what is racism

[Sdaeriji]

I never deny that but i argue those were indirect and it helped the british in exploiting in india

If Britain conquered India, clearly the Indian non-existant government was too weak. The strong rule the weak, it is the way of the world.

heard it justification of british rule by the brits

lol

Its hardly even justification, its was a necessity. The Indians were ignorant savages that lived as slaves to their princes. The British came and gave them technology, education, democracy. A system of government, laws, and defense that the Indians still use today.

If anything I think the Indian nation owes Britain a thank you for all they did and an apology for being so childishly restless while Britain was bestowing their gifts.

read this you british racists u unmasked your selfs

Neo-Sudan is every British person, ever?

but the british gave this as their official reason and thus neo-sudans are similiar to da official justification

Neo-Sudan is every British person, ever?

[Jedi 999]

I never deny that but i argue those were indirect and it helped the british in exploiting in india

If Britain conquered India, clearly the Indian non-existant government was too weak. The strong rule the weak, it is the way of the world.

heard it justification of british rule by the brits

lol

Its hardly even justification, its was a necessity. The Indians were ignorant savages that lived as slaves to their princes. The British came and gave them technology, education, democracy. A system of government, laws, and defense that the Indians still use today.

If anything I think the Indian nation owes Britain a thank you for all they did and an apology for being so childishly restless while Britain was bestowing their gifts.

read this you british racists u unmasked your selfs

Neo-Sudan is every British person, ever?

but the british gave this as their official reason and thus neo-sudans are similiar to da official justification

Neo-Sudan is every British person, ever?

but the british and neo-sudans explanation sound similiar

[Sdaeriji]

I never deny that but i argue those were indirect and it helped the british in exploiting in india

If Britain conquered India, clearly the Indian non-existant government was too weak. The strong rule the weak, it is the way of the world.

heard it justification of british rule by the brits

lol

Its hardly even justification, its was a necessity. The Indians were ignorant savages that lived as slaves to their princes. The British came and gave them technology, education, democracy. A system of government, laws, and defense that the Indians still use today.

If anything I think the Indian nation owes Britain a thank you for all they did and an apology for being so childishly restless while Britain was bestowing their gifts.

read this you british racists u unmasked your selfs

Neo-Sudan is every British person, ever?

but the british gave this as their official reason and thus neo-sudans are similiar to da official justification

Neo-Sudan is every British person, ever?

but the british and neo-sudans explanation sound similiar

Neo-Sudan is every British person, ever?

[Ifreann]

I never deny that but i argue those were indirect and it helped the british in exploiting in india

If Britain conquered India, clearly the Indian non-existant government was too weak. The strong rule the weak, it is the way of the world.

heard it justification of british rule by the brits

lol

Its hardly even justification, its was a necessity. The Indians were ignorant savages that lived as slaves to their princes. The British came and gave them technology, education, democracy. A system of government, laws, and defense that the Indians still use today.

If anything I think the Indian nation owes Britain a thank you for all they did and an apology for being so childishly restless while Britain was bestowing their gifts.

read this you british racists u unmasked your selfs

Neo-Sudan is every British person, ever?

but the british gave this as their official reason and thus neo-sudans are similiar to da official justification

Neo-Sudan is every British person, ever?

but the british and neo-sudans explanation sound similiar

Neo-Sudan is every British person, ever?
*ninja*

Awwww, too slow.

[Jedi 999]

I never deny that but i argue those were indirect and it helped the british in exploiting in india

If Britain conquered India, clearly the Indian non-existant government was too weak. The strong rule the weak, it is the way of the world.

heard it justification of british rule by the brits

lol

Its hardly even justification, its was a necessity. The Indians were ignorant savages that lived as slaves to their princes. The British came and gave them technology, education, democracy. A system of government, laws, and defense that the Indians still use today.

If anything I think the Indian nation owes Britain a thank you for all they did and an apology for being so childishly restless while Britain was bestowing their gifts.

read this you british racists u unmasked your selfs

Neo-Sudan is every British person, ever?

but the british gave this as their official reason and thus neo-sudans are similiar to da official justification

Neo-Sudan is every British person, ever?

but the british and neo-sudans explanation sound similiar

Neo-Sudan is every British person, ever?

no but he has the same views as the british raj

[Neo-Sudan]

I never deny that but i argue those were indirect and it helped the british in exploiting in india

If Britain conquered India, clearly the Indian non-existant government was too weak. The strong rule the weak, it is the way of the world.

heard it justification of british rule by the brits

lol

Its hardly even justification, its was a necessity. The Indians were ignorant savages that lived as slaves to their princes. The British came and gave them technology, education, democracy. A system of government, laws, and defense that the Indians still use today.

If anything I think the Indian nation owes Britain a thank you for all they did and an apology for being so childishly restless while Britain was bestowing their gifts.

read this you british racists u unmasked your selfs

Well I'm not British, but I do play one on tv...

But actually, Jedi 999, YOU FIGURED US OUT! Only you! We evil British tried for decades to conceal the truth, and our membership in the Legion of Doom.
But you, and only you, have discovered our evilness... on NationStates. You win, I hereby surrender Britian to you.

Seriously...

[Sdaeriji]

no

Congratulations, you're finally getting some fucking sense.

