NATION

PASSWORD

Gun Control: Shiny Toy Guns

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Am I Right?

Yeah, mostly, seems agreeable.
156
22%
Dunno/Not sure/Not American and I think that matters
40
6%
Nah, you're crazy. Guns should be more restricted.
187
26%
Nah, you're crazy. Guns should be less restricted.
287
40%
JC Christ CM come back when the meds wear off
54
7%
 
Total votes : 724

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41258
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Sun Mar 25, 2018 5:23 pm

Kernen wrote:
Albrenia wrote:
That doesn't really matter though, because the combination of the 2nd Amendment and the pro-gun side sticking to their guns (pardon the pun) means that although they may be less numerous, a lot of them are willing to vote based on this one issue (which is understandable, considering to them it's a literal human right). The NRA is one expression of this effective use of their democratic power.

Also, as I said, the 2nd Amendment basically hands it to the pro-gun folks legally, so you guys might be stuck with them unless you're willing to amend your Constitution.

I'm anti-gun myself, by the way, I just try to see things from all sides.

The odds of this happening are so astronomically small that I actually lul'd. Its just not going to happen absent what will basically amount to a revolution.


Hasn't it happened like 27 times in the past?

User avatar
Licana
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16276
Founded: Jul 26, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Licana » Sun Mar 25, 2018 5:26 pm

Zyr and Pony wrote:As to those saying this movement is supporting a minority position, guess what? You're wrong.

A little quiz about Americans' opinions on specific types of gun control this movement is promoting. Every position, except a total gun ban which was also thrown in and not supported by them, has majority support, usually supermajority support.


>538

And yet, even this source makes this statement near the top of the article.

Americans’ support of gun laws is known to increase in the aftermath of a mass shooting, so these numbers may decrease as time (hopefully) passes without another incident.


Further, under what context are these questions asked? Do these people know how "strict" their gun laws are? Are their opinions coloured by the strictness (or lack thereof) of their state's gun laws? Do they know that any purchase coming through an FFL requires a background check already? Can they define what an "assault weapon" is? There's a lot of questions that can be asked that throw doubt in the usefulness of this poll in gauging popular support even without calling into question the demographics of those polled.
Last edited by Licana on Sun Mar 25, 2018 5:29 pm, edited 2 times in total.
>American education
[19:21] <Lubyak> I want to go and wank all over him.
Puzikas wrote:Gulf War One was like Slapstick: The War. Except, you know, up to 40,000 people died.

Vitaphone Racing wrote:Never in all my years have I seen someone actually quote the dictionary and still get the definition wrong.

Husseinarti wrote:
Vitaphone Racing wrote:Do lets. I really want to hear another explanation about dirty vaginas keeping women out of combat, despite the vagina being a self-cleaning organ.

So was the M-16.

Senestrum wrote:How are KEPs cowardly? Surely the "real man" would in fact be the one firing giant rods of nuclear waste at speeds best described as "hilarious".

User avatar
Kernen
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7723
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Kernen » Sun Mar 25, 2018 5:26 pm

Albrenia wrote:
Indeed. There's a reason why I don't argue over this topic for the US anymore. In my mind, we lost, you won and now we need to find other ways to fix the problems of mass shootings.


Glad to see some people on your side can see the writing on the wall.

The recent statistics do make it seem as though people on the whole support more gun control. But the trend over the last 30 years shows an overall progression in favor of gun rights over gun control, with only momentary spikes. where the gun grabbers are in the majority. I suspect this will settle relatively soon.
Last edited by Kernen on Sun Mar 25, 2018 5:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
From the throne of Khan Juk i'Behemoti, Juk Who-Is-The-Strength-of-the-Behemoth, Supreme Khan of the Ogres of Kernen. May the Khan ever drink the blood of his enemies!

Lawful Evil

Get abortions, do drugs, own guns, but never misstate legal procedure.

User avatar
Kernen
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7723
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Kernen » Sun Mar 25, 2018 5:27 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Kernen wrote:The odds of this happening are so astronomically small that I actually lul'd. Its just not going to happen absent what will basically amount to a revolution.


Hasn't it happened like 27 times in the past?

Not with a Bill of Rights amendment. There are more than a few differences between the Bill of Rights and the subsequent amendments.
From the throne of Khan Juk i'Behemoti, Juk Who-Is-The-Strength-of-the-Behemoth, Supreme Khan of the Ogres of Kernen. May the Khan ever drink the blood of his enemies!

