NATION

PASSWORD

what is racism

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Jedi 999
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1914
Founded: Dec 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Jedi 999 » Fri Mar 26, 2010 3:26 am

Collective Systems wrote:
Jedi 999 wrote:
Collective Systems wrote:Hating British people, WHICH YOU ADMITTED TO DOING, is racist.

hating british people for a reason which is not racist is not racist

i say again hating racists is not racist

note i dont go around yelling british are inferior races and than writing utter nonsense to justify british rule

Define for me... racism.


Racism is the belief that race is a primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race

note : remember british propoganda and than say who is the racist
Last edited by Jedi 999 on Fri Mar 26, 2010 3:28 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Collective Systems
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1503
Founded: Feb 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Collective Systems » Fri Mar 26, 2010 3:28 am

You forgot the culture and actions part. You are a racist, you just won't admit it.

You are a closet racist.

User avatar
South Norwega
Senator
 
Posts: 3981
Founded: Jul 13, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby South Norwega » Fri Mar 26, 2010 3:28 am

Jedi 999 wrote:
South Norwega wrote:
Jedi 999 wrote:
South Norwega wrote:
Jedi 999 wrote:
Collective Systems wrote:Then how do you think I feel about the bloody caste system? An even more vile system that class. Next time, don't call me bloody pro-caste, eh?

Also, yeah... we have established that you discriminate (AKA; are racist) against British people. Good day, sir.

i hate racist yes but that doesnt make me racist

yes it does you cant deny it because bhagat singh was indian that makes you racist hague convention says you racist

bullshit

And thus you've argued against yourself quite effectively. I take my leave of this thread now, good sir.

Seriously, you're arguing against every English Dictionary in existence. And that's an argument you really can't win.


the dictionary says i am not racist wikipedia says i am not racist i say i am not racist

hating racists is not racist

But you don't just hate the racists. You hate the racist's race. Now that is god damn racism.

I shall quote from my Macquarie Dicionary the definition of racism:

1. The belief that human races have distinctive characteristics which determine their respective cultures, us. involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule or dominate others.
2. Offensive or aggressive behaviour stemming from such a belief.
3. A policy or system of government based upon it.

So, let us analyse the first definition: The belief that human races have distinctive characteristics which determine their respective cultures, usu. involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule or dominate others. You, give the British a characteristic, which is that they are all racist, because of something they did long ago. Now that is racism.
Worship the great Gordon Brown!
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Please sig this.

Jedi 999 wrote:the fact is the british colonised the british

Plains Nations wrote:the god of NS

Trippoli wrote:This here guy, is smart.

Second Placing: Sarzonian Indoor Gridball Cup

User avatar
Jedi 999
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1914
Founded: Dec 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Jedi 999 » Fri Mar 26, 2010 3:29 am

Collective Systems wrote:You forgot the culture and actions part. You are a racist, you just won't admit it.

You are a closet racist.

no i am not i dont think british is inferior and thats why i hate them but because they colonized my country and were first class racists

User avatar
Jedi 999
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1914
Founded: Dec 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Jedi 999 » Fri Mar 26, 2010 3:30 am

South Norwega wrote:
Jedi 999 wrote:
South Norwega wrote:
Jedi 999 wrote:
South Norwega wrote:
Jedi 999 wrote:
Collective Systems wrote:Then how do you think I feel about the bloody caste system? An even more vile system that class. Next time, don't call me bloody pro-caste, eh?

Also, yeah... we have established that you discriminate (AKA; are racist) against British people. Good day, sir.

i hate racist yes but that doesnt make me racist

yes it does you cant deny it because bhagat singh was indian that makes you racist hague convention says you racist

bullshit

And thus you've argued against yourself quite effectively. I take my leave of this thread now, good sir.

Seriously, you're arguing against every English Dictionary in existence. And that's an argument you really can't win.


the dictionary says i am not racist wikipedia says i am not racist i say i am not racist

hating racists is not racist

But you don't just hate the racists. You hate the racist's race. Now that is god damn racism.

