This is his answer to "what type of leftist are you".
Advertisement
by The Arian nation » Thu Feb 22, 2018 10:44 am
by The Arian nation » Thu Feb 22, 2018 10:46 am
by Aillyria » Thu Feb 22, 2018 10:49 am
Cekoviu wrote:Aillyria wrote:CNN, MSNBC, and media outlets of their ilk are regressive or at least sympathetic. Tbh, feminism has created this backlash on their own through their sexism and sympathizing for groups who'd love to kill us all (Islamists), forcing people who'd otherwise oppose eachother to move closer.
nice meem friendo :^)So now being egalitarian is being an MRA? That's quite telling of the feminist mindset right there! You don't want women to have superior rights to men? You're a misogynist!!!
Look, the regressives are the reason why no one wants to identify with the left, why many of the non-SJW leftists and socialists are desociating themselves from the "leftist" label (like I've done myself). They've turned the left into a joke, a very scary, very totalitarian joke.
If you want to willingly misinterpret my posts so you can start fights, go ahead, but i'm not falling for your bait, and I'm not interested in wasting my time arguing more about how ebil feminists are.
Conserative Morality wrote:If RWDT were Romans, who would they be?
......
Aillyria would be Claudius. Temper + unwillingness to suffer fools + supporter of the P E O P L E + traditional legalist
West Oros wrote:GOD DAMMIT! I thought you wouldn't be here.
Well you aren't a real socialist. Just a sociopath disguised as one.
Not to mention that this thread split off from LWDT, so I assumed you would think this thread was a "revisionist hellhole".
by Cekoviu » Thu Feb 22, 2018 10:55 am
Aillyria wrote:Cekoviu wrote:nice meem friendo :^)
If you want to willingly misinterpret my posts so you can start fights, go ahead, but i'm not falling for your bait, and I'm not interested in wasting my time arguing more about how ebil feminists are.
Because you can't prove that it isn't evil. Intersectionalism and Feminism's relevance to honest leftist-socialist activism has been the dominant subject for easily the last 10 or so pages, and not a single time has any of its proponents made any convincing arguments of their ideology's utility to our struggle against the bourgeois and inequality of opportunities. You know why? Because it can't be done, you can't defend an undefendable ideology based on half truths at best, and obsessed with abstraction and overemotiveness.
by Jackania yugo » Thu Feb 22, 2018 10:57 am
by The Arian nation » Thu Feb 22, 2018 11:06 am
Jackania yugo wrote:so...err...what are the problems with the world and how do we fix them?
by Aillyria » Thu Feb 22, 2018 11:14 am
Cekoviu wrote:Aillyria wrote:Because you can't prove that it isn't evil. Intersectionalism and Feminism's relevance to honest leftist-socialist activism has been the dominant subject for easily the last 10 or so pages, and not a single time has any of its proponents made any convincing arguments of their ideology's utility to our struggle against the bourgeois and inequality of opportunities. You know why? Because it can't be done, you can't defend an undefendable ideology based on half truths at best, and obsessed with abstraction and overemotiveness.
1.)Because I don't think feminism has anything to do with socialism. (2.)They can work together, but I've never argued that feminism is required for "dismantling the bourgeoisie" (3.)which I don't want to do anyway as a social democrat).(4.) Take your anger about this out on DCF.
(5.)And you also can't prove that socialism isn't evil, Islam isn't evil, and men aren't evil. Checkmate, atheists! :^)
Conserative Morality wrote:If RWDT were Romans, who would they be?
......
Aillyria would be Claudius. Temper + unwillingness to suffer fools + supporter of the P E O P L E + traditional legalist
West Oros wrote:GOD DAMMIT! I thought you wouldn't be here.
Well you aren't a real socialist. Just a sociopath disguised as one.
Not to mention that this thread split off from LWDT, so I assumed you would think this thread was a "revisionist hellhole".
by Dumb Ideologies » Thu Feb 22, 2018 11:16 am
Jackania yugo wrote:so...err...what are the problems with the world and how do we fix them?
by Jackania yugo » Thu Feb 22, 2018 11:22 am
by The Grene Knyght » Thu Feb 22, 2018 11:27 am
Jackania yugo wrote:Why does centrism not work (please give a proper response).
[_★_]
(◕‿◕)
Currently
Reading
2015: x=-8.75,y=-6.56
2016: x=-8.88,y=-9.54
2017: x=-9.63,y=-9.90
2018: x=-9.88,y=-9.23
2019: x=-10.0,y=-9.90
2020: x=-10.0,y=-10.0
2021: x=-10.0,y=-10.0
FULLY AUTOMATED LUXURY GAY SPACE COMMUNISM
Portal Nationalist | Proletarian MoralistPRO: Socialism, Communism, Internationalism, Revolution, Leninism.
NEUTRAL: Anarchism, Marxism-Leninism.
ANTI: Capitalism, Liberalism, Nationalism, Fascists, Hyper-Sectarian Leftists.
by Gospel Power » Thu Feb 22, 2018 11:28 am
by The Grene Knyght » Thu Feb 22, 2018 11:31 am
[_★_]
(◕‿◕)
Currently
Reading
2015: x=-8.75,y=-6.56
2016: x=-8.88,y=-9.54
2017: x=-9.63,y=-9.90
2018: x=-9.88,y=-9.23
2019: x=-10.0,y=-9.90
2020: x=-10.0,y=-10.0
2021: x=-10.0,y=-10.0
FULLY AUTOMATED LUXURY GAY SPACE COMMUNISM
Portal Nationalist | Proletarian MoralistPRO: Socialism, Communism, Internationalism, Revolution, Leninism.
