NATION

PASSWORD

Trump just recognized Jerusalem as Israel's Capital

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Do you approve or disapprove of this action?

Approve(Like Israel)
193
31%
Approve(Dislike Israel)
21
3%
Approve(Neutral)
42
7%
Unsure(Like Israel)
25
4%
Unsure(Dislike Israel)
14
2%
Unsure(Neutral on Israel)
44
7%
Disapprove(Like Israel)
70
11%
Disapprove(Hate Israel)
94
15%
Disapprove(Neutral on Israel)
125
20%
 
Total votes : 628

User avatar
The Empire of Pretantia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39273
Founded: Oct 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Empire of Pretantia » Wed Jan 03, 2018 5:18 am

Xenthalia wrote:Jerusalem has only been Israel's capital since the f*cking first century and most likely longer than that! The Palestinian terrorists have no legitimate claim over the holy land whatsoever, they'd have better luck claiming Stockholm as their capital.

and also may I add, at last a US President carrying out his promises. It's been a long time coming.

Disclaimer: Israel technically wasn't a country in the First Century.
ywn be as good as this video
Gacha
Trashing other people's waifus
Anti-NN
EA
Douche flutes
Zimbabwe
Putting the toilet paper roll the wrong way
Every single square inch of Asia
Lewding Earth-chan
Pollution
4Chan in all its glory and all its horror
Playing the little Switch controller handheld thing in public
Treading on me
Socialism, Communism, Anarchism, and all their cousins and sisters and brothers and wife's sons
Alternate Universe 40K
Nightcore
Comcast
Zimbabwe
Believing the Ottomans were the third Roman Empire
Parodies of the Gadsden flag
The Fate Series
US politics

User avatar
Xenthalia
Secretary
 
Posts: 26
Founded: Jan 02, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Xenthalia » Wed Jan 03, 2018 5:20 am

The Empire of Pretantia wrote:
Xenthalia wrote:Jerusalem has only been Israel's capital since the f*cking first century and most likely longer than that! The Palestinian terrorists have no legitimate claim over the holy land whatsoever, they'd have better luck claiming Stockholm as their capital.

and also may I add, at last a US President carrying out his promises. It's been a long time coming.

Disclaimer: Israel technically wasn't a country in the First Century.


But it was the area in which Jerusalem was the capital, correct me if I'm wrong.

User avatar
The Empire of Pretantia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39273
Founded: Oct 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Empire of Pretantia » Wed Jan 03, 2018 5:34 am

Xenthalia wrote:
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:Disclaimer: Israel technically wasn't a country in the First Century.


But it was the area in which Jerusalem was the capital, correct me if I'm wrong.

Actually, IIRC the area was divided between three kingdoms at that time.
ywn be as good as this video
Gacha
Trashing other people's waifus
Anti-NN
EA
Douche flutes
Zimbabwe
Putting the toilet paper roll the wrong way
Every single square inch of Asia
Lewding Earth-chan
Pollution
4Chan in all its glory and all its horror
Playing the little Switch controller handheld thing in public
Treading on me
Socialism, Communism, Anarchism, and all their cousins and sisters and brothers and wife's sons
Alternate Universe 40K
Nightcore
Comcast
Zimbabwe
Believing the Ottomans were the third Roman Empire
Parodies of the Gadsden flag
The Fate Series
US politics

User avatar
RoyalUKR
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 9
Founded: Jan 01, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby RoyalUKR » Wed Jan 03, 2018 6:57 am

Jerusalem is the Eternal Capital of Israel.

User avatar
Socialist Czechia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6183
Founded: Apr 06, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Socialist Czechia » Wed Jan 03, 2018 10:33 am

RoyalUKR wrote:Jerusalem is the Eternal Capital of Israel.


There is only one Eternal City in the world, though. :P

Image
"Those who reached my boundary, their seed is not; their hearts and their souls are finished forever and ever. As for those who had assembled before them on the sea, the full flame was their front before the harbour mouths, and a wall of metal upon the shore surrounded them. They were dragged, overturned, and laid low upon the beach; slain and made heaps from stern to bow of their galleys, while all their things were cast upon the water." - Ramesses III., Battle of the Delta

User avatar
RoyalUKR
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 9
Founded: Jan 01, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby RoyalUKR » Wed Jan 03, 2018 11:54 am

Socialist Czechia wrote:
RoyalUKR wrote:Jerusalem is the Eternal Capital of Israel.


