And yet, more people would rather fuck a corpse than fuck a woman. Says a lot, really.
Edit: As I said previously, whether it's fucking a corpse or having emotions, men simply do not care.
Advertisement

by Costa Fierro » Fri Oct 06, 2017 8:06 pm

by Herador » Fri Oct 06, 2017 8:08 pm

by Costa Fierro » Fri Oct 06, 2017 8:10 pm

by Herador » Fri Oct 06, 2017 8:12 pm
Costa Fierro wrote:Herador wrote:It certainlyy says you can make a lot of money off a novelty experience, yes.
Ain't a novelty if you chose it over your own wife.

by Costa Fierro » Fri Oct 06, 2017 8:26 pm
Herador wrote:
Good for that guy. Doesn't really prove anything other than one dude likes that specific thing, but I'm happy he's comfortable being who he is.

by Herador » Fri Oct 06, 2017 8:28 pm
Costa Fierro wrote:Herador wrote:Good for that guy. Doesn't really prove anything other than one dude likes that specific thing, but I'm happy he's comfortable being who he is.
There's more than one person in that article. There's also two previous articles about a brothel in Austria where sex robots were more popular than actual women. And a sex robot brothel in Barcelona was forced out because prostitutes complained. Because the sex robot brothel was taking all the customers.

by Costa Fierro » Fri Oct 06, 2017 11:53 pm
Herador wrote:Costa Fierro wrote:
There's more than one person in that article. There's also two previous articles about a brothel in Austria where sex robots were more popular than actual women. And a sex robot brothel in Barcelona was forced out because prostitutes complained. Because the sex robot brothel was taking all the customers.
Novelty makes money, yes.

by Saiwania » Sat Oct 07, 2017 1:39 am
Costa Fierro wrote:This isn't a novelty, it's the future. And what a bright new future it will be.

by Costa Fierro » Sat Oct 07, 2017 2:35 am
Saiwania wrote:Whether you want to admit it or not, it is still a novelty as of right now. There is no guarantee that the technology will ever go very far from where it is now.
The entire point from what I can discern, is to try to accurately replicate the sensation of sexual intercourse. A tool with which to "have fun" without exposing oneself to any venereal diseases and not having to rely on the cooperation of anyone else. Adding too many extras such as AI is actually a negative rather than a positive. What the typical male will really care about- is whether it accurately simulates a real vagina or not (or feels better) in terms of physical sensation. Not companionship, for which a real person would be far superior at providing.

by FelrikTheDeleted » Sat Oct 07, 2017 2:44 am
Costa Fierro wrote:So what is the issue exactly?

by FelrikTheDeleted » Sat Oct 07, 2017 2:46 am
Dooom35796821595 wrote:Why destroy something that brings satisfaction to others just because you don't like it? Not to mention that the 'kill it with fire,for the children/morality' crowd tend to have video games on their hit list. Not cool.

by Purpelia » Sat Oct 07, 2017 2:51 am

by Albrenia » Sat Oct 07, 2017 3:26 am
FelrikTheDeleted wrote:Dooom35796821595 wrote:Why destroy something that brings satisfaction to others just because you don't like it? Not to mention that the 'kill it with fire,for the children/morality' crowd tend to have video games on their hit list. Not cool.
Just because it brings satisfaction doesn't necessarily mean it is good. Plus, I'd prefer we don't come to favour fake women rather than real ones — not to mention we already have a built in pleasure device.
You (not you specifically) could go on and on about how they won't replace real women, but I'd still like to discourage this at every turn — I'm also morally against this type of stuff.

by Costa Fierro » Sat Oct 07, 2017 3:30 am
FelrikTheDeleted wrote:I'd rather the male populace was having sex with real women, just as I would rather the female populace was having sex with real men.
Just because it brings satisfaction doesn't necessarily mean it is good.
Plus, I'd prefer we don't come to favour fake women rather than real ones — not to mention we already have a built in pleasure device.
You (not you specifically) could go on and on about how they won't replace real women, but I'd still like to discourage this at every turn — I'm also morally against this type of stuff.

by Baltenstein » Sat Oct 07, 2017 3:30 am
Purpelia wrote:What I don't understand is why having a power cable would be such a big problem. If you've already went to such a big effort to get your self a synthetic girl might as well spring for an extension cord.