NEUTRAL: Anarchism, Marxism-Leninism.
ANTI: Capitalism, Liberalism, Nationalism, Fascists, Hyper-Sectarian Leftists.
by Gospel Power » Thu Feb 22, 2018 11:35 am
by Aillyria » Thu Feb 22, 2018 11:35 am
Conserative Morality wrote:If RWDT were Romans, who would they be?
......
Aillyria would be Claudius. Temper + unwillingness to suffer fools + supporter of the P E O P L E + traditional legalist
West Oros wrote:GOD DAMMIT! I thought you wouldn't be here.
Well you aren't a real socialist. Just a sociopath disguised as one.
Not to mention that this thread split off from LWDT, so I assumed you would think this thread was a "revisionist hellhole".
by Gospel Power » Thu Feb 22, 2018 11:38 am
by Democratic Communist Federation » Thu Feb 22, 2018 11:44 am
[color=#ff0000]Member,[/color] [url=https://www.nationstates.net/nation=democratic_communist_federation/detail=factbook/id=870177][color=#ff0000][u]Antifa Dialectical metaRealism[/u][/color][/url]
by Cekoviu » Thu Feb 22, 2018 11:55 am
Aillyria wrote:Cekoviu wrote:1.)Because I don't think feminism has anything to do with socialism. (2.)They can work together, but I've never argued that feminism is required for "dismantling the bourgeoisie" (3.)which I don't want to do anyway as a social democrat).(4.) Take your anger about this out on DCF.
(5.)And you also can't prove that socialism isn't evil, Islam isn't evil, and men aren't evil. Checkmate, atheists! :^)
1.) I agree.
2.) Socialism and feminism don't have anything in common to facilitate an alliance, tbh.
3.) I'm aware of your political leanings.
4.) For the last time, I'm not angry. Disagreement =/= anger. I'm passionate about socialism and betterment of society, so I am strong with my wording a bit, but I'm not angry.
5.) What? I'm not an atheist.....
by Cekoviu » Thu Feb 22, 2018 11:55 am
Democratic Communist Federation wrote:Honestly, it appears to me that terms like feminist, SJW, and regressive left are pretty much devoid of meaning in most postings. They are really just shorthand ways for abbreviating everything I don't like.
by Sunstruck » Thu Feb 22, 2018 12:07 pm
Democratic Communist Federation wrote:Honestly, it appears to me that terms like feminist, SJW, and regressive left are pretty much devoid of meaning in most postings. They are really just shorthand ways for abbreviating everything I don't like.
by Aillyria » Thu Feb 22, 2018 12:08 pm
Cekoviu wrote:Aillyria wrote:1.) I agree.
2.) Socialism and feminism don't have anything in common to facilitate an alliance, tbh.
3.) I'm aware of your political leanings.
4.) For the last time, I'm not angry. Disagreement =/= anger. I'm passionate about socialism and betterment of society, so I am strong with my wording a bit, but I'm not angry.
5.) What? I'm not an atheist.....
3. Don't see why you're trying to pander to my apparent anti-bourgeoisie thoughts, then.
4. >last time
Don't remember you ever saying that before, but eh. Bad word choice either way.
5. Man, you really need to get up to date with meme culture.
Cekoviu wrote:Democratic Communist Federation wrote:Honestly, it appears to me that terms like feminist, SJW, and regressive left are pretty much devoid of meaning in most postings. They are really just shorthand ways for abbreviating everything I don't like.
Feminist at least has some meaning, but otherwise true.
Conserative Morality wrote:If RWDT were Romans, who would they be?
......
Aillyria would be Claudius. Temper + unwillingness to suffer fools + supporter of the P E O P L E + traditional legalist
West Oros wrote:GOD DAMMIT! I thought you wouldn't be here.
Well you aren't a real socialist. Just a sociopath disguised as one.
Not to mention that this thread split off from LWDT, so I assumed you would think this thread was a "revisionist hellhole".
by Sunstruck » Thu Feb 22, 2018 12:09 pm
by The Multiversal Communist Collective » Thu Feb 22, 2018 12:10 pm
Aillyria wrote:I'm a bit older than the majority of the forum, so I'm not all that up to speed on new memes.
by Sunstruck » Thu Feb 22, 2018 12:11 pm
Aillyria wrote:Cekoviu wrote:3. Don't see why you're trying to pander to my apparent anti-bourgeoisie thoughts, then.
4. >last time
Don't remember you ever saying that before, but eh. Bad word choice either way.
5. Man, you really need to get up to date with meme culture.
I'm a bit older than the majority of the forum, so I'm not all that up to speed on new memes.Cekoviu wrote:Feminist at least has some meaning, but otherwise true.
If that were true I'd be calling people like Richard Spencer an SJW or regressive too. I despise both the alt-right and regressive left.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Philjia, Sarduri, The Lone Alliance, Turenia
Advertisement