When it comes to equal rights there is.
Advertisement

by The Flutterlands » Sat Dec 30, 2017 7:59 am

by Ifreann » Sat Dec 30, 2017 8:02 am
The Flutterlands wrote:Washington Resistance Army wrote:
You might want to tell yourself that but your ideas are a horrifically bad slippery slope.
Treating people like second-class citizens is objectively wrong, having a frew and open internet is objectively right. There is some form of objective morality.

by The Flutterlands » Sat Dec 30, 2017 8:03 am
Ifreann wrote:The Flutterlands wrote:Treating people like second-class citizens is objectively wrong, having a frew and open internet is objectively right. There is some form of objective morality.
To paraphrase the anthropomorphic personification, TAKE THE UNIVERSE AND GRIND IT DOWN TO THE FINEST POWDER AND SIEVE IT THROUGH THE FINEST SIEVE AND THEN SHOW ME ONE ATOM OF MORALITY

by Washington Resistance Army » Sat Dec 30, 2017 8:10 am
The Flutterlands wrote:Ifreann wrote:To paraphrase the anthropomorphic personification, TAKE THE UNIVERSE AND GRIND IT DOWN TO THE FINEST POWDER AND SIEVE IT THROUGH THE FINEST SIEVE AND THEN SHOW ME ONE ATOM OF MORALITY
I don't care. We need net neutrality, preemption be damned. A free and open internet is essential to a Democratic society, anything less could lead us to a digital dystopia.
Also, same for DACA dreamers. They must be protected at all cost too.

by The Flutterlands » Sat Dec 30, 2017 8:12 am
Washington Resistance Army wrote:The Flutterlands wrote:I don't care. We need net neutrality, preemption be damned. A free and open internet is essential to a Democratic society, anything less could lead us to a digital dystopia.
Also, same for DACA dreamers. They must be protected at all cost too.
We've had democracy a lot longer than we've had the Internet.

by Ifreann » Sat Dec 30, 2017 8:12 am
We need net neutrality

by Vassenor » Sat Dec 30, 2017 8:15 am

by Valrifell » Sat Dec 30, 2017 8:16 am
Washington Resistance Army wrote:The Flutterlands wrote:I don't care. We need net neutrality, preemption be damned. A free and open internet is essential to a Democratic society, anything less could lead us to a digital dystopia.
Also, same for DACA dreamers. They must be protected at all cost too.
We've had democracy a lot longer than we've had the Internet.

by The Flutterlands » Sat Dec 30, 2017 8:17 am
Vassenor wrote:Do you not think that maybe, just maybe, you should've thought about all this before you voted for the party that was vocally opposed to Net Neutrality?

by Washington Resistance Army » Sat Dec 30, 2017 8:19 am
The Flutterlands wrote:Washington Resistance Army wrote:
We've had democracy a lot longer than we've had the Internet.
Not the fucking point. The fact is that we need net neutrality. The internet must be free and open for all websites and all citizens. There is no debate. The free internet is objectively right and the tired internet is objectively wrong. It is an imperative.

by The Flutterlands » Sat Dec 30, 2017 8:20 am
Washington Resistance Army wrote:The Flutterlands wrote:Not the fucking point. The fact is that we need net neutrality. The internet must be free and open for all websites and all citizens. There is no debate. The free internet is objectively right and the tired internet is objectively wrong. It is an imperative.
That is the fucking point. You're wrong and that's that. We had democracy before NN and we'll continue to have it after.

by Washington Resistance Army » Sat Dec 30, 2017 8:22 am

by Corrian » Sat Dec 30, 2017 8:22 am

by The Flutterlands » Sat Dec 30, 2017 8:23 am

by Jerzylvania » Sat Dec 30, 2017 8:25 am

by Washington Resistance Army » Sat Dec 30, 2017 8:25 am

by Corrian » Sat Dec 30, 2017 8:26 am

by The Flutterlands » Sat Dec 30, 2017 8:28 am

by Luminesa » Sat Dec 30, 2017 8:36 am
The Flutterlands wrote:Vassenor wrote:Do you not think that maybe, just maybe, you should've thought about all this before you voted for the party that was vocally opposed to Net Neutrality?
I don't care about that now. That is in the past. I care about the now and the future. Stop beating that dead horse.
What is resistance against Trumpism without peaceful rebellion and civil disobedience against harmful polices like state preemption against net neutrality?

by Luminesa » Sat Dec 30, 2017 8:38 am

by The Flutterlands » Sat Dec 30, 2017 8:39 am
Luminesa wrote:The Flutterlands wrote:I don't care about that now. That is in the past. I care about the now and the future. Stop beating that dead horse.
What is resistance against Trumpism without peaceful rebellion and civil disobedience against harmful polices like state preemption against net neutrality?
Talk about projection. I have to side with Vass on this one, you haven’t stopped beating that horse since forever. The horse is probably beyond glue now and you’re still beating it. You haven’t seemed to figure-out the meaning of democracy yet, and you’re panicking over the issue when everyone else has moved on and is living their lives. You should do the same.

by The Flutterlands » Sat Dec 30, 2017 8:40 am

by Jerzylvania » Sat Dec 30, 2017 8:44 am

by The Flutterlands » Sat Dec 30, 2017 8:45 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Equai, Google [Bot], Great Britain eke Northern Ireland, Sutland Rep
Advertisement