And the highest IQ.
Advertisement

by Collatis » Fri Nov 03, 2017 1:02 pm

PRO: social democracy, internationalism, progressivism, democracy,
republicanism, human rights, democratic socialism, Keynesianism,
EU, NATO, two-state solution, Democratic Party, Bernie Sanders
CON: conservatism, authoritarianism, totalitarianism, neoliberalism,
death penalty, Marxism-Leninism, laissez faire, reaction, fascism,
antisemitism, isolationism, Republican Party, Donald Trump
Voting Through The Ages | Voter Guide | The Presidents | Voting Without Borders
by Post War America » Fri Nov 03, 2017 1:04 pm
Gravlen wrote:The famous Bowling Green Massacre is yesterday's news. Today it's all about the Cricket Blue Carnage. Tomorrow it'll be about the Curling Yellow Annihilation.

by Thermodolia » Fri Nov 03, 2017 1:07 pm
oh my.
by Petrasylvania » Fri Nov 03, 2017 1:08 pm

by The of Japan » Fri Nov 03, 2017 1:09 pm

by Jerzylvania » Fri Nov 03, 2017 1:25 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Post War America wrote:
To behttps://forum.nationstates.net/search ... =egosearch fair I suspect that the Donald legit has some form of Alzheimers or other mental deterioration. Comparing his speech in the 90s and his speech now, it seems that he was vastly more lucid.
Define "lucid."

by Seangoli » Fri Nov 03, 2017 1:28 pm
Jerzylvania wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Define "lucid."
Believe me, Trump has an interminable case of Affluenza. Totally incurable. He's a victim, man, that I can tell you. lol.
Affluenza is probably his only workable defense once Mueller get the goods on him. Wait. Unless the Donald has eaten lots of Twinkies with all those Big Macs and KFC meals over his seven decadent decades.

by Petrasylvania » Fri Nov 03, 2017 1:30 pm
Seangoli wrote:Jerzylvania wrote:
Believe me, Trump has an interminable case of Affluenza. Totally incurable. He's a victim, man, that I can tell you. lol.
Affluenza is probably his only workable defense once Mueller get the goods on him. Wait. Unless the Donald has eaten lots of Twinkies with all those Big Macs and KFC meals over his seven decadent decades.
Admitting to affluenza would mean admitting he is both in the wrong and that he has a mental disorder.
I do not see a world where that happens.

by Corrian » Fri Nov 03, 2017 1:38 pm
by Post War America » Fri Nov 03, 2017 1:41 pm
Corrian wrote:The fact people applaud Trump for blatantly saying for people to get the death penalty in a tweet is mildly disturbing. Because having our leader intervene in the legal process isn't at all disturbing or anything. Probably if it was his choice, they'd be dead already.
Gravlen wrote:The famous Bowling Green Massacre is yesterday's news. Today it's all about the Cricket Blue Carnage. Tomorrow it'll be about the Curling Yellow Annihilation.

by Seangoli » Fri Nov 03, 2017 1:46 pm
Corrian wrote:The fact people applaud Trump for blatantly saying for people to get the death penalty in a tweet is mildly disturbing. Because having our leader intervene in the legal process isn't at all disturbing or anything. Probably if it was his choice, they'd be dead already.

by Corrian » Fri Nov 03, 2017 1:55 pm
Seangoli wrote:Corrian wrote:The fact people applaud Trump for blatantly saying for people to get the death penalty in a tweet is mildly disturbing. Because having our leader intervene in the legal process isn't at all disturbing or anything. Probably if it was his choice, they'd be dead already.
Keep in mind these are the same people who demand we deport all Muslims or Mexicans without due process. Of course, when the hammer swings on them it is suddenly unfair.
The nimrods don't understand that violating ithers rights temds to lead to their own rights being violated. Also, something about being better than our enemies and all that jazz.

by Jerzylvania » Fri Nov 03, 2017 1:58 pm
Seangoli wrote:Jerzylvania wrote:
Believe me, Trump has an interminable case of Affluenza. Totally incurable. He's a victim, man, that I can tell you. lol.
Affluenza is probably his only workable defense once Mueller get the goods on him. Wait. Unless the Donald has eaten lots of Twinkies with all those Big Macs and KFC meals over his seven decadent decades.
Admitting to affluenza would mean admitting he is both in the wrong and that he has a mental disorder.
I do not see a world where that happens.

