Sovaal wrote:Greater Redosia wrote:We could always form some good ol peasant republic, form it in the breadbasket states. A Farmers' Republic!
Farmers of the world unite and blockade the cities?
...maybe
Advertisement
by Greater Redosia » Wed Nov 15, 2017 11:49 am
Sovaal wrote:Greater Redosia wrote:We could always form some good ol peasant republic, form it in the breadbasket states. A Farmers' Republic!
Farmers of the world unite and blockade the cities?
by The Two Jerseys » Wed Nov 15, 2017 4:29 pm
by Gig em Aggies » Wed Nov 15, 2017 4:53 pm
by The Two Jerseys » Wed Nov 15, 2017 4:58 pm
by Gig em Aggies » Wed Nov 15, 2017 5:08 pm
by The Two Jerseys » Wed Nov 15, 2017 5:35 pm
by Republic of Keshiland » Fri Nov 24, 2017 1:54 pm
by Senyosu » Fri Nov 24, 2017 2:01 pm
by Len Hyet » Fri Nov 24, 2017 2:07 pm
Republic of Keshiland wrote:I just fiqured out a way to prevent anyone from being able to appeal to the state regional or federal court.
Republic of Keshiland wrote:The city will have 2 court systems. Basic level and appeals.
Republic of Keshiland wrote:Those who get accepted to the court of appeals would be required to sign away there right to repeal further and that the courts ruling is final. That way the laws would never risk being overturned.
The court would simply say, don't like it in KeshiVille You are free to leave
by Republic of Keshiland » Sat Nov 25, 2017 11:06 am
Municipal courts only have jurisdiction over, dun dun dun, municipal matters! So your local court might very well be able to handle a traffic ticket or noise ordinance violation, but something like say, murder has to be handled by the court with jurisdiction - the State court.
by Katganistan » Sat Nov 25, 2017 11:50 am
by Katganistan » Sat Nov 25, 2017 11:54 am
by Katganistan » Sat Nov 25, 2017 11:58 am
Republic of Keshiland wrote:I just fiqured out a way to prevent anyone from being able to appeal to the state regional or federal court. The city will have 2 court systems. Basic level and appeals. Those who get accepted to the court of appeals would be required to sign away there right to repeal further and that the courts ruling is final. That way the laws would never risk being overturned.
The court would simply say, don't like it in KeshiVille You are free to leave
by Grays Harbor » Sat Nov 25, 2017 1:06 pm
by Gun Manufacturers » Sat Nov 25, 2017 7:17 pm
Republic of Keshiland wrote:I just fiqured out a way to prevent anyone from being able to appeal to the state regional or federal court. The city will have 2 court systems. Basic level and appeals. Those who get accepted to the court of appeals would be required to sign away there right to repeal further and that the courts ruling is final. That way the laws would never risk being overturned.
The court would simply say, don't like it in KeshiVille You are free to leave
Natapoc wrote:...You should post more in here so I don't seem like the extremist...
Auraelius wrote:If you take the the TITANIC, and remove the letters T, T, and one of the I's, and add the letters C,O,S,P,R, and Y you get CONSPIRACY. oOooOooooOOOooooOOOOOOoooooooo
Maineiacs wrote:Give a man a fish and he eats for a day, teach a man to fish and he'll sit in a boat and get drunk all day.
Luw wrote:Politics is like having two handfuls of shit - one that smells bad and one that looks bad - and having to decide which one to put in your mouth.
by Len Hyet » Sat Nov 25, 2017 9:02 pm
Republic of Keshiland wrote:Municipal courts only have jurisdiction over, dun dun dun, municipal matters! So your local court might very well be able to handle a traffic ticket or noise ordinance violation, but something like say, murder has to be handled by the court with jurisdiction - the State court.
Well, all the crimes that would be enforced in the city would have municipal legislation like a murder law passed by the legislature. This year some very large precedents have been set. 1. That cities and states are not required to enforce federal law since the federal government is not allowed to punish the state/city. The 2nd was that cities and states are allowed to enter international agreements with other nation i.e. the Paris agreement.
by Gig em Aggies » Sat Nov 25, 2017 9:17 pm
Len Hyet wrote:Republic of Keshiland wrote:
Well, all the crimes that would be enforced in the city would have municipal legislation like a murder law passed by the legislature. This year some very large precedents have been set. 1. That cities and states are not required to enforce federal law since the federal government is not allowed to punish the state/city. The 2nd was that cities and states are allowed to enter international agreements with other nation i.e. the Paris agreement.
