NATION

PASSWORD

The State of the Republican Party Post-2017

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

What is your favorite conservative political party?

Poll ended at Fri Mar 09, 2018 7:42 pm

Liberal Party of Australia
1
5%
Democrats (Brazil)
0
No votes
Kuomintang (Taiwan)
7
35%
Republicans (France)
3
15%
Christian Democrat Union (Germany)
3
15%
Liberal Democratic Party (Japan)
2
10%
Liberty Korea Party (South Korea)
1
5%
People's Party (Spain)
0
No votes
Conservative and Unionist Party (United Kingdom)
2
10%
Independent Democratic Union (Chile)
1
5%
 
Total votes : 20

User avatar
Arlenton
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10238
Founded: Dec 16, 2012
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Arlenton » Sun Nov 26, 2017 5:56 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Arlenton wrote:With the system you proposed, yes. :)

But would you support such a system?

No. I only support two systems. 1 the system we have now and 2 only Vietnamese can vote.

User avatar
Northern Davincia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16960
Founded: Jun 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Northern Davincia » Sun Nov 26, 2017 5:57 pm

Arlenton wrote:
Major-Tom wrote:
Working class Italian conservatives who voted for Obama in '12 but not '08.

I thought Staten Island was primarily wealthy people?

Also kinda odd that McCain won it in 2008 but Romney lost it in 2012.

Staten Island is like Fight Club.
We don't talk about it.
Hoppean Libertarian, Acolyte of von Mises, Protector of Our Sacred Liberties
Economic Left/Right: 9.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.05
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Sun Nov 26, 2017 5:57 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Telconi wrote:
The point had nothing to do with voter fraud, and everything to do with people casting bad votes. People cast bad votes, but we still extend the right to vote to them. Why?

Your exact words.


I just said people... you know that people live outside of Chicago and other urban areas right?
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Major-Tom
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15690
Founded: Mar 09, 2016
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Major-Tom » Sun Nov 26, 2017 5:58 pm

Arlenton wrote:
Major-Tom wrote:
Working class Italian conservatives who voted for Obama in '12 but not '08.

I thought Staten Island was primarily wealthy people?

Also kinda odd that McCain won it in 2008 but Romney lost it in 2012.


Largely working class whites, still. Not too much poverty but still not rich.

That is strange.

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81230
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Sun Nov 26, 2017 5:58 pm

Telconi wrote:
San Lumen wrote:Your exact words.


I just said people... you know that people live outside of Chicago and other urban areas right?

Yes I do. But do urban areas vote badly in your view because they don't vote the way you like?

User avatar
Arlenton
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10238
Founded: Dec 16, 2012
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Arlenton » Sun Nov 26, 2017 5:59 pm

Northern Davincia wrote:
Arlenton wrote:I thought Staten Island was primarily wealthy people?

Also kinda odd that McCain won it in 2008 but Romney lost it in 2012.

Staten Island is like Fight Club.
We don't talk about it.

It along with Chester County Pennsylvania are the Orange Counties of the Northeast.

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Sun Nov 26, 2017 5:59 pm

Valrifell wrote:
Telconi wrote:
Well if you go up the quote chain that you initially replied to, you'll find it in all capital bolder italics...


Misread, then, my bad.

Though, there is a massive gap between how the rules are written and how they affect things. Having rules apply equally is not insurance that the rules themselves are fair.

I'm reminded of Black Codes in the South following Abolition.


Black codes weren't fair because they applied only to blacks. And we're slapped on with the intent of disenfranchising a particular party's voters.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Arlenton
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10238
Founded: Dec 16, 2012
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Arlenton » Sun Nov 26, 2017 6:02 pm

Major-Tom wrote:
Arlenton wrote:I thought Staten Island was primarily wealthy people?

Also kinda odd that McCain won it in 2008 but Romney lost it in 2012.


Largely working class whites, still. Not too much poverty but still not rich.

That is strange.

Wait, I always thought Staten Island was Yankee country club Republican territory???

Everything I know is broken.

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Sun Nov 26, 2017 6:03 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Telconi wrote:
I just said people... you know that people live outside of Chicago and other urban areas right?

Yes I do. But do urban areas vote badly in your view because they don't vote the way you like?


Some do, sure... but it's hardly limited to urban people.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Valrifell
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31063
Founded: Aug 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Valrifell » Sun Nov 26, 2017 6:03 pm

Telconi wrote:
Valrifell wrote:
Misread, then, my bad.

Though, there is a massive gap between how the rules are written and how they affect things. Having rules apply equally is not insurance that the rules themselves are fair.

I'm reminded of Black Codes in the South following Abolition.


