NATION

PASSWORD

Gun Control: Shiny Toy Guns

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Am I Right?

Yeah, mostly, seems agreeable.
156
22%
Dunno/Not sure/Not American and I think that matters
40
6%
Nah, you're crazy. Guns should be more restricted.
187
26%
Nah, you're crazy. Guns should be less restricted.
287
40%
JC Christ CM come back when the meds wear off
54
7%
 
Total votes : 724

User avatar
Hallistrom
Envoy
 
Posts: 221
Founded: Jan 25, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Hallistrom » Sat Mar 17, 2018 5:07 am

Big Jim P wrote:
Hallistrom wrote:
Fixed that for you. Seriously though what compromise do you want? I cant think of any that would satisfy the 'cold dead hands' crowd. And as you lot throw a fit over even a proposal to have a discussion on an assault weapons ban, I don't see anything productive in inviting you to the table.


We won't "compromise" because 1.compromise is a two way transaction and gun-grabbers aren't giving up anything. 2. Every time we given up a portion of our rights gun-grabbers then demand more. 3. Todays "compromise" becomes tomorrows loophole and 4. Gun-grabbers for the most part have absolutely no clue (not even the minimum basics) of guns. I could go on, but the first point in and of itself is sufficient reason to not trust or accept gun-grabbers proposals.



'Gun grabbers' Fucking hell. :roll:
Well, I'm bored. Let's go get drunk!

User avatar
Hallistrom
Envoy
 
Posts: 221
Founded: Jan 25, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Hallistrom » Sat Mar 17, 2018 5:08 am

Big Jim P wrote:
Ors Might wrote:Haven’t seen anything to suggest that he’s far right. Honestly, that just seems your go to insult for those that disagree with you.


Typical leftist/gun-grabber tactic. When you can't win a debate on facts, hurl a personal insult. :roll:


Irony.
Well, I'm bored. Let's go get drunk!

User avatar
Ors Might
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8519
Founded: Nov 01, 2016
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Ors Might » Sat Mar 17, 2018 5:09 am

Hallistrom wrote:
Big Jim P wrote:
We won't "compromise" because 1.compromise is a two way transaction and gun-grabbers aren't giving up anything. 2. Every time we given up a portion of our rights gun-grabbers then demand more. 3. Todays "compromise" becomes tomorrows loophole and 4. Gun-grabbers for the most part have absolutely no clue (not even the minimum basics) of guns. I could go on, but the first point in and of itself is sufficient reason to not trust or accept gun-grabbers proposals.



'Gun grabbers' Fucking hell. :roll:

Given how many gun control activists are happy to use terms like ‘gun nuts’ it’s not unwarranted.
https://youtu.be/gvjOG5gboFU Best diss track of all time

User avatar
Hallistrom
Envoy
 
Posts: 221
Founded: Jan 25, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Hallistrom » Sat Mar 17, 2018 5:12 am

Ors Might wrote:
Hallistrom wrote:

'Gun grabbers' Fucking hell. :roll:

Given how many gun control activists are happy to use terms like ‘gun nuts’ it’s not unwarranted.


I was just noting the irony in whining about personal attacks while attack GC supporters as 'gun grabbers'.
Well, I'm bored. Let's go get drunk!

User avatar
Big Jim P
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55158
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Big Jim P » Sat Mar 17, 2018 5:20 am

Hallistrom wrote:
Ors Might wrote:Given how many gun control activists are happy to use terms like ‘gun nuts’ it’s not unwarranted.


I was just noting the irony in whining about personal attacks while attack GC supporters as 'gun grabbers'.


That wasn't a personal attack. It was a descriptive term.
Hail Satan!
Happily married to Roan Cara, The first RL NS marriage, and Pope Joan is my Father-in-law.
I edit my posts to fix typos.

User avatar
Hallistrom
Envoy
 
Posts: 221
Founded: Jan 25, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Hallistrom » Sat Mar 17, 2018 5:21 am

Big Jim P wrote:
Hallistrom wrote:
I was just noting the irony in whining about personal attacks while attack GC supporters as 'gun grabbers'.


That wasn't a personal attack. It was a descriptive term.


No it's an attack.
Well, I'm bored. Let's go get drunk!

User avatar
Big Jim P
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55158
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Big Jim P » Sat Mar 17, 2018 5:24 am

Hallistrom wrote:
Big Jim P wrote:
That wasn't a personal attack. It was a descriptive term.


No it's an attack.


Whatever helps you sleep at night. :roll:
Hail Satan!
Happily married to Roan Cara, The first RL NS marriage, and Pope Joan is my Father-in-law.
I edit my posts to fix typos.

