FCC to repeal Net Neutrality Bill

[The Arian nation]

Could you spoiler the images. Also some translations would be helpful.

The first pic:
1000 gigabytes
12 months
800000 rial
4 to 40 mbps
Low traffic
High speed
Second pic:
50 gigabytes
Three months
105000 rial
1 to 4 mbps
High traffic
Medium speed

[Corrian]

Washington overwhelmingly passes law to uphold net neutrality

[The Flutterlands]

http://www.thenewportbuzz.com/rhode-isl ... porn/14618

Jesus Christ. So much for Democrats being pro-net neutrality.

[The Empire of Pretantia]

http://www.thenewportbuzz.com/rhode-island-bill-seeks-to-charge-residents-20-to-watch-online-porn/14618

Jesus Christ. So much for Democrats being pro-net neutrality.

They never were. Did you not see the NN website that showed all the congressmen who were against net neutrality?

[The Flutterlands]

http://www.thenewportbuzz.com/rhode-island-bill-seeks-to-charge-residents-20-to-watch-online-porn/14618

Jesus Christ. So much for Democrats being pro-net neutrality.

They never were. Did you not see the NN website that showed all the congressmen who were against net neutrality?

Every Democrat in the U.S. Senate supports a bill that would undo the NN repeal.

Fucking hell... I guess RI really is the Alabama of New England.

[Topoliani]

They never were. Did you not see the NN website that showed all the congressmen who were against net neutrality?

Every Democrat in the U.S. Senate supports a bill that would undo the NN repeal.

Fucking hell... I guess RI really is the Alabama of New England.

Comparing Rhode Island to Alabama is an insult to Alabama Rhode Island.

[The Empire of Pretantia]

They never were. Did you not see the NN website that showed all the congressmen who were against net neutrality?

Every Democrat in the U.S. Senate supports a bill that would undo the NN repeal.

Fucking hell... I guess RI really is the Alabama of New England.

HEY.

I take offense to that statement.

[The Flutterlands]

Every Democrat in the U.S. Senate supports a bill that would undo the NN repeal.

Fucking hell... I guess RI really is the Alabama of New England.

HEY.

I take offense to that statement.

A tax on porn sounds exactly like something a God Fearing State like Alabama would come up with though, not a liberal Democratic state.

[The Empire of Pretantia]

HEY.

I take offense to that statement.

A tax on porn sounds exactly like something a God Fearing State like Alabama would come up with though, not a liberal Democratic state.

It sounds precisely like something a Democratic state would come up with.

Remember, feminism.

[Topoliani]

A tax on porn sounds exactly like something a God Fearing State like Alabama would come up with though, not a liberal Democratic state.

It sounds precisely like something a Democratic state would come up with.

Remember, feminism.

All states have their own reasons to ban anything

Yes, even the gun loving Texas has their own reason(s) to ban guns.

[Mujahidah]

HEY.

I take offense to that statement.

A tax on porn sounds exactly like something a God Fearing State like Alabama would come up with though, not a liberal Democratic state.

Out of curiosity, the government already "sin-taxes" things like cigarettes. Why is porn any different?

[The Flutterlands]

It sounds precisely like something a Democratic state would come up with.

Remember, feminism.

All states have their own reasons to ban anything

Yes, even the gun loving Texas has their own reason(s) to ban guns.

They can't ban first amendment content though and I would believe that taxing first amendment content is unconstitutional too.

[Washington Resistance Army]

I don't think taxing porn is even feasible. There would be so many ways around that.

[The Flutterlands]

A tax on porn sounds exactly like something a God Fearing State like Alabama would come up with though, not a liberal Democratic state.

Out of curiosity, the government already "sin-taxes" things like cigarettes. Why is porn any different?

Because porn is first amendment content.

[The Flutterlands]

I don't think taxing porn is even feasible. There would be so many ways around that.

Like VPNs and Proxies.

Anyway, I live in Rhode Island. So this particularly pisses me off.

[Mujahidah]

Out of curiosity, the government already "sin-taxes" things like cigarettes. Why is porn any different?

Because porn is first amendment content.

Is it, though? If porn is First Amendment content than why isn't it legal to put it on broadcast television?

[The Empire of Pretantia]

Because porn is first amendment content.

Is it, though? If porn is First Amendment content than why isn't it legal to put it on broadcast television?

It is legal.

See: Game of Thrones.

[Mujahidah]

Is it, though? If porn is First Amendment content than why isn't it legal to put it on broadcast television?

It is.

See: Game of Thrones.

Game of Thrones is HBO. You couldn't get away with it being on ABC, CBS, NBC, etc because of FCC regulations. If the FCC can literally ban porn from broadcast television, how can you say it is protected speech?

[The Empire of Pretantia]

It is.

See: Game of Thrones.

Game of Thrones is HBO. You couldn't get away with it being on ABC, CBS, NBC, etc because of FCC regulations.

But it's on TV regardless.

If the FCC can literally ban porn from broadcast television, how can you say it is protected speech?

They can't; they can only regulate where it is, just like the government can regulate where you're allowed to be naked.

[Mujahidah]

If the FCC can literally ban porn from broadcast television, how can you say it is protected speech?

They can't; they can only regulate where it is, just like the government can regulate where you're allowed to be naked.

They can though. Its not that they didn't ban it from cable - its that the FCC does not have the jurisdiction to do so. They do have jurisdiction over broadcast, and they banned porn from broadcast.

[The Empire of Pretantia]

They can't; they can only regulate where it is, just like the government can regulate where you're allowed to be naked.

They can though. Its not that they didn't ban it from cable - its that the FCC does not have the jurisdiction to do so. They do have jurisdiction over broadcast, and they banned porn from broadcast.

I stand corrected.

Still, porn is protected, even if it can't be on broadcast television.

[Telconi]

They can though. Its not that they didn't ban it from cable - its that the FCC does not have the jurisdiction to do so. They do have jurisdiction over broadcast, and they banned porn from broadcast.

I stand corrected.

Still, porn is protected, even if it can't be on broadcast television.

Does that necessarily prohibit taxation tho?

[Vulturret]

I stand corrected.

Still, porn is protected, even if it can't be on broadcast television.

Does that necessarily prohibit taxation tho?

Yes and no... Different instances in the past have suggested both responses... Typical

[Telconi]

Does that necessarily prohibit taxation tho?

Yes and no... Different instances in the past have suggested both responses... Typical

It would seem to me that the taxation of a protected right would be binary. If you can, then it applies to all, if you cannot, then it applies to all.

[Mujahidah]

Yes and no... Different instances in the past have suggested both responses... Typical

It would seem to me that the taxation of a protected right would be binary. If you can, then it applies to all, if you cannot, then it applies to all.

The Supreme Court does not like to be simple.