Lawful Evil

Get abortions, do drugs, own guns, but never misstate legal procedure.

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41258
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Sun Mar 25, 2018 5:28 pm

Kernen wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
Hasn't it happened like 27 times in the past?

Not with a Bill of Rights amendment. There are more than a few differences between the Bill of Rights and the subsequent amendments.


Such as?

User avatar
Mujahidah
Minister
 
Posts: 2625
Founded: Mar 03, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Mujahidah » Sun Mar 25, 2018 5:29 pm

Kernen wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
Hasn't it happened like 27 times in the past?

Not with a Bill of Rights amendment. There are more than a few differences between the Bill of Rights and the subsequent amendments.


Legally speaking the Bill of Rights are just 10 Amendments that can be repealed just like any of the other ones can.
Your friendly, quirky neighborhood muslim girl
The Parkus Empire wrote:To paraphrase my hero, Richard Nixon: she's pink right down to her hijab.
The Parkus Empire wrote:I misjudged you, you are much more smarter than I gave you credit for.
Northern Davincia wrote:Can we engrave this in a plaque?
The Parkus Empire wrote:I am not sure I'm entirely comfortable with a woman being this well informed, but I'll try not to judge.
The Parkus Empire wrote:Ah, m'lady, if I were a heathen I'd wed thee four times

User avatar
Taihei Tengoku
Senator
 
Posts: 4851
Founded: Dec 15, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Taihei Tengoku » Sun Mar 25, 2018 5:31 pm

Torrocca wrote:
Taihei Tengoku wrote:There's only two tribes in this holler, and it's only big enough for one.


The True Red Tribe will beat down the Red Reappropriators!

You are about as blue as they come.
REST IN POWER
Franberry - HMS Barham - North Point - Questers - Tyrandis - Rosbaningrad - Sharfghotten
UNJUSTLY DELETED
OUR DAY WILL COME

User avatar
Kernen
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7723
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Kernen » Sun Mar 25, 2018 5:32 pm

Mujahidah wrote:
Kernen wrote:Not with a Bill of Rights amendment. There are more than a few differences between the Bill of Rights and the subsequent amendments.


Legally speaking the Bill of Rights are just 10 Amendments that can be repealed just like any of the other ones can.

D'aww.

Procedurally, yes. But they are the rights that were, in their original conception, were added because the Constitutional COnvention was unable to add them directly to the constitution at the time of drafting (if Founder correspondance is to be believed).

Amendments which guarantee substantive rights to individuals are guarded more jealously by courts and legislatures, and are therefore less likely to change.

Got anything else?
Last edited by Kernen on Sun Mar 25, 2018 5:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
From the throne of Khan Juk i'Behemoti, Juk Who-Is-The-Strength-of-the-Behemoth, Supreme Khan of the Ogres of Kernen. May the Khan ever drink the blood of his enemies!

Lawful Evil

Get abortions, do drugs, own guns, but never misstate legal procedure.

User avatar
Kernen
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7723
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Kernen » Sun Mar 25, 2018 5:32 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Kernen wrote:Not with a Bill of Rights amendment. There are more than a few differences between the Bill of Rights and the subsequent amendments.


Such as?


Kernen wrote:
Mujahidah wrote:
Legally speaking the Bill of Rights are just 10 Amendments that can be repealed just like any of the other ones can.

D'aww.

Procedurally, yes. But they are the rights that were, in their original conception, were added because the Constitutional COnvention was unable to add them directly to the constitution at the time of drafting (if Founder correspondance is to be believed).

Amendments which guarantee substantive rights to individuals are guarded more jealously by courts and legislatures, and are therefore less likely to change.

Got anything else?
Last edited by Kernen on Sun Mar 25, 2018 5:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
From the throne of Khan Juk i'Behemoti, Juk Who-Is-The-Strength-of-the-Behemoth, Supreme Khan of the Ogres of Kernen. May the Khan ever drink the blood of his enemies!

Lawful Evil

Get abortions, do drugs, own guns, but never misstate legal procedure.

User avatar
Torrocca
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27691
Founded: Dec 01, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Torrocca » Sun Mar 25, 2018 5:33 pm

Taihei Tengoku wrote:
Torrocca wrote:
The True Red Tribe will beat down the Red Reappropriators!

You are about as blue as they come.


