NATION

PASSWORD

Economics Discussion Thread

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

To which school of economics do you personally prescribe?

Monetarist/Chicago-School
7
3%
Keynesian/Neo-Keynesian/New Keynesian/Post-Keynesian
51
24%
Neoclassical
6
3%
Austrian-School
31
14%
Mercantilist
6
3%
Classical
5
2%
Corporatist
11
5%
American/National
15
7%
Marxian/Socialist
60
28%
Other
23
11%
 
Total votes : 215

Donut section
 
Founded:

Postby Donut section » Wed Nov 29, 2017 11:49 pm

Constantinopolis wrote:
Donut section wrote:News just in forced labor camps are ok!

Stalin, Stalin's got the nerve of steel / Mess with him and you will know the feel :lol:

(non-sequitur comment gets non-sequitur response, but this also requires a disclaimer: joking aside, I absolutely do not support Stalin... in case anyone was wondering. Stalinism was a horrible thing.)


And yet Stalinism isn't the logical outcome of socialism or something?

User avatar
Constantinopolis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7501
Founded: Antiquity
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Constantinopolis » Wed Nov 29, 2017 11:53 pm

Donut section wrote:
Constantinopolis wrote:Stalin, Stalin's got the nerve of steel / Mess with him and you will know the feel :lol:

(non-sequitur comment gets non-sequitur response, but this also requires a disclaimer: joking aside, I absolutely do not support Stalin... in case anyone was wondering. Stalinism was a horrible thing.)

And yet Stalinism isn't the logical outcome of socialism or something?

Stalinism isn't even the logical outcome of Stalinism, as you know, because it ended within 3 years after Stalin died and then the USSR went on to exist for over 30 more years.
The Holy Socialist Republic of Constantinopolis
"Only a life lived for others is a life worthwhile." -- Albert Einstein
Political Compass: Economic Left/Right: -10.00 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.64
________________Communist. Leninist. Orthodox Christian.________________
Communism is the logical conclusion of Christian morality. "Whoever loves his neighbor as himself owns no more than his neighbor does", in the words of St. Basil the Great. The anti-theism of past Leninists was a tragic mistake, and the Church should be an ally of the working class.
My posts on the 12 Great Feasts of the Orthodox Church: -I- -II- -III- -IV- -V- -VI- -VII- -VIII- [PASCHA] -IX- -X- -XI- -XII-

Donut section
 
Founded:

Postby Donut section » Thu Nov 30, 2017 12:07 am

Constantinopolis wrote:
Donut section wrote:And yet Stalinism isn't the logical outcome of socialism or something?

Stalinism isn't even the logical outcome of Stalinism, as you know, because it ended within 3 years after Stalin died and then the USSR went on to exist for over 30 more years.


So there's no link between a psycho taking control and just killing folks and a socialist revolution?
Because every major socialist revolution I know Russia, china and North Korea it happened.

User avatar
Constantinopolis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7501
Founded: Antiquity
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Constantinopolis » Thu Nov 30, 2017 12:34 am

Donut section wrote:
Constantinopolis wrote:Stalinism isn't even the logical outcome of Stalinism, as you know, because it ended within 3 years after Stalin died and then the USSR went on to exist for over 30 more years.

So there's no link between a psycho taking control and just killing folks and a socialist revolution?
Because every major socialist revolution I know Russia, china and North Korea it happened.

Well there's a link between violent revolution and violence happening, yes.

But that's hardly limited to socialist revolutions. When someone takes power somewhere through armed struggle, people usually get killed.

The question, then, is whether it is possible to move from capitalism to socialism without armed struggle. I am not sure.
Last edited by Constantinopolis on Thu Nov 30, 2017 12:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
The Holy Socialist Republic of Constantinopolis
"Only a life lived for others is a life worthwhile." -- Albert Einstein
Political Compass: Economic Left/Right: -10.00 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.64
________________Communist. Leninist. Orthodox Christian.________________
Communism is the logical conclusion of Christian morality. "Whoever loves his neighbor as himself owns no more than his neighbor does", in the words of St. Basil the Great. The anti-theism of past Leninists was a tragic mistake, and the Church should be an ally of the working class.
My posts on the 12 Great Feasts of the Orthodox Church: -I- -II- -III- -IV- -V- -VI- -VII- -VIII- [PASCHA] -IX- -X- -XI- -XII-

Donut section
 
Founded:

Postby Donut section » Thu Nov 30, 2017 12:41 am

Constantinopolis wrote:
Donut section wrote:So there's no link between a psycho taking control and just killing folks and a socialist revolution?
Because every major socialist revolution I know Russia, china and North Korea it happened.

