NATION

PASSWORD

It's Okay To Be White campaign

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Is it though?

It's okay to be white, the campaign is good.
512
63%
It's okay to be white, the campaign is bad. (Explain below.)
248
31%
It's not okay to be white.
51
6%
 
Total votes : 811

User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Fri Nov 17, 2017 9:55 pm

Albrenia wrote:I was thinking, it seems plausible that both sides have some decent points, even if this campaign is just politically-aimed meme stuff.

Your following post is mostly correct. But it still misses the point.
Albrenia wrote:Racism and sexism exist, but are not only afflicted on any one race or gender.

Sure. Racism is directed against all persons of color in the West - not just, say, against black people. And the patriarchy oppresses not only women, but people who do not conform to the gender binary as well. It also hurts men in certain ways.
Albrenia wrote:So do you folks agree that it's possible that we don't live in a racist hivemind, but instead a society of individuals, some of whom are misogynists, misandrists or the many flavours of racist which afflict this world?

No one is saying this. But cultural prejudices, institutionalized bias, systemic discrimination, etc, are all still things, and thoroughly interconnected.
Albrenia wrote:By the same not, we are not all born racist or sexist, nor is racism or sexism a trait of any particular gender or race.

Of course no one is born racist or sexist. But, a white person who grows up in and is conditioned to their status within a society in which whites are on top will retain certain internal prejudices and such, whether they are blatant and conscious or not. It is our responsibility to recognize them and work toward their elimination.
Last edited by Prussia-Steinbach on Fri Nov 17, 2017 9:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


User avatar
Bakery Hill
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11973
Founded: Jul 03, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Bakery Hill » Fri Nov 17, 2017 9:56 pm

Prussia-Steinbach wrote:
Bakery Hill wrote:This is true, but they're not like matter and anti-matter. There's liberal ideas in socialism, sometimes regrettably so and socialistic ideas also creep into liberalism. Socialism is also in many ways a fulfillment of the liberal ideas of the French Revolution.

You can look at it that way, certainly. Political theory is a mire of influence and interpretation. I was just making the point that, in contrast to the modern right-wing narrative, the Clinton political machine is in fact not ideologically equivalent to a Marxist-Leninist vanguard.

Funnily enough, that seems to be the case.

Obama was however once in the same room as a former Maoist.
Founder of the Committee for Proletarian Morality - Winner of Best Communist Award 2018 - Godfather of NSG Syndicalism

User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Fri Nov 17, 2017 9:58 pm

Albrenia wrote:
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:You can look at it that way, certainly. Political theory is a mire of influence and interpretation. I was just making the point that, in contrast to the modern right-wing narrative, the Clinton political machine is in fact not ideologically equivalent to a Marxist-Leninist vanguard.


I'd hope nobody would actually believe that they were. It seems silly that a lot of people accuse the same people of being 'corporate' and 'elite' whilst also calling them Communist.

It's very silly, especially from the standpoint of a communist. Anyone who has read a word of Marx (or even the introductory paragraph for the "Communism" Wikipedia page) knows better than that, but sadly, many people are steadfast and content in their ignorance.
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Fri Nov 17, 2017 9:59 pm

Bakery Hill wrote:
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:You can look at it that way, certainly. Political theory is a mire of influence and interpretation. I was just making the point that, in contrast to the modern right-wing narrative, the Clinton political machine is in fact not ideologically equivalent to a Marxist-Leninist vanguard.

Funnily enough, that seems to be the case.

Obama was however once in the same room as a former Maoist.

And my former boss's husband used to be a military policeman, but I'm still not an authoritarian militarist. :p
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


User avatar
Albrenia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16619
Founded: Aug 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Albrenia » Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:05 pm

Prussia-Steinbach wrote:
Albrenia wrote:I was thinking, it seems plausible that both sides have some decent points, even if this campaign is just politically-aimed meme stuff.

Your following post is mostly correct. But it still misses the point.
Albrenia wrote:Racism and sexism exist, but are not only afflicted on any one race or gender.

Sure. Racism is directed against all persons of color in the West - not just, say, against black people. And the patriarchy oppresses not only women, but people who do not conform to the gender binary as well. It also hurts men in certain ways.
Albrenia wrote:So do you folks agree that it's possible that we don't live in a racist hivemind, but instead a society of individuals, some of whom are misogynists, misandrists or the many flavours of racist which afflict this world?

