But it doesn't further the glory of the American Empire. Establishing planetary Colonies on the other hand, does.
Advertisement
by The Emerald Legion » Thu Oct 12, 2017 1:49 pm
by Oil exporting People » Thu Oct 12, 2017 1:50 pm
Dooom35796821595 wrote:Or, legalise and tax cocaine, decrease police budgets due to the reduced crime rates and you have money for science! Cocaine and science, what could go wrong!
by Dooom35796821595 » Thu Oct 12, 2017 1:56 pm
Oil exporting People wrote:Dooom35796821595 wrote:Or, legalise and tax cocaine, decrease police budgets due to the reduced crime rates and you have money for science! Cocaine and science, what could go wrong!
Police budgets largely come from the local level, so you're getting almost fuck all from this savings wise.
by USS Monitor » Thu Oct 12, 2017 1:58 pm
by Ethel mermania » Thu Oct 12, 2017 2:02 pm
Dooom35796821595 wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:It's a lot more fun,
employs many people, up and down the production chain. Starving Bolivian farmers deserve love too.
Gives law enforcement something to do.
Or, legalise and tax cocaine, decrease police budgets due to the reduced crime rates and you have money for science! Cocaine and science, what could go wrong!
by Ethel mermania » Thu Oct 12, 2017 2:03 pm
The Emerald Legion wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:It's a lot more fun,
employs many people, up and down the production chain. Starving Bolivian farmers deserve love too.
Gives law enforcement something to do.
But it doesn't further the glory of the American Empire. Establishing planetary Colonies on the other hand, does.
by Ethel mermania » Thu Oct 12, 2017 2:05 pm
Oil exporting People wrote:Dooom35796821595 wrote:Or, legalise and tax cocaine, decrease police budgets due to the reduced crime rates and you have money for science! Cocaine and science, what could go wrong!
Police budgets largely come from the local level, so you're getting almost fuck all from this savings wise.
by The Emerald Legion » Thu Oct 12, 2017 2:05 pm
USS Monitor wrote:Mars, obviously.
Border walls aren't very effective since people can tunnel, sail, fly, overstay tourist visas, etc. -- and that's even before you get to the question of whether immigration is good or bad.
Going to Mars is at least scientifically interesting.
by Dooom35796821595 » Thu Oct 12, 2017 2:05 pm
Ethel mermania wrote:Dooom35796821595 wrote:
Or, legalise and tax cocaine, decrease police budgets due to the reduced crime rates and you have money for science! Cocaine and science, what could go wrong!
Then you are still back to the Mars v wall problem. Which I guess meaNS we can give a bigger tax cut.
by Ethel mermania » Thu Oct 12, 2017 2:06 pm
USS Monitor wrote:Mars, obviously.
Border walls aren't very effective since people can tunnel, sail, fly, overstay tourist visas, etc. -- and that's even before you get to the question of whether immigration is good or bad.
Going to Mars is at least scientifically interesting.
by The Emerald Legion » Thu Oct 12, 2017 2:07 pm
Ethel mermania wrote:USS Monitor wrote:Mars, obviously.
Border walls aren't very effective since people can tunnel, sail, fly, overstay tourist visas, etc. -- and that's even before you get to the question of whether immigration is good or bad.
Going to Mars is at least scientifically interesting.
It's red, it's got rocks, I can see the same in Colorado
by Ethel mermania » Thu Oct 12, 2017 2:09 pm
by Coalition of North American States » Thu Oct 12, 2017 2:10 pm
by The Emerald Legion » Thu Oct 12, 2017 2:13 pm
by Ethel mermania » Thu Oct 12, 2017 2:15 pm
by The Portland Territory » Thu Oct 12, 2017 2:18 pm
by The Emerald Legion » Thu Oct 12, 2017 2:21 pm
by Shofercia » Thu Oct 12, 2017 3:19 pm
Unstoppable Empire of Doom wrote:If you had to choose which one the US should do which would it be? Mars Direct or a Border wall with Mexico? Both have a similar price tag ($30b - $50b and $20b - $70b) and for the sake of the discussion assume they are both feasable. Also assume neither isn't an option.
by Ethel mermania » Thu Oct 12, 2017 3:42 pm
by Oldenfranck » Thu Oct 12, 2017 5:59 pm
by Dooom35796821595 » Thu Oct 12, 2017 6:03 pm
Valrifell wrote:Venus, in my mind, would be the cooler planet to explore. Even if we can't set foot on its surface.
by Shofercia » Thu Oct 12, 2017 6:22 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Corporate Collective Salvation, Ineva, Jewish Partisan Division, Singaporen Empire, Stellar Colonies, Tarsonis, Tiami
Advertisement