Advertisement

by Farnhamia » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:37 pm

by Petrolheadia » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:38 pm
Keshiland wrote:The New California Republic wrote:Keshiland, I can tell you right now, unequivocally, that you are not liberal. A liberal would not have the kind of authoritarian and misogynistic views that you hold. That being said, I cannot say precisely what your belief system would be classified as, it is just a random collection of extremely disturbing and contradictory views.
I am a liberal, I am just one who has no room in my life for the conservative right because they have ruined the federal judiciary for voting for Trump and I will likely not see progress till I'm in my 60s thanks to them. It's not misogynistic, who says marriage has to be about love? Why can't 2 people just get married to have kids and both be happy with that? I will teach my kids that people of all races, sexes, genders, orientations, nationalities, and religions are all equal and good people. I will let them dp what ever they wish that does not harm them or someone else or break the law. Will I protect them from right-wing propaganda of course, will I keep them out of right wing schools of course, will I stop them from watching faux, or Breitbart, yes. But I will not stop them from looking at conventional right wing outlets.
I am anti gun, pro envorment, pro immagration, pro refugees being let in, pro UHC, pro free college, pro universal healthcare, pro childcare, pro vaccinations, pro 3 meals a day in schools the only non "liberal view" is that I am pro life.

by Keshiland » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:39 pm
Dylar wrote:Keshiland wrote:
Its dire. Generation Z (2000-2019) are going to be the most conservative since the great generation (1920-1939) so we need to make sure generation Alfa (2020-2039) is liberal. I don't want them thinking guns are cool.
I...I hope you do know that Gen Z are still a bunch of kids right? Their ideologies will change over time...well except mine, I'm still being conservative, and I'm still buying guns for home defense and hunting...Nevertheless, I'm not sure how you know that Gen Z is gonna be the most conservative, especially since all of them haven't even graduated high-school yet...

by The New California Republic » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:40 pm
Keshiland wrote:The New California Republic wrote:Keshiland, I can tell you right now, unequivocally, that you are not liberal. A liberal would not have the kind of authoritarian and misogynistic views that you hold. That being said, I cannot say precisely what your belief system would be classified as, it is just a random collection of extremely disturbing and contradictory views.
the only non "liberal view" is that I am pro life.

by Petrolheadia » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:41 pm
Keshiland wrote:Dylar wrote:I...I hope you do know that Gen Z are still a bunch of kids right? Their ideologies will change over time...well except mine, I'm still being conservative, and I'm still buying guns for home defense and hunting...Nevertheless, I'm not sure how you know that Gen Z is gonna be the most conservative, especially since all of them haven't even graduated high-school yet...
I know that. Well thats what I have heard from the media and I can definitely see a more pessimistic view of the world coming from them then from us example (I beleive that I will get my dream job, have my own house even if rented, have a car and have a tone of kids, my little brother gen z does not think he will get any where in life and that he will succeed in what he wants.)
Its sad it really is, but I have hope that maybe they will change. Exept those freshmen in my US history class 2 years ago who were pro trump -_-

by The New California Republic » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:41 pm

by Dylar » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:43 pm
Keshiland wrote:The New California Republic wrote:Keshiland, I can tell you right now, unequivocally, that you are not liberal. A liberal would not have the kind of authoritarian and misogynistic views that you hold. That being said, I cannot say precisely what your belief system would be classified as, it is just a random collection of extremely disturbing and contradictory views.
I am a liberal, I am just one who has no room in my life for the conservative right because they have ruined the federal judiciary for voting for Trump and I will likely not see progress till I'm in my 60s thanks to them. It's not misogynistic, who says marriage has to be about love? Why can't 2 people just get married to have kids and both be happy with that? I will teach my kids that people of all races, sexes, genders, orientations, nationalities, and religions are all equal and good people. I will let them dp what ever they wish that does not harm them or someone else or break the law. Will I protect them from right-wing propaganda of course, will I keep them out of right wing schools of course, will I stop them from watching faux, or Breitbart, yes. But I will not stop them from looking at conventional right wing outlets.
I am anti gun, pro envorment, pro immagration, pro refugees being let in, pro UHC, pro free college, pro universal healthcare, pro childcare, pro vaccinations, pro 3 meals a day in schools the only non "liberal view" is that I am pro life.

