NATION

PASSWORD

Mass Shooting at Mandalay Bay, Las Vegas

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81228
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:13 pm

Telconi wrote:
San Lumen wrote:and yet again you didn't answer my question?


I have, like sixteen thousand times. Assault rifles are for shooting bad guys.

Oh gosh this is pointless. That sounds like NRA logic. If this person or that person had a gun then this shooting wouldn't have happened.

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:14 pm

Sovaal wrote:
Gauthier wrote:It's a valid question considering you're arguing semiautos have legitimate civilian applications.

Didn't know that you couldn't own and use semi-autos with out ever even touching a bump fire stock.

So there's no reason civilians should have bump stocks?
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81228
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:16 pm

Albrenia wrote:In the forlorn hope of getting y'all to stop yelling at each other, may I ask a question for those on the pro-gun side of the fence?

What sort of measures would you like taken in response to this tragedy? These don't have to be gun control measures obviously, but things you think would strike a good balance of making this sort of thing less likely, but keep your rights in place?

mandate more stringent background and mental health checks for all buyers, limit magazine size, require safety's on all guns to start and ban assault weapons.

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:16 pm

Albrenia wrote:In the forlorn hope of getting y'all to stop yelling at each other, may I ask a question for those on the pro-gun side of the fence?

What sort of measures would you like taken in response to this tragedy? These don't have to be gun control measures obviously, but things you think would strike a good balance of making this sort of thing less likely, but keep your rights in place?


Not certain, expanded criminal justice reform would help overall l, even if probably not for this particular incident. As of the moment with few and conflicting reports as to the motive behind this bastard's act it would be difficult to formulate
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Dooom35796821595
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9309
Founded: Sep 11, 2011
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Dooom35796821595 » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:16 pm

Telconi wrote:
Dooom35796821595 wrote:
That doesn't sound unreasonable.


There''s nothing beyond loose circumstantial evidence that these people might be mentally incompetent to own or operate a firearm. I personally don't see it as reasonable to remove a fundamental right from someone based upon such shaky evidence. It would be like the government passing a regulation saying that someone who is both Hispanic, and asks for their ballot in Spanish doesn't get to vote.


I assume it would require the individual be unable to manage their own finances, otherwise there would be a lot of rich people on that list. :lol:
Isn't that enough? And it's not a fundamental right, it's a constitutional one.

It's really not. And I don't think you can ask for a ballot to be in a different language, due to all the problems that would cause.
When life gives you lemons, you BURN THEIR HOUSE DOWN!
Anything can be justified if it is cool. If at first you don't succeed, destroy all in your way.
"Your methods are stupid! Your progress has been stupid! Your intelligence is stupid! For the sake of the mission, you must be terminated!”

User avatar
Sovaal
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13695
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Sovaal » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:16 pm

Gauthier wrote:
Sovaal wrote:Didn't know that you couldn't own and use semi-autos with out ever even touching a bump fire stock.

So there's no reason civilians should have bump stocks?

I've never made an argument for or against one.

Of course, I really don't see the use for one imho.
Most of the time I have no idea what the hell I'm doing or talking about.

”Many forms of government have been tried and will be tried in this world of sin and woe.
No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is
the worst form of government, except for all the others that have been tried from time to time." -
Winston Churchill, 1947.

"Rifles, muskets, long-bows and hand-grenades are inherently democratic weapons. A complex weapon makes the strong stronger, while a simple weapon – so long as there is no answer to it – gives claws to the weak.” - George Orwell

User avatar
The of Japan
Minister
 
Posts: 2781
Founded: Jul 30, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The of Japan » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:17 pm

Albrenia wrote:In the forlorn hope of getting y'all to stop yelling at each other, may I ask a question for those on the pro-gun side of the fence?

What sort of measures would you like taken in response to this tragedy? These don't have to be gun control measures obviously, but things you think would strike a good balance of making this sort of thing less likely, but keep your rights in place?

reform mental healthcare in the US
Texan Communist and Internationalist

User avatar
Len Hyet
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10712
Founded: Jun 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Len Hyet » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:17 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Telconi wrote:
I have, like sixteen thousand times. Assault rifles are for shooting bad guys.