Well there's a link between violent revolution and violence happening, yes.

But that's hardly limited to socialist revolutions. When someone takes power somewhere through armed struggle, people usually get killed.

The question, then, is whether it is possible to move from capitalism to socialism without armed struggle. I am not sure.


It's not. Nobody wants an objectively worse system. It needs violence to quail reasonable people into submission and keep them there. Hence the Stalins.

User avatar
Constantinopolis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7501
Founded: Antiquity
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Constantinopolis » Thu Nov 30, 2017 12:57 am

Donut section wrote:
Constantinopolis wrote:Well there's a link between violent revolution and violence happening, yes.

But that's hardly limited to socialist revolutions. When someone takes power somewhere through armed struggle, people usually get killed.

The question, then, is whether it is possible to move from capitalism to socialism without armed struggle. I am not sure.

It's not. Nobody wants an objectively worse system. It needs violence to quail reasonable people into submission and keep them there. Hence the Stalins.

Objectively worse than what?

In Russia, the socialist system replaced an ambiguous provisional government, which itself had replaced the Tsar. All during a catastrophic world war, which Russia was losing, and German troops were continually gaining ground.
In China, the country had been at war for decades - first a civil war, then war with Japan, then a civil war again - and the Communist victory was the thing that ended the war-without-end.
In North Korea, the country had been under Imperial Japanese occupation for over 30 years before Kim took over.

Even if you think socialism is objectively worse than capitalism, history doesn't usually provide countries with such neat choices. In the real world, you don't get to choose between socialism and capitalism. You get to choose between socialism and foreign occupation, or between socialism and a continued civil war. So the idea that violence is necessary to "quail reasonable people into submission" doesn't actually hold water, because in many cases, the realistic alternative to socialism isn't something that reasonable people would actually want. Most violent revolutions, including socialist ones, tend to happen under desperate and extreme circumstances. Because revolutions kill people, and everyone knows that, so you generally only get a revolution when there is already violence going on and most people feel their lives are at risk anyway - so, what the hell, might as well go for revolution.

But even when the threat of foreign occupation or civil war doesn't loom over people's heads... Tell me, if given the choice between the Soviet Union and present-day Russia, what do you think most Russians would choose? A lot of polls say they would choose the USSR.

So much for "objectively worse". Objectively worse than some ideal capitalism, maybe. But not objectively worse than the realistic alternative.

You see, real-world socialism doesn't need to be better than some perfect, ideal capitalism. It only needs to be better than the kind of capitalism that most people can realistically expect to get in their country. Swedish capitalism may be objectively better than Soviet socialism, but why should Russians care, when there is no realistic way they would ever get the Swedish model in their country?
Last edited by Constantinopolis on Thu Nov 30, 2017 1:15 am, edited 2 times in total.
The Holy Socialist Republic of Constantinopolis
"Only a life lived for others is a life worthwhile." -- Albert Einstein
Political Compass: Economic Left/Right: -10.00 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.64
________________Communist. Leninist. Orthodox Christian.________________
Communism is the logical conclusion of Christian morality. "Whoever loves his neighbor as himself owns no more than his neighbor does", in the words of St. Basil the Great. The anti-theism of past Leninists was a tragic mistake, and the Church should be an ally of the working class.
My posts on the 12 Great Feasts of the Orthodox Church: -I- -II- -III- -IV- -V- -VI- -VII- -VIII- [PASCHA] -IX- -X- -XI- -XII-

User avatar
36 Camera Perspective
Minister
 
Posts: 2887
Founded: Jul 18, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby 36 Camera Perspective » Thu Nov 30, 2017 1:17 am

@Constantinopolis

I read earlier in this thread that you don't believe the misallocation of resources under central planning was necessarily a structural issue. How, then, would you respond to Mises' socialist calculation argument?
Power, power, the law of the land
Those living for death
Will die by their own hand

User avatar
The Federation of Kendor
Senator
 
Posts: 4586
Founded: Dec 08, 2015
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Federation of Kendor » Thu Nov 30, 2017 1:21 am

Can someone teach me more about the economy systems? Also, what is mixed economic system officially called?
My Dispatch
North Korean Russia wrote:"I am God! You are powerless against me! I am so awesome that when I play basketball I always get four points per shot!" -Kim Jong-Putin.

