the win earned by Doug Jones in Alabama is indicative of the potential for a Blue Wave in 2018. The reason I'm bearish on the idea though is the pragmatic argument: there's far more Democrat seats up for re-election where it counts than GOP-held seats. To really set the table for a wave on the level we saw during the last few midterms, you'd need to see the split far more level I think. The truth of the matter is it's really too far out to see what things are going to look like in 2018, because that's when we'll really start to feel the brunt of Trump's activities in earnest.
What message should the Democrats run on in 2018?
The Democrats have to counter the narrative that they're the 'Party for Some People' that the media has played up. 2016 proved that angry voting demographics can exercise a lot of political capital when they want to. True inclusion means going after votes in the inner cities, in the rural and industrial working-class towns, from the coasts to the plains and all points in-between. The DNC has to put out a message that gives everyone a clear, decisive and productive alternative from the Trump agenda.
Should the Democrats even consider attempting to impeach Donald Trump?
Absolutely, unequivocally not, unless the ongoing investigations reveal complicity or other criminal acts (or he does something that clearly warrants it in the future). Talk of impeaching Trump without hard evidence just galvanizes the other side needlessly in my opinion. Plus, just as a general pragmatic rule, we don't want to weaponize impeachment, because once you do that, each side will try to use it on the other in the future, and things will break down even more than they already have.
Can the Democrats stop the Republicans' "Billionaires First" tax bill?
It would appear not.
How should the Democrats handle the ongoing Russia investigation led by Robert Mueller?
I would let it sit, personally. The Democrats need complete separation from Mueller to prevent the Republicans from screaming collusion. They will anyway, but letting the process play out uneventfully helps keep those appearances down.
Should Nancy Pelosi step down as House Minority Leader?
Yes. I've never been a big fan of Pelosi, and think new leadership would reinforce the vision of the Democrats as a party looking forward.
Should the Democrats risk working with the Republicans on infrastructure?
Absolutely! When it comes to generic issues where ideology doesn't play as crucial a role, there's always room for bipartisanship. It's far easier to work across the aisle on something like infrastructure as compared to, say, abortion rights or gun control. Just because partisanship divides the parties on a lot doesn't mean reaching across the aisle is always a bad thing.
Should superdelegates be abolished entirely?
This is... tough. On the one hand, the superdelegates were an instrumental part of Hillary Clinton's nomination over Bernie Sanders, and it created the mentality that Sanders was always trying to play catch up from an insurmountable hole. And the concept of superdelegates is a bit suspect to begin with. On the other hand, we saw what happened on the Republican side when a crazy person got through.
Should anyone care about Martin O'Malley?
I wonder if he's related to Mike O'Malley.
by Myrensis » Thu Dec 28, 2017 3:53 pm
by Valrifell » Thu Dec 28, 2017 4:17 pm
by Nouveau Yathrib » Thu Dec 28, 2017 9:40 pm
by San Lumen » Thu Dec 28, 2017 9:56 pm
Myrensis wrote:Corrian wrote:I have to agree with Sam Lumen in this case. Why the hell was a ballot written with both candidates in suddenly flipped to one? It should be scrapped if someone can't vote properly.
Virginia Law agrees with you, it's quite clearly a spoiled ballot.
Luckily for the GOP a panel of Republican appointed Judges determined that a ballot marked for both candidates is actually a clear and unambiguous declaration of undying support for the Republican Party.
by Senkaku » Thu Dec 28, 2017 10:28 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Atrito, Big Eyed Animation, Cyptopir, DataDyneIrkenAlliance, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Inferior, Kannap, Niolia, Ors Might, Pale Dawn, Port Carverton, Rumacia and Thrace, Shearoa, Shidei, Tarsonis, The Kharkivan Cossacks
Advertisement