Oh gosh this is pointless. That sounds like NRA logic. If this person or that person had a gun then this shooting wouldn't have happened.

You ever stop to think there might be a reason that, what's the statistic 93% of mass shootings have happened in gun free zones? Sure, someone with a concealed carry wouldn't have stopped this tragedy. But here and here are two MCIs stopped by a good guy with a gun.
=][= Founder, 1st NSG Irregulars. Our Militia is Well Regulated and Well Lubricated!

On a formerly defunct now re-declared one-man campaign to elevate the discourse of you heathens.

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76265
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:18 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Telconi wrote:
The first two don't, if executed correctly. Don't know what a "safety pin" is. I have a right to an "assalt weapon" and taking away something I have a right to is wrong.

what the hell do you need an assault weapon for? Are you in an army regiment? A safety pin prevents the gun from being fired if its in locked position.

Assault weapon is a meaningless term. We've been over this dude
Male, State Socialist, Cultural Nationalist, Welfare Chauvinist lives somewhere in AZ I'm GAY! Disabled US Military Veteran
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
>Xovland: I keep getting ads for printer ink. Sometimes, when you get that feeling down there, you have to look at some steamy printer pictures.
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:18 pm

Dooom35796821595 wrote:
Telconi wrote:
There''s nothing beyond loose circumstantial evidence that these people might be mentally incompetent to own or operate a firearm. I personally don't see it as reasonable to remove a fundamental right from someone based upon such shaky evidence. It would be like the government passing a regulation saying that someone who is both Hispanic, and asks for their ballot in Spanish doesn't get to vote.


I assume it would require the individual be unable to manage their own finances, otherwise there would be a lot of rich people on that list. :lol:
Isn't that enough? And it's not a fundamental right, it's a constitutional one.

It's really not. And I don't think you can ask for a ballot to be in a different language, due to all the problems that would cause.


Your assumption would be wrong. Enumeration in the US Constitution doesn't make something less fundamental. Yes you can, as a matter of fact ours here are automatically English/Spanish.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81228
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:19 pm

Thermodolia wrote:
San Lumen wrote:what the hell do you need an assault weapon for? Are you in an army regiment? A safety pin prevents the gun from being fired if its in locked position.

Assault weapon is a meaningless term. We've been over this dude

I would bring back the Assault Weapons Ban that expired in 2004

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_A ... eapons_Ban

User avatar
Len Hyet
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10712
Founded: Jun 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Len Hyet » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:19 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:Assault weapon is a meaningless term. We've been over this dude

I would bring back the Assault Weapons Ban that expired in 2004

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_A ... eapons_Ban

The one that was proven numerous times to have zero impact on homicide rates or mass shooting numbers? That one?
=][= Founder, 1st NSG Irregulars. Our Militia is Well Regulated and Well Lubricated!

On a formerly defunct now re-declared one-man campaign to elevate the discourse of you heathens.

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76265
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:20 pm

Dooom35796821595 wrote:
Telconi wrote:
No further exploration was done, the regulation as it previously existed placed anyone who both A) received social security benefits and B) had someone other than themselves manage finances, on the no guns list in NICS.


That doesn't sound unreasonable.

Obviously that dosen't require an individual to have a diagnosed mental illness to be placed on the no gun list, just to show symptoms of mental infirmness.

However you'd cry foul if they used that to ban people from doing other things. Like getting married or driving or anything else
Male, State Socialist, Cultural Nationalist, Welfare Chauvinist lives somewhere in AZ I'm GAY! Disabled US Military Veteran
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
>Xovland: I keep getting ads for printer ink. Sometimes, when you get that feeling down there, you have to look at some steamy printer pictures.
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Albrenia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16619
Founded: Aug 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Albrenia » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:20 pm

Telconi wrote:
Albrenia wrote:In the forlorn hope of getting y'all to stop yelling at each other, may I ask a question for those on the pro-gun side of the fence?