No one is saying this. But cultural prejudices, institutionalized bias, systemic discrimination, etc, are all still things, and thoroughly interconnected.
Albrenia wrote:By the same not, we are not all born racist or sexist, nor is racism or sexism a trait of any particular gender or race.

Of course no one is born racist or sexist. But, a white person who grows up in and is conditioned to their status within a society in which whites are on top will retain certain internal prejudices and such, whether they are blatant and conscious or not. It is our responsibility to recognize them and work toward their elimination.


Thanks for the in-depth answer to my post. :)

If it's not too off-topic, what exactly is the Patriarchy? I've heard the term a lot.

User avatar
Bakery Hill
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11973
Founded: Jul 03, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Bakery Hill » Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:09 pm

Prussia-Steinbach wrote:
Bakery Hill wrote:Funnily enough, that seems to be the case.

Obama was however once in the same room as a former Maoist.

And my former boss's husband used to be a military policeman, but I'm still not an authoritarian militarist. :p

That's nothing, an acquaintance of mine had a great uncle who was a low ranking diplomat in Nazi Germany. I check myself for fascism every day.
Founder of the Committee for Proletarian Morality - Winner of Best Communist Award 2018 - Godfather of NSG Syndicalism

Donut section
 
Founded:

Postby Donut section » Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:24 pm

Albrenia wrote:
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Your following post is mostly correct. But it still misses the point.

Sure. Racism is directed against all persons of color in the West - not just, say, against black people. And the patriarchy oppresses not only women, but people who do not conform to the gender binary as well. It also hurts men in certain ways.

No one is saying this. But cultural prejudices, institutionalized bias, systemic discrimination, etc, are all still things, and thoroughly interconnected.

Of course no one is born racist or sexist. But, a white person who grows up in and is conditioned to their status within a society in which whites are on top will retain certain internal prejudices and such, whether they are blatant and conscious or not. It is our responsibility to recognize them and work toward their elimination.


Thanks for the in-depth answer to my post. :)

If it's not too off-topic, what exactly is the Patriarchy? I've heard the term a lot.


Patriarchy is the fictional international male boogeyman.

It allows feminists to buy into the Marxist oppressor/oppressed narrative so they don't have to accept any personal responsibility for their own lives and empowers them to act in shitty ways.

User avatar
Aellex
Senator
 
Posts: 4635
Founded: Apr 23, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Aellex » Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:25 pm

Liriena wrote:Except I'd be fine with it if students at any given university chose to no-platform me.

And yet I've troubles believing that given you guys still didn't got over MacCarthyism.
Or they can protest, maybe even apply a healthy bit of civil disobedience.

No, again, they can go fuck themselves if they ain't happy about it and be glad that at least the conference isn't mandatory because it's well within the university's rights than to choose to make it so.
If they despite all that choose to start some shit, the university would be right to penalise their grades or downright expel them.
To many students, their university is a second home, a community, and a community has a right to choose who can use their platforms... specially if the person who wants to use their platform is a notorious extremist or propagandist with no academic value whatsoever.

lol no.
It's an university, not your "second home". Most people have barely more than twenty hours of classes there. Were you talking about preparatory classes or other such things were you actually spend literally half your time and that instill genuine " esprit de corps " , you could have had a point but right now you don't. Students don't make up the "community" of an university. They're CLIENTS of an university.

Again, if they ain't happy about it, they can go fuck themselves because it's not their call than to decide what conferences are on schedule.
Last edited by Aellex on Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Citoyen Français. Disillusioned Gaulliste. Catholique.

Tombé au champ d'honneur, add 11400 posts.

Member of the Committee
for Proletarian Morality


RIP Balk, you were too good a shitposter for this site.

User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:33 pm

Albrenia wrote:Thanks for the in-depth answer to my post. :)

If it's not too off-topic, what exactly is the Patriarchy? I've heard the term a lot.

No worries. I try.

The patriarchy is just the way in which society is largely run by and for men. That's it.
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


User avatar
Aellex
Senator
 
Posts: 4635
Founded: Apr 23, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Aellex » Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:36 pm

Albrenia wrote:[
If it's not too off-topic, what exactly is the Patriarchy? I've heard the term a lot.