by Herador » Sat Oct 07, 2017 3:33 am
Baltenstein wrote:Purpelia wrote:What I don't understand is why having a power cable would be such a big problem. If you've already went to such a big effort to get your self a synthetic girl might as well spring for an extension cord.
Would you really inject bodily fluids into something that is actually connected to deadly voltage? I don't know, it sounds rather unnerving.

by Costa Fierro » Sat Oct 07, 2017 3:35 am
Baltenstein wrote:Purpelia wrote:What I don't understand is why having a power cable would be such a big problem. If you've already went to such a big effort to get your self a synthetic girl might as well spring for an extension cord.
Would you really inject bodily fluids into something that is actually connected to deadly voltage? I don't know, it sounds rather unnerving.

by Purpelia » Sat Oct 07, 2017 3:45 am
Baltenstein wrote:Purpelia wrote:What I don't understand is why having a power cable would be such a big problem. If you've already went to such a big effort to get your self a synthetic girl might as well spring for an extension cord.
Would you really inject bodily fluids into something that is actually connected to deadly voltage? I don't know, it sounds rather unnerving.

by FelrikTheDeleted » Sat Oct 07, 2017 4:01 am
Costa Fierro wrote:Why? It's expensive and risky as hell.[...]
Costa Fierro wrote:[...]Satisfaction is what they're designed to do. And they do it well. So I'd say it's good.[...]
Costa Fierro wrote:[...]And why should men have to forego sexual pleasure and satisfaction because they can't get laid, or don't want to put themselves at risk just for a one night stand? [...]
Costa Fierro wrote:[...]What's immoral about it?
by Donut section » Sat Oct 07, 2017 4:05 am
FelrikTheDeleted wrote:Costa Fierro wrote:Why? It's expensive and risky as hell.[...]
Dude, go to a fucking bar, buy a ten dollar drink, pick up a bloody girl — pay a fucking prostitute to fuck you — it honestly can't be anymore expensive than a bloody sex robot. As for the risk, I'm sure there are ways in which you could mitigate that.Costa Fierro wrote:[...]Satisfaction is what they're designed to do. And they do it well. So I'd say it's good.[...]
You seemed to be mixed up, I know what its purpose is, I know it achieves that goal. I'm referring to the moral good (mine to be specific).Costa Fierro wrote:[...]And why should men have to forego sexual pleasure and satisfaction because they can't get laid, or don't want to put themselves at risk just for a one night stand? [...]
Why? I'd say that it was so they don't become a slave to pleasure — I'm also sure the hand would suffice should they not be as conservative as I.Costa Fierro wrote:[...]What's immoral about it?
Well that would depend on your moral code. That being said, in my case, sex outside of marriage is immoral — masturbastion is also immoral.

by Purpelia » Sat Oct 07, 2017 4:06 am
FelrikTheDeleted wrote:Dude, go to a fucking bar, buy a ten dollar drink, pick up a bloody girl — pay a fucking prostitute to fuck you — it honestly can't be anymore expensive than a bloody sex robot. As for the risk, I'm sure there are ways in which you could mitigate that.

by FelrikTheDeleted » Sat Oct 07, 2017 4:09 am
Purpelia wrote:What if you're like me and you don't really care about the actual sex part and you only really want to take a screwdriver to her to see what makes her tick? I don't think many girls would let me pay to cut them up. And fewer still actually have electric motors and intricate circuitry and all sorts of fun stuff inside.

by Purpelia » Sat Oct 07, 2017 4:16 am
FelrikTheDeleted wrote:Purpelia wrote:What if you're like me and you don't really care about the actual sex part and you only really want to take a screwdriver to her to see what makes her tick? I don't think many girls would let me pay to cut them up. And fewer still actually have electric motors and intricate circuitry and all sorts of fun stuff inside.
... Say again? I suppose you could check a chart on human anatomy.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ethel mermania, Grinning Dragon, Ifreann, Kenowa, Kurey, Nantoraka, Nilokeras, Ors Might, Ostroeuropa, Picairn, Port Caverton, Primitive Communism, Sorcery, Southland, Stellar Colonies, The Pirateariat, The Sherpa Empire, Urkennalaid, Vylumiti, Washington Resistance Army, Xmara
Advertisement