What sort of measures would you like taken in response to this tragedy? These don't have to be gun control measures obviously, but things you think would strike a good balance of making this sort of thing less likely, but keep your rights in place?


Not certain, expanded criminal justice reform would help overall l, even if probably not for this particular incident. As of the moment with few and conflicting reports as to the motive behind this bastard's act it would be difficult to formulate


Agreed. Without knowing what made him do this, it is difficult to know what could have been done to stop it.

I briefly considered 'lateral' ideas like bulletproof glass on windows facing public entertainment areas, but that would do little but make it harder to rescue people in the event of a fire and such.

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:20 pm

Len Hyet wrote:
San Lumen wrote:I would bring back the Assault Weapons Ban that expired in 2004

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_A ... eapons_Ban

The one that was proven numerous times to have zero impact on homicide rates or mass shooting numbers? That one?


Because "stop mass shootings" is just dog whistle for "oppress these people who we don't like"
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76265
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:21 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Gun Manufacturers wrote:
Repair/warranty work (assuming it's an outdoor store like Cabelas/Bass Pro Shop/Gander Mountain/etc)? No way to secure it in your vehicle before/after going to the range/hunting (assuming an open top vehicle with no lockable trunk)?

Last time i checked places like Wal Mart and Target don't sell guns.

Um the mart of wal does indeed sell guns
Male, State Socialist, Cultural Nationalist, Welfare Chauvinist lives somewhere in AZ I'm GAY! Disabled US Military Veteran
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
>Xovland: I keep getting ads for printer ink. Sometimes, when you get that feeling down there, you have to look at some steamy printer pictures.
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81228
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:21 pm

Len Hyet wrote:
San Lumen wrote:I would bring back the Assault Weapons Ban that expired in 2004

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_A ... eapons_Ban

The one that was proven numerous times to have zero impact on homicide rates or mass shooting numbers? That one?

Did we have mass shootings on regular basis before that Ban expired cuz when I was growing up I don't recall hearing about one every few months.

User avatar
The of Japan
Minister
 
Posts: 2781
Founded: Jul 30, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The of Japan » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:21 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:Assault weapon is a meaningless term. We've been over this dude

I would bring back the Assault Weapons Ban that expired in 2004

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_A ... eapons_Ban

how does a grip make a gun bad?
Texan Communist and Internationalist

User avatar
The of Japan
Minister
 
Posts: 2781
Founded: Jul 30, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The of Japan » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:22 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Len Hyet wrote:The one that was proven numerous times to have zero impact on homicide rates or mass shooting numbers? That one?

Did we have mass shootings on regular basis before that Ban expired cuz when I was growing up I don't recall hearing about one every few months.

did it prevent people obtaining them, legally or illegally, whom conducted said mass shootings?
Texan Communist and Internationalist

User avatar
Sovaal
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13695
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Sovaal » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:22 pm

Albrenia wrote:In the forlorn hope of getting y'all to stop yelling at each other, may I ask a question for those on the pro-gun side of the fence?

What sort of measures would you like taken in response to this tragedy? These don't have to be gun control measures obviously, but things you think would strike a good balance of making this sort of thing less likely, but keep your rights in place?

I wouldn't mind more extensive back ground checks, classes, or mental check ups. I see these as far more doable then banning "assault weapons", which aren't that different from other common firearms that aren't targeted nearly as much.
Most of the time I have no idea what the hell I'm doing or talking about.

”Many forms of government have been tried and will be tried in this world of sin and woe.
No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is
the worst form of government, except for all the others that have been tried from time to time." -
Winston Churchill, 1947.

"Rifles, muskets, long-bows and hand-grenades are inherently democratic weapons. A complex weapon makes the strong stronger, while a simple weapon – so long as there is no answer to it – gives claws to the weak.” - George Orwell

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76265
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:22 pm

Gauthier wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:Where did I say anything of the sort?

It's a valid question considering you're arguing semiautos have legitimate civilian applications.