Independant Nations and Guilds wrote:Their founder turned into an eagle and flew into the sun before being burned to death. This is what their flag really means, and any other attempt at explanation of its meaning is ignored in favor of this explanation.

If you support liberal democratic capitalism, paste this into your sig: $LFD
RP links: TBA

User avatar
Antarctic Commonwealth of Equality
Attaché
 
Posts: 74
Founded: Dec 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Antarctic Commonwealth of Equality » Thu Nov 30, 2017 1:35 am

The Federation of Kendor wrote:Can someone teach me more about the economy systems? Also, what is mixed economic system officially called?

I guess the most "mixed" economy would be market socialism if you want something between socialism and capitalism.

Many communists would say it is just capitalism with worker cooperatives though.

Most people would say that social democracy is a mix of socialism and capitalism. However social democracy is just capitalism with a strong welfare system.
Last edited by Antarctic Commonwealth of Equality on Thu Nov 30, 2017 1:38 am, edited 2 times in total.
Soviet Socialist Fleet of Sapient Species’ Liberation
Советский Социалистический Флот Освобождения Разумных Видов

404 Income taxes not found. Income tax is 0% as we use surplus to fund government functions.
Just your average peaceful space faring nation with a large military.
Who needs physical education when you can replace it with military training?
IC year: 2218
Wiki style factbook
Tier 8.5 FT nation

OOC: Activity! Yay!

User avatar
The Federation of Kendor
Senator
 
Posts: 4586
Founded: Dec 08, 2015
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Federation of Kendor » Thu Nov 30, 2017 1:43 am

Antarctic Commonwealth of Equality wrote:
The Federation of Kendor wrote:Can someone teach me more about the economy systems? Also, what is mixed economic system officially called?

I guess the most "mixed" economy would be market socialism if you want something between socialism and capitalism.

Many communists would say it is just capitalism with worker cooperatives though.

Most people would say that social democracy is a mix of socialism and capitalism. However social democracy is just capitalism with a strong welfare system.

The ideal economic system i'm thinking of is a combination of capitalism and socialism, with free enterprise and state owned business of all sizes, from a person selling something to a corporation. However, they both must be regulated to prevent the evils of capitalism. We must also educate the people to be kinder, as well as using some of the tax money, especially from rich people, to benefit the less fortunate
Last edited by The Federation of Kendor on Thu Nov 30, 2017 1:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
My Dispatch
North Korean Russia wrote:"I am God! You are powerless against me! I am so awesome that when I play basketball I always get four points per shot!" -Kim Jong-Putin.

Independant Nations and Guilds wrote:Their founder turned into an eagle and flew into the sun before being burned to death. This is what their flag really means, and any other attempt at explanation of its meaning is ignored in favor of this explanation.

If you support liberal democratic capitalism, paste this into your sig: $LFD
RP links: TBA

User avatar
Constantinopolis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7501
Founded: Antiquity
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Constantinopolis » Thu Nov 30, 2017 1:49 am

36 Camera Perspective wrote:@Constantinopolis

I read earlier in this thread that you don't believe the misallocation of resources under central planning was necessarily a structural issue. How, then, would you respond to Mises' socialist calculation argument?

Ah, I wrote a paper on this once! Let me see if I can summarize my points.

First, Mises' argument relies on a non-falsifiable assertion that there is some kind of information that is revealed by market prices but which central planners cannot learn. He doesn't actually provide any evidence that this is the case. He simply asserts it. And in fact, since the information is question is by definition something that is only revealed by market prices and cannot be learned any other way, his argument isn't merely without evidence, it is actually non-falsifiable. It is by definition impossible to prove that such information exists, because if we could find it, then central planners could find it too. We pretty much just have to take Mises' word for it that there is something that market prices reveal that cannot be learned any other way.

Second, there is the fact that Mises was arguing from the perspective of an extremely idealized vision of capitalism, where all markets are free and competitive and no prices are distorted in any way. It is necessary to make this assumption in order to argue that capitalism is definitely superior to socialism in allocating resources. Without this assumption, in the real world, both capitalism and socialism have various inefficiencies, and one isn't systematically more efficient than the other. Between real capitalism and real socialism, either one could be more efficient, depending on circumstances.