I shall quote from my Macquarie Dicionary the definition of racism:

1. The belief that human races have distinctive characteristics which determine their respective cultures, us. involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule or dominate others.
2. Offensive or aggressive behaviour stemming from such a belief.
3. A policy or system of government based upon it.

So, let us analyse the first definition: The belief that human races have distinctive characteristics which determine their respective cultures, usu. involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule or dominate others. You, give the British a characteristic, which is that they are all racist, because of something they did long ago. Now that is racism.


they did colonize countries if you deny that than history is against you

and you accept they did something
Last edited by Jedi 999 on Fri Mar 26, 2010 3:32 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Collective Systems
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1503
Founded: Feb 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Collective Systems » Fri Mar 26, 2010 3:30 am

So you hate all British people based on a specific culture, religion, trait, ideology, or action?

User avatar
Rambhutan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5227
Founded: Jul 28, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Rambhutan » Fri Mar 26, 2010 3:30 am

Racism, like using global warming instead of climate change, is a term that needs to be changed to reflect new understadning. There is only one human race so how can there be racism? It is better to use something like discrimination or prejudice - so Jedi999 is prejudiced against the British.
Are we there yet?

Overherelandistan wrote: I chalange you to find a better one that isnt even worse

User avatar
Jedi 999
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1914
Founded: Dec 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Jedi 999 » Fri Mar 26, 2010 3:34 am

Rambhutan wrote:Racism, like using global warming instead of climate change, is a term that needs to be changed to reflect new understadning. There is only one human race so how can there be racism? It is better to use something like discrimination or prejudice - so Jedi999 is prejudiced against the British.

no i have a valid reason so thus anti-imperialist would do

User avatar
South Norwega
Senator
 
Posts: 3981
Founded: Jul 13, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby South Norwega » Fri Mar 26, 2010 3:35 am

Jedi 999 wrote:they did colonize countries if you deny that than history is against you

Oh no, the British never colonised everything. The New World order and the USians are pulling the wool over your eyes man! Liberate yourself from their oppressive vibes, dude! History is one big lie made by capitalist pigs after another. Advance the revolution! Heil Che! Heil Mao! Heil Stalin! Long live the revolution!

Yeah, guess what, stuff your straw man.
Worship the great Gordon Brown!
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Please sig this.

Jedi 999 wrote:the fact is the british colonised the british

Plains Nations wrote:the god of NS

Trippoli wrote:This here guy, is smart.

Second Placing: Sarzonian Indoor Gridball Cup

User avatar
Collective Systems
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1503
Founded: Feb 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Collective Systems » Fri Mar 26, 2010 3:37 am

Note that the British aren't imperialistic anymore. That the British Empire fell long ago.
So hating them because they're imperialistic is, well, just plain retarded.

User avatar
Jedi 999
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1914
Founded: Dec 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Jedi 999 » Fri Mar 26, 2010 3:37 am

South Norwega wrote:
Jedi 999 wrote:they did colonize countries if you deny that than history is against you

Oh no, the British never colonised everything. The New World order and the USians are pulling the wool over your eyes man! Liberate yourself from their oppressive vibes, dude! History is one big lie made by capitalist pigs after another. Advance the revolution! Heil Che! Heil Mao! Heil Stalin! Long live the revolution!

Yeah, guess what, stuff your straw man.

the brits did colonize countries and this would make you shut up for years now

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_empire

User avatar
South Norwega
Senator
 
Posts: 3981
Founded: Jul 13, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby South Norwega » Fri Mar 26, 2010 3:37 am

Jedi 999 wrote:
Rambhutan wrote:Racism, like using global warming instead of climate change, is a term that needs to be changed to reflect new understadning. There is only one human race so how can there be racism? It is better to use something like discrimination or prejudice - so Jedi999 is prejudiced against the British.

no i have a valid reason so thus anti-imperialist would do

It's not a valid reason in the first place. You're extrapolating your anti-imperialism onto an entire group of people. 50, 60 million people. Almost none of whom had anything to do with the colonisation of India. It's ridiculous. it's baffling. It's superman!
Worship the great Gordon Brown!
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Please sig this.

