Like I said it comes from passion LOL.
Advertisement

by Keshiland » Wed Oct 04, 2017 2:24 pm

by Twilight Imperium » Wed Oct 04, 2017 2:54 pm

by Nulla Bellum » Wed Oct 04, 2017 3:01 pm

by The Holy Therns » Thu Oct 05, 2017 8:22 am
Gallade wrote:Love, cake, wine and banter. No greater meaning to life (〜^∇^)〜
Ethel mermania wrote:to therns is to transend the pettiness of the field of play into the field of dreams.

by Neutraligon » Thu Oct 05, 2017 9:08 am

by Helladic Empire » Thu Oct 05, 2017 9:13 am
Eisen Wolf Reich wrote:Also, I would just like to say that even though I am totally straight, me and my best friend have a arrangement that after college we will get married for the tax breaks. And when one of us finds a woman we wish to marry we will simply divorce.
Anyone else think this is a good idea?

by Neutraligon » Thu Oct 05, 2017 9:22 am
Eisen Wolf Reich wrote:Also, I would just like to say that even though I am totally straight, me and my best friend have a arrangement that after college we will get married for the tax breaks. And when one of us finds a woman we wish to marry we will simply divorce.
Anyone else think this is a good idea?

by Keshiland » Thu Oct 05, 2017 9:50 am
Neutraligon wrote:Keshiland wrote:
Like I said it comes from passion LOL.
Your passion makes you seem like an authoritarian controlling abusive man? Also...didn't you claim to be good at convincing people of things? You do realize that part of raising healthy kids when you are actually married is doing things together as an entire family, including with their mother right?

by Trumptonium » Thu Oct 05, 2017 9:53 am
Dylar wrote:Keshiland wrote:
Its dire. Generation Z (2000-2019) are going to be the most conservative since the great generation (1920-1939) so we need to make sure generation Alfa (2020-2039) is liberal. I don't want them thinking guns are cool.
I...I hope you do know that Gen Z are still a bunch of kids right? Their ideologies will change over time...well except mine, I'm still being conservative, and I'm still buying guns for home defense and hunting...Nevertheless, I'm not sure how you know that Gen Z is gonna be the most conservative, especially since all of them haven't even graduated high-school yet...

by Sovaal » Thu Oct 05, 2017 10:45 am

by Keshiland » Thu Oct 05, 2017 10:47 am
Sovaal wrote:Sp, Keshi, have you not thought about just skipping the whole loveless marriage thing and just adopting a couple kids? God knows there are plenty out there.

by Petrolheadia » Thu Oct 05, 2017 10:52 am

by The New California Republic » Thu Oct 05, 2017 11:24 am
Keshiland wrote:I am going to try and explain my self the best I can with out sounding horrible.
1. I plan to make sure that I find a woman who has the same goal as me to be co-parents/get married to have kids and want to parent them in the same way.
2. I only plan to separate assets like the car so that I can easily get around to work or do things with my kids without both of us having to be home at the same time to do it.
3. The reason I want to keep my kids in liberal schools is because this election showed that the right is filled with 10s of millions of racist, sexist, homophobic/transphobic, islamiphobic, nationalistic, people who I don't want influencing them.
4. (because of 1) I will spend time with my wife/co-parent if she wants on occasion, but the vast majority of the time I will be with the kids, however if their is time and she really wants alone time I will give her that when the kids are asleep and if I don't need to get ready for work early in the morning.
5. The reason I am against abortion is clear, I see the fetus as equal to the baby, and when I see babies they are the essence of pure love, they have every emotion in its purist form. Am I going to not allow my car to be used to go to an abortion clinic yes, will I throw her out the house, no, especially if we already have kids, will I get heated and try to stop her of course, when its all said and done and she makes her choice, I might go weeks or even months with out talking to her but I am sure I would come back around.
6. The reason I am against guns is cause they are dangerous, I don't want them in the house cause I don't want someone getting hurt or killed on accident. Why am I against tobacco because its bad for the health of everyone, am I going to want my kids vaccinated of course.
Hopefully this makes more sence and sounds better lol. Im passionate about what I beleive so it probably comes off worse then I mean to.

by Keshiland » Thu Oct 05, 2017 11:29 am
The New California Republic wrote:Keshiland wrote:I am going to try and explain my self the best I can with out sounding horrible.
1. I plan to make sure that I find a woman who has the same goal as me to be co-parents/get married to have kids and want to parent them in the same way.
2. I only plan to separate assets like the car so that I can easily get around to work or do things with my kids without both of us having to be home at the same time to do it.
3. The reason I want to keep my kids in liberal schools is because this election showed that the right is filled with 10s of millions of racist, sexist, homophobic/transphobic, islamiphobic, nationalistic, people who I don't want influencing them.
4. (because of 1) I will spend time with my wife/co-parent if she wants on occasion, but the vast majority of the time I will be with the kids, however if their is time and she really wants alone time I will give her that when the kids are asleep and if I don't need to get ready for work early in the morning.
5. The reason I am against abortion is clear, I see the fetus as equal to the baby, and when I see babies they are the essence of pure love, they have every emotion in its purist form. Am I going to not allow my car to be used to go to an abortion clinic yes, will I throw her out the house, no, especially if we already have kids, will I get heated and try to stop her of course, when its all said and done and she makes her choice, I might go weeks or even months with out talking to her but I am sure I would come back around.
6. The reason I am against guns is cause they are dangerous, I don't want them in the house cause I don't want someone getting hurt or killed on accident. Why am I against tobacco because its bad for the health of everyone, am I going to want my kids vaccinated of course.
Hopefully this makes more sence and sounds better lol. Im passionate about what I beleive so it probably comes off worse then I mean to.
None of this washes away what you have already said. Your views are abhorrent, absolutely abhorrent. Your views are authoritarian, misogynistic, and perhaps even a little bit fascist. You think you are liberal, but if you are liberal, then I am the Pope. Backpedaling now is far too little, far too late. I sincerely doubt that anyone that has heard your views over the past few weeks will change their opinion of you now, the damage has already been done, and is irreversible.
In fact, a lot of this is not even backpedaling, you are just pouring a ton of sugar on your abhorrent views through rewording, to make them seem more palatable to us. But once you get past the sugar, the real substance of your views still remains just as bitter as before.
You seem to think the wool can easily be pulled over our eyes, but here is a secret: it most certainly can not.

