Advertisement

by Corrian » Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:40 pm

by Corrian » Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:45 pm

by Senkaku » Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:49 pm
Corrian wrote:Roy Moore’s Wife Kayla Pictured In Same Yearbook As Accuser
Mind you, the "dance recital" he met his wife at, according to HIS OWN TIME FRAME, she would have been 15.

by Petrasylvania » Wed Nov 22, 2017 1:59 pm
Senkaku wrote:Corrian wrote:Roy Moore’s Wife Kayla Pictured In Same Yearbook As Accuser
Mind you, the "dance recital" he met his wife at, according to HIS OWN TIME FRAME, she would have been 15.
Did he meet her or just see her? Whatever I read a while ago had some ambiguity...

by Cosmopoles » Wed Nov 22, 2017 2:08 pm
Senkaku wrote:Corrian wrote:Roy Moore’s Wife Kayla Pictured In Same Yearbook As Accuser
Mind you, the "dance recital" he met his wife at, according to HIS OWN TIME FRAME, she would have been 15.
Did he meet her or just see her? Whatever I read a while ago had some ambiguity...

by Seangoli » Wed Nov 22, 2017 2:13 pm
The rumor mill was that he liked young girls, and ... we were advised that he was being suspended from the mall because he would hang around the young girls that worked in the stores and ... really got into a place of where they say he was harassing

by Seangoli » Wed Nov 22, 2017 2:18 pm
Telconi wrote:Farnhamia wrote:As far as possible. It's not achievable 100% but it would be nice if we weren't constantly discovering just how big their feet of clay really are.The Alma Mater wrote:
And the president should be the embodiment of what everyone aspires to be.
I think both of these views are naive. Politicians are corrupt. Period. They should be under constant suspicion, simply by virtue of being government officials. They are not good people, they are at best well checked necessary scum, and at worst monsters.

by Telconi » Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:06 pm
Corrian wrote:Roy Moore’s Wife Kayla Pictured In Same Yearbook As Accuser
Mind you, the "dance recital" he met his wife at, according to HIS OWN TIME FRAME, she would have been 15.

by Telconi » Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:07 pm
Seangoli wrote:Telconi wrote:
I think both of these views are naive. Politicians are corrupt. Period. They should be under constant suspicion, simply by virtue of being government officials. They are not good people, they are at best well checked necessary scum, and at worst monsters.
I feel you miss the point; when someone says that Politicians should be above suspicion, they are not saying that they actually are above suspicion. Rather, we should expect our politicians to remain out of shit that is suspicioius.
It's the general concept of why judges recuse themselves from cases where a conflicts of interest might be involved

by Senkaku » Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:07 pm
Telconi wrote:Corrian wrote:Roy Moore’s Wife Kayla Pictured In Same Yearbook As Accuser
Mind you, the "dance recital" he met his wife at, according to HIS OWN TIME FRAME, she would have been 15.
Mrs. Telconi was twelve when I first met her.

by Telconi » Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:08 pm

by Senkaku » Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:09 pm
Telconi wrote:Seangoli wrote:
I feel you miss the point; when someone says that Politicians should be above suspicion, they are not saying that they actually are above suspicion. Rather, we should expect our politicians to remain out of shit that is suspicioius.
It's the general concept of why judges recuse themselves from cases where a conflicts of interest might be involved
I think you're missing my point. A politician is incapable of staying out of "shit that is suspicious".

by Telconi » Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:10 pm
Senkaku wrote:Telconi wrote:
I think you're missing my point. A politician is incapable of staying out of "shit that is suspicious".
Manifestly untrue, especially since you were generalizing about all government officials ("simply by virtue of being gov't. officials") and literally saying all politicians/officials are scum or monsters. There are plenty of upstanding politicians and officials who are committed to public service. This makes about as much sense as saying "some black people commit crimes, so all should be constantly under suspicion."

by Senkaku » Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:12 pm
And I'm guessing that the love bit came a bit later and your concern at the time was teaching her, not grooming her.
by Senkaku » Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:12 pm
Telconi wrote:Senkaku wrote:Manifestly untrue, especially since you were generalizing about all government officials ("simply by virtue of being gov't. officials") and literally saying all politicians/officials are scum or monsters. There are plenty of upstanding politicians and officials who are committed to public service. This makes about as much sense as saying "some black people commit crimes, so all should be constantly under suspicion."
Bad analogy, criminality is not caused by being black.

