Holy Tedalonia wrote:Wow, for the love of rights let them do what they want!
I will get the beating stick and I will make it into a cross, I swear on me mum bruv.
Advertisement

by Ostroeuropa » Tue Nov 14, 2017 1:40 pm
Catoll wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:As I said, you don't have to, but if you're not going to be constructive, its best to be quiet.
You're in a situation where someone is threatening to kill you, and you're there winding them up and stopping people from de-escalating the situation.
Except for the fact that they're already real wound up and escalating the situation on their own just fine without me. If they're going to continue to escalate, and they are dead-set on escalation, there is no amount of de-escalation that I can attempt that will bring around any kind of peaceful resolution, and I'm not going to wait for them to escalate it to actual violence before I start telling them to go fuck themselves. I'm not going to be quiet and sit pretty while things amp up more and more and people like you are acting as apologists for people who want to commit murder and perpetrate racial and ethnical segregation. Sorry, not sorry.

by Holy Tedalonia » Tue Nov 14, 2017 1:40 pm



by Anarchitaria » Tue Nov 14, 2017 1:43 pm

by Holy Tedalonia » Tue Nov 14, 2017 1:43 pm


by Republican Corentia » Tue Nov 14, 2017 1:44 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:Catoll wrote:
Except for the fact that they're already real wound up and escalating the situation on their own just fine without me. If they're going to continue to escalate, and they are dead-set on escalation, there is no amount of de-escalation that I can attempt that will bring around any kind of peaceful resolution, and I'm not going to wait for them to escalate it to actual violence before I start telling them to go fuck themselves. I'm not going to be quiet and sit pretty while things amp up more and more and people like you are acting as apologists for people who want to commit murder and perpetrate racial and ethnical segregation. Sorry, not sorry.
You're advocating literally the opposite of what we need to do when you say you want them isolated. It betrays a lack of comprehension on how cults and extremism works.
It isn't apologetics for their views, it's provably functional.
Do you think the way to deradicalize Jihadis is to constantly insult them and make sure nobody except Jihadis will tolerate their presence? That way lies explosions, same as listening to your views on this subject will lead to more black church shootings.
Or to do what anti-extremist programmes do and get them ties in the community outside the extremist group, especially if it involves regular and positive experiences with members outside their demographic. This, alongside going through their beliefs and questioning them, calmly.
Hate is like a drug in that it's addictive behavior, but beyond that, if all your contacts do it, it's much more difficult to quit.
Consider, do you think it will lead to less drug addicts if we just up and declare nobody who doesn't do drugs will associate with them?
If you're worried, why don't you support what works?
I can only conclude its an excuse, and hate has toxified both you and them.

by Ostroeuropa » Tue Nov 14, 2017 1:47 pm
Republican Corentia wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
You're advocating literally the opposite of what we need to do when you say you want them isolated. It betrays a lack of comprehension on how cults and extremism works.
It isn't apologetics for their views, it's provably functional.
Do you think the way to deradicalize Jihadis is to constantly insult them and make sure nobody except Jihadis will tolerate their presence? That way lies explosions, same as listening to your views on this subject will lead to more black church shootings.
Or to do what anti-extremist programmes do and get them ties in the community outside the extremist group, especially if it involves regular and positive experiences with members outside their demographic. This, alongside going through their beliefs and questioning them, calmly.
Hate is like a drug in that it's addictive behavior, but beyond that, if all your contacts do it, it's much more difficult to quit.
Consider, do you think it will lead to less drug addicts if we just up and declare nobody who doesn't do drugs will associate with them?
If you're worried, why don't you support what works?
I can only conclude its an excuse, and hate has toxified both you and them.
"It isn't apologetics for their views, it's provably functional.
Do you think the way to deradicalize Jihadis is to constantly insult them?"
Wow guys, all we need is LOVE and SUPPORT and people will deradicalize from their violent tendencies! You know, we don't need to deal with that whole saudi funding thing, or the racial caste system in the U.S.

by Tekeristan » Tue Nov 14, 2017 1:47 pm
Republican Corentia wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
You're advocating literally the opposite of what we need to do when you say you want them isolated. It betrays a lack of comprehension on how cults and extremism works.
It isn't apologetics for their views, it's provably functional.
Do you think the way to deradicalize Jihadis is to constantly insult them and make sure nobody except Jihadis will tolerate their presence? That way lies explosions, same as listening to your views on this subject will lead to more black church shootings.
Or to do what anti-extremist programmes do and get them ties in the community outside the extremist group, especially if it involves regular and positive experiences with members outside their demographic. This, alongside going through their beliefs and questioning them, calmly.
Hate is like a drug in that it's addictive behavior, but beyond that, if all your contacts do it, it's much more difficult to quit.
Consider, do you think it will lead to less drug addicts if we just up and declare nobody who doesn't do drugs will associate with them?
If you're worried, why don't you support what works?
I can only conclude its an excuse, and hate has toxified both you and them.
"It isn't apologetics for their views, it's provably functional.
Do you think the way to deradicalize Jihadis is to constantly insult them?"
Wow guys, all we need is LOVE and SUPPORT and people will deradicalize from their violent tendencies! You know, we don't need to deal with that whole saudi funding thing, or the racial caste system in the U.S.


by Sovaal » Tue Nov 14, 2017 1:48 pm
Sleet Clans wrote:With the white population of the world declining world wide, it is nice to see things such as these that can make one take pride in their race

by Catoll » Tue Nov 14, 2017 1:48 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:If you're worried, why don't you support what works?

