Nothing to do with sensibilities, but with interest.
Advertisement
by The Parkus Empire » Fri Jan 05, 2018 4:59 pm
by Aillyria » Fri Jan 05, 2018 5:15 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:If RWDT were Romans, who would they be?
......
Aillyria would be Claudius. Temper + unwillingness to suffer fools + supporter of the P E O P L E + traditional legalist
West Oros wrote:GOD DAMMIT! I thought you wouldn't be here.
Well you aren't a real socialist. Just a sociopath disguised as one.
Not to mention that this thread split off from LWDT, so I assumed you would think this thread was a "revisionist hellhole".
by The Parkus Empire » Fri Jan 05, 2018 5:17 pm
by Aillyria » Fri Jan 05, 2018 5:52 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:If RWDT were Romans, who would they be?
......
Aillyria would be Claudius. Temper + unwillingness to suffer fools + supporter of the P E O P L E + traditional legalist
West Oros wrote:GOD DAMMIT! I thought you wouldn't be here.
Well you aren't a real socialist. Just a sociopath disguised as one.
Not to mention that this thread split off from LWDT, so I assumed you would think this thread was a "revisionist hellhole".
by Bienenhalde » Fri Jan 05, 2018 6:22 pm
The Parkus Empire wrote:"A secularization followed in the nineteenth century—an apparently hybrid and impossible combination of aesthetic-romantic and economic-technical tendencies. In reality, the romanticism of the nineteenth century signifies (if we want to utilize the moderately didactic word romanticism in a way different from the phenomenon itself, i.e., as a vehicle of confusion) only the intermediary stage of the aesthetic between the moralism of the eighteenth and the economism of the nineteenth century, only a transition which precipitated the aestheticization of all intellectual domains. It did so very easily and successfully. The way from the meta- physical and moral domains is through the aesthetic domain, which is the surest and most comfortable way to the general economization of intellectual life and to a state of mind which finds the core categories of human existence in production and consumption."
by Northern Davincia » Fri Jan 05, 2018 7:22 pm
The East Marches II wrote:Conserative Morality wrote:Germany needs to relearn national pride. They made some of the coolest nationalist songs in the 19th century. Can we really let such a tradition die?
A-anon d-don't you remember the last time G*rmans were allowed nice things?
*flashbacks*
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."
by War Gears » Fri Jan 05, 2018 9:24 pm
United Muscovite Nations wrote:like most orientalists,
An Orientalist is someone from the West who studies the language, culture, history, or customs of countries in eastern Asia.
United Muscovite Nations wrote:they believe in some mystical Eastern tradition that has no flaws,
United Muscovite Nations wrote:and have the misconception that large numbers of Eastern people actually follow this mystical tradition, rather than adhering to Western ideologies.
by Aillyria » Fri Jan 05, 2018 9:45 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:If RWDT were Romans, who would they be?
......
Aillyria would be Claudius. Temper + unwillingness to suffer fools + supporter of the P E O P L E + traditional legalist
West Oros wrote:GOD DAMMIT! I thought you wouldn't be here.
Well you aren't a real socialist. Just a sociopath disguised as one.
Not to mention that this thread split off from LWDT, so I assumed you would think this thread was a "revisionist hellhole".
by United Muscovite Nations » Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:02 pm
War Gears wrote:United Muscovite Nations wrote:like most orientalists,An Orientalist is someone from the West who studies the language, culture, history, or customs of countries in eastern Asia.
I mean, I guess this is me. Not really sure how it's relevant.United Muscovite Nations wrote:they believe in some mystical Eastern tradition that has no flaws,
Tell me more, Mr. Christian, about how you believe your religion has flaws.United Muscovite Nations wrote:and have the misconception that large numbers of Eastern people actually follow this mystical tradition, rather than adhering to Western ideologies.
Why are these mutually exclusive?
Also, I really don't want to hear this from an "unironic" Byzantinist and Tsarist who also happens to be an American. JFC some self-awareness would be nice.
by Aillyria » Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:10 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:If RWDT were Romans, who would they be?
......
Aillyria would be Claudius. Temper + unwillingness to suffer fools + supporter of the P E O P L E + traditional legalist
West Oros wrote:GOD DAMMIT! I thought you wouldn't be here.
Well you aren't a real socialist. Just a sociopath disguised as one.