by Corrian » Fri Nov 03, 2017 2:02 pm
An expected choice for science adviser of the US Environmental Protection Agency believes the air is too clean – another indication that Donald Trump’s head of the EPA appears to be stacking the group in charge of trying to protect the environment with climate sceptics.
Robert Phalen, who currently directs the Air Pollution Health Effects Laboratory at the University of California Irvine, has research that would support the deregulation of policies aimed at preventing air pollution.
“The relative risks associated with modern [particulate matter] are very small and confounded by many factors,” Mr Phalen wrote in a 2004 study. “Neither toxicology studies nor human clinical investigations have identified the components and/or characteristics of [particulate matter] that might be causing the health-effect associations.”
Mr Phalen has asserted that air is currently too clean, because children’s lungs need to breathe irritants so their bodies can learn how to fight them. “Modern air,” he said in 2012, “is a little too clean for optimum health.”
by Post War America » Fri Nov 03, 2017 2:04 pm
Corrian wrote:Potential EPA Advisor Thinks That Pollution Is Good For Children's HealthAn expected choice for science adviser of the US Environmental Protection Agency believes the air is too clean – another indication that Donald Trump’s head of the EPA appears to be stacking the group in charge of trying to protect the environment with climate sceptics.
Robert Phalen, who currently directs the Air Pollution Health Effects Laboratory at the University of California Irvine, has research that would support the deregulation of policies aimed at preventing air pollution.
“The relative risks associated with modern [particulate matter] are very small and confounded by many factors,” Mr Phalen wrote in a 2004 study. “Neither toxicology studies nor human clinical investigations have identified the components and/or characteristics of [particulate matter] that might be causing the health-effect associations.”
Mr Phalen has asserted that air is currently too clean, because children’s lungs need to breathe irritants so their bodies can learn how to fight them. “Modern air,” he said in 2012, “is a little too clean for optimum health.”
Gravlen wrote:The famous Bowling Green Massacre is yesterday's news. Today it's all about the Cricket Blue Carnage. Tomorrow it'll be about the Curling Yellow Annihilation.

by Seangoli » Fri Nov 03, 2017 2:12 pm
Post War America wrote:
I can't anymore. The levels of stupid coming out of the EPA and the Department of energy are just too fucking much.

by Thermodolia » Fri Nov 03, 2017 2:12 pm
Post War America wrote:Corrian wrote:The fact people applaud Trump for blatantly saying for people to get the death penalty in a tweet is mildly disturbing. Because having our leader intervene in the legal process isn't at all disturbing or anything. Probably if it was his choice, they'd be dead already.
Given that those supporters on twitter likely think that Muslims are evil and the chap who deserted are unworthy of being alive, they probably aren't too concerned about his blatant interference into the legal sphere.

by Jerzylvania » Fri Nov 03, 2017 2:18 pm
Post War America wrote:
I can't anymore. The levels of stupid coming out of the EPA and the Department of energy are just too fucking much.

by Corrian » Fri Nov 03, 2017 2:19 pm
Thermodolia wrote:Post War America wrote:
Given that those supporters on twitter likely think that Muslims are evil and the chap who deserted are unworthy of being alive, they probably aren't too concerned about his blatant interference into the legal sphere.
Well the guy who deserted does deserve to rot in prison but Trump fucked that up by opening his mouth

by Fartsniffage » Fri Nov 03, 2017 2:22 pm

by Ifreann » Fri Nov 03, 2017 2:23 pm
Seangoli wrote:Post War America wrote:
I can't anymore. The levels of stupid coming out of the EPA and the Department of energy are just too fucking much.
There is some grain to this reasoning in other fields. It is vaguely similar to the underlying theories that are the basis of vaccines, after all.
That said, I seriously doubt that the same can be said of particulates as they operate entirely differently than viruses do, as well as the concept that modern air is too clean. Thatt is just an absurdity. There is no way in hell that modern aor jas fewer particulates in it now than it did 100,000 years ago during our major species wide developmental breakthroughs.

by Thermodolia » Fri Nov 03, 2017 2:23 pm

by Corrian » Fri Nov 03, 2017 2:37 pm

by Thermodolia » Fri Nov 03, 2017 2:43 pm

by Thermodolia » Fri Nov 03, 2017 2:44 pm
Ifreann wrote:Seangoli wrote:
There is some grain to this reasoning in other fields. It is vaguely similar to the underlying theories that are the basis of vaccines, after all.
That said, I seriously doubt that the same can be said of particulates as they operate entirely differently than viruses do, as well as the concept that modern air is too clean. Thatt is just an absurdity. There is no way in hell that modern aor jas fewer particulates in it now than it did 100,000 years ago during our major species wide developmental breakthroughs.
Yeah, I'm no doctor, but I wouldn't have thought that lungs...toughen up or whatever in some beneficial way with the right exposure to airborne particulates.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Equai, Google [Bot], Great Britain eke Northern Ireland, Sutland Rep
Advertisement