Black codes weren't fair because they applied only to blacks. And we're slapped on with the intent of disenfranchising a particular party's voters.


They didn't exclusively apply to blacks, not all of them, at least. They just criminalized behavior that blacks were more likely to take part in, technically any white man could've been arrested for vagrancy. Likely? No. Possible as it was written in the books? Yes.
HAVING AN ALL CAPS SIG MAKES ME FEEL SMART

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Sun Nov 26, 2017 6:05 pm

Valrifell wrote:
Telconi wrote:
Black codes weren't fair because they applied only to blacks. And we're slapped on with the intent of disenfranchising a particular party's voters.


They didn't exclusively apply to blacks, not all of them, at least. They just criminalized behavior that blacks were more likely to take part in, technically any white man could've been arrested for vagrancy. Likely? No. Possible as it was written in the books? Yes.


They were in practice only applied to blacks at least.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Nouveau Yathrib
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1030
Founded: Jul 27, 2016
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Nouveau Yathrib » Sun Nov 26, 2017 6:06 pm

Arlenton wrote:
San Lumen wrote:But would you support such a system?

No. I only support two systems. 1 the system we have now and 2 only Vietnamese can vote.


Second system would not necessarily work in your party’s favor.
I still can't believe that Brazil lost to Germany 1:7. Copy and paste onto your sig if you were alive when this happened.

This account is the predecessor state of Jamilkhuze and Syfenq. This is how they're different, and this is why they exist.

We are currently in the year 2181. About Us | Factbooks | Past and Future History | OOC Info | Public Relations | iiWiki | Q&A

"I am only one, but still I am one. I cannot do everything, but still I can do something.
And because I cannot do everything, I will not refuse to do the something that I can do."

-Edward Everett Hale

User avatar
Arlenton
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10238
Founded: Dec 16, 2012
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Arlenton » Sun Nov 26, 2017 6:14 pm

Nouveau Yathrib wrote:
Arlenton wrote:No. I only support two systems. 1 the system we have now and 2 only Vietnamese can vote.


Second system would not necessarily work in your party’s favor.

Yes it would.

54% of Vietnamese Americans voted for Romney over Obama in 2012.
http://aaldef.org/press-releases/press-release/new-findings-asian-american-vote-in-2012-varied-widely-by-ethnic-group-and-geographic-location.html

67% voted for McCain over Obama in 2008.
http://www.aaldef.org/docs/AALDEF2008ExitPollRpt.pdf

Vietnamese are establishment Republicans.

User avatar
Corrian
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 73683
Founded: Mar 19, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Corrian » Sun Nov 26, 2017 6:32 pm

Apparently Muslim Americans voted heavily for Republicans, too, but I am pretty sure Republicans have managed to fuck that voting block out of their side for a long while.
My Last.FM and RYM

RP's hosted by me: The Last of Us RP's

Look on the bright side, one day you'll be dead~Street Sects

User avatar
Northern Davincia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16960
Founded: Jun 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Northern Davincia » Sun Nov 26, 2017 6:33 pm

Corrian wrote:Apparently Muslim Americans voted heavily for Republicans, too, but I am pretty sure Republicans have managed to fuck that voting block out of their side for a long while.

Unfortunately. Bush dropped the ball but we only kept it rolling.
Hoppean Libertarian, Acolyte of von Mises, Protector of Our Sacred Liberties
Economic Left/Right: 9.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.05
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."

User avatar
Arlenton
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10238
Founded: Dec 16, 2012
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Arlenton » Sun Nov 26, 2017 6:36 pm

Northern Davincia wrote:
Corrian wrote:Apparently Muslim Americans voted heavily for Republicans, too, but I am pretty sure Republicans have managed to fuck that voting block out of their side for a long while.

Unfortunately. Bush dropped the ball but we only kept it rolling.

Was it all just Bush (I'm sure some of it was) or was much of it from uninformed anti-Islamic sentiment that appeared after 9/11?

User avatar
Northern Davincia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16960
Founded: Jun 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Northern Davincia » Sun Nov 26, 2017 7:12 pm

Arlenton wrote:
Northern Davincia wrote:Unfortunately. Bush dropped the ball but we only kept it rolling.

Was it all just Bush (I'm sure some of it was) or was much of it from uninformed anti-Islamic sentiment that appeared after 9/11?

Islamophobia was atrocious after 9/11, but despite the fact that Bush was sympathetic to Muslim Americans, he simply never found the right message to keep them in the party.
And now highly socially conservative voters are in the hands of the Democrats. I have no mouth, and I must scream.
Hoppean Libertarian, Acolyte of von Mises, Protector of Our Sacred Liberties
Economic Left/Right: 9.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.05
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."