Jedi 999 wrote:the fact is the british colonised the british

Plains Nations wrote:the god of NS

Trippoli wrote:This here guy, is smart.

Second Placing: Sarzonian Indoor Gridball Cup

User avatar
South Norwega
Senator
 
Posts: 3981
Founded: Jul 13, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby South Norwega » Fri Mar 26, 2010 3:38 am

Jedi 999 wrote:
South Norwega wrote:
Jedi 999 wrote:they did colonize countries if you deny that than history is against you

Oh no, the British never colonised everything. The New World order and the USians are pulling the wool over your eyes man! Liberate yourself from their oppressive vibes, dude! History is one big lie made by capitalist pigs after another. Advance the revolution! Heil Che! Heil Mao! Heil Stalin! Long live the revolution!

Yeah, guess what, stuff your straw man.

the brits did colonize countries and this would make you shut up for years now

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_empire

Sarcasm is lost on you.
Worship the great Gordon Brown!
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Please sig this.

Jedi 999 wrote:the fact is the british colonised the british

Plains Nations wrote:the god of NS

Trippoli wrote:This here guy, is smart.

Second Placing: Sarzonian Indoor Gridball Cup

User avatar
Jedi 999
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1914
Founded: Dec 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Jedi 999 » Fri Mar 26, 2010 3:39 am

South Norwega wrote:
Jedi 999 wrote:
Rambhutan wrote:Racism, like using global warming instead of climate change, is a term that needs to be changed to reflect new understadning. There is only one human race so how can there be racism? It is better to use something like discrimination or prejudice - so Jedi999 is prejudiced against the British.

no i have a valid reason so thus anti-imperialist would do

It's not a valid reason in the first place. You're extrapolating your anti-imperialism onto an entire group of people. 50, 60 million people. Almost none of whom had anything to do with the colonisation of India. It's ridiculous. it's baffling. It's superman!

so the ________ colonised india

fill in the blank if you know history

User avatar
Jedi 999
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1914
Founded: Dec 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Jedi 999 » Fri Mar 26, 2010 3:39 am

South Norwega wrote:
Jedi 999 wrote:
South Norwega wrote:
Jedi 999 wrote:they did colonize countries if you deny that than history is against you

Oh no, the British never colonised everything. The New World order and the USians are pulling the wool over your eyes man! Liberate yourself from their oppressive vibes, dude! History is one big lie made by capitalist pigs after another. Advance the revolution! Heil Che! Heil Mao! Heil Stalin! Long live the revolution!

Yeah, guess what, stuff your straw man.

the brits did colonize countries and this would make you shut up for years now

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_empire

Sarcasm is lost on you.

this is off topic sarcasm

User avatar
South Norwega
Senator
 
Posts: 3981
Founded: Jul 13, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby South Norwega » Fri Mar 26, 2010 3:41 am

Jedi 999 wrote:
South Norwega wrote:
Jedi 999 wrote:
Rambhutan wrote:Racism, like using global warming instead of climate change, is a term that needs to be changed to reflect new understadning. There is only one human race so how can there be racism? It is better to use something like discrimination or prejudice - so Jedi999 is prejudiced against the British.

no i have a valid reason so thus anti-imperialist would do

It's not a valid reason in the first place. You're extrapolating your anti-imperialism onto an entire group of people. 50, 60 million people. Almost none of whom had anything to do with the colonisation of India. It's ridiculous. it's baffling. It's superman!

so the Danish, Dutch, Portuguese, French and British colonised india

fill in the blank if you know history

This is not a very fun gameshow. What's the prize?
Worship the great Gordon Brown!
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Please sig this.

Jedi 999 wrote:the fact is the british colonised the british

Plains Nations wrote:the god of NS

Trippoli wrote:This here guy, is smart.