Third, Mises' claim that socialist planners would have no idea how to allocate resources in the absence of prices is laughable. You don't need detailed information or calculation to dismiss totally outrageous and insane allocations (e.g. "let's devote all our resources to a combination of duck farms and contemporary theater!"). Basic common sense is enough to restrict potential allocations from infinity down to at least a bounded set of some kind. And then other methods can reduce the number of options further. Socialist planners would always have at least some idea of how to allocate resources, even if Mises was right about everything. Which leads back to the second point above: Let's grant that socialism would be inefficient to some extent; that doesn't necessarily mean it has to be more inefficient than really-existing capitalism.

Fourth, to the extent that the argument becomes one about the complexity of socialist calculation - which is not actually what Mises was saying, but is what many people imagine when they hear the words "socialist calculation" - modern computers render this argument obsolete. Already by the late 1980s, computers had advanced enough to make the "input-output matrix" method of socialist calculation actually feasible. Considering the sort of capabilities we have in the present day, socialist calculation would be downright easy.
The Holy Socialist Republic of Constantinopolis
"Only a life lived for others is a life worthwhile." -- Albert Einstein
Political Compass: Economic Left/Right: -10.00 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.64
________________Communist. Leninist. Orthodox Christian.________________
Communism is the logical conclusion of Christian morality. "Whoever loves his neighbor as himself owns no more than his neighbor does", in the words of St. Basil the Great. The anti-theism of past Leninists was a tragic mistake, and the Church should be an ally of the working class.
My posts on the 12 Great Feasts of the Orthodox Church: -I- -II- -III- -IV- -V- -VI- -VII- -VIII- [PASCHA] -IX- -X- -XI- -XII-

User avatar
Antarctic Commonwealth of Equality
Attaché
 
Posts: 74
Founded: Dec 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Antarctic Commonwealth of Equality » Thu Nov 30, 2017 1:50 am

The Federation of Kendor wrote:The ideal economic system i'm thinking of is a combination of capitalism and socialism, with free enterprise and state owned business of all sizes, from a person selling something to a corporation. However, they both must be regulated to prevent the evils of capitalism. We must also educate the people to be kinder, as well as using some of the tax money, especially from rich people, to benefit the less fortunate


Do you mean that all companies are state owned but started by entrepreneurs or just capitalism with a strong welfare state and many state owned companies?
Soviet Socialist Fleet of Sapient Species’ Liberation
Советский Социалистический Флот Освобождения Разумных Видов

404 Income taxes not found. Income tax is 0% as we use surplus to fund government functions.
Just your average peaceful space faring nation with a large military.
Who needs physical education when you can replace it with military training?
IC year: 2218
Wiki style factbook
Tier 8.5 FT nation

OOC: Activity! Yay!

User avatar
The Federation of Kendor
Senator
 
Posts: 4586
Founded: Dec 08, 2015
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Federation of Kendor » Thu Nov 30, 2017 1:52 am

Antarctic Commonwealth of Equality wrote:
The Federation of Kendor wrote:The ideal economic system i'm thinking of is a combination of capitalism and socialism, with free enterprise and state owned business of all sizes, from a person selling something to a corporation. However, they both must be regulated to prevent the evils of capitalism. We must also educate the people to be kinder, as well as using some of the tax money, especially from rich people, to benefit the less fortunate


Do you mean that all companies are state owned but started by entrepreneurs or just capitalism with a strong welfare state and many state owned companies?

The latter
My Dispatch
North Korean Russia wrote:"I am God! You are powerless against me! I am so awesome that when I play basketball I always get four points per shot!" -Kim Jong-Putin.

Independant Nations and Guilds wrote:Their founder turned into an eagle and flew into the sun before being burned to death. This is what their flag really means, and any other attempt at explanation of its meaning is ignored in favor of this explanation.

If you support liberal democratic capitalism, paste this into your sig: $LFD
RP links: TBA

User avatar
Antarctic Commonwealth of Equality
Attaché
 
Posts: 74
Founded: Dec 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Antarctic Commonwealth of Equality » Thu Nov 30, 2017 1:57 am

The Federation of Kendor wrote:The latter

The question then would be how you would sustain such a system. Currently social democracies are slowly selling off their state companies and to make the companies "more efficient". They are also making liberal(economic) reforms where the tax burden on the rich is decreased to "create jobs". Without competition from a socialist system there simply seems to be no need for a government to sustain it's welfare system in the long run.
Soviet Socialist Fleet of Sapient Species’ Liberation
Советский Социалистический Флот Освобождения Разумных Видов

404 Income taxes not found. Income tax is 0% as we use surplus to fund government functions.
Just your average peaceful space faring nation with a large military.
Who needs physical education when you can replace it with military training?
IC year: 2218
Wiki style factbook
Tier 8.5 FT nation

OOC: Activity! Yay!

