Trump MAGAthread X - Follow the Money

[Austria-Bohemia-Hungary]

Not sure whether or not this would be what we do. They probably won't until their nuclear weapons are more functional. Maybe bait them into it before then?

Nah, let Kim Jong Un's ego take care of it.

They fuck up, Nato + Japan dog piles NK, NK + SK = UK*, Nato + Japan showers UK* with loads o' money to rebuild.

*Not that UK

NATO cannot even raise a single corps for its own defence, much less ship it to Korea. If a war breaks out nearly all the fighting will be on ROKA's shoulders.

[Arlenton]

No one will be starving with the NK government gone. Just a lot of money will need to be spent bu the US and SK. The latter is a better option, since no one is starving/being killed/trapped in NK. So get them before getting them would be more costly than it already is.

Integrating even half of 20 million stunted, retarded former North Koreans into the South Korean economy would poison the South Korean economy. In turn it would poison the Chinese and Japanese economies, and then the American one.

[Austria-Bohemia-Hungary]

In 2200 maybe. It'd take 30-60 years to replace the current North Korean generations who are all utterly useless for South Korea. These aren't East Germans who could be taught capitalism in a matter of a dozen years. These are people who needs to be instructed on the proper use of bank accounts and bank cards, are helplessly retarded and fit for only menial labour in South Korea.

There's nothing philanthropy can't solve.

The influx of 20 million such individuals would completely destroy the Republic, and in its wake China, Japan and then the West.

At first I thought you were just exaggerating, then I read the other three and laughed.

Do you seriously believe the American economy will be fine sans Asia? Or that you can replace three generations in 10 years?

[Genivaria]

No one will be starving with the NK government gone. Just a lot of money will need to be spent bu the US and SK. The latter is a better option, since no one is starving/being killed/trapped in NK. So get them before getting them would be more costly than it already is.

Integrating even half of 20 million stunted, retarded former North Koreans into the South Korean economy would poison the South Korean economy. In turn it would poison the Chinese and Japanese economies, and then the American one.

And we'd bounce back and we'd have multiple countries working together to put the situation right for the sake of regional stability that NOONE wants disrupted.
This isn't Syria we're talking about here, this is on the border of a UNSC member and a 'great power' if we're still using that term.
We DON'T want China's economy to tank, noone does.

[Arlenton]

Nah, let Kim Jong Un's ego take care of it.

They fuck up, Nato + Japan dog piles NK, NK + SK = UK*, Nato + Japan showers UK* with loads o' money to rebuild.

*Not that UK

NATO cannot even raise a single corps for its own defence, much less ship it to Korea. If a war breaks out nearly all the fighting will be on ROKA's shoulders.

With US support. And they'd win relatively quickly.

[Genivaria]

Nah, let Kim Jong Un's ego take care of it.

They fuck up, Nato + Japan dog piles NK, NK + SK = UK*, Nato + Japan showers UK* with loads o' money to rebuild.

*Not that UK

NATO cannot even raise a single corps for its own defence, much less ship it to Korea. If a war breaks out nearly all the fighting will be on ROKA's shoulders.

I'm sorry what?

[Parti Ouvrier]

Nah, let Kim Jong Un's ego take care of it.

They fuck up, Nato + Japan dog piles NK, NK + SK = UK*, Nato + Japan showers UK* with loads o' money to rebuild.

*Not that UK

NATO cannot even raise a single corps for its own defence, much less ship it to Korea. If a war breaks out nearly all the fighting will be on ROKA's shoulders.

Indeed, which might explain why both the North and South want constructive talks.

[The Empire of Pretantia]

Nah, let Kim Jong Un's ego take care of it.

They fuck up, Nato + Japan dog piles NK, NK + SK = UK*, Nato + Japan showers UK* with loads o' money to rebuild.

*Not that UK

NATO cannot even raise a single corps for its own defence, much less ship it to Korea. If a war breaks out nearly all the fighting will be on ROKA's shoulders.

lolno

t.NATO soldier

[Arlenton]

Nah, let Kim Jong Un's ego take care of it.

They fuck up, Nato + Japan dog piles NK, NK + SK = UK*, Nato + Japan showers UK* with loads o' money to rebuild.

*Not that UK

NATO cannot even raise a single corps for its own defence, much less ship it to Korea. If a war breaks out nearly all the fighting will be on ROKA's shoulders.

What

[Austria-Bohemia-Hungary]

Integrating even half of 20 million stunted, retarded former North Koreans into the South Korean economy would poison the South Korean economy. In turn it would poison the Chinese and Japanese economies, and then the American one.

And we'd bounce back and we'd have multiple countries working together to put the situation right for the sake of regional stability that NOONE wants disrupted.
This isn't Syria we're talking about here, this is on the border of a UNSC member and a 'great power' if we're still using that term.
We DON'T want China's economy to tank, noone does.

Poisoning the South Korean economy, and the Chinese one by war and North Korean refugees will tank PRC's economy. Do you seriously believe that nobody is connected economically to what happens in South Korea?

[Corrian]

So there is a chunk of Trump's support that rather likes Bannon, potentially even more so than Trump himself. Now Bannon and Trump are beefing with each other. This should go well.

[Kramania]

Need any extra tinfoil?

Are you joking.

Have you not been following the news for the past fucking year-

Oh. Of course.

>a Vox article

This explains a lot about you, actually.

Will you stop dickwaving while whining about dickwaving?

"You're not getting the point."