Not to mention that this thread split off from LWDT, so I assumed you would think this thread was a "revisionist hellhole".
by United Muscovite Nations » Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:16 pm
Aillyria wrote:WG and UMN, you both are calling the kettle black....tbh.
Where you're from shouldn't be held against your agreement with ideas from elsewhere.
I'm an American, that despises western culture in general, and follows a middle eastern faith. So what.
by War Gears » Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:20 pm
United Muscovite Nations wrote:And I don't want to hear your one-liner borderline trolling
United Muscovite Nations wrote:that adds literally nothing to this thread
United Muscovite Nations wrote:except to show how edgy you are for hating Western society
United Muscovite Nations wrote:despite the fact that you've spent your entire life in one.
by Bienenhalde » Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:20 pm
by Oil exporting People » Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:21 pm
Bienenhalde wrote:Both Europe and Asia have produced magnificent civilizations. Rather than arguing which is better, reactionaries from the both east and west ought to unite against secular-materialist capitalist modernity.
by Herskerstad » Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:22 pm
by War Gears » Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:24 pm
Oil exporting People wrote:I have never regarded the Chinese or the Japanese as being inferior to ourselves.
by United Muscovite Nations » Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:25 pm
War Gears wrote:United Muscovite Nations wrote:And I don't want to hear your one-liner borderline trolling
Saying "yes" to letting German nationalism die isn't "one-liner borderline trolling." considering you're an "ironic Maoist" (implying there isn't anything about your views which isn't ironic) you don't have much of a leg to stand on when it comes to accusing people of trolling.United Muscovite Nations wrote:that adds literally nothing to this thread
Please don't pretend you actually care about quality here.United Muscovite Nations wrote:except to show how edgy you are for hating Western society
> not wanting a resurgence of German nationalism.
> "hating Western society."
Was it you or Parkus who was bitching at me for being an individualist despite belonging to an Eastern religion.United Muscovite Nations wrote:despite the fact that you've spent your entire life in one.
It seems like you're projecting onto me.
Boxer violence against Christians was understandable because of the fact that Christians were attempting to totally destroy the traditional culture and religion of their region. But I've never "exalted" the torture and murder of Chinese Christians, and I'm extremely skeptical based on being able to find next to nothing on alleged torture besides from Christian books.
The West has been spiritually dead for thousands of years. It's why Christianity and Islam managed to spread.
Christianity spread a lot through missionary activity rather than conquest, that was how it spread in Rome and the Germanic tribes at least.
Julian the Apostate didn't go far enough.
by Aillyria » Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:26 pm
Bienenhalde wrote:Both Europe and Asia have produced magnificent civilizations. Rather than arguing which is better, reactionaries from the both east and west ought to unite against secular-materialist capitalist modernity.
Conserative Morality wrote:If RWDT were Romans, who would they be?
......
Aillyria would be Claudius. Temper + unwillingness to suffer fools + supporter of the P E O P L E + traditional legalist
West Oros wrote:GOD DAMMIT! I thought you wouldn't be here.
Well you aren't a real socialist. Just a sociopath disguised as one.
Not to mention that this thread split off from LWDT, so I assumed you would think this thread was a "revisionist hellhole".
by Herskerstad » Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:30 pm
by Aillyria » Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:31 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:If RWDT were Romans, who would they be?
......
Aillyria would be Claudius. Temper + unwillingness to suffer fools + supporter of the P E O P L E + traditional legalist
West Oros wrote:GOD DAMMIT! I thought you wouldn't be here.
Well you aren't a real socialist. Just a sociopath disguised as one.
Not to mention that this thread split off from LWDT, so I assumed you would think this thread was a "revisionist hellhole".
by Oil exporting People » Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:31 pm
War Gears wrote:Except for all the times that he did. Such as referring to them as a "culture-bearing" race instead of a "culture-creating" race like the Aryans, as well as saying that Japanese culture would deteriorate if it didn't have Aryans around.
by Northern Davincia » Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:38 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."
by United Muscovite Nations » Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:39 pm
by Bienenhalde » Fri Jan 05, 2018 10:41 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Alvecia, Ancientania, Atrito, Emotional Support Crocodile, Hirota, Ifreann, Likhinia, Neo-Hermitius, Republics of the Solar Union, Singaporen Empire, Stratonesia, Tungstan
Advertisement