26 Dead including children at San Antonio Church massacre

[Arlenton]

Thank God for Neil Gorsuch.

[Washington Resistance Army]

Thank God for Neil Gorsuch.

Hurry up and replace Kennedy with someone good ya darn dirty neocon.

[Telconi]

Thank God for Neil Gorsuch.

We'll see. I'd like to see some more pro-gun SCOUTS justices in place.

[Thermodolia]

Thank God for Neil Gorsuch.

Hurry up and replace Kennedy with someone good ya darn dirty neocon.

Replace Kennedy? He's not dead yet ya goof

[Arlenton]

Thank God for Neil Gorsuch.

We'll see. I'd like to see some more pro-gun SCOUTS justices in place.

Same. Crazy to think how a liberal USSC was almost the case. We really dodged a bullet there.

[Thermodolia]

We'll see. I'd like to see some more pro-gun SCOUTS justices in place.

Same. Crazy to think how a liberal USSC was almost the case. We really dodged a bullet there.

Id like to see a more socially liberal court with a pro-national security bent

[Telconi]

We'll see. I'd like to see some more pro-gun SCOUTS justices in place.

Same. Crazy to think how a liberal USSC was almost the case. We really dodged a bullet there.

I'd like to see a court that's actually liberal, not DNC brand "Liberal"

[Imperializt Russia]

The argument is backwards and hyperbolic.

It only makes sense if one argues that the gun registry would be used to imprison or otherwise persons for having owned firearms, which... makes no sense?
Whereas registries of ethnicities or perceived proclivities have been used and would still be used to do just that against such persons.

They'd be used to confiscate the guns on said registry.

If you commit a crime worth having the gun confiscated, sure.

How many times has your car been confiscated due to it being centrally registered with the government?
(and how does this work in your hyperbolic "argument"? a gay person has their... sexuality... confiscated? Unless you're an escaped piece of an MLP fanfic, your gun isn't part of you to be surgically removed. So no, it's not comparable to conversion therapy)

[Washington Resistance Army]

They'd be used to confiscate the guns on said registry.

If you commit a crime worth having the gun confiscated, sure.

How many times has your car been confiscated due to it being centrally registered with the government?

The crime being someone deciding "we should ban that too!"

[Imperializt Russia]

If you commit a crime worth having the gun confiscated, sure.

How many times has your car been confiscated due to it being centrally registered with the government?

The crime being someone deciding "we should ban that too!"

Judging by the current political landscape, that seems completely impossible.

Far more unlikely than a registry of climate scientists, Muslims, Planned Parenthood users or homosexuals being drawn up in the current political landscape.
Hell in the UK, we had a member of parliament use official government documentation to try and order universities to submit their EU-related teaching materials and professors to deem whether such was sufficiently treasonous.

The UK has had a firearm registry for decades. Number of mass confiscations: 0. Technically 0, the handgun ban was enforced through an amnesty, I believe. We never "banned guns", there are still around 4 million firearms in ownership in the UK.

[Grinning Dragon]

A firearm registry would be expensive to maintain. Canada repealed their universal gun registry back in 2012 as it cost a 100times more than promised and non-compliance was around 50% and proved to be entirely useless in fighting crime.

[Telconi]

They'd be used to confiscate the guns on said registry.

If you commit a crime worth having the gun confiscated, sure.

How many times has your car been confiscated due to it being centrally registered with the government?
(and how does this work in your hyperbolic "argument"? a gay person has their... sexuality... confiscated? Unless you're an escaped piece of an MLP fanfic, your gun isn't part of you to be surgically removed. So no, it's not comparable to conversion therapy)

Like, wake up one morning to your government deciding you're committing a crime? Such a wicked man I am.

Also, there isn't an entire political party opposed to private car ownership. And yes, it really us comparable, just because it isn't a physical part doesn't make it less of a right, if someone demanded all homosexuals be on a list, and actively advocated for the chemical castration of homosexuals, they would oppose it, and rightfully so.

[Ifreann]

If you commit a crime worth having the gun confiscated, sure.

How many times has your car been confiscated due to it being centrally registered with the government?
(and how does this work in your hyperbolic "argument"? a gay person has their... sexuality... confiscated? Unless you're an escaped piece of an MLP fanfic, your gun isn't part of you to be surgically removed. So no, it's not comparable to conversion therapy)

Like, wake up one morning to your government deciding you're committing a crime? Such a wicked man I am.

Also, there isn't an entire political party opposed to private car ownership. And yes, it really us comparable, just because it isn't a physical part doesn't make it less of a right, if someone demanded all homosexuals be on a list, and actively advocated for the chemical castration of homosexuals, they would oppose it, and rightfully so.

Is there a political party opposed to private gun ownership?

[Valrifell]

Same. Crazy to think how a liberal USSC was almost the case. We really dodged a bullet there.

I'd like to see a court that's actually liberal, not DNC brand "Liberal"

Translation: "I'd like a court that always agrees with me, also I'm morally and ideological superiority to Democrats"

[Thermodolia]

Same. Crazy to think how a liberal USSC was almost the case. We really dodged a bullet there.

I'd like to see a court that's actually liberal, not DNC brand "Liberal"

I two wish that money grew on trees

[Fartsniffage]

Why are you worried? You have a gun, defend yourself if the government goes all tyrannical.

That's just asinine and you know it, got an actual response?