User avatar
Nouveau Yathrib
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1030
Founded: Jul 27, 2016
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Nouveau Yathrib » Sun Nov 26, 2017 10:00 pm

Arlenton wrote:
Nouveau Yathrib wrote:
Second system would not necessarily work in your party’s favor.

Yes it would.

54% of Vietnamese Americans voted for Romney over Obama in 2012.
http://aaldef.org/press-releases/press-release/new-findings-asian-american-vote-in-2012-varied-widely-by-ethnic-group-and-geographic-location.html

67% voted for McCain over Obama in 2008.
http://www.aaldef.org/docs/AALDEF2008ExitPollRpt.pdf

Vietnamese are establishment Republicans.


Not if you look at the direction younger Vietnamese Americans trend politically. Or what direction the Republican Party is headed in. I'm not arguing that Vietnamese Americans lean reliably Democratic, just that they have been trending away from voting reliably Republican.

Corrian wrote:Apparently Muslim Americans voted heavily for Republicans, too, but I am pretty sure Republicans have managed to fuck that voting block out of their side for a long while.


The shift of Muslim Americans and Asian Americans from Republican-leaning to reliably Democratic voting blocs reflects the GOP's drift from the Party of Reagan to the Party of Trump. This might not be a change the current Republican establishment can reverse.

http://www.atimes.com/two-americas-whos ... americans/

Moreover, second- and third-generation Asian-Americans tend now to embrace the voting patterns of their respective socio-economic groups. So it is not surprising that young, urbanite, over-educated and well-to-do Asian-American professionals and business executives tend to adopt the political culture of (and vote like other) young, urbanite, over-educated Americans in, say, Manhattan, Cambridge, or Silicon Valley. They identify themselves as politically liberal and vote mostly for Democratic candidates.

To put it in simple terms, more Asian-Americans work today in the Silicon Valley than in the mining industries of West Virginia, and reside in the upper-middle-class suburbs of northern Virginia than in the backwater areas of Mississippi.

And young Asian-Americans embrace the “cool” values of urban America on immigration and environmental protection, and are alienated from the culture of rural America. They have more in common with the liberal Jews of New York City than with gun-toting rednecks in Alabama.

Hence, take an average Asian-American family, and you may discover that the grandfather who immigrated from China or Vietnam and opened a business in the US had voted for Republican Reagan in 1980; his daughter cast her ballot for the Democrat Bill Clinton in 1992; and his grandson was a fan of left-leaning Democratic presidential contender Bernie Sanders or of the libertarian presidential candidate Gary Johnson in 2016.
I still can't believe that Brazil lost to Germany 1:7. Copy and paste onto your sig if you were alive when this happened.

This account is the predecessor state of Jamilkhuze and Syfenq. This is how they're different, and this is why they exist.

We are currently in the year 2181. About Us | Factbooks | Past and Future History | OOC Info | Public Relations | iiWiki | Q&A

"I am only one, but still I am one. I cannot do everything, but still I can do something.
And because I cannot do everything, I will not refuse to do the something that I can do."

-Edward Everett Hale

User avatar
Arlenton
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10238
Founded: Dec 16, 2012
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Arlenton » Sun Nov 26, 2017 10:14 pm

Nouveau Yathrib wrote:
Arlenton wrote:Yes it would.

54% of Vietnamese Americans voted for Romney over Obama in 2012.
http://aaldef.org/press-releases/press-release/new-findings-asian-american-vote-in-2012-varied-widely-by-ethnic-group-and-geographic-location.html

67% voted for McCain over Obama in 2008.
http://www.aaldef.org/docs/AALDEF2008ExitPollRpt.pdf

Vietnamese are establishment Republicans.


Not if you look at the direction younger Vietnamese Americans trend politically. Or what direction the Republican Party is headed in. I'm not arguing that Vietnamese Americans lean reliably Democratic, just that they have been trending away from voting reliably Republican.

Corrian wrote:Apparently Muslim Americans voted heavily for Republicans, too, but I am pretty sure Republicans have managed to fuck that voting block out of their side for a long while.


The shift of Muslim Americans and Asian Americans from Republican-leaning to reliably Democratic voting blocs reflects the GOP's drift from the Party of Reagan to the Party of Trump. This might not be a change the current Republican establishment can reverse.

http://www.atimes.com/two-americas-whos ... americans/

Moreover, second- and third-generation Asian-Americans tend now to embrace the voting patterns of their respective socio-economic groups. So it is not surprising that young, urbanite, over-educated and well-to-do Asian-American professionals and business executives tend to adopt the political culture of (and vote like other) young, urbanite, over-educated Americans in, say, Manhattan, Cambridge, or Silicon Valley. They identify themselves as politically liberal and vote mostly for Democratic candidates.