User avatar
Hallistrom
Envoy
 
Posts: 221
Founded: Jan 25, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Hallistrom » Sat Mar 17, 2018 5:26 am

Big Jim P wrote:
Hallistrom wrote:
No it's an attack.


Whatever helps you sleep at night. :roll:


So you admit it's a slur?
Well, I'm bored. Let's go get drunk!

User avatar
Big Jim P
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55158
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Big Jim P » Sat Mar 17, 2018 5:33 am

Hallistrom wrote:
Big Jim P wrote:
Whatever helps you sleep at night. :roll:


So you admit it's a slur?


No, as I said, it is a descriptive term. Would you prefer I use the term "gun control freak"?
Hail Satan!
Happily married to Roan Cara, The first RL NS marriage, and Pope Joan is my Father-in-law.
I edit my posts to fix typos.

User avatar
Len Hyet
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10798
Founded: Jun 25, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Len Hyet » Sat Mar 17, 2018 5:33 am

Hallistrom wrote:
Big Jim P wrote:
Whatever helps you sleep at night. :roll:


So you admit it's a slur?

No more than gun nut or gun stroker is. It's a descriptive term. You want to take people's guns away, hence gun grabber.
=][= Founder, 1st NSG Irregulars. Our Militia is Well Regulated and Well Lubricated!
On a formerly defunct now re-declared one-man campaign to elevate the discourse of you heathens.
American 2L. No I will not answer your legal question.

User avatar
Big Jim P
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55158
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Big Jim P » Sat Mar 17, 2018 5:40 am

Len Hyet wrote:
Hallistrom wrote:
So you admit it's a slur?

No more than gun nut or gun stroker is. It's a descriptive term. You want to take people's guns away, hence gun grabber.


The difference being, we (I) don't get our panties in a wad when we get called gun nut or gun stroker. I prefer "ammosexual" personally.
Hail Satan!
Happily married to Roan Cara, The first RL NS marriage, and Pope Joan is my Father-in-law.
I edit my posts to fix typos.

User avatar
Hallistrom
Envoy
 
Posts: 221
Founded: Jan 25, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Hallistrom » Sat Mar 17, 2018 5:53 am

Len Hyet wrote:
Hallistrom wrote:
So you admit it's a slur?

No more than gun nut or gun stroker is. It's a descriptive term. You want to take people's guns away, hence gun grabber.


Well no I want to take guns away from people who throw a fit if they hear the words 'gun control' or call themselves 'ammosexuals'.
Well, I'm bored. Let's go get drunk!

User avatar
Big Jim P
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55158
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Big Jim P » Sat Mar 17, 2018 5:57 am

Hallistrom wrote:
Len Hyet wrote:No more than gun nut or gun stroker is. It's a descriptive term. You want to take people's guns away, hence gun grabber.


Well no I want to take guns away from people who throw a fit if they hear the words 'gun control' or call themselves 'ammosexuals'.


Calling myself an ammosexual is insufficient reason to restrict my right to bear arms. Please feel free to try and find another excuse.
Hail Satan!
Happily married to Roan Cara, The first RL NS marriage, and Pope Joan is my Father-in-law.
I edit my posts to fix typos.

User avatar
Gig em Aggies
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7728
Founded: Aug 15, 2009
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Gig em Aggies » Sat Mar 17, 2018 5:57 am

Hallistrom wrote:
Len Hyet wrote:No more than gun nut or gun stroker is. It's a descriptive term. You want to take people's guns away, hence gun grabber.


Well no I want to take guns away from people who throw a fit if they hear the words 'gun control' or call themselves 'ammosexuals'.

Then your technically a gun grabber how hard is that to comprehend plus calling one self a ammosexual is no reason to take away someone's guns so by your amazing logic I can takeaway someone's home or car if they call themselves a homosexual?
“One of the serious problems of planning against Aggie doctrine is that the Aggies do not read their manuals nor do they feel any obligations to follow their doctrine.”
“The reason that the Aggies does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the Aggies practices chaos on a daily basis.”
“If we don’t know what we are doing, the enemy certainly can’t anticipate our future actions!”

User avatar
Big Jim P
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55158
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Big Jim P » Sat Mar 17, 2018 6:00 am

Gig em Aggies wrote:
Hallistrom wrote:
Well no I want to take guns away from people who throw a fit if they hear the words 'gun control' or call themselves 'ammosexuals'.

Then your technically a gun grabber how hard is that to comprehend plus calling one self a ammosexual is no reason to take away someone's guns so by your amazing logic I can takeaway someone's home or car if they call themselves a homosexual?