User avatar
Constantinopolis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7501
Founded: Antiquity
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Constantinopolis » Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:00 am

Antarctic Commonwealth of Equality wrote:
The Federation of Kendor wrote:The latter

The question then would be how you would sustain such a system. Currently social democracies are slowly selling off their state companies and to make the companies "more efficient". They are also making liberal(economic) reforms where the tax burden on the rich is decreased to "create jobs". Without competition from a socialist system there simply seems to be no need for a government to sustain it's welfare system in the long run.

And this, comrades, is the main reason why I do not support social democracy.

I see strong evidence that as long as a capitalist class exists, the welfare state is never safe.

So let's get rid of the capitalist class.
The Holy Socialist Republic of Constantinopolis
"Only a life lived for others is a life worthwhile." -- Albert Einstein
Political Compass: Economic Left/Right: -10.00 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.64
________________Communist. Leninist. Orthodox Christian.________________
Communism is the logical conclusion of Christian morality. "Whoever loves his neighbor as himself owns no more than his neighbor does", in the words of St. Basil the Great. The anti-theism of past Leninists was a tragic mistake, and the Church should be an ally of the working class.
My posts on the 12 Great Feasts of the Orthodox Church: -I- -II- -III- -IV- -V- -VI- -VII- -VIII- [PASCHA] -IX- -X- -XI- -XII-

User avatar
The Federation of Kendor
Senator
 
Posts: 4586
Founded: Dec 08, 2015
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Federation of Kendor » Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:05 am

Constantinopolis wrote:
Antarctic Commonwealth of Equality wrote:The question then would be how you would sustain such a system. Currently social democracies are slowly selling off their state companies and to make the companies "more efficient". They are also making liberal(economic) reforms where the tax burden on the rich is decreased to "create jobs". Without competition from a socialist system there simply seems to be no need for a government to sustain it's welfare system in the long run.

And this, comrades, is the main reason why I do not support social democracy.

I see strong evidence that as long as a capitalist class exists, the welfare state is never safe.

So let's get rid of the capitalist class.

I don't want to have my freedom and individualism removed. I do support teamwork, however, but I also think that freedom must be kept too. Plus, I think life will be more bland with communism/pure socialism. My suggestion is merely a wide reform of the capitalist state to make them more center-left, while actually caring for the people.
My Dispatch
North Korean Russia wrote:"I am God! You are powerless against me! I am so awesome that when I play basketball I always get four points per shot!" -Kim Jong-Putin.

Independant Nations and Guilds wrote:Their founder turned into an eagle and flew into the sun before being burned to death. This is what their flag really means, and any other attempt at explanation of its meaning is ignored in favor of this explanation.

If you support liberal democratic capitalism, paste this into your sig: $LFD
RP links: TBA

User avatar
36 Camera Perspective
Minister
 
Posts: 2887
Founded: Jul 18, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby 36 Camera Perspective » Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:11 am

Constantinopolis wrote:
36 Camera Perspective wrote:@Constantinopolis

I read earlier in this thread that you don't believe the misallocation of resources under central planning was necessarily a structural issue. How, then, would you respond to Mises' socialist calculation argument?

Ah, I wrote a paper on this once! Let me see if I can summarize my points.

First, Mises' argument relies on a non-falsifiable assertion that there is some kind of information that is revealed by market prices but which central planners cannot learn. He doesn't actually provide any evidence that this is the case. He simply asserts it. And in fact, since the information is question is by definition something that is only revealed by market prices and cannot be learned any other way, his argument isn't merely without evidence, it is actually non-falsifiable. It is by definition impossible to prove that such information exists, because if we could find it, then central planners could find it too. We pretty much just have to take Mises' word for it that there is something that market prices reveal that cannot be learned any other way.


I'll just start here because it's your first point, and coincidentally the one I would be able to engage with the most. I am unsure if you have summarized Mises' premise correctly. The argument is that without a market, there is no way to determine prices, and therefore it is impossible to rationally allocate resources. This is why we saw chronic shortages throughout the history of the Soviet Union. Of course, if the central planners control the productive structure of the entire country, then there is no market, no prices, and the signaling function of prices is lost. Mises does not need to provide "evidence" that central planners don't have access to this information, because the signaling function of prices is obviously lost if there is no market.

