Trump MAGAthread X - Follow the Money

[Ifreann]

Impeach everyone.

Or require everyone elected to any office to resign immediately after being sworn in. Really, it's the only way.

It'd certainly prolong election season.

[Vulturret]

Overthrow the Government To Avenge Net Neutrality, But Don't Impeach Trump Even Though He Put Ajit Pai In Charge of the FCC in the First Place.

What people should be doing is lobbying Congress to pass a bill to protect net neutrality.

But why, it's a joke

[Holy Tedalonia]

What people should be doing is lobbying Congress to pass a bill to protect net neutrality.

Like Republicans will ever betray their ISP donors...

Some genuinely believe in the cause for removing NN. It's not just bribery, it's just most people (on both sides) don't understand the issue.

[The Flutterlands]

Like Republicans will ever betray their ISP donors...

Some genuinely believe in the cause for removing NN. It's not just bribery, it's just most people (on both sides) don't understand the issue.

One Republican chick introduced a "net neutrality" scam bill that would ban blocking and throttling but allow paid prioritization, meaning fast lanes...

[Valrifell]

Like Republicans will ever betray their ISP donors...

Some genuinely believe in the cause for removing NN. It's not just bribery, it's just most people (on both sides) don't understand the issue.

Please stop peddling the both sides stuff.

[Holy Tedalonia]

Some genuinely believe in the cause for removing NN. It's not just bribery, it's just most people (on both sides) don't understand the issue.

One Republican chick introduced a "net neutrality" scam bill that would ban blocking and throttling but allow paid prioritization, meaning fast lanes...

Which is fine, doesn't necessarily mean she was bribed. A everyday republican like my dad is someone who doesn't agree with NN, and I doubt ISPs bribed him.

[The Black Forrest]

Like Republicans will ever betray their ISP donors...

Some genuinely believe in the cause for removing NN. It's not just bribery, it's just most people (on both sides) don't understand the issue.

It's bribery. If something has a problem you fix it. If you don't like it because the "free market" will take care of it; you remove the law or regulation.

[The Black Forrest]

One Republican chick introduced a "net neutrality" scam bill that would ban blocking and throttling but allow paid prioritization, meaning fast lanes...

Which is fine, doesn't necessarily mean she was bribed. A everyday republican like my dad is someone who doesn't agree with NN, and I doubt ISPs bribed him.

Statement means nothing unless of course he holds public office and is involved in that area.

[The Flutterlands]

One Republican chick introduced a "net neutrality" scam bill that would ban blocking and throttling but allow paid prioritization, meaning fast lanes...

Which is fine, doesn't necessarily mean she was bribed. A everyday republican like my dad is someone who doesn't agree with NN, and I doubt ISPs bribed him.

Maybe more like quid pro quo. Do the dirty work in office and get a nice comfy fat check job when you leave. That kind bribery is legal and is most likely what Ajit Pai is up to.

[Holy Tedalonia]

Some genuinely believe in the cause for removing NN. It's not just bribery, it's just most people (on both sides) don't understand the issue.

It's bribery. If something has a problem you fix it. If you don't like it because the "free market" will take care of it; you remove the law or regulation.

I'm saying that if your against NN it does not equal that you were bribed

[The Black Forrest]

It's bribery. If something has a problem you fix it. If you don't like it because the "free market" will take care of it; you remove the law or regulation.

I'm saying that if your against NN it does not equal that you were bribed

Where did anybody suggest you were bribed?

[Holy Tedalonia]

Which is fine, doesn't necessarily mean she was bribed. A everyday republican like my dad is someone who doesn't agree with NN, and I doubt ISPs bribed him.

Maybe more like quid pro quo. Do the dirty work in office and get a nice comfy fat check job when you leave. That kind bribery is legal and is most likely what Ajit Pai is up to.

Which is undoubtedly common on both sides, but until there is realistic and undeniable evidence that says he has been bribed, I would treat it like he believes NN is bad.

[Oil exporting People]

I'm saying that if your against NN it does not equal that you were bribed

If it does, I got fucking screwed fam.

