>butchering Menonites
>"liberating the downtrodden"
Advertisement
by United Muscovite Nations » Thu Nov 09, 2017 5:59 pm
by The East Marches II » Thu Nov 09, 2017 5:59 pm
by The Parkus Empire » Thu Nov 09, 2017 6:00 pm
by -Jochistan- » Thu Nov 09, 2017 6:02 pm
by Minzerland II » Thu Nov 09, 2017 6:02 pm
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)
by -Jochistan- » Thu Nov 09, 2017 6:07 pm
by -Jochistan- » Thu Nov 09, 2017 6:08 pm
The East Marches II wrote:-Jochistan- wrote:I don't see what's wrong with freebooters if they're fighting to liberate the downtrodden and carve out a homeland for them.
Bandits are a menace to society and honest citizens, goby pls. The Thirty Years War is proof enough you don't want that sort around. They engaged in butchery in addition to banditry. I see no reason to lionize them as something they weren't.
by Minzerland II » Thu Nov 09, 2017 6:11 pm
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)
by Luminesa » Thu Nov 09, 2017 6:13 pm
-Jochistan- wrote:Luminesa wrote:> Anarchy being based.
> Ever.
Yes, disorder and the destruction of an orderly society is based.
Eh. Anarchism has been characatured into being about that by contemporary media and stupid "activists" that only know of the concept of Anarchy from the lyrics of Punk Rock songs. So I wont hold having that misconception against you.
It's just communism without the concept of a dictatorship of the proletariat.
by War Gears » Thu Nov 09, 2017 6:14 pm
Minzerland II wrote:You may defend the accomplishments of Christianity, but that does not take away from the fact that you do not take Christianity seriously outside of its accomplishments.
Minzerland II wrote:I am not Felrik, this issue has already been resolved. But if you are so inclined to believe that I am Felrik... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Minzerland II wrote:My point being, you criticise UMN and Parkus for discouraging sympathy towards Christianity, but then you do exactly what you criticise: make your beliefs as unsympathetic as possible.
by The Founding Fatherland » Thu Nov 09, 2017 6:14 pm
by Proctopeo » Thu Nov 09, 2017 6:14 pm
-Jochistan- wrote:Luminesa wrote:> Anarchy being based.
> Ever.
Yes, disorder and the destruction of an orderly society is based.
Eh. Anarchism has been characatured into being about that by contemporary media and stupid "activists" that only know of the concept of Anarchy from the lyrics of Punk Rock songs. So I wont hold having that misconception against you.
It's just communism without the concept of a dictatorship of the proletariat.
by The East Marches II » Thu Nov 09, 2017 6:15 pm
-Jochistan- wrote:The East Marches II wrote:
Bandits are a menace to society and honest citizens, goby pls. The Thirty Years War is proof enough you don't want that sort around. They engaged in butchery in addition to banditry. I see no reason to lionize them as something they weren't.
That's why I glorify their violence to get the best of both worlds :^)
by The Founding Fatherland » Thu Nov 09, 2017 6:15 pm
Luminesa wrote:-Jochistan- wrote:Eh. Anarchism has been characatured into being about that by contemporary media and stupid "activists" that only know of the concept of Anarchy from the lyrics of Punk Rock songs. So I wont hold having that misconception against you.
It's just communism without the concept of a dictatorship of the proletariat.
...No...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchy
Literally means a “stateless” society. Communism gives all the power to the state.
by -Jochistan- » Thu Nov 09, 2017 6:15 pm
Luminesa wrote:-Jochistan- wrote:Eh. Anarchism has been characatured into being about that by contemporary media and stupid "activists" that only know of the concept of Anarchy from the lyrics of Punk Rock songs. So I wont hold having that misconception against you.
It's just communism without the concept of a dictatorship of the proletariat.
...No...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchy
Literally means a “stateless” society. Communism gives all the power to the state.
by Proctopeo » Thu Nov 09, 2017 6:17 pm
The Founding Fatherland wrote:Luminesa wrote:...No...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchy
Literally means a “stateless” society. Communism gives all the power to the state.
Uh, no, communism abolishes the state.
by -Jochistan- » Thu Nov 09, 2017 6:17 pm
Proctopeo wrote:-Jochistan- wrote:Eh. Anarchism has been characatured into being about that by contemporary media and stupid "activists" that only know of the concept of Anarchy from the lyrics of Punk Rock songs. So I wont hold having that misconception against you.
It's just communism without the concept of a dictatorship of the proletariat.
tbf all anarchism looks like egoist anarchism if you let it fester long enough
by The Founding Fatherland » Thu Nov 09, 2017 6:20 pm
by War Gears » Thu Nov 09, 2017 6:21 pm
The Founding Fatherland wrote:Proctopeo wrote:On paper.
In practice, it empowers the state and is generally worse than monarchy.
Then it's not communism.
Communism is the absence of a state, currency, and class. If it retains any of those things it's not communism. The states of the Cold War were socialist states run by communists.
by Luminesa » Thu Nov 09, 2017 6:23 pm
by The East Marches II » Thu Nov 09, 2017 6:23 pm
by Proctopeo » Thu Nov 09, 2017 6:23 pm
The Founding Fatherland wrote:Proctopeo wrote:On paper.
In practice, it empowers the state and is generally worse than monarchy.
Then it's not communism.
Communism is the absence of a state, currency, and class. If it retains any of those things it's not communism. The states of the Cold War were socialist states run by communists.
by -Jochistan- » Thu Nov 09, 2017 6:25 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Corporate Collective Salvation, Dogmeat, Eahland, Experina, Ifreann, Ineva, Juansonia, La Xinga, Marxist Mississippi, Norse Inuit Union, Umeria
Advertisement