It's incorrect to say that any information provided by the market would also be available to central planners. Mises' exact point is that equilibrium emerges dynamically from the subjective preferences and interactions of economic agents. On Mises' view, we don't need to "find" this information, because the market will work everything out and "find" it for us. If you're a central planner, however, you are tasked with allocating resources a priori rather than dynamically, and you still have your work cut out for you to determine how to best rationally allocate resources.
Last edited by 36 Camera Perspective on Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:17 am, edited 3 times in total.
Power, power, the law of the land
Those living for death
Will die by their own hand

User avatar
Constantinopolis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7501
Founded: Antiquity
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Constantinopolis » Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:13 am

The Federation of Kendor wrote:
Constantinopolis wrote:And this, comrades, is the main reason why I do not support social democracy.

I see strong evidence that as long as a capitalist class exists, the welfare state is never safe.

So let's get rid of the capitalist class.

I don't want to have my freedom and individualism removed. I do support teamwork, however, but I also think that freedom must be kept too. Plus, I think life will be more bland with communism/pure socialism. My suggestion is merely a wide reform of the capitalist state to make them more center-left, while actually caring for the people.

But the point is that the capitalists will fight you every step of the way, and then after you've won, they will never stop trying to tear down your reforms.

Practically all of the things that the center-left wants today (and then some) were already implemented in Western and Northern Europe by the mid-1970s. Then the capitalists fought back, hard, and destroyed most of those reforms over the course of the neoliberal era.

So it does not appear to be possible to make a permanent peace with the capitalists. When you have an enemy that will never make peace, the only options are victory or death. The capitalists want war. So let's give them war.
The Holy Socialist Republic of Constantinopolis
"Only a life lived for others is a life worthwhile." -- Albert Einstein
Political Compass: Economic Left/Right: -10.00 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.64
________________Communist. Leninist. Orthodox Christian.________________
Communism is the logical conclusion of Christian morality. "Whoever loves his neighbor as himself owns no more than his neighbor does", in the words of St. Basil the Great. The anti-theism of past Leninists was a tragic mistake, and the Church should be an ally of the working class.
My posts on the 12 Great Feasts of the Orthodox Church: -I- -II- -III- -IV- -V- -VI- -VII- -VIII- [PASCHA] -IX- -X- -XI- -XII-

User avatar
The Federation of Kendor
Senator
 
Posts: 4586
Founded: Dec 08, 2015
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Federation of Kendor » Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:16 am

Constantinopolis wrote:
The Federation of Kendor wrote:I don't want to have my freedom and individualism removed. I do support teamwork, however, but I also think that freedom must be kept too. Plus, I think life will be more bland with communism/pure socialism. My suggestion is merely a wide reform of the capitalist state to make them more center-left, while actually caring for the people.

But the point is that the capitalists will fight you every step of the way, and then after you've won, they will never stop trying to tear down your reforms.

Practically all of the things that the center-left wants today (and then some) were already implemented in Western and Northern Europe by the mid-1970s. Then the capitalists fought back, hard, and destroyed most of those reforms over the course of the neoliberal era.

So it does not appear to be possible to make a permanent peace with the capitalists. When you have an enemy that will never make peace, the only options are victory or death. The capitalists want war. So let's give them war.

So we must sacrifice most of things we loved, like video games, capitalist/bourgeoisie fun, sports car, etc, and become a selfless being, who works for everyone, without wanting capitalist hedonism
My Dispatch
North Korean Russia wrote:"I am God! You are powerless against me! I am so awesome that when I play basketball I always get four points per shot!" -Kim Jong-Putin.

Independant Nations and Guilds wrote:Their founder turned into an eagle and flew into the sun before being burned to death. This is what their flag really means, and any other attempt at explanation of its meaning is ignored in favor of this explanation.

If you support liberal democratic capitalism, paste this into your sig: $LFD
RP links: TBA

User avatar
Antarctic Commonwealth of Equality
Attaché
 
Posts: 74
Founded: Dec 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Antarctic Commonwealth of Equality » Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:33 am

The Federation of Kendor wrote:So we must sacrifice most of things we loved, like video games, capitalist/bourgeoisie fun, sports car, etc, and become a selfless being, who works for everyone, without wanting capitalist hedonism

I honestly do not get why we would lose games or fun, but yeah we will likely lose sports cars.