Second Placing: Sarzonian Indoor Gridball Cup

User avatar
Jedi 999
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1914
Founded: Dec 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Jedi 999 » Fri Mar 26, 2010 3:43 am

South Norwega wrote:
Jedi 999 wrote:
South Norwega wrote:
Jedi 999 wrote:
Rambhutan wrote:Racism, like using global warming instead of climate change, is a term that needs to be changed to reflect new understadning. There is only one human race so how can there be racism? It is better to use something like discrimination or prejudice - so Jedi999 is prejudiced against the British.

no i have a valid reason so thus anti-imperialist would do

It's not a valid reason in the first place. You're extrapolating your anti-imperialism onto an entire group of people. 50, 60 million people. Almost none of whom had anything to do with the colonisation of India. It's ridiculous. it's baffling. It's superman!

so the Danish, Dutch, Portuguese, French and British colonised india

fill in the blank if you know history

This is not a very fun gameshow. What's the prize?

your right good the prize is staisfaction of giving the right answer
Last edited by Jedi 999 on Fri Mar 26, 2010 3:43 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Collective Systems
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1503
Founded: Feb 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Collective Systems » Fri Mar 26, 2010 3:45 am

So why don't you hate the others?

Oh, that's right, you only hate a specific group of people, but you're not racist. Whoevers calling you racist is out of their mind.

User avatar
Jedi 999
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1914
Founded: Dec 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Jedi 999 » Fri Mar 26, 2010 3:46 am

Collective Systems wrote:So why don't you hate the others?

Oh, that's right, you only hate a specific group of people, but you're not racist. Whoevers calling you racist is out of their mind.

I hate the others too

User avatar
Rambhutan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5227
Founded: Jul 28, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Rambhutan » Fri Mar 26, 2010 3:50 am

Jedi 999 wrote:
Rambhutan wrote:Racism, like using global warming instead of climate change, is a term that needs to be changed to reflect new understadning. There is only one human race so how can there be racism? It is better to use something like discrimination or prejudice - so Jedi999 is prejudiced against the British.

no i have a valid reason so thus anti-imperialist would do


Whether you have a valid reason is irrelevant - you are prejudiced against the British whether the individual Brtains were involved in imperialism or not. If you are holding me responsible for something I have not done then you are prejudiced. As I pointed out in another thread Alexander of Macedon also invaded India - do you still hate all Greeks. Is there some cut of point after so many years? As I also asked do you actually live in Britain?
Are we there yet?

Overherelandistan wrote: I chalange you to find a better one that isnt even worse

User avatar
Jedi 999
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1914
Founded: Dec 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Jedi 999 » Fri Mar 26, 2010 4:18 am

Rambhutan wrote:
Jedi 999 wrote:
Rambhutan wrote:Racism, like using global warming instead of climate change, is a term that needs to be changed to reflect new understadning. There is only one human race so how can there be racism? It is better to use something like discrimination or prejudice - so Jedi999 is prejudiced against the British.

no i have a valid reason so thus anti-imperialist would do


Whether you have a valid reason is irrelevant - you are prejudiced against the British whether the individual Brtains were involved in imperialism or not. If you are holding me responsible for something I have not done then you are prejudiced. As I pointed out in another thread Alexander of Macedon also invaded India - do you still hate all Greeks. Is there some cut of point after so many years? As I also asked do you actually live in Britain?

the reason is important ,the british supported imperialism and the british people voted for imperialist policies thus they are partially at fault

User avatar
Andaluciae
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5766
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Andaluciae » Fri Mar 26, 2010 4:35 am

Jedi 999 wrote:
South Norwega wrote:
Jedi 999 wrote:
Rambhutan wrote:Racism, like using global warming instead of climate change, is a term that needs to be changed to reflect new understadning. There is only one human race so how can there be racism? It is better to use something like discrimination or prejudice - so Jedi999 is prejudiced against the British.

no i have a valid reason so thus anti-imperialist would do

It's not a valid reason in the first place. You're extrapolating your anti-imperialism onto an entire group of people. 50, 60 million people. Almost none of whom had anything to do with the colonisation of India. It's ridiculous. it's baffling. It's superman!

so the ________ colonised india

fill in the blank if you know history


Macedonians, Aryans, Persians, Portuguese, Spanish, Dutch, British...
FreeAgency wrote:Shellfish eating used to be restricted to dens of sin such as Red Lobster and Long John Silvers, but now days I cannot even take my children to a public restaurant anymore (even the supposedly "family friendly ones") without risking their having to watch some deranged individual flaunting his sin...

