FCC to repeal Net Neutrality Bill

[The Flutterlands]

Perjury. That is lying to the courts.

I know what it is. When did Ajit Pai commit perjury?

He is going to commit perjury if he keeps selling the bullshit of net neutrality hurting investment and is heavy handed to the court. Net Neutrality has nothing to do with investment and is not heavy handed. It is just a policy that is meant to keep the internet equal.

[Luminesa]

Nobody cares and there’s nothing you can do. Give it up.

The internet would like to disagree with that. Or else there would not be such great outbursts all over the web and massive lawsuits from all over the country. That suggests that a lot of people care about this. And no I will not give up and will find say as to do something about it. So fuck all that shit.

So It's not that no one cares. It is that you don't care and such apathy is why the bad guys almost always wins. Evil only wins when good people don't do anything, except good people are doing something about it.

Pretty much nobody in this forum cares, because you've run it into the ground. I dunno how you haven't noticed that.

[Ifreann]

I know what it is. When did Ajit Pai commit perjury?

He is going to commit perjury if he keeps selling the bullshit of net neutrality hurting investment and is heavy handed to the court. Net Neutrality has nothing to do with investment and is not heavy handed. It is just a policy that is meant to keep the internet equal.

So to circle back to your earlier post, courts should punish Ajit Pai for lying in policy making, even though that is not a crime.

You want to send innocent people to prison now?

[The Flutterlands]

He is going to commit perjury if he keeps selling the bullshit of net neutrality hurting investment and is heavy handed to the court. Net Neutrality has nothing to do with investment and is not heavy handed. It is just a policy that is meant to keep the internet equal.

So to circle back to your earlier post, courts should punish Ajit Pai for lying in policy making, even though that is not a crime.

You want to send innocent people to prison now?

For fucking over consumers and robbing them of protections so Corporate Thugs can extort and exploit them? Yes. Because that is not innocent.

[The Flutterlands]

The internet would like to disagree with that. Or else there would not be such great outbursts all over the web and massive lawsuits from all over the country. That suggests that a lot of people care about this. And no I will not give up and will find say as to do something about it. So fuck all that shit.

So It's not that no one cares. It is that you don't care and such apathy is why the bad guys almost always wins. Evil only wins when good people don't do anything, except good people are doing something about it.

Pretty much nobody in this forum cares, because you've run it into the ground. I dunno how you haven't noticed that.

Regardless, apathy like yours is why the bad guys win.

[Farnhamia]

So to circle back to your earlier post, courts should punish Ajit Pai for lying in policy making, even though that is not a crime.

You want to send innocent people to prison now?

For fucking over consumers and robbing them of protections so Corporate Thugs can extort and exploit them? Yes. Because that is not innocent.

But it's not illegal, either, not completely. This is why we have courts and laws. Would you like it if you could be prosecuted for your political beliefs or your religion or your ... I don't know, because you have a foreign-sounding name? That's what you're advocating. If Pai broke the law, he should be prosecuted. Setting policies you do not like is not against the law.

[The Flutterlands]

For fucking over consumers and robbing them of protections so Corporate Thugs can extort and exploit them? Yes. Because that is not innocent.

But it's not illegal, either, not completely. This is why we have courts and laws. Would you like it if you could be prosecuted for your political beliefs or your religion or your ... I don't know, because you have a foreign-sounding name? That's what you're advocating. If Pai broke the law, he should be prosecuted. Setting policies you do not like is not against the law.

Creating policies that would do great harm to consumers and lying to their faces should be wrong though and against the law. He is basically allowing Telecom thugs to nickle and dime us while claiming it would be good for us when i's not. We shouldn't have to stand for that and accept it without a huge fight.

[The Black Forrest]

But it's not illegal, either, not completely. This is why we have courts and laws. Would you like it if you could be prosecuted for your political beliefs or your religion or your ... I don't know, because you have a foreign-sounding name? That's what you're advocating. If Pai broke the law, he should be prosecuted. Setting policies you do not like is not against the law.

Creating policies that would do great harm to consumers and lying to their faces should be wrong though and against the law. He is basically allowing Telecom thugs to nickle and dime us while claiming it would be good for us when i's not. We shouldn't have to stand for that and accept it without a huge fight.

You make it sound like American business has never used their politicians for that purpose.

[Luminesa]

Pretty much nobody in this forum cares, because you've run it into the ground. I dunno how you haven't noticed that.

Regardless, apathy like yours is why the bad guys win.

Apathy like everyone else on this forum.

[The Black Forrest]

Regardless, apathy like yours is why the bad guys win.

Apathy like everyone else on this forum.

Many of us did vote against donnie.

[The Knockout Gun Gals]

Regardless, apathy like yours is why the bad guys win.

Apathy like everyone else on this forum.

Really? Everyone else?

[Luminesa]

So to circle back to your earlier post, courts should punish Ajit Pai for lying in policy making, even though that is not a crime.

You want to send innocent people to prison now?

For fucking over consumers and robbing them of protections so Corporate Thugs can extort and exploit them? Yes. Because that is not innocent.

They're not thugs. They're politicians. And as far as we know, they don't have any ties to illegal organizations...though that's irrelevant.

[Luminesa]

Apathy like everyone else on this forum.

Many of us did vote against donnie.

I did too? What does that have to do with it?

[The Black Forrest]

Many of us did vote against donnie.

I did too? What does that have to do with it?

We wouldn't have been talking about NN and the FCC if he had lost.

[Farnhamia]

But it's not illegal, either, not completely. This is why we have courts and laws. Would you like it if you could be prosecuted for your political beliefs or your religion or your ... I don't know, because you have a foreign-sounding name? That's what you're advocating. If Pai broke the law, he should be prosecuted. Setting policies you do not like is not against the law.