I'd rather Dick Cheney or the ghost of Richard Nixon over that guy. If anyone id prefer Mattis

To each his own, I guess; I think Nehlen would run an excellent regime.

[What R Ye Doin in Muh Swaomp]

What a douche.

/biting original satire NOT

[The Flutterlands]

https://www.geekwire.com/2017/full-text ... ike-close/

I suggest all states do the same thing regardless of the consequences and ignore the consequences. Net Neutrality must be maintained at all cost as the free and open internet is essential to a Democratic digital age.

And my morality is superior to Moore's because it doesn't treat groups of people like second-clqss cirizens. So bigotry doesn't count as justifaction for dissent against stupid laws.

[Washington Resistance Army]

https://www.geekwire.com/2017/full-text-heres-washington-states-legally-contentious-net-neutrality-bill-looks-like-close/

I suggest all states do the same thing regardless of the consequences and ignore the consequences. Net Neutrality must be maintained at all cost as the free and open internet is essential to a Democratic digital age.

As always your ideas are silly and should be totally ignored.

[The Flutterlands]

https://www.geekwire.com/2017/full-text-heres-washington-states-legally-contentious-net-neutrality-bill-looks-like-close/

I suggest all states do the same thing regardless of the consequences and ignore the consequences. Net Neutrality must be maintained at all cost as the free and open internet is essential to a Democratic digital age.

As always your ideas are silly and should be totally ignored.

It's not silly when the free and open internet is at stake. Even if the Courts does strike state rules down they should still enforce their own Net Neutrality rules.

[Washington Resistance Army]

As always your ideas are silly and should be totally ignored.

It's not silly when the free and open internet is at stake. Even if the Courts does strike state rules down they should still enforce their own Net Neutrality rules.

I too support the south getting rid of gay marriage.

[The Flutterlands]

It's not silly when the free and open internet is at stake. Even if the Courts does strike state rules down they should still enforce their own Net Neutrality rules.

I too support the south getting rid of gay marriage.

Doesn't count because you are treating people as second class citizens.

[Washington Resistance Army]

I too support the south getting rid of gay marriage.

Doesn't count because you are treating people as second class citizens.

Oh but it does count. You can't have one but not the other, either states can totally give .fed the finger and ignore things like court rulings or they can't.

[The Flutterlands]

Doesn't count because you are treating people as second class citizens.

Oh but it does count. You can't have one but not the other, either states can totally give .fed the finger and ignore things like court rulings or they count.

There must be secular justifaction in the name of equality and democracy. Anything less is wrong.

[Washington Resistance Army]

Oh but it does count. You can't have one but not the other, either states can totally give .fed the finger and ignore things like court rulings or they count.

There must be secular justifaction in the name of equality and democracy. Anything less is wrong.

You might want to tell yourself that but your ideas are a horrifically bad slippery slope.

[Ifreann]

https://www.geekwire.com/2017/full-text-heres-washington-states-legally-contentious-net-neutrality-bill-looks-like-close/

I suggest all states do the same thing regardless of the consequences and ignore the consequences. Net Neutrality must be maintained at all cost as the free and open internet is essential to a Democratic digital age.

And my morality is superior to Moore's because it doesn't treat groups of people like second-clqss cirizens. So bigotry doesn't count as justifaction for dissent against stupid laws.

"My morality is superior because my morality tells me that it's superior and my morality is right because my morality is superior"

You reason me right round, baby, right round, like a circle baby, right round, round, round

[The Flutterlands]

There must be secular justifaction in the name of equality and democracy. Anything less is wrong.

You might want to tell yourself that but your ideas are a horrifically bad slippery slope.

Treating people like second-class citizens is objectively wrong, having a frew and open internet is objectively right. There is some form of objective morality.

[Washington Resistance Army]

You might want to tell yourself that but your ideas are a horrifically bad slippery slope.

Treating people like second-clqss citizens is objectively wrong, having a frew and open internet is objectively right. There is some form of objective morality.

No there isn't.