There is only one Eternal City in the world, though. :P

Image

Jerusalem is older than Rome.

User avatar
Holy Tedalonia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12455
Founded: Nov 14, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Holy Tedalonia » Wed Jan 03, 2018 12:01 pm

Socialist Czechia wrote:
RoyalUKR wrote:Jerusalem is the Eternal Capital of Israel.


There is only one Eternal City in the world, though. :P

Image

Attila and co ruined the eternal city. Nothing is eternal.
Name: Ted
I have hot takes, I like roasting the fuck out of bad takes, and I don't take shit way too seriously.
I M P E R I A LR E P U B L I C

User avatar
Holy Tedalonia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12455
Founded: Nov 14, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Holy Tedalonia » Wed Jan 03, 2018 12:02 pm

RoyalUKR wrote:
Socialist Czechia wrote:
There is only one Eternal City in the world, though. :P

Image

Jerusalem is older than Rome.

Doesn't matter. The Eternal City is Romes nickname whether it's true or not.
Name: Ted
I have hot takes, I like roasting the fuck out of bad takes, and I don't take shit way too seriously.
I M P E R I A LR E P U B L I C

User avatar
RoyalUKR
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 9
Founded: Jan 01, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby RoyalUKR » Wed Jan 03, 2018 5:01 pm

Holy Tedalonia wrote:
RoyalUKR wrote:Jerusalem is older than Rome.

Doesn't matter. The Eternal City is Romes nickname whether it's true or not.

Jerusalem was the eternal capital before Rome and still is after Rome.

User avatar
Socialist Czechia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6183
Founded: Apr 06, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Socialist Czechia » Fri Jan 05, 2018 8:12 am

RoyalUKR wrote:
Socialist Czechia wrote:
There is only one Eternal City in the world, though. :P


Jerusalem is older than Rome.


And Damascus is older than Jerusalem. Athens too, probably.

But Jerusalem is not called 'eternal'. Probably because what happened to rhe city, after traitor Simon Bar Giora met his end, as his followers, from rightful wrath of Emperor Titus :P
Last edited by Socialist Czechia on Fri Jan 05, 2018 8:14 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Those who reached my boundary, their seed is not; their hearts and their souls are finished forever and ever. As for those who had assembled before them on the sea, the full flame was their front before the harbour mouths, and a wall of metal upon the shore surrounded them. They were dragged, overturned, and laid low upon the beach; slain and made heaps from stern to bow of their galleys, while all their things were cast upon the water." - Ramesses III., Battle of the Delta

User avatar
Kibbutz Unions
Diplomat
 
Posts: 666
Founded: May 09, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Kibbutz Unions » Fri Jan 05, 2018 8:20 am

Socialist Czechia wrote:
RoyalUKR wrote:Jerusalem is older than Rome.


And Damascus is older than Jerusalem. Athens too, probably.

But Jerusalem is not called 'eternal'. Probably because what happened to rhe city, after traitor Simon Bar Giora met his end, as his followers, from rightful wrath of Emperor Titus :P

What is this, a competition?
Plus, Jericho is probably older than Damascus. I win.
Just another Zionist (((Globalist))) Cultural Marxist Commie Antifa Reptilian Degenerate Comrade, nice to meet you!
Pro: Socialism, Democracy, Two-States Solution, Left-Wing Solidarity, Communicative Art, LGBT Rights, Antifa
Anti: Capitalism, Imperialism, Culture Industry, Racism, Antisemitism, Fascism, Homophobia and Transphobia

User avatar
Tajeria
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 2
Founded: Nov 14, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Tajeria » Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:18 am

Guys, 136 countries recognize Palestine as a NATION. If 136 countries recognize Palestine, that's the majority of the entire world beliving that Palestine is a country, meaning that, for all intents and purposes, it is a nation. If Palestine is a nation, then shouldn't it be illegal to occupy a part of a country and declare it as your capital? See, this is the problem with the current UN system of recognizing countries, because this will just be left unnoticed by the west, which are the countries that do not recognize Palestine, this should technically be a declaration of war. But, it's not because not eveyone has recognized it. It could be that once a majority of the world recognizes it as a country, then it is a country. That way, stuff like this wouldn't just fall under the radar and be seen as insane. It also won;t allow countries that don't reognize a county to misinform the populus. But then again, that would take away some rights from other nations so....