User avatar
Jedi 999
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1914
Founded: Dec 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Jedi 999 » Fri Mar 26, 2010 4:41 am

Andaluciae wrote:
Jedi 999 wrote:
South Norwega wrote:
Jedi 999 wrote:
Rambhutan wrote:Racism, like using global warming instead of climate change, is a term that needs to be changed to reflect new understadning. There is only one human race so how can there be racism? It is better to use something like discrimination or prejudice - so Jedi999 is prejudiced against the British.

no i have a valid reason so thus anti-imperialist would do

It's not a valid reason in the first place. You're extrapolating your anti-imperialism onto an entire group of people. 50, 60 million people. Almost none of whom had anything to do with the colonisation of India. It's ridiculous. it's baffling. It's superman!

so the ________ colonised india

fill in the blank if you know history


Macedonians, Aryans, Persians, Portuguese, Spanish, Dutch, British...

wrong they never colonise and the british were more successfull and dont belive the aryan invasion theory its british propoganda

User avatar
Andaluciae
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5766
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Andaluciae » Fri Mar 26, 2010 4:47 am

Jedi 999 wrote:
Andaluciae wrote:
Jedi 999 wrote:
South Norwega wrote:
Jedi 999 wrote:
Rambhutan wrote:Racism, like using global warming instead of climate change, is a term that needs to be changed to reflect new understadning. There is only one human race so how can there be racism? It is better to use something like discrimination or prejudice - so Jedi999 is prejudiced against the British.

no i have a valid reason so thus anti-imperialist would do

It's not a valid reason in the first place. You're extrapolating your anti-imperialism onto an entire group of people. 50, 60 million people. Almost none of whom had anything to do with the colonisation of India. It's ridiculous. it's baffling. It's superman!

so the ________ colonised india

fill in the blank if you know history


Macedonians, Aryans, Persians, Portuguese, Spanish, Dutch, British...

wrong they never colonise and the british were more successfull and dont belive the aryan invasion theory its british propoganda


The Indo-Greek Kingdoms installed by Alexander.
Uh, huh. Yeah, whatever.
Outlasted the Brits.
FreeAgency wrote:Shellfish eating used to be restricted to dens of sin such as Red Lobster and Long John Silvers, but now days I cannot even take my children to a public restaurant anymore (even the supposedly "family friendly ones") without risking their having to watch some deranged individual flaunting his sin...

User avatar
Jedi 999
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1914
Founded: Dec 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Jedi 999 » Fri Mar 26, 2010 4:49 am

Andaluciae wrote:
Jedi 999 wrote:
Andaluciae wrote:
Jedi 999 wrote:
South Norwega wrote:
Jedi 999 wrote:
Rambhutan wrote:Racism, like using global warming instead of climate change, is a term that needs to be changed to reflect new understadning. There is only one human race so how can there be racism? It is better to use something like discrimination or prejudice - so Jedi999 is prejudiced against the British.

no i have a valid reason so thus anti-imperialist would do

It's not a valid reason in the first place. You're extrapolating your anti-imperialism onto an entire group of people. 50, 60 million people. Almost none of whom had anything to do with the colonisation of India. It's ridiculous. it's baffling. It's superman!

so the ________ colonised india

fill in the blank if you know history


Macedonians, Aryans, Persians, Portuguese, Spanish, Dutch, British...

wrong they never colonise and the british were more successfull and dont belive the aryan invasion theory its british propoganda


The Indo-Greek Kingdoms installed by Alexander.
Uh, huh. Yeah, whatever.
Outlasted the Brits.


we defeated the portugeese and indo-greek kingdoms are too old and aryan immigration is british propoganda dont belive it

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Bajtocja, Dumb Ideologies, Eahland, Han Tom Alechia, Ifreann, Nantoraka, Necroghastia, Northern Seleucia, Oceasia, Querria, Ryemarch, Socialistic Britain, United Northen States Canada, Vassenor, Yasuragi, Zebastani

Advertisement

Remove ads