To put it in simple terms, more Asian-Americans work today in the Silicon Valley than in the mining industries of West Virginia, and reside in the upper-middle-class suburbs of northern Virginia than in the backwater areas of Mississippi.

And young Asian-Americans embrace the “cool” values of urban America on immigration and environmental protection, and are alienated from the culture of rural America. They have more in common with the liberal Jews of New York City than with gun-toting rednecks in Alabama.

Hence, take an average Asian-American family, and you may discover that the grandfather who immigrated from China or Vietnam and opened a business in the US had voted for Republican Reagan in 1980; his daughter cast her ballot for the Democrat Bill Clinton in 1992; and his grandson was a fan of left-leaning Democratic presidential contender Bernie Sanders or of the libertarian presidential candidate Gary Johnson in 2016.

So Vietnamese voters align with me on most issues. Which is my point.

Also the GOP won Asian voters as a whole nationally in 2014.
Last edited by Arlenton on Sun Nov 26, 2017 10:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81230
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Sun Nov 26, 2017 10:16 pm

Arlenton wrote:
Nouveau Yathrib wrote:
Not if you look at the direction younger Vietnamese Americans trend politically. Or what direction the Republican Party is headed in. I'm not arguing that Vietnamese Americans lean reliably Democratic, just that they have been trending away from voting reliably Republican.



The shift of Muslim Americans and Asian Americans from Republican-leaning to reliably Democratic voting blocs reflects the GOP's drift from the Party of Reagan to the Party of Trump. This might not be a change the current Republican establishment can reverse.

http://www.atimes.com/two-americas-whos ... americans/


So Vietnamese voters align with me on most issues. Which is my point.

Also the GOP won Asian voters as a whole nationally in 2014.

So only the people who agree with you should be allowed to vote? Sounds like you want a dictatorship or one party state.

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Sun Nov 26, 2017 10:24 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Arlenton wrote:So Vietnamese voters align with me on most issues. Which is my point.

Also the GOP won Asian voters as a whole nationally in 2014.

So only the people who agree with you should be allowed to vote? Sounds like you want a dictatorship or one party state.


TBF "Vietnamese" isn't a party...
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Arlenton
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10238
Founded: Dec 16, 2012
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Arlenton » Sun Nov 26, 2017 10:26 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Arlenton wrote:So Vietnamese voters align with me on most issues. Which is my point.

Also the GOP won Asian voters as a whole nationally in 2014.

So only the people who agree with you should be allowed to vote? Sounds like you want a dictatorship or one party state.

Yes. Now bow down to your center-right Southeast Asian overlords.
Last edited by Arlenton on Sun Nov 26, 2017 10:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81230
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Sun Nov 26, 2017 10:29 pm

Arlenton wrote:
San Lumen wrote:So only the people who agree with you should be allowed to vote? Sounds like you want a dictatorship or one party state.

Yes. Now bow down to your center-right Southeast Asian overlords.

Laos would be perfect for you as its a one party state and the incumbent party is guaranteed of winning.

User avatar
Petrasylvania
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10647
Founded: Oct 20, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Petrasylvania » Sun Nov 26, 2017 10:31 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Arlenton wrote:Yes. Now bow down to your center-right Southeast Asian overlords.

Laos would be perfect for you as its a one party state and the incumbent party is guaranteed of winning.

Let him keep going. Sooner or later he'll drive another Vietnamese to go Uncle Ho.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be proof of a pan-Islamic plot and Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand, crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of mentally ill lone wolves who do not represent their professed belief system at all.
The probability of someone secretly participating in homosexual acts is directly proportional to the frequency and loudness of their publicly professed disapproval and/or disgust for homosexuality.
If Donald Trump accuses an individual of malfeasance without evidence, it is almost a certainty either he or someone associated with him has in fact committed that very same malfeasance to a greater degree.

New Flag Courtesy of The Realist Polities

User avatar
Arlenton
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10238
Founded: Dec 16, 2012
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Arlenton » Sun Nov 26, 2017 10:31 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Arlenton wrote:Yes. Now bow down to your center-right Southeast Asian overlords.

Laos would be perfect for you as its a one party state and the incumbent party is guaranteed of winning.

I prefer Oklahoma. A much more free single party state.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bienenhalde, El Lazaro, Firaeth, Gun Manufacturers, Hurdergaryp, Ostroeuropa, Swedesttanossa, Tarsonis, The United Penguin Commonwealth, Uminaku

Advertisement

Remove ads