User avatar
Ors Might
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8514
Founded: Nov 01, 2016
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Ors Might » Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:34 am

Tajeria wrote:Guys, 136 countries recognize Palestine as a NATION. If 136 countries recognize Palestine, that's the majority of the entire world beliving that Palestine is a country, meaning that, for all intents and purposes, it is a nation. If Palestine is a nation, then shouldn't it be illegal to occupy a part of a country and declare it as your capital? See, this is the problem with the current UN system of recognizing countries, because this will just be left unnoticed by the west, which are the countries that do not recognize Palestine, this should technically be a declaration of war. But, it's not because not eveyone has recognized it. It could be that once a majority of the world recognizes it as a country, then it is a country. That way, stuff like this wouldn't just fall under the radar and be seen as insane. It also won;t allow countries that don't reognize a county to misinform the populus. But then again, that would take away some rights from other nations so....

I’m not an expert on international law but is land gained through defensive action against an aggressive power illegal? Provided that the land was taken from said aggressive power, of course.
Last edited by Ors Might on Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
https://youtu.be/gvjOG5gboFU Best diss track of all time

User avatar
Community Values
Minister
 
Posts: 2880
Founded: Nov 14, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Community Values » Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:38 am

Tajeria wrote:Guys, 136 countries recognize Palestine as a NATION. If 136 countries recognize Palestine, that's the majority of the entire world beliving that Palestine is a country, meaning that, for all intents and purposes, it is a nation. If Palestine is a nation, then shouldn't it be illegal to occupy a part of a country and declare it as your capital? See, this is the problem with the current UN system of recognizing countries, because this will just be left unnoticed by the west, which are the countries that do not recognize Palestine, this should technically be a declaration of war. But, it's not because not eveyone has recognized it. It could be that once a majority of the world recognizes it as a country, then it is a country. That way, stuff like this wouldn't just fall under the radar and be seen as insane. It also won;t allow countries that don't reognize a county to misinform the populus. But then again, that would take away some rights from other nations so....

It's a nation to 136 countries. It's illegal occupation to 136 countries. To the remaining countries, it's not a nation, and ergo not illegal occupation. When was nation recognition ever a vote?
"Corrupted by wealth and power, your government is like a restaurant with only one dish. They've got a set of Republican waiters on one side and a set of Democratic waiters on the other side. But no matter which set of waiters brings you the dish, the legislative grub is all prepared in the same Wall Street kitchen."
-Huey Long

User avatar
Holy Tedalonia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12455
Founded: Nov 14, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Holy Tedalonia » Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:40 am

Ors Might wrote:
Tajeria wrote:Guys, 136 countries recognize Palestine as a NATION. If 136 countries recognize Palestine, that's the majority of the entire world beliving that Palestine is a country, meaning that, for all intents and purposes, it is a nation. If Palestine is a nation, then shouldn't it be illegal to occupy a part of a country and declare it as your capital? See, this is the problem with the current UN system of recognizing countries, because this will just be left unnoticed by the west, which are the countries that do not recognize Palestine, this should technically be a declaration of war. But, it's not because not eveyone has recognized it. It could be that once a majority of the world recognizes it as a country, then it is a country. That way, stuff like this wouldn't just fall under the radar and be seen as insane. It also won;t allow countries that don't reognize a county to misinform the populus. But then again, that would take away some rights from other nations so....

I’m not an expert on international law but is land not gained through defensive action against an aggressive power legal? Provided that the land was taken from said aggressive power, of course.

Palestine was the ones to declare war first, and Isreal occupied the territory in a treaty they begrudgingly agreed to. How I see it, this is the best possible peace solution until Palestinians immigrate peacefully into Isreal fully removing this political issue.
Name: Ted
I have hot takes, I like roasting the fuck out of bad takes, and I don't take shit way too seriously.
I M P E R I A LR E P U B L I C

User avatar
Holy Tedalonia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12455
Founded: Nov 14, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Holy Tedalonia » Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:42 am

Community Values wrote:
Tajeria wrote:Guys, 136 countries recognize Palestine as a NATION. If 136 countries recognize Palestine, that's the majority of the entire world beliving that Palestine is a country, meaning that, for all intents and purposes, it is a nation. If Palestine is a nation, then shouldn't it be illegal to occupy a part of a country and declare it as your capital? See, this is the problem with the current UN system of recognizing countries, because this will just be left unnoticed by the west, which are the countries that do not recognize Palestine, this should technically be a declaration of war. But, it's not because not eveyone has recognized it. It could be that once a majority of the world recognizes it as a country, then it is a country. That way, stuff like this wouldn't just fall under the radar and be seen as insane. It also won;t allow countries that don't reognize a county to misinform the populus. But then again, that would take away some rights from other nations so....

