Page 499 of 499

PostPosted: Mon Mar 05, 2018 7:09 pm
by Hakons
Sanctissima wrote:
Northern Davincia wrote:That's a wee bit harsh.


Eh, it's just self-preservation on a national scale.

A country, particularly a developed Western one, should only accept high-skill, desirable immigrants who are willing to fully assimilate. The rest are simply a charity case, and represent a net loss to the country. What little they offer is a population surplus, which frankly should be sought through tax credits and other incentives for having children, rather than importing one's surplus population from abroad.


Is it still charity if I specifically want Christian immigrants? ;)

PostPosted: Mon Mar 05, 2018 7:09 pm
by Herskerstad
Northern Davincia wrote:
The East Marches II wrote:
>He thinks G*rmans can be made into good Romans

It's like you've learned nothing

C'mon, we know it was you who opened the gates for the barbarians, kraut.


Ceasar's brilliant senatorial reshuffle would never come back to stab him in the back now would it?

PostPosted: Mon Mar 05, 2018 7:10 pm
by Sanctissima
Hakons wrote:
Sanctissima wrote:
Eh, it's just self-preservation on a national scale.

A country, particularly a developed Western one, should only accept high-skill, desirable immigrants who are willing to fully assimilate. The rest are simply a charity case, and represent a net loss to the country. What little they offer is a population surplus, which frankly should be sought through tax credits and other incentives for having children, rather than importing one's surplus population from abroad.


Is it still charity if I specifically want Christian immigrants? ;)


To be honest, yes, albeit selective charity. ;)

PostPosted: Mon Mar 05, 2018 7:10 pm
by Herskerstad
Hakons wrote:
Sanctissima wrote:
Eh, it's just self-preservation on a national scale.

A country, particularly a developed Western one, should only accept high-skill, desirable immigrants who are willing to fully assimilate. The rest are simply a charity case, and represent a net loss to the country. What little they offer is a population surplus, which frankly should be sought through tax credits and other incentives for having children, rather than importing one's surplus population from abroad.


Is it still charity if I specifically want Christian immigrants? ;)


Depends on really the terms posed on any immigrant and the situations. Charity would imply at least being willing to suffer a deficit on their behalf I would imagine.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 05, 2018 7:11 pm
by Herskerstad
Sanctissima wrote:
Hakons wrote:
Is it still charity if I specifically want Christian immigrants? ;)


To be honest, yes, albeit selective charity. ;)


Universal immigration charity would be helluva expensive.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 05, 2018 7:12 pm
by Herskerstad

PostPosted: Mon Mar 05, 2018 7:12 pm
by Sanctissima
Herskerstad wrote:
Sanctissima wrote:
To be honest, yes, albeit selective charity. ;)


Universal immigration charity would be helluva expensive.


Then turn the other cheek. :^)

Yes, it would. Actually, it would be akin to national suicide, given the ramifications.