Advertisement
by Greed and Death » Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:09 pm
by The Flutterlands » Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:10 pm
Greed and Death wrote:As the FCC's newly appointed head I wish to ensure you your freedom will be respected. Crisitism of President is still allowed you just might be throttled to allow more pro administration posters has greater enjoyment of the net.
Any questions can be seen through the pretrottled device located under your seat.
by Independant Nations and Guilds » Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:12 pm
The Flutterlands wrote:Len Hyet wrote:I'm not saying net neutrality is bad or unnecessary, but it sure as shit isn't the end of the world.
To use their example, if you don't like not having crystal clear Netflix, switch to a different ISP. Something like 90% of Americans have more than two options for ISPs.
It is though.
Confederate News: Reserves called in to aid in the defense of Civurgrangten, an important Confederate city. Captain Venturius to be first human to receive the Red Star of the Confederacy in over a century, for valiant actions in battle. 'State opera a glorious, communist success' says Chairman Hringsson.
by The Flutterlands » Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:13 pm
Independant Nations and Guilds wrote:The Flutterlands wrote:It is though.
Most Americans do NOT have more than ONE option for an ISP. Source: I'm from America. I would know this.
And this is WORSE than most of you realize. This wouldn't just be like cable, where you have to pay for website packages for this. ISPs could force websites to pay bribes to have remotely decent speeds, or even bribes to allow any traffic to reach them at all. Most websites would die, especially smaller ones. Those who don't pay the bribes would suffocate and die from lack of traffic, and those who are paying the bribes would barely be making any money either because they'd be giving it all to the ISPs. It would be the death of all Internet commerce. With how much stuff is online, this would effectively cripple the economy.
by Greed and Death » Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:14 pm
The Flutterlands wrote:Independant Nations and Guilds wrote:
Most Americans do NOT have more than ONE option for an ISP. Source: I'm from America. I would know this.
And this is WORSE than most of you realize. This wouldn't just be like cable, where you have to pay for website packages for this. ISPs could force websites to pay bribes to have remotely decent speeds, or even bribes to allow any traffic to reach them at all. Most websites would die, especially smaller ones. Those who don't pay the bribes would suffocate and die from lack of traffic, and those who are paying the bribes would barely be making any money either because they'd be giving it all to the ISPs. It would be the death of all Internet commerce. With how much stuff is online, this would effectively cripple the economy.
This is why we must revolt!
by The Flutterlands » Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:16 pm
by The Black Forrest » Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:16 pm
by Saiwania » Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:21 pm
by Independant Nations and Guilds » Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:22 pm
Confederate News: Reserves called in to aid in the defense of Civurgrangten, an important Confederate city. Captain Venturius to be first human to receive the Red Star of the Confederacy in over a century, for valiant actions in battle. 'State opera a glorious, communist success' says Chairman Hringsson.
by The Flutterlands » Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:23 pm
Independant Nations and Guilds wrote:Here's the thing. Flutterlands, from what you described, Ajit Pai is relying on a few things for his plan to gut Net Neutrality to work: He is relying on people not paying attention, being ignorant to what is going on around them, and not caring about Net Neutrality.
The effective counter is to inform as many people as possible, teach them about Net Neutrality in a caring manner, and inform them of what will happen if it is gone.
This wouldn't just affect America, it would affect any company that does buisiness in America as well, and potentially have even further reaching effects.
But we've stopped it before, and hopefully we can stop it again now.
by Len Hyet » Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:26 pm
Independant Nations and Guilds wrote:The Flutterlands wrote:It is though.
Most Americans do NOT have more than ONE option for an ISP. Source: I'm from America. I would know this.
And this is WORSE than most of you realize. This wouldn't just be like cable, where you have to pay for website packages for this. ISPs could force websites to pay bribes to have remotely decent speeds, or even bribes to allow any traffic to reach them at all. Most websites would die, especially smaller ones. Those who don't pay the bribes would suffocate and die from lack of traffic, and those who are paying the bribes would barely be making any money either because they'd be giving it all to the ISPs. It would be the death of all Internet commerce. With how much stuff is online, this would effectively cripple the economy.
by The Black Forrest » Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:29 pm
Len Hyet wrote:Independant Nations and Guilds wrote:
Most Americans do NOT have more than ONE option for an ISP. Source: I'm from America. I would know this.