Creating policies that would do great harm to consumers and lying to their faces should be wrong though and against the law. He is basically allowing Telecom thugs to nickle and dime us while claiming it would be good for us when i's not. We shouldn't have to stand for that and accept it without a huge fight.

You do have remedies. They're called elections. We've been over this before.

[Luminesa]

I did too? What does that have to do with it?

We wouldn't have been talking about NN and the FCC if he had lost.

Ajit Pai was placed originally by Obama, and Hillary wasn't exactly one to shy away from corporate connections. But that would all be guessing along hypotheticals. I would take a guess that Pai himself would not be directly affected either way. But that's more beside the point. Flutter has been screaming over this issue and savoring every ounce of fear-mongering he can get. It just doesn't seem productive anymore.

[The Flutterlands]

Creating policies that would do great harm to consumers and lying to their faces should be wrong though and against the law. He is basically allowing Telecom thugs to nickle and dime us while claiming it would be good for us when i's not. We shouldn't have to stand for that and accept it without a huge fight.

You do have remedies. They're called elections. We've been over this before.

I do not want to have four to eight years of a fucking tired internet.. I would see the FCC abd ISPs in hell first before I live under corporate tyranny.over the internet.

[Farnhamia]

You do have remedies. They're called elections. We've been over this before.

I do not want to have four to eight years of a fucking tired internet.. I would see the FCC abd ISPs in hell first before I live under corporate tyranny.over the internet.

Tough. You made your bed, lie in it.

[Luminesa]

You do have remedies. They're called elections. We've been over this before.

I do not want to have four to eight years of a fucking tired internet.. I would see the FCC abd ISPs in hell first before I live under corporate tyranny.over the internet.

"I WANT IT AND I WANT IT NOW," is not going to make it happen.

[The Black Forrest]

We wouldn't have been talking about NN and the FCC if he had lost.

Ajit Pai was placed originally by Obama, and Hillary wasn't exactly one to shy away from corporate connections. But that would all be guessing along hypotheticals. I would take a guess that Pai himself would not be directly affected either way. But that's more beside the point. Flutter has been screaming over this issue and savoring every ounce of fear-mongering he can get. It just doesn't seem productive anymore.

He did vote for donnie. But, you are correct it's reached a point of being white noise.

[Freezic Vast]

You do have remedies. They're called elections. We've been over this before.

I do not want to have four to eight years of a fucking tired internet.. I would see the FCC abd ISPs in hell first before I live under corporate tyranny.over the internet.

Oh well, guess what, not everything goes your way, so you're just gonna have to wait it out. Stop acting like a privileged kid who needs internet, as we keep trying to remind you your screeching isn't doing anything.

[The Flutterlands]

I do not want to have four to eight years of a fucking tired internet.. I would see the FCC abd ISPs in hell first before I live under corporate tyranny.over the internet.

Oh well, guess what, not everything goes your way, so you're just gonna have to wait it out. Stop acting like a privileged kid who needs internet, as we keep trying to remind you your screeching isn't doing anything.

I fucking do need internet. I need internet to be doing what I'm fucking doing now. I need internet to do my research for school. People need internet to conduct business almost all the time now. You are acting very disingenuous claiming that the internet is not as much part of everyday life as electricity and running water.

This is far more fucking dangerous than you claim it to be. It puts information in the hands of a few corporate thugs who will soon get to manipulate it for their own gain.

[The Black Forrest]

Oh well, guess what, not everything goes your way, so you're just gonna have to wait it out. Stop acting like a privileged kid who needs internet, as we keep trying to remind you your screeching isn't doing anything.

I fucking do need internet. I need internet to be doing what I'm fucking doing now. I need internet to do my research for school. People need internet to conduct business almost all the time now. You are acting very disingenuous claiming that the internet is not as much part of everyday life as electricity and running water.

This is far more fucking dangerous than you claim it to be. It puts information in the hands of a few corporate thugs who will soon get to manipulate it for their own gain.

Universities will have the Net. They have always had the Net. You will just be paying more for fun use.

[Freezic Vast]

Oh well, guess what, not everything goes your way, so you're just gonna have to wait it out. Stop acting like a privileged kid who needs internet, as we keep trying to remind you your screeching isn't doing anything.

I fucking do need internet. I need internet to be doing what I'm fucking doing now. I need internet to do my research for school. People need internet to conduct business almost all the time now. You are acting very disingenuous claiming that the internet is not as much part of everyday life as electricity and running water.

Because it wasn't always like that at all, and the internet access for free is not a right, it is a service provided to you and you should pay for it. There is no such thing as freedom being free as I keep trying to remind you. Not only that but you constantly ignore everything we've been saying to you and you continue to screech at us all the time, which is not gonna help you at all, it makes you seen desperate. Let a mod do something about this, because frankly this has been a waste of time and it's not even a debate anymore. It's just us against you and your endless screeching that no one wants.

[The Flutterlands]

I fucking do need internet. I need internet to be doing what I'm fucking doing now. I need internet to do my research for school. People need internet to conduct business almost all the time now. You are acting very disingenuous claiming that the internet is not as much part of everyday life as electricity and running water.

This is far more fucking dangerous than you claim it to be. It puts information in the hands of a few corporate thugs who will soon get to manipulate it for their own gain.

Universities will have the Net. They have always had the Net. You will just be paying more for fun use.

Fucking hell, that is not how the internet should fucking work and you god damn know it. The way things must factually be is that you pay for the whole internet under a single price, not pay for every single ''website package" separately. Why are you downplaying all of this?