You take things too seriously. Calm down or you'll have a heart attack and I hear that's rather expensive in the US...

[Telconi]

Like, wake up one morning to your government deciding you're committing a crime? Such a wicked man I am.

Also, there isn't an entire political party opposed to private car ownership. And yes, it really us comparable, just because it isn't a physical part doesn't make it less of a right, if someone demanded all homosexuals be on a list, and actively advocated for the chemical castration of homosexuals, they would oppose it, and rightfully so.

Is there a political party opposed to private gun ownership?

https://www.democrats.org

[Imperializt Russia]

If you commit a crime worth having the gun confiscated, sure.

How many times has your car been confiscated due to it being centrally registered with the government?
(and how does this work in your hyperbolic "argument"? a gay person has their... sexuality... confiscated? Unless you're an escaped piece of an MLP fanfic, your gun isn't part of you to be surgically removed. So no, it's not comparable to conversion therapy)

Like, wake up one morning to your government deciding you're committing a crime? Such a wicked man I am.

Literally what major movement in the US government believes that the general ownership of firearms should be a crime?
In the UK, the US' favourite gun-rights punching bag, private, personal ownership of firearms is not remotely illegal or a criminal act, so long as it is performed through the appropriate channels.

Also, there isn't an entire political party opposed to private car gun ownership.

You're right, there isn't. What's your point?

Oh wait... no I misread, I assumed you were making sense and saying "there isn't an entire political party opposed to private gun ownership".

The Democrat Party is not opposed to private firearm ownership, in part or its entirety.

And yes, it really us comparable

No it fucking isn't.

[Telconi]

I'd like to see a court that's actually liberal, not DNC brand "Liberal"

Translation: "I'd like a court that always agrees with me, also I'm morally and ideological superiority to Democrats"

Not necessarily the first one. But yeah, the second is a given.

[Thermodolia]

They'd be used to confiscate the guns on said registry.

If you commit a crime worth having the gun confiscated, sure.

How many times has your car been confiscated due to it being centrally registered with the government?

My car isn't centrally registered with the government. The national government has no idea what I drive. The national government should not be allowed to register guns, leave it up to the states

[Thermodolia]

I'd like to see a court that's actually liberal, not DNC brand "Liberal"

Translation: "I'd like a court that always agrees with me, also I'm morally and ideological superiority to Democrats"

TIL that Telconi isn't a democrat because he disagrees with the DNC

[Telconi]

Like, wake up one morning to your government deciding you're committing a crime? Such a wicked man I am.

Literally what major movement in the US government believes that the general ownership of firearms should be a crime?
In the UK, the US' favourite gun-rights punching bag, private, personal ownership of firearms is not remotely illegal or a criminal act, so long as it is performed through the appropriate channels.

Also, there isn't an entire political party opposed to private car gun ownership.

You're right, there isn't. What's your point?

Oh wait... no I misread, I assumed you were making sense and saying "there isn't an entire political party opposed to private gun ownership".

The Democrat Party is not opposed to private firearm ownership, [i]in part or its entirety[/i].

And yes, it really us comparable

No it fucking isn't.

TIL there's no such thing l, nor has there ever been a such a thing as an assault weapon ban, handgun bans, the NFA, the CA handgun roster. The SAFE act, etc. etc. etc.

You mean coming into somebody's home and forcefully depriving them of a human right isn't comparable to coming into somebody's home and forcefully depriving them of a human right? Care to explain?

[Imperializt Russia]

If you commit a crime worth having the gun confiscated, sure.

How many times has your car been confiscated due to it being centrally registered with the government?

My car isn't centrally registered with the government. The national government has no idea what I drive. The national government should not be allowed to register guns, leave it up to the states

It's centrally registered to your state, is it not?

Your vehicle holds a licence plate which is tied to it. There is a registered owner of the vehicle, identified by its licence plate.
No, it isn't registered with the federal government, because the federal government does not issue plates to the US populace. But I didn't claim it did.

[Sovaal]

I'd like to see a court that's actually liberal, not DNC brand "Liberal"

Translation: "I'd like a court that always agrees with me,

I mean if anyone gives a shit about the courts they want this. Don't tell me you don't either.

also I'm morally and ideological superiority to Democrats"

Ideas like this go towards both sides.

[Imperializt Russia]

Literally what major movement in the US government believes that the general ownership of firearms should be a crime?
In the UK, the US' favourite gun-rights punching bag, private, personal ownership of firearms is not remotely illegal or a criminal act, so long as it is performed through the appropriate channels.
You're right, there isn't. What's your point?

Oh wait... no I misread, I assumed you were making sense and saying "there isn't an entire political party opposed to private gun ownership".

The Democrat Party is not opposed to private firearm ownership, in part or its entirety.No it fucking isn't.

TIL there's no such thing l, nor has there ever been a such a thing as an assault weapon ban, handgun bans, the NFA, the CA handgun roster. The SAFE act, etc. etc. etc.

You mean coming into somebody's home and forcefully depriving them of a human right isn't comparable to coming into somebody's home and forcefully depriving them of a human right? Care to explain?

And private firearm ownership - even of those types of weapons - was not outlawed. New sales and transfers of some of those types of weapons were heavily restricted but... firearm ownership of modern semiautomatic weapons was not outlawed, attempted to be outlawed, nor suggested as policy by the Democrat Party.