Especially funny since the gun-grabbers coined the term "ammosexual". I am just seizing it for our side. :D
Hail Satan!
Happily married to Roan Cara, The first RL NS marriage, and Pope Joan is my Father-in-law.
I edit my posts to fix typos.

User avatar
Kernen
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9967
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Kernen » Sat Mar 17, 2018 6:06 am

Hallistrom wrote:
Len Hyet wrote:No more than gun nut or gun stroker is. It's a descriptive term. You want to take people's guns away, hence gun grabber.


Well no I want to take guns away from people who throw a fit if they hear the words 'gun control' or call themselves 'ammosexuals'.


You're really bad at due process of law.
From the throne of Khan Juk i'Behemoti, Juk Who-Is-The-Strength-of-the-Behemoth, Supreme Khan of the Ogres of Kernen. May the Khan ever drink the blood of his enemies!

Lawful Evil

Get abortions, do drugs, own guns, but never misstate legal procedure.

User avatar
Len Hyet
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10798
Founded: Jun 25, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Len Hyet » Sat Mar 17, 2018 6:18 am

Hallistrom wrote:
Len Hyet wrote:No more than gun nut or gun stroker is. It's a descriptive term. You want to take people's guns away, hence gun grabber.


Well no I want to take guns away from people who throw a fit if they hear the words 'gun control' or call themselves 'ammosexuals'.

Stop shaming my sexual orientation you bigot
=][= Founder, 1st NSG Irregulars. Our Militia is Well Regulated and Well Lubricated!
On a formerly defunct now re-declared one-man campaign to elevate the discourse of you heathens.
American 2L. No I will not answer your legal question.

User avatar
Big Jim P
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55158
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Big Jim P » Sat Mar 17, 2018 6:24 am

Len Hyet wrote:
Hallistrom wrote:
Well no I want to take guns away from people who throw a fit if they hear the words 'gun control' or call themselves 'ammosexuals'.

Stop shaming my sexual orientation you bigot


Phobes gonna phobe. >:(
Hail Satan!
Happily married to Roan Cara, The first RL NS marriage, and Pope Joan is my Father-in-law.
I edit my posts to fix typos.

User avatar
The Two Jerseys
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20989
Founded: Jun 07, 2012
Father Knows Best State

Postby The Two Jerseys » Sat Mar 17, 2018 6:41 am

Hallistrom wrote:
Grinning Dragon wrote:I don't understand how a school can claim authority over a student, when said student isn't on school grounds, let alone dictate what said student can or cannot do on THEIR time.
NJ Gun Clubs Threaten Lawsuit Over Lacy Township Students’ Gun Range Photos




This is clearly unconstitutional, and an egregious power grab by school admins.


The source is literally a site called 'Ammoland' are you fucking kidding me? :roll:

Fine then, now go home and get your fucking shinebox.
"The Duke of Texas" is too formal for regular use. Just call me "Your Grace".
"If I would like to watch goodness, sanity, God and logic being fucked I would watch Japanese porn." -Nightkill the Emperor
"This thread makes me wish I was a moron so that I wouldn't have to comprehend how stupid the topic is." -The Empire of Pretantia
Head of State: HM King Louis
Head of Government: The Rt. Hon. James O'Dell MP, Prime Minister
Ambassador to the World Assembly: HE Sir John Ross "J.R." Ewing II, Bt.
Join Excalibur Squadron. We're Commandos who fly Spitfires. Chicks dig Commandos who fly Spitfires.

User avatar
Paddy O Fernature
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13802
Founded: Sep 30, 2010
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Paddy O Fernature » Sat Mar 17, 2018 6:52 am

Found this today on my news feed, couldn't help but laugh a little inside at the misplaced priorities.

Proud Co-Founder of The Axis Commonwealth - Would you like to know more?
SJW! Why? Some nobody on the internet who has never met me accused me of being one, so it absolutely MUST be true! *Nod Nod*

User avatar
The Two Jerseys
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20989
Founded: Jun 07, 2012
Father Knows Best State

Postby The Two Jerseys » Sat Mar 17, 2018 7:04 am

Paddy O Fernature wrote:Found this today on my news feed, couldn't help but laugh a little inside at the misplaced priorities.