>Anarchist
>Blue

weeeeew laddie
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
They call me Torra, but you can call me... anytime (☞⌐■_■)☞
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NOTICE 1: Anything depicted IC on this nation does NOT reflect my IRL views or values, and is not endorsed by me.
NOTICE 2: Most RP and every OOC post by me prior to 2023 are no longer endorsed nor tolerated by me. I've since put on my adult pants!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

User avatar
Mujahidah
Minister
 
Posts: 2625
Founded: Mar 03, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Mujahidah » Sun Mar 25, 2018 5:34 pm

Kernen wrote:
Mujahidah wrote:
Legally speaking the Bill of Rights are just 10 Amendments that can be repealed just like any of the other ones can.

D'aww.


This is an extension of "Don't call me cute," though I can't remember if that was directed at you or someone else. Regardless, knock it off.

Procedurally, yes.


Thats all that matters. Legally, if there was enough political support, they could be repealed.

But they are the rights that were, in their original conception, were added because the Constitutional COnvention was unable to add them directly to the constitution at the time of drafting (if the Federalist papers are to be believed)

Amendments which guarantee substantive rights to individuals are guarded more jealously by courts and legislatures, and are therefore less likely to change.


I only said that it could be repealed, not that it should be or realistically will be.

Got anything else?


What's that supposed to mean? I never said that it should be repealed.
Your friendly, quirky neighborhood muslim girl
The Parkus Empire wrote:To paraphrase my hero, Richard Nixon: she's pink right down to her hijab.
The Parkus Empire wrote:I misjudged you, you are much more smarter than I gave you credit for.
Northern Davincia wrote:Can we engrave this in a plaque?
The Parkus Empire wrote:I am not sure I'm entirely comfortable with a woman being this well informed, but I'll try not to judge.
The Parkus Empire wrote:Ah, m'lady, if I were a heathen I'd wed thee four times

User avatar
Gig em Aggies
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7709
Founded: Aug 15, 2009
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Gig em Aggies » Sun Mar 25, 2018 5:35 pm

Mujahidah wrote:
Kernen wrote:Not with a Bill of Rights amendment. There are more than a few differences between the Bill of Rights and the subsequent amendments.


Legally speaking the Bill of Rights are just 10 Amendments that can be repealed just like any of the other ones can.

And how many times has anyone even gotten to a committee to amend or repeal any one of the Bill of Rights amendments? 0% just because their called amendments doesn't mean they should be amended.
“One of the serious problems of planning against Aggie doctrine is that the Aggies do not read their manuals nor do they feel any obligations to follow their doctrine.”
“The reason that the Aggies does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the Aggies practices chaos on a daily basis.”
“If we don’t know what we are doing, the enemy certainly can’t anticipate our future actions!”

User avatar
Mujahidah
Minister
 
Posts: 2625
Founded: Mar 03, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Mujahidah » Sun Mar 25, 2018 5:36 pm

Gig em Aggies wrote:
Mujahidah wrote:
Legally speaking the Bill of Rights are just 10 Amendments that can be repealed just like any of the other ones can.

And how many times has anyone even gotten to a committee to amend or repeal any one of the Bill of Rights amendments? 0% just because their called amendments doesn't mean they should be amended.


Where did I advocate for repealing the 2A or did I say that such activity was practical?
Your friendly, quirky neighborhood muslim girl
The Parkus Empire wrote:To paraphrase my hero, Richard Nixon: she's pink right down to her hijab.
The Parkus Empire wrote:I misjudged you, you are much more smarter than I gave you credit for.
Northern Davincia wrote:Can we engrave this in a plaque?
The Parkus Empire wrote:I am not sure I'm entirely comfortable with a woman being this well informed, but I'll try not to judge.
The Parkus Empire wrote:Ah, m'lady, if I were a heathen I'd wed thee four times

User avatar
Kernen
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7723
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Kernen » Sun Mar 25, 2018 5:37 pm

Mujahidah wrote:This is an extension of "Don't call me cute," though I can't remember if that was directed at you or someone else. Regardless, knock it off.

If you can't handle contempt toward your arguments, I can't help you. Block me?


Thats all that matters. Legally, if there was enough political support, they could be repealed.

Oh dear. No, realistically, that is not the case. It is theoretically possible for my Constitutional Textbook's atoms to all rearrange themselves into gold. It is so unlikely as to be virtually impossible.

I only said that it could be repealed, not that it should be or realistically will be.