by Telconi » Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:13 pm
Senkaku wrote:Telconi wrote:
I wasn't "thirty something" but I was in a position of authority over her. She was a student, I was a TA.
Well, that's a bit different than lurking around events you have no other reason to be at.And I'm guessing that the love bit came a bit later and your concern at the time was teaching her, not grooming her.
No one's saying relationships with age gaps can't work, but I think Roy Moore is a bit different lol

by Telconi » Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:14 pm

by Senkaku » Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:18 pm
Telconi wrote:Senkaku wrote:Well, that's a bit different than lurking around events you have no other reason to be at.And I'm guessing that the love bit came a bit later and your concern at the time was teaching her, not grooming her.
No one's saying relationships with age gaps can't work, but I think Roy Moore is a bit different lol
Yeah, about eight year's later actually![]()
I'm not saying Moore is necessarily innocent, but meeting a future love interest as a child in passing is hardly unusual IMO.

by Telconi » Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:24 pm
Senkaku wrote:Telconi wrote:
Yeah, about eight year's later actually![]()
I'm not saying Moore is necessarily innocent, but meeting a future love interest as a child in passing is hardly unusual IMO.
Sure, but you met her in the context of, you know, actually teaching her. Roy Moore lurking at events trying to pick up teen girls and happening to see his future wife at one such event doesn't strike me as being at all innocuous in the way your story would be.Telconi wrote:
Being a corrupt government official is the inevitable outcome of being a government official.
Oh, for fuck's sakes, no it isn't. There are millions of honest people out there doing important official work who are law-abiding, morally upright people who care about their communities and want to serve their country. This is such bullshit.

by Senkaku » Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:32 pm
Telconi wrote:[
I'm unable to think of a single one. I'm sure you can offer me at least one example out of these millions, but I'd rather not derail the thread further.
Telconi wrote:
On the subject of Moore: Can you be sure he was 'lurking' or is that an assumption based upon a character judgement? Because nothing I have seen says one way or the other if he had a 'legitimate' reason for being there.

by Vassenor » Wed Nov 22, 2017 5:05 pm
The Post requested documentation to support DuPré’s description of another address on Tuesday, and a spokeswoman for the Moore campaign said she would try to respond. On Wednesday morning, after another request for the information, Brett Doster, a strategist for the Moore campaign, sent an email to The Post.
“The Washington Post is a worthless piece of crap that has gone out of its way to railroad Roy Moore,” Doster wrote in an email he described as an “on the record” statement. “There is no need for anyone at the Washington Post to ever reach out to the Roy Moore campaign again because we will not respond to anyone from the Post now or in the future. Happy Thanksgiving.”

by Herador » Wed Nov 22, 2017 6:29 pm
Vassenor wrote:Right thread this time.
WaPo: Roy Moore campaign refuses to substantiate claims about accuser
To wit:The Post requested documentation to support DuPré’s description of another address on Tuesday, and a spokeswoman for the Moore campaign said she would try to respond. On Wednesday morning, after another request for the information, Brett Doster, a strategist for the Moore campaign, sent an email to The Post.
“The Washington Post is a worthless piece of crap that has gone out of its way to railroad Roy Moore,” Doster wrote in an email he described as an “on the record” statement. “There is no need for anyone at the Washington Post to ever reach out to the Roy Moore campaign again because we will not respond to anyone from the Post now or in the future. Happy Thanksgiving.”
...Well that's just childish.

by Petrasylvania » Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:49 pm
Herador wrote:Vassenor wrote:Right thread this time.
WaPo: Roy Moore campaign refuses to substantiate claims about accuser
To wit:
...Well that's just childish.
Pissing off the news doesn't seem to be working for these people, and yet they keep doing it. I'm baffled at how regularly these career politicians and political aids fail to grasp basic PR shit.

by Outer Sparta » Wed Nov 22, 2017 9:51 pm
Petrasylvania wrote:Herador wrote:Pissing off the news doesn't seem to be working for these people, and yet they keep doing it. I'm baffled at how regularly these career politicians and political aids fail to grasp basic PR shit.
Trump didn't give a shit about the women accusing him and called the press The Enemy and he won. Moore's campaign is hoping it works for him too.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Arvenia, Atlantic Isles, Beeglare, Cerespasia, Emotional Support Crocodile, Juansonia, Ostroeuropa, Pizza Friday Forever91, Reich of the New World Order, Stellar Colonies, Teffland, The North Polish Union, The Syrian Interim Government, Thought Obliteration, Ventura Bay
Advertisement