It's a nation to 136 countries. It's illegal occupation to 136 countries. To the remaining countries, it's not a nation, and ergo not illegal occupation. When was nation recognition ever a vote?

If I don't recognize the UK as a nation, so they can't vote? :p

Flaws like that might start rising
Name: Ted
I have hot takes, I like roasting the fuck out of bad takes, and I don't take shit way too seriously.
I M P E R I A LR E P U B L I C

User avatar
Ors Might
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8514
Founded: Nov 01, 2016
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Ors Might » Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:42 am

Holy Tedalonia wrote:
Ors Might wrote:I’m not an expert on international law but is land not gained through defensive action against an aggressive power legal? Provided that the land was taken from said aggressive power, of course.

Palestine was the ones to declare war first, and Isreal occupied the territory in a treaty they begrudgingly agreed to. How I see it, this is the best possible peace solution until Palestinians immigrate peacefully into Isreal fully removing this political issue.

Then Israel is the rightful occupier of the land. Simple enough.
https://youtu.be/gvjOG5gboFU Best diss track of all time

User avatar
Socialist Czechia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6183
Founded: Apr 06, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Socialist Czechia » Sat Jan 13, 2018 12:31 pm

First thing MUST BE the tolerance of Jewish state if Muslims truly wants any comprehensive settlement

This could happen, if Arabs were reasonable in 1930s.
Image

This could happen, if Arabs were reasonable in 1940s.
Image

And West Bank and half of Jerusalem would be still realm of Jordanese King, if they didn't start local Arab Axis to destroy Jews once and for all.


Do you Arabs, Iranians, Turks and whatever else worship mostly same deity, understand, that Jewish state WILL exist and NO MAN can alter it?

After so many victorious wars, if I was religious, I'd also claim that existence of Israel is a will of God :p Try to deny it...
"Those who reached my boundary, their seed is not; their hearts and their souls are finished forever and ever. As for those who had assembled before them on the sea, the full flame was their front before the harbour mouths, and a wall of metal upon the shore surrounded them. They were dragged, overturned, and laid low upon the beach; slain and made heaps from stern to bow of their galleys, while all their things were cast upon the water." - Ramesses III., Battle of the Delta

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Sat Jan 13, 2018 12:48 pm

Socialist Czechia wrote:First thing MUST BE the tolerance of Jewish state if Muslims truly wants any comprehensive settlement

This could happen, if Arabs were reasonable in 1930s.
(Image)

This could happen, if Arabs were reasonable in 1940s.
(Image)

And West Bank and half of Jerusalem would be still realm of Jordanese King, if they didn't start local Arab Axis to destroy Jews once and for all.


Do you Arabs, Iranians, Turks and whatever else worship mostly same deity, understand, that Jewish state WILL exist and NO MAN can alter it?

After so many victorious wars, if I was religious, I'd also claim that existence of Israel is a will of God :p Try to deny it...


Both sides rejected the Peel proposal.

https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Zionist_ ... resolution
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Socialist Czechia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6183
Founded: Apr 06, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Socialist Czechia » Sat Jan 13, 2018 1:31 pm

Greed and Death wrote:
Both sides rejected the Peel proposal.

https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Zionist_ ... resolution



Nope.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peel_Commission

While some factions at the Congress supported the Peel Report, arguing that later the borders could be adjusted, others opposed the proposal because the Jewish State would be too small. The Congress decided to reject the specific borders recommended by the Peel Commission, but empowered its executive to negotiate a more favorable plan for a Jewish State in Palestine.[34][35] In the wake of the Peel Commission the Jewish Agency set up committees to begin planning for the state. At the time, it had already created a complete administrative apparatus amounting to "a Government existing side by side with the Mandatory Government."[35]