And this is WORSE than most of you realize. This wouldn't just be like cable, where you have to pay for website packages for this. ISPs could force websites to pay bribes to have remotely decent speeds, or even bribes to allow any traffic to reach them at all. Most websites would die, especially smaller ones. Those who don't pay the bribes would suffocate and die from lack of traffic, and those who are paying the bribes would barely be making any money either because they'd be giving it all to the ISPs. It would be the death of all Internet commerce. With how much stuff is online, this would effectively cripple the economy.
I'm American too, and unfortunately for you I'm a well informed American. 70% of Americans have 2+ ISPs.
by Len Hyet » Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:30 pm
by Independant Nations and Guilds » Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:30 pm
The Flutterlands wrote:Independant Nations and Guilds wrote:Here's the thing. Flutterlands, from what you described, Ajit Pai is relying on a few things for his plan to gut Net Neutrality to work: He is relying on people not paying attention, being ignorant to what is going on around them, and not caring about Net Neutrality.
The effective counter is to inform as many people as possible, teach them about Net Neutrality in a caring manner, and inform them of what will happen if it is gone.
This wouldn't just affect America, it would affect any company that does buisiness in America as well, and potentially have even further reaching effects.
But we've stopped it before, and hopefully we can stop it again now.
I am trying to fucking do so that and they still don't care!
Confederate News: Reserves called in to aid in the defense of Civurgrangten, an important Confederate city. Captain Venturius to be first human to receive the Red Star of the Confederacy in over a century, for valiant actions in battle. 'State opera a glorious, communist success' says Chairman Hringsson.
by The Black Forrest » Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:33 pm
by Len Hyet » Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:35 pm
by Independant Nations and Guilds » Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:35 pm
Confederate News: Reserves called in to aid in the defense of Civurgrangten, an important Confederate city. Captain Venturius to be first human to receive the Red Star of the Confederacy in over a century, for valiant actions in battle. 'State opera a glorious, communist success' says Chairman Hringsson.
by The Black Forrest » Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:38 pm
by The Flutterlands » Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:39 pm
by Luminesa » Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:43 pm
The Flutterlands wrote:Saying ISPs won't throttle and block if net neutrality is repealed is like saying rapists won't rape if anti-rape laws are repealed...
by The Flutterlands » Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:43 pm
Luminesa wrote:The Flutterlands wrote:Saying ISPs won't throttle and block if net neutrality is repealed is like saying rapists won't rape if anti-rape laws are repealed...
Losing net neutrality and being raped are not comparable. If you say, “Yes they are,” you obviously have no idea of the actual impact of rape.
by Luminesa » Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:44 pm
by Independant Nations and Guilds » Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:45 pm
The Flutterlands wrote:Saying ISPs won't throttle and block if net neutrality is repealed is like saying rapists won't rape if anti-rape laws are repealed...
Confederate News: Reserves called in to aid in the defense of Civurgrangten, an important Confederate city. Captain Venturius to be first human to receive the Red Star of the Confederacy in over a century, for valiant actions in battle. 'State opera a glorious, communist success' says Chairman Hringsson.
by Greed and Death » Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:45 pm
Luminesa wrote:The Flutterlands wrote:Saying ISPs won't throttle and block if net neutrality is repealed is like saying rapists won't rape if anti-rape laws are repealed...
Losing net neutrality and being raped are not comparable. If you say, “Yes they are,” you obviously have no idea of the actual impact of rape.
by Luminesa » Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:47 pm
The Flutterlands wrote:Luminesa wrote:Relevant
Instead of calling for revolution any time you're dissatisfied, why don't you just follow the democratic process? What is so difficult to understand about the fact that the more you call for "revolution" for everything, the less people are going to listen and take you seriously? Keep in mind, the man you are quoting (Patrick Henry) literally got off his butt, went out of his house, and made one of the most powerful speeches we as Americans have. If you want to even begin to compare your calls for revolution to one of the speech of one of the heroes of the American Revolution, you need to first go and actually do something productive. Keep writing to the FCC. Keep spreading the news and tell people to vote for net neutrality.Don't march around throwing a fit, you're only spinning your wheels.
We can't simply vote for net neutrality! We are not the ones voting for or against this! It's those FCC fucks that are voting against our outcry to take away the internet freedoms that are rightfully ours.
I'll repeat what I have been saying all along: The point is to stop them from repealing net neutrality, not letting them do it so we may pit it back a fucking decade or so. Net Neutrality now and and forever is the end goal.
Also, about it being bad for business, I don't think they care because it would be good for their evil masters, the ISPs.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bovad, Dazchan, Singaporen Empire, The Notorious Mad Jack
Advertisement