EDIT:
Can you please provide your reasoning for this.
Last edited by Antarctic Commonwealth of Equality on Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
Soviet Socialist Fleet of Sapient Species’ Liberation
Советский Социалистический Флот Освобождения Разумных Видов

404 Income taxes not found. Income tax is 0% as we use surplus to fund government functions.
Just your average peaceful space faring nation with a large military.
Who needs physical education when you can replace it with military training?
IC year: 2218
Wiki style factbook
Tier 8.5 FT nation

OOC: Activity! Yay!

User avatar
Franklyn Kreul
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Nov 30, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Franklyn Kreul » Thu Nov 30, 2017 3:32 am

has served thousands of clients all across Southern California and the Western United States.

User avatar
Constantinopolis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7501
Founded: Antiquity
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Constantinopolis » Thu Nov 30, 2017 3:51 am

36 Camera Perspective wrote:
Constantinopolis wrote:Ah, I wrote a paper on this once! Let me see if I can summarize my points.

First, Mises' argument relies on a non-falsifiable assertion that there is some kind of information that is revealed by market prices but which central planners cannot learn. He doesn't actually provide any evidence that this is the case. He simply asserts it. And in fact, since the information is question is by definition something that is only revealed by market prices and cannot be learned any other way, his argument isn't merely without evidence, it is actually non-falsifiable. It is by definition impossible to prove that such information exists, because if we could find it, then central planners could find it too. We pretty much just have to take Mises' word for it that there is something that market prices reveal that cannot be learned any other way.

I'll just start here because it's your first point, and coincidentally the one I would be able to engage with the most. I am unsure if you have summarized Mises' premise correctly. The argument is that without a market, there is no way to determine prices, and therefore it is impossible to rationally allocate resources.

Correct, that is his argument. But the question then becomes: Why is that so? Why is it not possible to rationally allocate resources without prices? What is it about prices that makes them special, that cannot be re-created without prices?

It was Hayek who tried to answer this question, later, by making the argument about information. I assume Mises agreed with him.

36 Camera Perspective wrote:This is why we saw chronic shortages throughout the history of the Soviet Union.

Actually, that was mainly due to "taut planning": The practice of allocating PRECISELY enough inputs to an enterprise to produce the outputs specified by the plan. This meant that if anything went wrong - the slightest human error, or perhaps some weather change or nature interfering in other ways, or if the plan was slightly wrong - the enterprise would be left with not enough inputs to produce the planned outputs. Hence, shortages.

Ironically, this practice grew precisely out of a desire for efficiency. It seemed inefficient to allocate extra inputs to an enterprise, above the resources they needed, "just in case" they might need more than was planned. Yet that would have been the way to fix the shortages.

36 Camera Perspective wrote:Of course, if the central planners control the productive structure of the entire country, then there is no market, no prices, and the signaling function of prices is lost. Mises does not need to provide "evidence" that central planners don't have access to this information, because the signaling function of prices is obviously lost if there is no market.

But this argument relies on the existence of something that prices signal, which cannot be discovered in other ways. That was my point. What is that "something"? How do we know it exists?

36 Camera Perspective wrote:It's incorrect to say that any information provided by the market would also be available to central planners. Mises' exact point is that we cannot really "find" what the equilibrum point is. It emerges dynamically from the subjective preferences and interactions of economic agents. On Mises' view, we don't need to find this information, because the market will work everything out. If you're a central planner, however, you are tasked with allocating resources a priori rather than dynamically, and you still have your work cut out for you.

Okay, let me put it this way: If the issue is finding the subjective preferences of economic agents, why can't we just ask them? Imagine some type of online rating system, for example. Consumers are asked to rate various products according to a certain point-based system. Et voilà, we've found their preferences without a market.

Of course, the Soviet economy did not do this. The technology wasn't there at the time. But we can do it now.

This is only one example. The general point is, whatever people say to each other in a market, they can also say outside of a market. Whatever information or preferences are revealed in a market, can also be revealed outside of a market. Mises asserts that this is not so, that there is something quasi-magical about markets that makes them unique, but he never really defends his assertion.
The Holy Socialist Republic of Constantinopolis
"Only a life lived for others is a life worthwhile." -- Albert Einstein
Political Compass: Economic Left/Right: -10.00 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.64
________________Communist. Leninist. Orthodox Christian.________________
Communism is the logical conclusion of Christian morality. "Whoever loves his neighbor as himself owns no more than his neighbor does", in the words of St. Basil the Great. The anti-theism of past Leninists was a tragic mistake, and the Church should be an ally of the working class.
My posts on the 12 Great Feasts of the Orthodox Church: -I- -II- -III- -IV- -V- -VI- -VII- -VIII- [PASCHA] -IX- -X- -XI- -XII-

User avatar
Constantinopolis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7501
Founded: Antiquity
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Constantinopolis » Thu Nov 30, 2017 3:54 am

The Federation of Kendor wrote:
Constantinopolis wrote:But the point is that the capitalists will fight you every step of the way, and then after you've won, they will never stop trying to tear down your reforms.

