Gun Control: Shiny Toy Guns

[The Empire of Pretantia]

"Our votes must go together with our guns. After all, any vote we shall have, shall have been the product of the gun. The gun which produces the vote should remain its security officer - its guarantor. The people's votes and the people's guns are always inseparable twins." -Robert Mugabe

Saying quotes from the dictator president of Rhodesia Zimbabwe Future Second Rhodesia knows doesn't make your position true

[Sovaal]

Oh yeah?

Yeah, that's the opposite of stable.

Uh, it’s almost as if we’re fuckin joking.

[Hammer Britannia]

What is the purpose of this quote? It seems completely misplaced in relation to the rest of the conversation.

Probably trying to make a connection between tin pit dictators and guns right supporters.

Good job, you convinced us to not want gun control

[Infinite Coscotlan]

Yeah, that's the opposite of stable.

Never said it had to be stable. Reactor No.4 in Chernobyl wasn't stable, and yet it's still called a nuclear reactor.

And it melted just like your attempt at a reasoned argument.

Give us all reasons not to round up and imprison every firearm in the country?

[Kramanica]

Untrue. Not even ironclad wooden logs are stable artillery. I would know.

Oh yeah?

That is fucking glorious.

Slavs are an enlightened people.

[I Like Nukes]

Guns are cool, but if civilians have too many guns, the government has less control over them. As Lenin said: “One man with a gun can control 100 without one.”

[Sovaal]

Never said it had to be stable. Reactor No.4 in Chernobyl wasn't stable, and yet it's still called a nuclear reactor.

And it melted just like your attempt at a reasoned argument.

Give us all reasons not to round up and imprison every firearm in the country?

Because we live in the real world, where we have things called logistics.

And it’s kinda stupid to imprison objects.

[The Empire of Pretantia]

Never said it had to be stable. Reactor No.4 in Chernobyl wasn't stable, and yet it's still called a nuclear reactor.

And it melted just like your attempt at a reasoned argument.

Give us all reasons not to round up and imprison every firearm in the country?

It's a dumb idea.

[The New California Republic]

What is the purpose of this quote? It seems completely misplaced in relation to the rest of the conversation.

Probably trying to make a connection between tin pit dictators and guns right supporters.

If that is the intended purpose, then it fails miserably. The supposed "connection" is spurious to the extreme.

[Sovaal]

Guns are cool, but if civilians have too many guns, the government has less control over them. As Lenin said: “One man with a gun can control 100 without one.”

Good. Governments around the world are too powerful imho.

[Hammer Britannia]

Never said it had to be stable. Reactor No.4 in Chernobyl wasn't stable, and yet it's still called a nuclear reactor.

And it melted just like your attempt at a reasoned argument.

Give us all reasons not to round up and imprison every firearm in the country?

Because they are innocent guns?

Guns are cool, but if civilians have too many guns, the government has less control over them. As Lenin said: “One man with a gun can control 100 without one.”

>Says you like nukes
>Not An-cap

[The New California Republic]

Give us all reasons not to round up and imprison every firearm in the country?

Erm...you do realize that objects cannot be imprisoned, right?

...

Right?

[Sovaal]

Oh yeah?

That is fucking glorious.

Slavs are an enlightened people.

Jesus wore Adidas confirmed.

[Dylar]

Never said it had to be stable. Reactor No.4 in Chernobyl wasn't stable, and yet it's still called a nuclear reactor.

And it melted just like your attempt at a reasoned argument.

Give us all reasons not to round up and imprison every firearm in the country?

First, off, it's a meme, just like the last few posts related to Slavic artillery that I made. Wasn't meant to be a reasonable argument.

Secondly, you make firearms illegal, not everyone is going to turn them in resulting in pretty much a Second Civil War with firearm owners facing off against cops and soldiers.

[Kramanica]

That is fucking glorious.

Slavs are an enlightened people.

Jesus wore Adidas confirmed.

Dress shoes and track pants while squatting.

[Len Hyet]

Never said it had to be stable. Reactor No.4 in Chernobyl wasn't stable, and yet it's still called a nuclear reactor.

And it melted just like your attempt at a reasoned argument.

Give us all reasons not to round up and imprison every firearm in the country?

Civil War, the death of hundreds of thousands if not millions, the sheer logistical impossibility, the inevitable sundering of the United States into several fragmented new nations and the resulting outbreak of warfare across the globe that would result?

[The New California Republic]

Guns are cool, but if civilians have too many guns, the government has less control over them.

You say that as if it is a bad thing...?

[Ors Might]

Never said it had to be stable. Reactor No.4 in Chernobyl wasn't stable, and yet it's still called a nuclear reactor.

And it melted just like your attempt at a reasoned argument.

Give us all reasons not to round up and imprison every firearm in the country?

Good sir, if you can track down and successfully confiscate every single one of the 600+ million guns in the US, that will legitimately be impressive if tyrannical.

[Dylar]

Jesus wore Adidas confirmed.

Dress shoes and track pants while squatting.

And yells "Cyka Blyat" at the Pharisees

[Infinite Coscotlan]

And it melted just like your attempt at a reasoned argument.

Give us all reasons not to round up and imprison every firearm in the country?

First, off, it's a meme, just like the last few posts related to Slavic artillery that I made. Wasn't meant to be a reasonable argument.

Secondly, you make firearms illegal, not everyone is going to turn them in resulting in pretty much a Second Civil War with firearm owners facing off against cops and soldiers.

You overvalue the impact of private firearms. A fart in a puddle rather than a war, methinks.

[Ors Might]

First, off, it's a meme, just like the last few posts related to Slavic artillery that I made. Wasn't meant to be a reasonable argument.

Secondly, you make firearms illegal, not everyone is going to turn them in resulting in pretty much a Second Civil War with firearm owners facing off against cops and soldiers.

You overvalue the impact of private firearms. A fart in a puddle rather than a war, methinks.

You don’t think that banning guns in a nation like the US would result in mass conflict?

[Dylar]

First, off, it's a meme, just like the last few posts related to Slavic artillery that I made. Wasn't meant to be a reasonable argument.

Secondly, you make firearms illegal, not everyone is going to turn them in resulting in pretty much a Second Civil War with firearm owners facing off against cops and soldiers.

You overvalue the impact of private firearms. A fart in a puddle rather than a war, methinks.

You underestimate my power as a firearm owner. Remember Vietnam?

[Sovaal]

And it melted just like your attempt at a reasoned argument.

Give us all reasons not to round up and imprison every firearm in the country?

First, off, it's a meme, just like the last few posts related to Slavic artillery that I made. Wasn't meant to be a reasonable argument.

Secondly, you make firearms illegal, not everyone is going to turn them in resulting in pretty much a Second Civil War with firearm owners facing off against cops and soldiers.

It’s going to be worse then that. If it got to that point the government never probably doesn’t give much a shit about the Constitution any more, hell, a popular uprising may even be possible.

[The New California Republic]

You overvalue the impact of private firearms.

And you woefully underestimate the effect that a major crackdown on firearms would have. I mean, do you expect people to give them up willingly?

[Sovaal]

First, off, it's a meme, just like the last few posts related to Slavic artillery that I made. Wasn't meant to be a reasonable argument.

Secondly, you make firearms illegal, not everyone is going to turn them in resulting in pretty much a Second Civil War with firearm owners facing off against cops and soldiers.

You overvalue the impact of private firearms. A fart in a puddle rather than a war, methinks.

I’m running out of polite words here.

All I can say is that your scenario of a peaceful world if only we got rid of all the private guns is nothing but a fantasy world, and one that doesn’t even have good world building at that.