Remember folks, this is the same city where knife control results in your neck being broken in a police van.
"The Duke of Texas" is too formal for regular use. Just call me "Your Grace".
"If I would like to watch goodness, sanity, God and logic being fucked I would watch Japanese porn." -Nightkill the Emperor
"This thread makes me wish I was a moron so that I wouldn't have to comprehend how stupid the topic is." -The Empire of Pretantia
Head of State: HM King Louis
Head of Government: The Rt. Hon. James O'Dell MP, Prime Minister
Ambassador to the World Assembly: HE Sir John Ross "J.R." Ewing II, Bt.
Join Excalibur Squadron. We're Commandos who fly Spitfires. Chicks dig Commandos who fly Spitfires.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68115
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Sat Mar 17, 2018 8:32 am

Grinning Dragon wrote:I don't understand how a school can claim authority over a student, when said student isn't on school grounds, let alone dictate what said student can or cannot do on THEIR time.
NJ Gun Clubs Threaten Lawsuit Over Lacy Township Students’ Gun Range Photos
Two students at Lacey Township High-school, NJ were suspended for posting a picture of themselves shooting guns at a private gun range with the caption “fun day at the range“. The school's zero tolerance policy says that students cannot be in possession of weapons at any time, whether on or off campus


Image


This is clearly unconstitutional, and an egregious power grab by school admins.


I take it you have similar problems with the schools that threatened to suspend or otherwise sanction students for engaging in the walk-outs, thus denying them their first amendment rights?
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
The Empire of Pretantia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39273
Founded: Oct 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Empire of Pretantia » Sat Mar 17, 2018 8:36 am

Vassenor wrote:
Grinning Dragon wrote:I don't understand how a school can claim authority over a student, when said student isn't on school grounds, let alone dictate what said student can or cannot do on THEIR time.
NJ Gun Clubs Threaten Lawsuit Over Lacy Township Students’ Gun Range Photos


Image


This is clearly unconstitutional, and an egregious power grab by school admins.


I take it you have similar problems with the schools that threatened to suspend or otherwise sanction students for engaging in the walk-outs, thus denying them their first amendment rights?

If you don't show up for school you're breaking the rules.
ywn be as good as this video
Gacha
Trashing other people's waifus
Anti-NN
EA
Douche flutes
Zimbabwe
Putting the toilet paper roll the wrong way
Every single square inch of Asia
Lewding Earth-chan
Pollution
4Chan in all its glory and all its horror
Playing the little Switch controller handheld thing in public
Treading on me
Socialism, Communism, Anarchism, and all their cousins and sisters and brothers and wife's sons
Alternate Universe 40K
Nightcore
Comcast
Zimbabwe
Believing the Ottomans were the third Roman Empire
Parodies of the Gadsden flag
The Fate Series
US politics

User avatar
Gig em Aggies
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7728
Founded: Aug 15, 2009
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Gig em Aggies » Sat Mar 17, 2018 8:36 am

Vassenor wrote:
Grinning Dragon wrote:I don't understand how a school can claim authority over a student, when said student isn't on school grounds, let alone dictate what said student can or cannot do on THEIR time.
NJ Gun Clubs Threaten Lawsuit Over Lacy Township Students’ Gun Range Photos


Image


This is clearly unconstitutional, and an egregious power grab by school admins.


I take it you have similar problems with the schools that threatened to suspend or otherwise sanction students for engaging in the walk-outs, thus denying them their first amendment rights?
first of all walking out is disruptive to those who dont want to participate. 2nd students go to school to learn not play politics. 3rd most of them most likely did it to just get out of class.
“One of the serious problems of planning against Aggie doctrine is that the Aggies do not read their manuals nor do they feel any obligations to follow their doctrine.”
“The reason that the Aggies does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the Aggies practices chaos on a daily basis.”
“If we don’t know what we are doing, the enemy certainly can’t anticipate our future actions!”

User avatar
Spirit of Hope
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12484
Founded: Feb 21, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Spirit of Hope » Sat Mar 17, 2018 8:36 am

Vassenor wrote:
Grinning Dragon wrote:I don't understand how a school can claim authority over a student, when said student isn't on school grounds, let alone dictate what said student can or cannot do on THEIR time.
NJ Gun Clubs Threaten Lawsuit Over Lacy Township Students’ Gun Range Photos


Image


This is clearly unconstitutional, and an egregious power grab by school admins.


I take it you have similar problems with the schools that threatened to suspend or otherwise sanction students for engaging in the walk-outs, thus denying them their first amendment rights?

One of those events happens on campus during school hours the other happened off school campus outside of school hours. If students want to protest and not get punished their are a number of avenues for them to do that without disrupting others classroom experience, and depending on how the walk out is handled it may meet this criteria. Shooting a gun off campus and outside of school hours does not in any way disrupt the classroom.
Fact Book.
Helpful hints on combat vehicle terminology.

Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Corporate Collective Salvation, Elejamie, Emotional Support Crocodile, Hidrandia, Lagene, New Heldervinia, The Greater Ohio Valley, The Matthew Islands, W3C [Validator]

Advertisement

Remove ads