Practically all of the things that the center-left wants today (and then some) were already implemented in Western and Northern Europe by the mid-1970s. Then the capitalists fought back, hard, and destroyed most of those reforms over the course of the neoliberal era.

So it does not appear to be possible to make a permanent peace with the capitalists. When you have an enemy that will never make peace, the only options are victory or death. The capitalists want war. So let's give them war.

So we must sacrifice most of things we loved, like video games, capitalist/bourgeoisie fun, sports car, etc, and become a selfless being, who works for everyone, without wanting capitalist hedonism

Um... who here has a sports car...? We won't be sacrificing capitalist luxuries. We never had them in the first place.

As for video games and other non-luxury entertainment - I don't see any reason why socialism would imply giving up that. Obviously an entertainment industry would still exist, and in this day and age, video games are a big part of it.
The Holy Socialist Republic of Constantinopolis
"Only a life lived for others is a life worthwhile." -- Albert Einstein
Political Compass: Economic Left/Right: -10.00 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.64
________________Communist. Leninist. Orthodox Christian.________________
Communism is the logical conclusion of Christian morality. "Whoever loves his neighbor as himself owns no more than his neighbor does", in the words of St. Basil the Great. The anti-theism of past Leninists was a tragic mistake, and the Church should be an ally of the working class.
My posts on the 12 Great Feasts of the Orthodox Church: -I- -II- -III- -IV- -V- -VI- -VII- -VIII- [PASCHA] -IX- -X- -XI- -XII-

User avatar
The Portland Territory
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14193
Founded: Dec 12, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby The Portland Territory » Thu Nov 30, 2017 4:39 am

Galloism wrote:
The Portland Territory wrote:Saving money is the side effect of wage-fixing. If they wanted to just save money, why would they try and gather their competition to literally do the same thing?

The same reason Google and Apple did:

They save money together.

But why would Google want one of their biggest competitors to also save money? That doesnt make sense
Korwin-Mikke 2020
Տխերք հավակեկ բոզերա. Կոոնել կոոնելով Արաչ ենկ երտոոմ մինչեվ Բակու

16 year old Monarchist from Rhode Island. Interested in economics, governance, metaphysical philosophy, European + Near Eastern history, vexillology, faith, hunting, automotive, ranching, science fiction, music, and anime.

Pro: Absolute Monarchy, Lex Rex, Subsidiarity, Guild Capitalism, Property Rights, Tridentine Catholicism, Unlimited Gun Rights, Hierarchy, Traditionalism, Ethnic Nationalism, Irredentism
Mixed: Fascism, Anarcho Capitalism, Donald Trump
Against: Democracy/ Democratic Republicanism, Egalitarianism, Direct Taxation, Cultural Marxism, Redistribution of Wealth

User avatar
The New California Republic
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35483
Founded: Jun 06, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The New California Republic » Thu Nov 30, 2017 4:51 am

Constantinopolis wrote:As for video games and other non-luxury entertainment - I don't see any reason why socialism would imply giving up that. Obviously an entertainment industry would still exist, and in this day and age, video games are a big part of it.

Tetris is a good example, made in the USSR.
Last edited by Sigmund Freud on Sat Sep 23, 1939 2:23 am, edited 999 times in total.

The Irradiated Wasteland of The New California Republic: depicting the expanded NCR, several years after the total victory over Caesar's Legion, and the annexation of New Vegas and its surrounding areas.

White-collared conservatives flashing down the street
Pointing their plastic finger at me
They're hoping soon, my kind will drop and die
But I'm going to wave my freak flag high
Wave on, wave on
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Fartsniffage, Hurdergaryp, Msaeachubaets, New Stonen, Ostroeuropa, Picairn, Port Caverton, Rary, The Archregimancy, The Notorious Mad Jack, Wartime Wallowis

Advertisement

Remove ads