St. Albert the Great wrote:"Natural science does not consist in ratifying what others have said, but in seeking the causes of phenomena."
Franko Tildon wrote:Fire washes the skin off the bone and the sin off the soul. It cleans away the dirt. And my momma didn't raise herself no dirty boy.

by Keshiland » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:44 pm
The New California Republic wrote:Keshiland wrote:
the only non "liberal view" is that I am pro life.
Nope, you missed a bunch. You think abusing women by with-holding property and restricting free movement to prevent them having an abortion is OK (see the abortion thread for the entire saga), you are a misogynist, and you are authoritarian. Any one of those things would be incompatible with being liberal. The fact that you display all three of those things shows that you are far removed from being liberal.

by Eisen Wolf Reich » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:46 pm
Dylar wrote:Keshiland wrote:
Its dire. Generation Z (2000-2019) are going to be the most conservative since the great generation (1920-1939) so we need to make sure generation Alfa (2020-2039) is liberal. I don't want them thinking guns are cool.
I...I hope you do know that Gen Z are still a bunch of kids right? Their ideologies will change over time...well except mine, I'm still being conservative, and I'm still buying guns for home defense and hunting...Nevertheless, I'm not sure how you know that Gen Z is gonna be the most conservative, especially since all of them haven't even graduated high-school yet...

by Attempted Socialism » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:46 pm
Think it through: This may have both social and legal effects. Are you ready to be each others legal guardians/next of kin if an accident happens? Are you sure that you'll stay best friends for 5+ years - and that any issues arising (Including divorce) can be handled without a lawyer that eats into those tax breaks? Are there any legal obligations that can be levied against you, on behalf of your spouse, such as shared debt or other liability?Eisen Wolf Reich wrote:Also, I would just like to say that even though I am totally straight, me and my best friend have a arrangement that after college we will get married for the tax breaks. And when one of us finds a woman we wish to marry we will simply divorce.
Anyone else think this is a good idea?
| Represented in the World Assembly by Ambassador Robert Mortimer Pride, called The Regicide Assume OOC unless otherwise indicated. | Cui Bono, quod seipsos custodes custodiunt? | Who am I in real life, my opinions and notes My NS career |

by The Holy Therns » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:46 pm
Keshiland wrote:The New California Republic wrote:
Nope, you missed a bunch. You think abusing women by with-holding property and restricting free movement to prevent them having an abortion is OK (see the abortion thread for the entire saga), you are a misogynist, and you are authoritarian. Any one of those things would be incompatible with being liberal. The fact that you display all three of those things shows that you are far removed from being liberal.
I am a liberal who is willing to play dirty to achieve my goals, that does not make me not a liberal. Absolutely no one who knows me would say I am masoginistic or authoritarian and yes some of them know of how I would use legal leverage to prevent abortions.
Gallade wrote:Love, cake, wine and banter. No greater meaning to life (〜^∇^)〜
Ethel mermania wrote:to therns is to transend the pettiness of the field of play into the field of dreams.

by Keshiland » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:46 pm
Dylar wrote:Keshiland wrote:
I am a liberal, I am just one who has no room in my life for the conservative right because they have ruined the federal judiciary for voting for Trump and I will likely not see progress till I'm in my 60s thanks to them. It's not misogynistic, who says marriage has to be about love? Why can't 2 people just get married to have kids and both be happy with that? I will teach my kids that people of all races, sexes, genders, orientations, nationalities, and religions are all equal and good people. I will let them dp what ever they wish that does not harm them or someone else or break the law. Will I protect them from right-wing propaganda of course, will I keep them out of right wing schools of course, will I stop them from watching faux, or Breitbart, yes. But I will not stop them from looking at conventional right wing outlets.
I am anti gun, pro envorment, pro immagration, pro refugees being let in, pro UHC, pro free college, pro universal healthcare, pro childcare, pro vaccinations, pro 3 meals a day in schools the only non "liberal view" is that I am pro life.
Hang on...you're gonna stop your kids from looking at right-wing outlets like Fox, and Breitbart, but you're also gonna let them look at right-wing outlets...please explain...

by The New California Republic » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:46 pm
Dylar wrote:Keshiland wrote:I am anti gun, pro envorment, pro immagration, pro refugees being let in, pro UHC, pro free college, pro universal healthcare, pro childcare, pro vaccinations, pro 3 meals a day in schools the only non "liberal view" is that I am pro life.
Hang on...you're gonna stop your kids from looking at right-wing outlets like Fox, and Breitbart, but you're also gonna let them look at right-wing outlets...please explain...