So, now, what is it called when you apply the characteristics of a single member of a race or ethnicity to that entire race or ethnicity?

Neo-Sudan is every British person, ever?
*ninja*

You wish.

[Piedmontovia]

Is it racist to think that there are statistically significant differences between racial groups?

[South Norwega]

no

Congratulations, you're finally getting some fucking sense.

You deserve some sort of award.

[Jedi 999]

no

Congratulations, you're finally getting some fucking sense.

So, now, what is it called when you apply the characteristics of a single member of a race or ethnicity to that entire race or ethnicity?

Neo-Sudan is every British person, ever?
*ninja*

You wish.

but a foreign government who implemented racist policies um yes

[Blitzkrenia]

Is it racist to think that there are statistically significant differences between racial groups?

Depends.

[Sdaeriji]

no

Congratulations, you're finally getting some fucking sense.

So, now, what is it called when you apply the characteristics of a single member of a race or ethnicity to that entire race or ethnicity?

but a foreign government who implemented racist policies um yes

So, now, what is it called when you apply the characteristics of a single member of a race or ethnicity to that entire race or ethnicity?

[Piedmontovia]

Is it racist to think that there are statistically significant differences between racial groups?

Depends.

On what?

[Jedi 999]

no

Congratulations, you're finally getting some fucking sense.

So, now, what is it called when you apply the characteristics of a single member of a race or ethnicity to that entire race or ethnicity?

but a foreign government who implemented racist policies um yes

So, now, what is it called when you apply the characteristics of a single member of a race or ethnicity to that entire race or ethnicity?

well but they did colonise india

hello thats the fact

[Blitzkrenia]

Is it racist to think that there are statistically significant differences between racial groups?

Depends.

On what?

on whether or not the difference, and the conclusions you draw from it, can be proven.

[South Norwega]

no

Congratulations, you're finally getting some fucking sense.

So, now, what is it called when you apply the characteristics of a single member of a race or ethnicity to that entire race or ethnicity?

but a foreign government who implemented racist policies um yes

So, now, what is it called when you apply the characteristics of a single member of a race or ethnicity to that entire race or ethnicity?

well but they did colonise india

hello thats the fact

It's irrelevant to what he's asking. That's a fact.

[Sdaeriji]

no

Congratulations, you're finally getting some fucking sense.

So, now, what is it called when you apply the characteristics of a single member of a race or ethnicity to that entire race or ethnicity?

but a foreign government who implemented racist policies um yes

So, now, what is it called when you apply the characteristics of a single member of a race or ethnicity to that entire race or ethnicity?

well but they did colonise india

hello thats the fact

So, now, what is it called when you apply the characteristics of a single member of a race or ethnicity to that entire race or ethnicity?

[Blitzkrenia]

no

Congratulations, you're finally getting some fucking sense.

So, now, what is it called when you apply the characteristics of a single member of a race or ethnicity to that entire race or ethnicity?

but a foreign government who implemented racist policies um yes

So, now, what is it called when you apply the characteristics of a single member of a race or ethnicity to that entire race or ethnicity?

well but they did colonise india

hello thats the fact

It's irrelevant to what he's asking. That's a fact.

So just answer the fucking question.

[Ifreann]

no

Congratulations, you're finally getting some fucking sense.

So, now, what is it called when you apply the characteristics of a single member of a race or ethnicity to that entire race or ethnicity?

but a foreign government who implemented racist policies um yes

So, now, what is it called when you apply the characteristics of a single member of a race or ethnicity to that entire race or ethnicity?

well but they did colonise india

hello thats the fact

Do you read posts or do you just whine about the colonisation of India?

[Jedi 999]

no

Congratulations, you're finally getting some fucking sense.

So, now, what is it called when you apply the characteristics of a single member of a race or ethnicity to that entire race or ethnicity?

but a foreign government who implemented racist policies um yes

So, now, what is it called when you apply the characteristics of a single member of a race or ethnicity to that entire race or ethnicity?

well but they did colonise india

hello thats the fact

It's irrelevant to what he's asking. That's a fact.

the fact is the british colonised the british thus no characteristics are being applied but a unjust and unfair action causes me to hate them

[Piedmontovia]

Is it racist to think that there are statistically significant differences between racial groups?

Depends.

On what?

on whether or not the difference, and the conclusions you draw from it, can be proven.

and what would you accept as proof?

[South Norwega]

the fact is the british colonised the british

Did they now? But this is irrelevant to what Sdaeriji was asking. You're obfuscating and being silly.

[Blitzkrenia]

Is it racist to think that there are statistically significant differences between racial groups?

Depends.

On what?

on whether or not the difference, and the conclusions you draw from it, can be proven.

and what would you accept as proof?

What can you give? It's mostly a case-by-case basis.

[Mostrov]

the fact is the british colonised the british thus no characteristics are being applied but a unjust and unfair action causes me to hate them

You have yet to explain how these people have committed atrocities so bad that they are deserving of your eternal slander.

[Blitzkrenia]

the fact is the british colonised the british

Did they now? But this is irrelevant to what Sdaeriji was asking. You're obfuscating and being silly.

Again, just answer the fucking question, Jedi999: What is it called when you apply the characteristics of a single member of a race or ethnicity to that entire race or ethnicity?

If you can't answer it, there's a cheat sheet below.

generalization