by Sovaal » Thu Oct 05, 2017 11:32 am
Keshiland wrote:The New California Republic wrote:
None of this washes away what you have already said. Your views are abhorrent, absolutely abhorrent. Your views are authoritarian, misogynistic, and perhaps even a little bit fascist. You think you are liberal, but if you are liberal, then I am the Pope. Backpedaling now is far too little, far too late. I sincerely doubt that anyone that has heard your views over the past few weeks will change their opinion of you now, the damage has already been done, and is irreversible.
In fact, a lot of this is not even backpedaling, you are just pouring a ton of sugar on your abhorrent views through rewording, to make them seem more palatable to us. But once you get past the sugar, the real substance of your views still remains just as bitter as before.
You seem to think the wool can easily be pulled over our eyes, but here is a secret: it most certainly can not.
You only think that is horrible because you think marriage should only be about love despite the poll saying otherwise. You asked for an explination of why I have those views and I gave it to you. Not everyone wants to have a romantic relationship you know.

by The New California Republic » Thu Oct 05, 2017 11:44 am
Keshiland wrote:The New California Republic wrote:
None of this washes away what you have already said. Your views are abhorrent, absolutely abhorrent. Your views are authoritarian, misogynistic, and perhaps even a little bit fascist. You think you are liberal, but if you are liberal, then I am the Pope. Backpedaling now is far too little, far too late. I sincerely doubt that anyone that has heard your views over the past few weeks will change their opinion of you now, the damage has already been done, and is irreversible.
In fact, a lot of this is not even backpedaling, you are just pouring a ton of sugar on your abhorrent views through rewording, to make them seem more palatable to us. But once you get past the sugar, the real substance of your views still remains just as bitter as before.
You seem to think the wool can easily be pulled over our eyes, but here is a secret: it most certainly can not.
You only think that is horrible because you think marriage should only be about love despite the poll saying otherwise.
Keshiland wrote:You asked for an explination of why I have those views and I gave it to you. Not everyone wants to have a romantic relationship you know.

by Keshiland » Thu Oct 05, 2017 11:49 am
The New California Republic wrote:Keshiland wrote:
You only think that is horrible because you think marriage should only be about love despite the poll saying otherwise.
And just where on earth did I say this little gem? I challenge you to find a quotation where I said that marriage should only be about love. I will save you some time: it doesn't exist. Stop putting words into my mouth, I find your views horrible because I think abusive relationships - and a warped family life that can harm the children - are horrible.Keshiland wrote:You asked for an explination of why I have those views and I gave it to you. Not everyone wants to have a romantic relationship you know.
Yup, because abhorrent views, with an explanation attached to them, makes them not abhorrent any more(!)

by Ethel mermania » Thu Oct 05, 2017 11:58 am
Keshiland wrote:Petrolheadia wrote:TFW when people read your rhetoricals seriously.
Also, you'd restrict your children from seeing their nearest ancestors for political reasons? Stalin's getting disgusted in his grave.
EDIT: Your edit's crossed the border between disgusting and comedic sociopathy.
I don't want my kids hearing any right-wing opinions on issues, so I will do what any parent would do watch them whenever they are with someone who is to the right of me. My parents are on the left so I would not worry about my kids being with them, but if they have any right wing view other then pro life, I need to protect my kids. If I have the money I will send them to a liberal private or charter school, who will assure they don't end up being conservative which is the trend for the younger generations :/

by Crylante » Thu Oct 05, 2017 12:10 pm

by The New California Republic » Thu Oct 05, 2017 12:22 pm

by Galloism » Thu Oct 05, 2017 12:27 pm
The New California Republic wrote:You seem to think that with-holding property is not abuse. Wrong.
You seem to think that arbitrarily divorcing your wife when the kids reach 18, for no reason other than "you are bored" is not abuse. Wrong.
by Segral » Thu Oct 05, 2017 12:31 pm

by The New California Republic » Thu Oct 05, 2017 12:38 pm
Galloism wrote:How is divorcing abuse?
I mean, it's kind of being shitty, but I'm not sure "refusing to take positive action" is abuse.

by The New California Republic » Thu Oct 05, 2017 12:39 pm
Segral wrote:New California, just because someone acts like a dick doesn't mean they're abusing someone. To abuse is to treat someone with cruelty and violence regularly. Keshiland's not abusive, just shitty.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Achan, Dimetrodon Empire, Kerwa, Second Peenadian
Advertisement