by Eisen Wolf Reich » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:47 pm

by Petrolheadia » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:47 pm

by Eisen Wolf Reich » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:48 pm
The New California Republic wrote:Eisen Wolf Reich wrote:Also, I would just like to say that even though I am totally straight, me and my best friend have a arrangement that after college we will get married for the tax breaks. And when one of us finds a woman we wish to marry we will simply divorce.
Anyone else think this is a good idea?
Are you sure that you are totally straight, and the tax breaks are not just an excuse to be in a relationship with another man? The mind works in mysterious ways, it can nudge us towards doing something we desire, but cannot deal with emotionally, by creating stratagems to achieve satisfaction of the desire in an indirect way.

by Petrolheadia » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:48 pm
Keshiland wrote:The New California Republic wrote:
Nope, you missed a bunch. You think abusing women by with-holding property and restricting free movement to prevent them having an abortion is OK (see the abortion thread for the entire saga), you are a misogynist, and you are authoritarian. Any one of those things would be incompatible with being liberal. The fact that you display all three of those things shows that you are far removed from being liberal.
I am a liberal who is willing to play dirty to achieve my goals, that does not make me not a liberal. Absolutely no one who knows me would say I am masoginistic or authoritarian and yes some of them know of how I would use legal leverage to prevent abortions.
Wiktionary wrote:Liberalism - any political movement founded on the autonomy and personal freedom of the individual, progress and reform, and government by law with the consent of the governed.

by Twilight Imperium » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:49 pm

by Keshiland » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:51 pm

by Petrolheadia » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:51 pm

by Dylar » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:52 pm
St. Albert the Great wrote:"Natural science does not consist in ratifying what others have said, but in seeking the causes of phenomena."
Franko Tildon wrote:Fire washes the skin off the bone and the sin off the soul. It cleans away the dirt. And my momma didn't raise herself no dirty boy.

by Eisen Wolf Reich » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:53 pm
Attempted Socialism wrote:Think it through: This may have both social and legal effects. Are you ready to be each others legal guardians/next of kin if an accident happens? Are you sure that you'll stay best friends for 5+ years - and that any issues arising (Including divorce) can be handled without a lawyer that eats into those tax breaks? Are there any legal obligations that can be levied against you, on behalf of your spouse, such as shared debt or other liability?Eisen Wolf Reich wrote:Also, I would just like to say that even though I am totally straight, me and my best friend have a arrangement that after college we will get married for the tax breaks. And when one of us finds a woman we wish to marry we will simply divorce.
Anyone else think this is a good idea?
A gay marriage may also be hard to explain to future girlfriends, their family, future friends and your own families - even if they're not against gay rights, it can have social ramifications.
I get the economic incentive: When I shared a flat with a good friend, we considered "becoming" a 'paperless couple' (Which is a legal term where I live) because that would make us 1 household in terms of a lot of expenses, rather than the 2 households we were, effectively halving a number of monthly costs for us. We ultimately decided against, mostly for legal reasons. So before you do, take a good look at what you're entering into, what risks there may be, what benefits it will have, what likely costs you can accrue getting out, and give a good thought to how your current and future social circles may react to it.

by Attempted Socialism » Wed Oct 04, 2017 2:07 pm
Give some thought to social ramifications as well.Eisen Wolf Reich wrote:1. Am I ready to back his next of kin/guardian. Yes, We've literally known each other sense we were infants as our families are close friends, we are practically brothers.
2. Refer to one
3. WE will sign a prenup to make sure that there is a clean 50/50 division of assets, again the only thing we will share is maybe a flat. Also, We both have no legal liabilities or debts. And even if we weren't married I would help him pay.
| Represented in the World Assembly by Ambassador Robert Mortimer Pride, called The Regicide Assume OOC unless otherwise indicated. | Cui Bono, quod seipsos custodes custodiunt? | Who am I in real life, my opinions and notes My NS career |

by Keshiland » Wed Oct 04, 2017 2:21 pm

by Twilight Imperium » Wed Oct 04, 2017 2:23 pm
Keshiland wrote:-snip-
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Achan, Dimetrodon Empire, Kerwa, Second Peenadian
Advertisement