Stojam wrote:Who believes Buzzfeed anyways? They're clearly not a credible source.
They have a terrible editorial style, but as far as I can recall their worst sin is dumb hyperbole and bad takes on stuff, not outright lying.
Advertisement
by Liriena » Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:38 am
Stojam wrote:Who believes Buzzfeed anyways? They're clearly not a credible source.
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by Stojam » Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:38 am
by Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:39 am
Katzenstaat wrote:Soldati Senza Confini wrote:
There's little to no harm done in genocide towards the perpetrator materially.
Sure, we just wiped out the globe from everyone in that region, but how does that harm the perpetrators?
They are harmed for three reasons.
First of all such behaviors can easily result in global hatred towards the perpetrators. Nobody knows whether they are the next to be genocided so everybody is better off if they simply join forces and get rid of the unpredictable genocide perpetrators.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.
by Katzenstaat » Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:40 am
Soldati Senza Confini wrote:Katzenstaat wrote:They are harmed for three reasons.
First of all such behaviors can easily result in global hatred towards the perpetrators. Nobody knows whether they are the next to be genocided so everybody is better off if they simply join forces and get rid of the unpredictable genocide perpetrators.
But surely, if might is right, it only means we need to be the strongest country in the world before we start genociding, which ensures nobody will touch us.
by Washington Resistance Army » Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:40 am
by Stojam » Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:41 am
by Katzenstaat » Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:41 am
by Liriena » Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:41 am
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by Stojam » Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:42 am
by Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:43 am
Katzenstaat wrote:Secondly even if you manage to kill off all but your ingroup genocide may become a norm and you will settle your minor differences through more genocides. Once the spiral of death starts it will probably continue until at most one human is left or genocide is banned again.
At last genocide weakens humanity which makes an alien invasion or AI takeover more likely.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.
by Stojam » Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:43 am
Katzenstaat wrote:Liriena wrote:Welp, there go 99% of the "arguments" for "race realism" and its apologists. Fare thee well, pseudo-science.
Because race realism is real. Israel is awesome because of Jews. Japan is awesome because of Japanese people. Period.
At the very least RR should be the null hypothesis.
by Thermodolia » Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:43 am
Katzenstaat wrote:Thermodolia wrote:I'm Jewish.
Still doesn't mean that IQ isn't a horrible way to measure intelligence
Awesome!
IQ is not a horrible way to measure intelligence because it predicts racial differences well. Ashkenazis are at the top and blacks and Australian Aborigines are at the bottom.
I'm an HBDer.
by Katzenstaat » Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:44 am
by Katzenstaat » Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:44 am
Thermodolia wrote:Katzenstaat wrote:Awesome!
IQ is not a horrible way to measure intelligence because it predicts racial differences well. Ashkenazis are at the top and blacks and Australian Aborigines are at the bottom.
I'm an HBDer.
You do know that this is extremely similar to the Nazi idea that Ayrans are at the top due to some vague, highly suspect, and pseudoscientific reasoning while everyone else is at the bottom
by Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:45 am
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.
by Stojam » Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:45 am
Katzenstaat wrote:Thermodolia wrote:You do know that this is extremely similar to the Nazi idea that Ayrans are at the top due to some vague, highly suspect, and pseudoscientific reasoning while everyone else is at the bottom
Nazis banned IQ tests because Jews did so well. Hence antisemitism is absurd while HBD is factual.
by Stojam » Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:46 am
by Liriena » Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:46 am
Stojam wrote:Liriena wrote:They have a terrible editorial style, but as far as I can recall their worst sin is dumb hyperbole and bad takes on stuff, not outright lying.
They are terrible in general as they have been a very great target to YouTubers debunking them left and right... That really says something.
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by Katzenstaat » Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:46 am
Soldati Senza Confini wrote:Katzenstaat wrote:Secondly even if you manage to kill off all but your ingroup genocide may become a norm and you will settle your minor differences through more genocides. Once the spiral of death starts it will probably continue until at most one human is left or genocide is banned again.
At last genocide weakens humanity which makes an alien invasion or AI takeover more likely.
Your second and last lines of reasoning are moral views.
I will cut off our discussion here because it is bordering on threadjack already. But like I said, you were just going to rationalize and justify your view as right even if I happen to be right, and I wasn't wrong. I'll leave you to reflect on what we discussed, because I just boxed you on your own set of views.
by Liriena » Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:46 am
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by Washington Resistance Army » Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:46 am
Thermodolia wrote:Katzenstaat wrote:Awesome!
IQ is not a horrible way to measure intelligence because it predicts racial differences well. Ashkenazis are at the top and blacks and Australian Aborigines are at the bottom.
I'm an HBDer.
You do know that this is extremely similar to the Nazi idea that Ayrans are at the top due to some vague, highly suspect, and pseudoscientific reasoning while everyone else is at the bottom
by Corporate Societies » Wed Dec 06, 2017 9:47 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Andavarast, Bienenhalde, Burnt Calculators, Cinnaa, Deblar, Dimetrodon Empire, Duvniask, Eahland, Emotional Support Crocodile, Floppa Lovers, Pale Dawn, Teclana, Zurkerx
Advertisement