No it's not. Bump stocks are illegal, last time i checked. Why are you putting words in my mouth?
Male, State Socialist, Cultural Nationalist, Welfare Chauvinist lives somewhere in AZ I'm GAY! Disabled US Military Veteran
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
>Xovland: I keep getting ads for printer ink. Sometimes, when you get that feeling down there, you have to look at some steamy printer pictures.
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Len Hyet
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10712
Founded: Jun 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Len Hyet » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:23 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Len Hyet wrote:The one that was proven numerous times to have zero impact on homicide rates or mass shooting numbers? That one?

Did we have mass shootings on regular basis before that Ban expired cuz when I was growing up I don't recall hearing about one every few months.

Hm. Gosh I can't remember. Did we have mass shootings before 2004. Hm. Hmmmmmmm. Gosh I can't remember. I feel like there's something... Colombia? No that's not it. Colorado? No, no that's not it either.

Well why don't you read about it a bit while I try to remember what wildly infamous mass shooting happened before 2004.
Last edited by Len Hyet on Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
=][= Founder, 1st NSG Irregulars. Our Militia is Well Regulated and Well Lubricated!

On a formerly defunct now re-declared one-man campaign to elevate the discourse of you heathens.

User avatar
Sovaal
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13695
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Sovaal » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:23 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:Assault weapon is a meaningless term. We've been over this dude

I would bring back the Assault Weapons Ban that expired in 2004

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_A ... eapons_Ban

Really? It was freaking useless. Pretty much all it did was ban scary features that didn't affect firearm function at all. you could still buy ARs and AKs during the ban.
Most of the time I have no idea what the hell I'm doing or talking about.

”Many forms of government have been tried and will be tried in this world of sin and woe.
No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is
the worst form of government, except for all the others that have been tried from time to time." -
Winston Churchill, 1947.

"Rifles, muskets, long-bows and hand-grenades are inherently democratic weapons. A complex weapon makes the strong stronger, while a simple weapon – so long as there is no answer to it – gives claws to the weak.” - George Orwell

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76265
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:24 pm

Albrenia wrote:In the forlorn hope of getting y'all to stop yelling at each other, may I ask a question for those on the pro-gun side of the fence?

What sort of measures would you like taken in response to this tragedy? These don't have to be gun control measures obviously, but things you think would strike a good balance of making this sort of thing less likely, but keep your rights in place?

We really need to give people more mental health care. I know it's easier said than done but we need to remove the mental health stigma in our nation. It's not helping anyone
Male, State Socialist, Cultural Nationalist, Welfare Chauvinist lives somewhere in AZ I'm GAY! Disabled US Military Veteran
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
>Xovland: I keep getting ads for printer ink. Sometimes, when you get that feeling down there, you have to look at some steamy printer pictures.
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Albrenia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16619
Founded: Aug 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Albrenia » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:25 pm

Sovaal wrote:
Albrenia wrote:In the forlorn hope of getting y'all to stop yelling at each other, may I ask a question for those on the pro-gun side of the fence?

What sort of measures would you like taken in response to this tragedy? These don't have to be gun control measures obviously, but things you think would strike a good balance of making this sort of thing less likely, but keep your rights in place?

I wouldn't mind more extensive back ground checks, classes, or mental check ups. I see these as far more doable then banning "assault weapons", which aren't that different from other common firearms that aren't targeted nearly as much.


Classes on weapon safety being free for people owning guns sounds good to me. Would help to prevent accidental shootings at least, by reducing the number of people who buy a gun but never actually learn how to properly keep them.

EDIT Response to Therm above:
Very true. Removing the stigma on mental health would certainly help bring in people to get help long before they reach the depths of illness where shooting people randomly seems like a good idea.
Last edited by Albrenia on Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Dimetrodon Empire, Ethel mermania, EuroStralia, Frogstar, Ifreann, Pizza Friday Forever91, Port Caverton, The Caleshan Valkyrie, Umeria, Xmara, Zurkerx

Advertisement

Remove ads