What is your thought on marriage?

[Internationalist Bastard]

But remember per your own words its abuse if you don't include your spouse in the will even if they are a billionair and well off to do and you want to help your children get ahead in life. all must be equal.

But, you see, it's a polygamous relationship disguised as a corporation, so he'd be including all the spouses in his will.

*She*
And I'm glad we are debating the merits of polygamy trunced into a business partnership

[The New California Republic]

But remember per your own words its abuse if you don't include your spouse in the will even if they are a billionair and well off to do and you want to help your children get ahead in life. all must be equal.

But, you see, it's a polygamous relationship disguised as a corporation, so he'd be including all the spouses in his will.

Indeed it is, you understand it perfectly.*

*apart from referring to her as a "he".

[Dylar]

But, you see, it's a polygamous relationship disguised as a corporation, so he'd be including all the spouses in his will.

*She*
And I'm glad we are debating the merits of polygamy trunced into a business partnership

Mein apologies.

Also polygamy is heresy! Well, someone had to say it...

[Petrolheadia]

*She*
And I'm glad we are debating the merits of polygamy trunced into a business partnership

Mein apologies.

Also polygamy is heresy! Well, someone had to say it...

I gotta ask, why is it a heresy?

[The Parkus Empire]

Mein apologies.

Also polygamy is heresy! Well, someone had to say it...

I gotta ask, why is it a heresy?

Goes against dogma.

[Petrolheadia]

I gotta ask, why is it a heresy?

Goes against dogma.

No, as in why the dogma excludes it?

[The New California Republic]

I'm glad we are debating the merits of polygamy trunced into a business partnership

We are just using business law as a framework and precedent, "thinking out loud" and such. Creative legal solutions are always fun, especially when it is encroaching into mostly uncharted territory as far as the law is concerned.

[Keshiland]

But remember per your own words its abuse if you don't include your spouse in the will

Nope, I didn't say that. You are putting words in my mouth again, that is very bad of you. Naughty naughty Keshiland!

Also, how is the spouse not included in the will if they are form part of the legal person that is formed? They are included in the will as part of the legal person, so you are talking nonsense Keshiland.

The will is simply who you wish to leave your stuff to. So I would not be abusive to only leave my assets to my kids?

[The Parkus Empire]

Goes against dogma.

No, as in why the dogma excludes it?

God says so.

[Codora]

I will not date anyone until marriage.

What do you mean by that? Do you mean that you will not date anyone up to the marriage stage, or do you mean you will not start dating someone until you are married?

I will not start dating someone until l I am married.

[Dylar]

What do you mean by that? Do you mean that you will not date anyone up to the marriage stage, or do you mean you will not start dating someone until you are married?

I will not start dating someone until l I am married.

Wait...but doesn't dating usually have to deal with trying to find the one you want to marry, and when you do, you go into a courtship, and then marriage? I don't think you're supposed to marry and then date...

[Petrolheadia]

No, as in why the dogma excludes it?

God says so.

And why?

[New haven america]

What do you mean by that? Do you mean that you will not date anyone up to the marriage stage, or do you mean you will not start dating someone until you are married?

I will not start dating someone until l I am married.

Then how do you expect to find the person you're going to marry?

[The New California Republic]

Nope, I didn't say that. You are putting words in my mouth again, that is very bad of you. Naughty naughty Keshiland!

Also, how is the spouse not included in the will if they are form part of the legal person that is formed? They are included in the will as part of the legal person, so you are talking nonsense Keshiland.

The will is simply who you wish to leave your stuff to. So I would not be abusive to only leave my assets to my kids?

Keshiland, we are talking about polygamous marriage, and using corporate law as a framework and precedent, towards creating a legal person out of all the people in the relationship, in order to act as a single next of kin. It has nothing to do with whatever you have just said.

[The Parkus Empire]

God says so.

And why?

God doesn't possess any human faculties except in the incarnation, so there is no "why" in humanist terms, but practically speaking marriage is a devotion, and keeping it open on the male's end is whoring on his part (this is the term also used when you worship a god other than YHWH, it's likened to betraying your exclusive devotion to him). Marriage is a spiritual path to salvation; that is all it is, everything in it is subordinated to that end.

[Petrolheadia]

And why?

God doesn't possess any human faculties except in the incarnation, so there is no "why" in humanist terms, but practically speaking marriage is a devotion, and keeping it open on the male's end is whoring on his part (this is the term also used when you worship a god other than YHWH, it's likened to betraying your exclusive devotion to him). Marriage is a spiritual path to salvation; that is all it is, everything in it is subordinated to that end.

One can be devoted to a few people more than to a single person.

[The New California Republic]

What do you mean by that? Do you mean that you will not date anyone up to the marriage stage, or do you mean you will not start dating someone until you are married?

I will not start dating someone until l I am married.

That is impossible. That is like getting a job as a pilot before you have ever flown a plane.

[Dylar]

God doesn't possess any human faculties except in the incarnation, so there is no "why" in humanist terms, but practically speaking marriage is a devotion, and keeping it open on the male's end is whoring on his part (this is the term also used when you worship a god other than YHWH, it's likened to betraying your exclusive devotion to him). Marriage is a spiritual path to salvation; that is all it is, everything in it is subordinated to that end.

One can be devoted to a few people more than to a single person.

That's what we call "friends and loved ones"

[The Parkus Empire]

God doesn't possess any human faculties except in the incarnation, so there is no "why" in humanist terms, but practically speaking marriage is a devotion, and keeping it open on the male's end is whoring on his part (this is the term also used when you worship a god other than YHWH, it's likened to betraying your exclusive devotion to him). Marriage is a spiritual path to salvation; that is all it is, everything in it is subordinated to that end.

One can be devoted to a few people more than to a single person.

Historically that's not how it's worked. Polygamy just meant the man was free to screw around with women, but the women had to be devoted to him.

[New haven america]

*She*
And I'm glad we are debating the merits of polygamy trunced into a business partnership

Mein apologies.

Also polygamy is heresy! Well, someone had to say it...

Actually, humans aren't a naturally monogamous species, funnily enough...

[Petrolheadia]

One can be devoted to a few people more than to a single person.

Historically that's not how it's worked. Polygamy just meant the man was free to screw around with women, but the women had to be devoted to him.

Does not mean it always has to look like this.

[The New California Republic]

One can be devoted to a few people more than to a single person.

Polygamy just meant the man was free to screw around with women, but the women had to be devoted to him.

Modern polygamy is very different. Nowadays they tend to be very loving group relationships, where everyone mutually loves and respects one another, irrespective of gender.

[The Parkus Empire]

Historically that's not how it's worked. Polygamy just meant the man was free to screw around with women, but the women had to be devoted to him.

Does not mean it always has to look like this.

Christian marriage is about subordination to God's will, though, not about God pleasing yours.

[The Parkus Empire]

Polygamy just meant the man was free to screw around with women, but the women had to be devoted to him.

Modern polygamy is very different. Nowadays they tend to be very loving group relationships, where everyone mutually loves and respects one another, irrespective of gender.

I'll be sure to check next time I'm in a Muslim country.

[The New California Republic]

Mein apologies.

Also polygamy is heresy! Well, someone had to say it...

Actually, humans aren't a naturally monogamous species, funnily enough...

Indeed, most of the time it has to be forced, with the non-monogamous urges being fought tooth and nail by religions/morality.