Any my open contempt at that argument is focused entirely on the realism, not the legal possibility. Textbook. Atoms.
From the throne of Khan Juk i'Behemoti, Juk Who-Is-The-Strength-of-the-Behemoth, Supreme Khan of the Ogres of Kernen. May the Khan ever drink the blood of his enemies!

Lawful Evil

Get abortions, do drugs, own guns, but never misstate legal procedure.

User avatar
Taihei Tengoku
Senator
 
Posts: 4851
Founded: Dec 15, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Taihei Tengoku » Sun Mar 25, 2018 5:38 pm

Torrocca wrote:
Taihei Tengoku wrote:You are about as blue as they come.


>Anarchist
>Blue

weeeeew laddie

Whatever buzzword you describe yourself with is far less important than the cultural milieu you were raised in--and that you are splitting hairs over what word describes your specific ideology gives your Blueness away. You are a Blue Triber through and through, wishing to make the world one big university campus governed by thousands of student unions.
REST IN POWER
Franberry - HMS Barham - North Point - Questers - Tyrandis - Rosbaningrad - Sharfghotten
UNJUSTLY DELETED
OUR DAY WILL COME

User avatar
Gig em Aggies
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7709
Founded: Aug 15, 2009
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Gig em Aggies » Sun Mar 25, 2018 5:38 pm

Mujahidah wrote:
Gig em Aggies wrote:And how many times has anyone even gotten to a committee to amend or repeal any one of the Bill of Rights amendments? 0% just because their called amendments doesn't mean they should be amended.


Where did I advocate for repealing the 2A or did I say that such activity was practical?

Legally speaking the Bill of Rights are just 10 Amendments that can be repealed just like any of the other ones can.

Right here since you seem to forget what you write one or two posts ago.
“One of the serious problems of planning against Aggie doctrine is that the Aggies do not read their manuals nor do they feel any obligations to follow their doctrine.”
“The reason that the Aggies does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the Aggies practices chaos on a daily basis.”
“If we don’t know what we are doing, the enemy certainly can’t anticipate our future actions!”

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41258
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Sun Mar 25, 2018 5:38 pm

Kernen wrote:
Mujahidah wrote:This is an extension of "Don't call me cute," though I can't remember if that was directed at you or someone else. Regardless, knock it off.

If you can't handle contempt toward your arguments, I can't help you. Block me?


Thats all that matters. Legally, if there was enough political support, they could be repealed.

Oh dear. No, realistically, that is not the case. It is theoretically possible for my Constitutional Textbook's atoms to all rearrange themselves into gold. It is so unlikely as to be virtually impossible.

I only said that it could be repealed, not that it should be or realistically will be.


Any my open contempt at that argument is focused entirely on the realism, not the legal possibility. Textbook. Atoms.


Stop being an ass. This is a thread for debate and discussion.

User avatar
Torrocca
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27691
Founded: Dec 01, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Torrocca » Sun Mar 25, 2018 5:40 pm

Taihei Tengoku wrote:
Torrocca wrote:
>Anarchist
>Blue

weeeeew laddie

Whatever buzzword you describe yourself with is far less important than the cultural milieu you were raised in--and that you are splitting hairs over what word describes your specific ideology gives your Blueness away. You are a Blue Triber through and through, wishing to make the world one big university campus governed by thousands of student unions.


f a l s e
a
l
s
e

I'm an anarchist through and through :^)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
They call me Torra, but you can call me... anytime (☞⌐■_■)☞
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NOTICE 1: Anything depicted IC on this nation does NOT reflect my IRL views or values, and is not endorsed by me.
NOTICE 2: Most RP and every OOC post by me prior to 2023 are no longer endorsed nor tolerated by me. I've since put on my adult pants!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

User avatar
Mujahidah
Minister
 
Posts: 2625
Founded: Mar 03, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Mujahidah » Sun Mar 25, 2018 5:40 pm

Gig em Aggies wrote:
Mujahidah wrote:
Where did I advocate for repealing the 2A or did I say that such activity was practical?

Legally speaking the Bill of Rights are just 10 Amendments that can be repealed just like any of the other ones can.

Right here since you seem to forget what you write one or two posts ago.