by Ostroeuropa » Tue Nov 14, 2017 1:50 pm
Catoll wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:If you're worried, why don't you support what works?
Social ostracization and preventative measures like keeping their target audiences informed about their true intentions works pretty well, and when shit really hits the fan, we all saw how things worked out in WWII. When they are actively escalating with the intention to cause harm and damage on a massive scale, that is not the time to open channels for polite discourse and 'de-convert'. That is the time to start kicking those fuckers out. When they are no longer in a position to do damage on a massive scale, THEN we can attempt opening channels of discourse and only then. Up to that point, they are the enemy.

by Holy Tedalonia » Tue Nov 14, 2017 1:51 pm

by Tekeristan » Tue Nov 14, 2017 1:51 pm
Sovaal wrote:Sleet Clans wrote:With the white population of the world declining world wide, it is nice to see things such as these that can make one take pride in their race
Yep, I'm so proud of the fact that my skin has low amounts of melanin comparable to that of other famous people./s
Honestly, people "proud" of there race, no matter which it is, need to grow up.


by Hammer Britannia » Tue Nov 14, 2017 1:55 pm

by Holy Tedalonia » Tue Nov 14, 2017 1:55 pm
Catoll wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:If you're worried, why don't you support what works?
Social ostracization and preventative measures like keeping their target audiences informed about their true intentions works pretty well, and when shit really hits the fan, we all saw how things worked out in WWII. When they are actively escalating with the intention to cause harm and damage on a massive scale, that is not the time to open channels for polite discourse and 'de-convert'. That is the time to start kicking those fuckers out. When they are no longer in a position to do damage on a massive scale, THEN we can attempt opening channels of discourse and only then. Up to that point, they are the enemy.


by Catoll » Tue Nov 14, 2017 1:56 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:Once again, do you believe in a rehabilitative justice system?
Yes or no.
Ostroeuropa wrote:Klan membership and such has risen in recent years, not fallen. The far-right is also making gains across the western world.
The tactics of the progressive left have demonstrably failed, you aren't describing the reality of the situation.
Hate crimes have also increased.

by Holy Tedalonia » Tue Nov 14, 2017 1:57 pm

by Ostroeuropa » Tue Nov 14, 2017 1:58 pm
Catoll wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:Once again, do you believe in a rehabilitative justice system?
Yes or no.
Yes. With rehabilitative justice, the crime has already been perpetrated, the victims are either dead or safely distanced (y'know, isolated) from the perpetrator, and we can start moving forward and moving on. But talking to neo-nazis isn't rehabilitative justice or even remotely comparable when they are, as we speak, attempting to cause change and reform to fit their radical ideologies. Not many crimes in progress have been stopped by negotiation, to continue your strange analogy. Some, yes. But not many.Ostroeuropa wrote:Klan membership and such has risen in recent years, not fallen. The far-right is also making gains across the western world.
The tactics of the progressive left have demonstrably failed, you aren't describing the reality of the situation.
Hate crimes have also increased.
You mean in response to an upsurge of anti-WN sentimentality the WNs are hunkering down and fortifying in fear for their dying ideology, latching onto anyone they can? You don't say!

by A Carrier Pigeon » Tue Nov 14, 2017 1:58 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:A Carrier Pigeon wrote:From the original post:
"We are giving the left all the rope they want and they are racing to hang themselves. The goal is to expose the media’s anti-white bias through their reaction to a harmless flyer. It is working."
A campaign like "Black lives matter" is a positive campaign. However misguided you may think the principle is, the intention is to improve the lot of a portion of society.
This campaign is a negative campaign. It's stated goal is to make a fool of the left. So this campaign sucks.
It's easy to make a positive campaign. For example, in the UK, working class white males fall behind their peers in education. This is a genuine issue that impacts the future prospects of these children. Positive action needs to be taken to address this issue. That's something worth campaigning about, not some BS designed to make the left look stupid.
I agree positive campaigning on those issues is important, and i'd prefer to see it, and have it work.
However, those campaigns are often opposed by the left for noting disadvantages males and whites face. That is why campaigns like this are aimed at "The Left."
(Said as a syndicalist.)
Gandhism is based on a similar concept.
Provoking the enemy into revealing their barbarism to alienate moderate support.
Is Gandhism "Negative"?

by Conserative Morality » Tue Nov 14, 2017 1:59 pm
Holy Tedalonia wrote:Ironically our hero Julius Ceaser killed and enslaved a third of what Hitler did...
Its wouldve been called genocide today, but history has a weird way on looking back on past events...

by Holy Tedalonia » Tue Nov 14, 2017 2:01 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Holy Tedalonia wrote:Ironically our hero Julius Ceaser killed and enslaved a third of what Hitler did...
Its wouldve been called genocide today, but history has a weird way on looking back on past events...
Two million (generally considered a greatly exaggerated estimate but the highest acceptable one) is a third of 30+million?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Al-Momenta, Czechostan, El Lazaro, Elwher, Fahran, Hurdergaryp, Picairn, Tarsonis, The Femboy Liberation Forces Territories, The Jamesian Republic, The marxist plains, The North Polish Union, The Rio Grande River Basin, The Two Jerseys, Thermodolia, Tinhampton, Valentine Z, Valyxias
Advertisement