A conspiracy theory.
Citoyen Français. Disillusioned Gaulliste. Catholique.

Tombé au champ d'honneur, add 11400 posts.

Member of the Committee
for Proletarian Morality


RIP Balk, you were too good a shitposter for this site.

User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:38 pm

Aellex wrote:
Albrenia wrote:[
If it's not too off-topic, what exactly is the Patriarchy? I've heard the term a lot.

A conspiracy theory.

basic knowledge of sociology = conspiracy theory

lol k
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


User avatar
Aellex
Senator
 
Posts: 4635
Founded: Apr 23, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Aellex » Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:44 pm

Prussia-Steinbach wrote:basic knowledge of sociology = conspiracy theory

lol k

Well, "Patriarchy" =/= basic knowledge of sociology, quite the contrary rather.
It's indeed way more akin to a conspiracy.
Citoyen Français. Disillusioned Gaulliste. Catholique.

Tombé au champ d'honneur, add 11400 posts.

Member of the Committee
for Proletarian Morality


RIP Balk, you were too good a shitposter for this site.

User avatar
The Snazzylands
Diplomat
 
Posts: 726
Founded: Feb 20, 2015
Libertarian Police State

Postby The Snazzylands » Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:44 pm

Donut section wrote:
Albrenia wrote:
Thanks for the in-depth answer to my post. :)

If it's not too off-topic, what exactly is the Patriarchy? I've heard the term a lot.


Patriarchy is the fictional international male boogeyman.

It allows feminists to buy into the Marxist oppressor/oppressed narrative so they don't have to accept any personal responsibility for their own lives and empowers them to act in shitty ways.

Huh, I never knew modern feminism was rooted in critique of political economy though the lens of historical materialism.
Mind awaits entrance
Of a witty signature.
One has yet to come.

User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:48 pm

The Snazzylands wrote:
Donut section wrote:
Patriarchy is the fictional international male boogeyman.

It allows feminists to buy into the Marxist oppressor/oppressed narrative so they don't have to accept any personal responsibility for their own lives and empowers them to act in shitty ways.

Huh, I never knew modern feminism was rooted in critique of political economy though the lens of historical materialism.

No no no no, see, you are misinformed. Marxism is not a methodology for analyzing class relations, an outline of the historical progression of society, and dialectical materialism; it's everything nasty and bad in the world (according, of course, to those paragons of rationality, objectivity, and truth: reactionary white Westerners).
Last edited by Prussia-Steinbach on Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


User avatar
Crockerland
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5456
Founded: Oct 15, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Crockerland » Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:53 pm

Albrenia wrote:
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Your following post is mostly correct. But it still misses the point.

Sure. Racism is directed against all persons of color in the West - not just, say, against black people. And the patriarchy oppresses not only women, but people who do not conform to the gender binary as well. It also hurts men in certain ways.

No one is saying this. But cultural prejudices, institutionalized bias, systemic discrimination, etc, are all still things, and thoroughly interconnected.

Of course no one is born racist or sexist. But, a white person who grows up in and is conditioned to their status within a society in which whites are on top will retain certain internal prejudices and such, whether they are blatant and conscious or not. It is our responsibility to recognize them and work toward their elimination.


Thanks for the in-depth answer to my post. :)

If it's not too off-topic, what exactly is the Patriarchy? I've heard the term a lot.

Feminist version of the Illuminati.
Free Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Tibet.
Gay not Queer / Why Abortion is Genocide / End Gay Erasure
PROUD SUPPORTER OF:
National Liberalism, Nuclear & Geothermal Power, GMOs, Vaccines, Biodiesel, LGBTIA equality, Universal Healthcare, Universal Basic Income, Constitutional Carry, Emotional Support Twinks, Right to Life


User avatar
The Alexanderians
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12581
Founded: Oct 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Alexanderians » Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:55 pm

The Snazzylands wrote:
Donut section wrote:
Patriarchy is the fictional international male boogeyman.

It allows feminists to buy into the Marxist oppressor/oppressed narrative so they don't have to accept any personal responsibility for their own lives and empowers them to act in shitty ways.