"OMG STOP DICKWAVING"

That's a new one.

"You're not getting my point."

"Well, what is your point?"

"You're not getting my point."

???

[The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp]

China has said multiple times that if NK shoots first, they lose there backing.

China is the only reason why NK even exists and they have grown to hate it.

Have they now?
Okay could I get a source for that because that's a game-changer right there.

Think I read it in a wikipedia article that I lost the link to.

But even then that, there actions speak louder than words.

Also, we could just wait 4 more years and let this treaty go un renewed.

[Genivaria]

And we'd bounce back and we'd have multiple countries working together to put the situation right for the sake of regional stability that NOONE wants disrupted.
This isn't Syria we're talking about here, this is on the border of a UNSC member and a 'great power' if we're still using that term.
We DON'T want China's economy to tank, noone does.

Poisoning the South Korean economy, and the Chinese one by war and North Korean refugees will tank PRC's economy. Do you seriously believe that nobody is connected economically to what happens in South Korea?

will tank PRC's economy

Hardly, we'd bounce back.

Do you seriously believe that nobody is connected economically to what happens in South Korea?

Nowhere did I come close to implying that.

[The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp]

Nah, let Kim Jong Un's ego take care of it.

They fuck up, Nato + Japan dog piles NK, NK + SK = UK*, Nato + Japan showers UK* with loads o' money to rebuild.

*Not that UK

NATO cannot even raise a single corps for its own defence, much less ship it to Korea. If a war breaks out nearly all the fighting will be on ROKA's shoulders.

[citation needed]

[The Empire of Pretantia]

And we'd bounce back and we'd have multiple countries working together to put the situation right for the sake of regional stability that NOONE wants disrupted.
This isn't Syria we're talking about here, this is on the border of a UNSC member and a 'great power' if we're still using that term.
We DON'T want China's economy to tank, noone does.

Poisoning the South Korean economy, and the Chinese one by war and North Korean refugees will tank PRC's economy. Do you seriously believe that nobody is connected economically to what happens in South Korea?

>He thinks a united Korea will destroy the East

[Kramania]

So there is a chunk of Trump's support that rather likes Bannon, potentially even more so than Trump himself. Now Bannon and Trump are beefing with each other. This should go well.

MSM dilemma:

Defend Bannon to make Trump look bad or agree with Trump and be forced to admit that he said something good.

Choices.

[Conserative Morality]

>a Vox article

This explains a lot about you, actually.

Would this be more acceptable?

It's not a particularly controversial phenomenon.

"You're not getting my point."

"Well, what is your point?"

"You're not getting my point."

???

Please, point out where you asked what the point was.

I'll wait.

[Austria-Bohemia-Hungary]

NATO cannot even raise a single corps for its own defence, much less ship it to Korea. If a war breaks out nearly all the fighting will be on ROKA's shoulders.

[citation needed]

Woohoo a chair. NATO can ship a chair to Korea.

[The Empire of Pretantia]

[citation needed]

Woohoo a chair. NATO can ship a chair to Korea.

I don't understand, is this supposed to prove your point?

[Kramania]

>a Vox article

This explains a lot about you, actually.

Would this be more acceptable?

It's not a particularly controversial phenomenon.

Not that this isn't fun, but what exactly does this have to do with the button? I can't speak for other Trump supporters. I can only speak for myself, so these links you're providing are completely irrelevant to, well, everything. Can't you just stay focused?

"You're not getting my point."

"Well, what is your point?"

"You're not getting my point."

???

Please, point out where you asked what the point was.

I'll wait.

I've been trying to get you to explain what your point was since this entire fucking debate began. Unfortunately you've been too caught up in your own snark and jerking off to the thought of Trump being impeached to explain it to me.

[Austria-Bohemia-Hungary]

Poisoning the South Korean economy, and the Chinese one by war and North Korean refugees will tank PRC's economy. Do you seriously believe that nobody is connected economically to what happens in South Korea?

>He thinks a united Korea will destroy the East

Do you believe 20-30 years of constant starvation and malnutrition is beneficial for a human being, intellectually and physically? If you do not believe this then why do you believe that forcing even half of these malnourished North Koreans on South Korea will produce no ill economic effects? Why do you insist on the fable that the South Korean economy is irrelevant to East Asia?

[The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp]

[citation needed]

Woohoo a chair. NATO can ship a chair to Korea.

I don't see how this is a poor group?

We can use them soon while other countries get ready more troops.

Also, NK still uses Migs. I have said that before, but it bears repeating, jets from the 50's aren't very good anymore.

[Genivaria]

>He thinks a united Korea will destroy the East

Do you believe 20-30 years of constant starvation and malnutrition is beneficial for a human being, intellectually and physically? If you do not believe this then why do you believe that forcing even half of these malnourished North Koreans on South Korea will produce no ill economic effects? Why do you insist on the fable that the South Korean economy is irrelevant to East Asia?

You seem to love misrepresenting what people are saying.

[The Empire of Pretantia]

>He thinks a united Korea will destroy the East

Do you believe 20-30 years of constant starvation and malnutrition is beneficial for a human being, intellectually and physically? If you do not believe this then why do you believe that forcing even half of these malnourished North Koreans on South Korea will produce no ill economic effects? Why do you insist on the fable that the South Korean economy is irrelevant to East Asia?

Why do you insist on blowing things out of proportion?

Why do you insist I said things I didn't say?

Why do you insist on lying?