Oh gosh this is pointless. That sounds like NRA logic. If this person or that person had a gun then this shooting wouldn't have happened.
Advertisement

by Gauthier » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:14 pm

by San Lumen » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:16 pm
Albrenia wrote:In the forlorn hope of getting y'all to stop yelling at each other, may I ask a question for those on the pro-gun side of the fence?
What sort of measures would you like taken in response to this tragedy? These don't have to be gun control measures obviously, but things you think would strike a good balance of making this sort of thing less likely, but keep your rights in place?

by Telconi » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:16 pm
Albrenia wrote:In the forlorn hope of getting y'all to stop yelling at each other, may I ask a question for those on the pro-gun side of the fence?
What sort of measures would you like taken in response to this tragedy? These don't have to be gun control measures obviously, but things you think would strike a good balance of making this sort of thing less likely, but keep your rights in place?

by Dooom35796821595 » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:16 pm
Telconi wrote:Dooom35796821595 wrote:
That doesn't sound unreasonable.
There''s nothing beyond loose circumstantial evidence that these people might be mentally incompetent to own or operate a firearm. I personally don't see it as reasonable to remove a fundamental right from someone based upon such shaky evidence. It would be like the government passing a regulation saying that someone who is both Hispanic, and asks for their ballot in Spanish doesn't get to vote.

by Sovaal » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:16 pm

by The of Japan » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:17 pm
Albrenia wrote:In the forlorn hope of getting y'all to stop yelling at each other, may I ask a question for those on the pro-gun side of the fence?
What sort of measures would you like taken in response to this tragedy? These don't have to be gun control measures obviously, but things you think would strike a good balance of making this sort of thing less likely, but keep your rights in place?

by Len Hyet » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:17 pm

by Thermodolia » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:18 pm
San Lumen wrote:Telconi wrote:
The first two don't, if executed correctly. Don't know what a "safety pin" is. I have a right to an "assalt weapon" and taking away something I have a right to is wrong.
what the hell do you need an assault weapon for? Are you in an army regiment? A safety pin prevents the gun from being fired if its in locked position.

by Telconi » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:18 pm
Dooom35796821595 wrote:Telconi wrote:
There''s nothing beyond loose circumstantial evidence that these people might be mentally incompetent to own or operate a firearm. I personally don't see it as reasonable to remove a fundamental right from someone based upon such shaky evidence. It would be like the government passing a regulation saying that someone who is both Hispanic, and asks for their ballot in Spanish doesn't get to vote.
I assume it would require the individual be unable to manage their own finances, otherwise there would be a lot of rich people on that list.![]()
Isn't that enough? And it's not a fundamental right, it's a constitutional one.
It's really not. And I don't think you can ask for a ballot to be in a different language, due to all the problems that would cause.

by San Lumen » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:19 pm

by Len Hyet » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:19 pm
San Lumen wrote:Thermodolia wrote:Assault weapon is a meaningless term. We've been over this dude
I would bring back the Assault Weapons Ban that expired in 2004
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_A ... eapons_Ban

by Thermodolia » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:20 pm
Dooom35796821595 wrote:Telconi wrote:
No further exploration was done, the regulation as it previously existed placed anyone who both A) received social security benefits and B) had someone other than themselves manage finances, on the no guns list in NICS.
That doesn't sound unreasonable.
Obviously that dosen't require an individual to have a diagnosed mental illness to be placed on the no gun list, just to show symptoms of mental infirmness.

by Albrenia » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:20 pm
Telconi wrote:Albrenia wrote:In the forlorn hope of getting y'all to stop yelling at each other, may I ask a question for those on the pro-gun side of the fence?
What sort of measures would you like taken in response to this tragedy? These don't have to be gun control measures obviously, but things you think would strike a good balance of making this sort of thing less likely, but keep your rights in place?
Not certain, expanded criminal justice reform would help overall l, even if probably not for this particular incident. As of the moment with few and conflicting reports as to the motive behind this bastard's act it would be difficult to formulate

by Telconi » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:20 pm
Len Hyet wrote:San Lumen wrote:I would bring back the Assault Weapons Ban that expired in 2004
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_A ... eapons_Ban
The one that was proven numerous times to have zero impact on homicide rates or mass shooting numbers? That one?

by Thermodolia » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:21 pm
San Lumen wrote:Gun Manufacturers wrote:
Repair/warranty work (assuming it's an outdoor store like Cabelas/Bass Pro Shop/Gander Mountain/etc)? No way to secure it in your vehicle before/after going to the range/hunting (assuming an open top vehicle with no lockable trunk)?
Last time i checked places like Wal Mart and Target don't sell guns.

by San Lumen » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:21 pm
Len Hyet wrote:San Lumen wrote:I would bring back the Assault Weapons Ban that expired in 2004
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_A ... eapons_Ban
The one that was proven numerous times to have zero impact on homicide rates or mass shooting numbers? That one?

by The of Japan » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:21 pm
San Lumen wrote:Thermodolia wrote:Assault weapon is a meaningless term. We've been over this dude
I would bring back the Assault Weapons Ban that expired in 2004
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_A ... eapons_Ban

by The of Japan » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:22 pm

by Sovaal » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:22 pm
Albrenia wrote:In the forlorn hope of getting y'all to stop yelling at each other, may I ask a question for those on the pro-gun side of the fence?
What sort of measures would you like taken in response to this tragedy? These don't have to be gun control measures obviously, but things you think would strike a good balance of making this sort of thing less likely, but keep your rights in place?

by Thermodolia » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:22 pm

by Len Hyet » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:23 pm

by Sovaal » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:23 pm
San Lumen wrote:Thermodolia wrote:Assault weapon is a meaningless term. We've been over this dude
I would bring back the Assault Weapons Ban that expired in 2004
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_A ... eapons_Ban

by Thermodolia » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:24 pm
Albrenia wrote:In the forlorn hope of getting y'all to stop yelling at each other, may I ask a question for those on the pro-gun side of the fence?
What sort of measures would you like taken in response to this tragedy? These don't have to be gun control measures obviously, but things you think would strike a good balance of making this sort of thing less likely, but keep your rights in place?

by Albrenia » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:25 pm
Sovaal wrote:Albrenia wrote:In the forlorn hope of getting y'all to stop yelling at each other, may I ask a question for those on the pro-gun side of the fence?
What sort of measures would you like taken in response to this tragedy? These don't have to be gun control measures obviously, but things you think would strike a good balance of making this sort of thing less likely, but keep your rights in place?
I wouldn't mind more extensive back ground checks, classes, or mental check ups. I see these as far more doable then banning "assault weapons", which aren't that different from other common firearms that aren't targeted nearly as much.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Dimetrodon Empire, Ethel mermania, EuroStralia, Frogstar, Ifreann, Pizza Friday Forever91, Port Caverton, The Caleshan Valkyrie, Umeria, Xmara, Zurkerx
Advertisement