Huh, I never knew modern feminism was rooted in critique of political economy though the lens of historical materialism.

Marxist sociology isn't the same though it is related to the marxist economics.
Galloism wrote:Or we can go with feminism doesn't exist. We all imagined it. Collectively.
You can't fight the friction
Women belong in the kitchen
Men belong in the kitchen
Everyone belongs in the kitchen
Kitchen has food
I have brought dishonor to my gaming clan
Achesia wrote:Threads like this is why I need to stop coming to NSG....

Marethian Lupanar of Teladre wrote:A bright and cheerful mountain village of chapel-goers~

The Archregimancy wrote:
Hagia Sophia is best church.

Major-Tom wrote:Why am I full of apathy?

I'm just here to be the peanut gallery
уσυ нανєи'т gσт тнє fυℓℓ єffє¢т

User avatar
Novas Arcanum
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5647
Founded: Oct 14, 2016
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Novas Arcanum » Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:56 pm

This is strange

User avatar
The Alexanderians
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12581
Founded: Oct 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Alexanderians » Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:59 pm

Novas Arcanum wrote:This is strange

Life is strange

What about this in particular is strange?
Galloism wrote:Or we can go with feminism doesn't exist. We all imagined it. Collectively.
You can't fight the friction
Women belong in the kitchen
Men belong in the kitchen
Everyone belongs in the kitchen
Kitchen has food
I have brought dishonor to my gaming clan
Achesia wrote:Threads like this is why I need to stop coming to NSG....

Marethian Lupanar of Teladre wrote:A bright and cheerful mountain village of chapel-goers~

The Archregimancy wrote:
Hagia Sophia is best church.

Major-Tom wrote:Why am I full of apathy?

I'm just here to be the peanut gallery
уσυ нανєи'т gσт тнє fυℓℓ єffє¢т

User avatar
Nevada Communes
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 129
Founded: Nov 17, 2017
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Nevada Communes » Sat Nov 18, 2017 1:46 am

Crockerland wrote:
Albrenia wrote:
Thanks for the in-depth answer to my post. :)

If it's not too off-topic, what exactly is the Patriarchy? I've heard the term a lot.

Feminist version of the Illuminati.

I don't think you understand where the patriarchy lies in the feminist understanding of the world.

You seem to think feminists regard the patriarchy as some evil malevolent force that insidiously conspires against womankind with sadistic intention. Most feminists - radfems included - do not actually believe this.

Feminists tend to regard patriarchy as simply existing. Not inherently as anybody's fault persey - though feminists do expect men to educate themselves on how to undermine it - but instead manifesting itself as a set of cultural norms, beliefs, and institutions that all intersect to implicitly undermine the value of women in all aspects of their lives. The patriarchy isn't some monolithic juggernaut; it's just the result of centuries of Judeo-Christian and pre-modern misogyny.

User avatar
Asherahan
Minister
 
Posts: 2626
Founded: Dec 08, 2015
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Asherahan » Sat Nov 18, 2017 2:47 am

Here is a real question:

I am a Greek Caucasian white male and my people were serfs and slaves to the Ottoman turks for a better part of 400 years so if I go to America and meet a black lives matter group and they start yelling of white privilege what should I do?
Status: Serial Forum Lurker
Ideologically a Blanquist
Who Likes: Single Party Democracy | Democratic Centralism | State Capitalism | Blanquism | State Atheism | Sex Positive Feminism & Socialist Feminism
Former Resident of NSG CTALNH here since 2011 - Add like 10000 to my post number.

User avatar
Albrenia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16619
Founded: Aug 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Albrenia » Sat Nov 18, 2017 4:34 am

Nevada Communes wrote:
Crockerland wrote:Feminist version of the Illuminati.

I don't think you understand where the patriarchy lies in the feminist understanding of the world.

You seem to think feminists regard the patriarchy as some evil malevolent force that insidiously conspires against womankind with sadistic intention. Most feminists - radfems included - do not actually believe this.

Feminists tend to regard patriarchy as simply existing. Not inherently as anybody's fault persey - though feminists do expect men to educate themselves on how to undermine it - but instead manifesting itself as a set of cultural norms, beliefs, and institutions that all intersect to implicitly undermine the value of women in all aspects of their lives. The patriarchy isn't some monolithic juggernaut; it's just the result of centuries of Judeo-Christian and pre-modern misogyny.


Sorry if this is a stupid question, but isn't it a little unfair to expect people (in this case men) to educate themselves and change an alleged part of their culture of which they mostly have no idea?

User avatar
Washington Resistance Army
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53355
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Washington Resistance Army » Sat Nov 18, 2017 4:43 am

Asherahan wrote:Here is a real question:

I am a Greek Caucasian white male and my people were serfs and slaves to the Ottoman turks for a better part of 400 years so if I go to America and meet a black lives matter group and they start yelling of white privilege what should I do?


Ignore them.
Hellenic Polytheist, Socialist

Donut section
 
Founded:

Postby Donut section » Sat Nov 18, 2017 5:06 am

Albrenia wrote:
Nevada Communes wrote:I don't think you understand where the patriarchy lies in the feminist understanding of the world.

You seem to think feminists regard the patriarchy as some evil malevolent force that insidiously conspires against womankind with sadistic intention. Most feminists - radfems included - do not actually believe this.

Feminists tend to regard patriarchy as simply existing. Not inherently as anybody's fault persey - though feminists do expect men to educate themselves on how to undermine it - but instead manifesting itself as a set of cultural norms, beliefs, and institutions that all intersect to implicitly undermine the value of women in all aspects of their lives. The patriarchy isn't some monolithic juggernaut; it's just the result of centuries of Judeo-Christian and pre-modern misogyny.


Sorry if this is a stupid question, but isn't it a little unfair to expect people (in this case men) to educate themselves and change an alleged part of their culture of which they mostly have no idea?


Men have "privilege". So they don't get any consideration.

As I said, it's so that feminists can claim anything they want, because they are always the victim.
Last edited by Donut section on Sat Nov 18, 2017 5:08 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Pilarcraft
Senator
 
Posts: 3826
Founded: Dec 19, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Pilarcraft » Sat Nov 18, 2017 5:07 am

Albrenia wrote:
Nevada Communes wrote:I don't think you understand where the patriarchy lies in the feminist understanding of the world.

You seem to think feminists regard the patriarchy as some evil malevolent force that insidiously conspires against womankind with sadistic intention. Most feminists - radfems included - do not actually believe this.

Feminists tend to regard patriarchy as simply existing. Not inherently as anybody's fault persey - though feminists do expect men to educate themselves on how to undermine it - but instead manifesting itself as a set of cultural norms, beliefs, and institutions that all intersect to implicitly undermine the value of women in all aspects of their lives. The patriarchy isn't some monolithic juggernaut; it's just the result of centuries of Judeo-Christian and pre-modern misogyny.


Sorry if this is a stupid question, but isn't it a little unfair to expect people (in this case men) to educate themselves and change an alleged part of their culture of which they mostly have no idea?

to be fair, the answer to that question (at least, from the POV of a feminist) would be sometihng like how you deal with someone who has an illness he himself did nothing to get.
You educate them, so that their unintentional illness does not affect everyone else.
again, as I'm not exactly a feminist I wouldn't know. find one and ask
The Confederal Alliance of Pilarcraft ✺ That world will cease to be
Led by The Triumvirate.
OOC | Military | History |Language | Overview | Parties | Q&A | Factbooks
Proud Civic Persian Nationalist
B.P.D.: Dossier on parallel home-worlds released, will be updated regularly to include more encountered in the Convergence.

User avatar
Bardarus
Secretary
 
Posts: 29
Founded: Jun 25, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Bardarus » Sat Nov 18, 2017 5:52 am

It's ok to be a white Christian male as far as i know, just stay away from radical Liberals or proud Social Justice Warriors or any other type of radical hippie.
Proud vassal empire of the Imperium of Man since 701.M41

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Al-Momenta, Czechostan, Dimetrodon Empire, El Lazaro, Elwher, Fahran, Google [Bot], Hurdergaryp, Picairn, Tarsonis, The Femboy Liberation Forces Territories, The Jamesian Republic, The marxist plains, The North Polish Union, The Rio Grande River Basin, The Two Jerseys, Thermodolia, Tinhampton, Valentine Z, Valyxias

Advertisement

Remove ads