Okay so;
1. Cities are required to enforce State law. That's not up for debate. That's a well established fact.
2. Neither cities nor states are permitted to enter into international treaties. They are allowed to abide by them, which is what they're doing with the Paris Agreement, but they are not bound by it because they do not have the standing to sign it.
Neither of those two things you brought up have anything to do with the fact that you cannot waive your rights to trial or appeal. Contracts don't work like that.
I award you no points, and may god have mercy on your soul.
by Republic of Keshiland » Sat Nov 25, 2017 9:51 pm
Len Hyet wrote:Republic of Keshiland wrote:
Well, all the crimes that would be enforced in the city would have municipal legislation like a murder law passed by the legislature. This year some very large precedents have been set. 1. That cities and states are not required to enforce federal law since the federal government is not allowed to punish the state/city. The 2nd was that cities and states are allowed to enter international agreements with other nation i.e. the Paris agreement.
Okay so;
1. Cities are required to enforce State law. That's not up for debate. That's a well established fact.
2. Neither cities nor states are permitted to enter into international treaties. They are allowed to abide by them, which is what they're doing with the Paris Agreement, but they are not bound by it because they do not have the standing to sign it.
Neither of those two things you brought up have anything to do with the fact that you cannot waive your rights to trial or appeal. Contracts don't work like that.
I award you no points, and may god have mercy on your soul.
by The Two Jerseys » Sat Nov 25, 2017 10:24 pm
Republic of Keshiland wrote:Len Hyet wrote:Okay so;
1. Cities are required to enforce State law. That's not up for debate. That's a well established fact.
2. Neither cities nor states are permitted to enter into international treaties. They are allowed to abide by them, which is what they're doing with the Paris Agreement, but they are not bound by it because they do not have the standing to sign it.
Neither of those two things you brought up have anything to do with the fact that you cannot waive your rights to trial or appeal. Contracts don't work like that.
I award you no points, and may god have mercy on your soul.
1. If my police force and city guard have more people then the states police and national guard
they can't inforce any of their laws in are city
and if the federal government leaves us alone to bad so sad for that state i.e. wyoming
2. I honestly wonder what the federal government would do if a state or city created a trade agrement with say the EU with out their permission.
I am sure that the court especially a conservative court would set a precedent allowing contracts to over ride appeils
by Republic of Keshiland » Sat Nov 25, 2017 10:32 pm
Yeah, like that's gonna happen...
Yes, they can.
Parlez-vous anglais?
Habla usted ingles?
Sprechen sie Englisch?
Do you base your legal opinions on anything other than stereotypes?
by The Two Jerseys » Sat Nov 25, 2017 10:44 pm
Yes, they can.
No they can't they could send in the NG and then instantly retreat when they are met with a bigger force with the same equipment.
They would go away especially if we promised not to run candidates for election in the state elections.
Parlez-vous anglais?
Habla usted ingles?
Sprechen sie Englisch?
who?
who?
who?
Do you base your legal opinions on anything other than stereotypes?
You can call it a stereotype but they said coperations are people so I would only think they would let businesses have people sign away the right to appeal.
by Herador » Sat Nov 25, 2017 10:47 pm
The Two Jerseys wrote:So if the feds come to your city to enforce federal laws, your reaction is obstruction of justice at best and insurrection and rebellion at worst...
by Washington Resistance Army » Sat Nov 25, 2017 10:59 pm
Herador wrote:The Two Jerseys wrote:So if the feds come to your city to enforce federal laws, your reaction is obstruction of justice at best and insurrection and rebellion at worst...
Hey man, if it worked for David Koresh, Randy Weaver, Jim Jones, Russell Means, and Carter Camp, it can work for him!
...wait
by Republic of Keshiland » Sat Nov 25, 2017 11:02 pm
Yeah, after the next ice age...
So if the feds come to your city to enforce federal laws, your reaction is obstruction of justice at best and insurrection and rebellion at worst...
No they won't, now that you're in a state of insurrection.
So you base your legal opinions on stereotypes?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Danternoust, Floofybit, Keltionialang, Kostane, Plan Neonie, The Vooperian Union, Tungstan
Advertisement