At the same Zionist Congress, David Ben-Gurion, then chairman of the executive committee of the Jewish Agency for Palestine, told those in attendance that, though "there could be no question...of giving up any part of the Land of Israel,... it was arguable that the ultimate goal would be achieved most quickly by accepting the Peel proposals."[36] University of Arizona professor Charles D. Smith suggests that, "Weizmann and Ben-Gurion did not feel they had to be bound by the borders proposed [by the Peel Commission]. These could be considered temporary boundaries to be expanded in the future."[36] Ben-Gurion saw the plan as only a stage in the realisation of a larger Jewish state.[37]



So, they were actually in favour of that: but Arabs, without any discussion, rejected it, thinking exactly what is above, that Jews will want more anyway and that Jewish state in unthinkable altogether.
But it was Arab mistake: if they accepted, they would have more options in the future, especially in keeping Jews in that small portion of Palestine.


If you want to defend everything, you can lose everything.
"Those who reached my boundary, their seed is not; their hearts and their souls are finished forever and ever. As for those who had assembled before them on the sea, the full flame was their front before the harbour mouths, and a wall of metal upon the shore surrounded them. They were dragged, overturned, and laid low upon the beach; slain and made heaps from stern to bow of their galleys, while all their things were cast upon the water." - Ramesses III., Battle of the Delta

User avatar
Frostnia
Envoy
 
Posts: 272
Founded: Aug 06, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Frostnia » Mon Jan 15, 2018 8:23 pm

Socialist Czechia wrote:First thing MUST BE the tolerance of Jewish state if Muslims truly wants any comprehensive settlement

This could happen, if Arabs were reasonable in 1930s.
(Image)

This could happen, if Arabs were reasonable in 1940s.
(Image)

And West Bank and half of Jerusalem would be still realm of Jordanese King, if they didn't start local Arab Axis to destroy Jews once and for all.


Do you Arabs, Iranians, Turks and whatever else worship mostly same deity, understand, that Jewish state WILL exist and NO MAN can alter it?

After so many victorious wars, if I was religious, I'd also claim that existence of Israel is a will of God :p Try to deny it...

Honestly I kinda wish the Arabs accepted the second proposal. Could’ve been cool to see if Israel evolved into a system like Switzerland with all the different languages and cultures. But nope.
MT nation composed of people from every nation with a current Antarctic base. NS stats somewhat apply (despite them being generally stupid). I would use my factbooks but I'm lazy and haven't gotten around to it yet.

Antarctica is a pretty "cool" place.
I'm not sorry

User avatar
Sovaal
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13695
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Sovaal » Mon Jan 15, 2018 9:48 pm

Frostnia wrote:
Socialist Czechia wrote:First thing MUST BE the tolerance of Jewish state if Muslims truly wants any comprehensive settlement

This could happen, if Arabs were reasonable in 1930s.
(Image)

This could happen, if Arabs were reasonable in 1940s.
(Image)

And West Bank and half of Jerusalem would be still realm of Jordanese King, if they didn't start local Arab Axis to destroy Jews once and for all.


Do you Arabs, Iranians, Turks and whatever else worship mostly same deity, understand, that Jewish state WILL exist and NO MAN can alter it?

After so many victorious wars, if I was religious, I'd also claim that existence of Israel is a will of God :p Try to deny it...

Honestly I kinda wish the Arabs accepted the second proposal. Could’ve been cool to see if Israel evolved into a system like Switzerland with all the different languages and cultures. But nope.

Eh, the Holy Land is destined for its current state imo.
Most of the time I have no idea what the hell I'm doing or talking about.

”Many forms of government have been tried and will be tried in this world of sin and woe.
No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is
the worst form of government, except for all the others that have been tried from time to time." -
Winston Churchill, 1947.

"Rifles, muskets, long-bows and hand-grenades are inherently democratic weapons. A complex weapon makes the strong stronger, while a simple weapon – so long as there is no answer to it – gives claws to the weak.” - George Orwell

Previous

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Cerula, Cyptopir, Fartsniffage, Google [Bot], Hidrandia, Ifreann, Keltionialang, Kidai, Narvatus, Stellar Colonies, The Kharkivan Cossacks, Tungstan, Western Theram, Zurkerx

Advertisement

Remove ads