Thats not advocacy. I was pointing out that it could happen. I didn't say should. In fact, I believe that it should remain.
Your friendly, quirky neighborhood muslim girl
The Parkus Empire wrote:To paraphrase my hero, Richard Nixon: she's pink right down to her hijab.
The Parkus Empire wrote:I misjudged you, you are much more smarter than I gave you credit for.
Northern Davincia wrote:Can we engrave this in a plaque?
The Parkus Empire wrote:I am not sure I'm entirely comfortable with a woman being this well informed, but I'll try not to judge.
The Parkus Empire wrote:Ah, m'lady, if I were a heathen I'd wed thee four times

User avatar
Gig em Aggies
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7709
Founded: Aug 15, 2009
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Gig em Aggies » Sun Mar 25, 2018 5:40 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Kernen wrote:If you can't handle contempt toward your arguments, I can't help you. Block me?



Oh dear. No, realistically, that is not the case. It is theoretically possible for my Constitutional Textbook's atoms to all rearrange themselves into gold. It is so unlikely as to be virtually impossible.



Any my open contempt at that argument is focused entirely on the realism, not the legal possibility. Textbook. Atoms.


Stop being an ass. This is a thread for debate and discussion.

And yet most of the time we all act like an ass but at least we still debate doesn't mean we can't act like an ass.
“One of the serious problems of planning against Aggie doctrine is that the Aggies do not read their manuals nor do they feel any obligations to follow their doctrine.”
“The reason that the Aggies does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the Aggies practices chaos on a daily basis.”
“If we don’t know what we are doing, the enemy certainly can’t anticipate our future actions!”

User avatar
Kernen
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7723
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Kernen » Sun Mar 25, 2018 5:42 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Kernen wrote:If you can't handle contempt toward your arguments, I can't help you. Block me?



Oh dear. No, realistically, that is not the case. It is theoretically possible for my Constitutional Textbook's atoms to all rearrange themselves into gold. It is so unlikely as to be virtually impossible.



Any my open contempt at that argument is focused entirely on the realism, not the legal possibility. Textbook. Atoms.


Stop being an ass. This is a thread for debate and discussion.



I'm an ass. Its my schtick. I'm a bad person primarily because I'm an ass. Its why I'm studying law. Gotta channel that bad juju.

Granted, I only care about arguments. The people behind them are, on the whole, fine.
From the throne of Khan Juk i'Behemoti, Juk Who-Is-The-Strength-of-the-Behemoth, Supreme Khan of the Ogres of Kernen. May the Khan ever drink the blood of his enemies!

Lawful Evil

Get abortions, do drugs, own guns, but never misstate legal procedure.

User avatar
Gig em Aggies
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7709
Founded: Aug 15, 2009
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Gig em Aggies » Sun Mar 25, 2018 5:42 pm

Mujahidah wrote:
Gig em Aggies wrote:Legally speaking the Bill of Rights are just 10 Amendments that can be repealed just like any of the other ones can.

Right here since you seem to forget what you write one or two posts ago.


Thats not advocacy. I was pointing out that it could happen. I didn't say should. In fact, I believe that it should remain.

Well if you want it to remain then don't bring hypothetical what ifs into the debate they mean nothing.
“One of the serious problems of planning against Aggie doctrine is that the Aggies do not read their manuals nor do they feel any obligations to follow their doctrine.”
“The reason that the Aggies does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the Aggies practices chaos on a daily basis.”
“If we don’t know what we are doing, the enemy certainly can’t anticipate our future actions!”

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41258
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Sun Mar 25, 2018 5:50 pm

Gig em Aggies wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
Stop being an ass. This is a thread for debate and discussion.

And yet most of the time we all act like an ass but at least we still debate doesn't mean we can't act like an ass.


Manners maketh man.

User avatar
Kernen
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7723
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Kernen » Sun Mar 25, 2018 5:57 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Gig em Aggies wrote:And yet most of the time we all act like an ass but at least we still debate doesn't mean we can't act like an ass.


Manners maketh man.


Take all the fools out of this world and there wouldn't be any fun living in it, or profit. I'm just providing a service.
From the throne of Khan Juk i'Behemoti, Juk Who-Is-The-Strength-of-the-Behemoth, Supreme Khan of the Ogres of Kernen. May the Khan ever drink the blood of his enemies!

Lawful Evil

Get abortions, do drugs, own guns, but never misstate legal procedure.

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41258
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Sun Mar 25, 2018 5:58 pm

Kernen wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
Manners maketh man.


Take all the fools out of this world and there wouldn't be any fun living in it, or profit. I'm just providing a service.


*locks you in a pub with me*

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: El Lazaro, Hurdergaryp, Ifreann, Mel-akkam, Necroghastia, Port Caverton, Ryemarch, Shrillland, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads