A baby factory complex.
With frequent messy mergers at the Human Resources level.
Advertisement

by Imperializt Russia » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:24 pm
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Eisen Wolf Reich » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:24 pm
Keshiland wrote:The New California Republic wrote:Sources don't matter to Keshiland, he has repeatedly resisted using them before, I doubt he will start using them now. He is content with throwing any "fact" out there that even barely justifies his views, with little or no evidence to back it up.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... e-WW2.html

by Keshiland » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:24 pm
Petrolheadia wrote:Eisen Wolf Reich wrote:
I wouldn't call seeking marriage for the sake of children mysognisitic. There are plenty of women who seek marriage for the sake of women too. And no one is saying that he won't fall in love with a woman and pursue children with them, just that he himself said that he is seeking only the character of a good mother in a woman.
Good babymaker, that is.
A mother is too much of a human being for Keshi to bear.

by The New California Republic » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:25 pm
Eisen Wolf Reich wrote:I wouldn't call seeking marriage for the sake of children mysognisitic.

by Petrolheadia » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:25 pm
Keshiland wrote:The New California Republic wrote:Sources don't matter to Keshiland, he has repeatedly resisted using them before, I doubt he will start using them now. He is content with throwing any "fact" out there that even barely justifies his views, with little or no evidence to back it up.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... e-WW2.html

by Torisakia » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:25 pm

by Eisen Wolf Reich » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:26 pm
The New California Republic wrote:Eisen Wolf Reich wrote:I wouldn't call seeking marriage for the sake of children mysognisitic.
You need to look at the wider context of what Keshiland has been saying, it isn't just a matter of being in a marriage for the sake of wanting children, that is a massive understatement. His views are far deeper and more disturbing than that.

by Petrolheadia » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:28 pm

by Attempted Socialism » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:28 pm
Check out Keshilands posting history earlier in this thread and in the abortion thread. He has stated a desire to own a woman solely for procreation, rejects loving her, intends to let her own nothing on her own, and when she's done being his breeding stock, kick her out with nothing. He will also immobilise her physically, ostracise her socially and abuse her emotionally.Eisen Wolf Reich wrote:I wouldn't call seeking marriage for the sake of children mysognisitic. There are plenty of women who seek marriage for the sake of women too. And no one is saying that he won't fall in love with a woman and pursue children with them, just that he himself said that he is seeking only the character of a good mother in a woman.
| Represented in the World Assembly by Ambassador Robert Mortimer Pride, called The Regicide Assume OOC unless otherwise indicated. | Cui Bono, quod seipsos custodes custodiunt? | Who am I in real life, my opinions and notes My NS career |

by Eisen Wolf Reich » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:28 pm

by Eisen Wolf Reich » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:29 pm
Attempted Socialism wrote:Check out Keshilands posting history earlier in this thread and in the abortion thread. He has stated a desire to own a woman solely for procreation, rejects loving her, intends to let her own nothing on her own, and when she's done being his breeding stock, kick her out with nothing. He will also immobilise her physically, ostracise her socially and abuse her emotionally.Eisen Wolf Reich wrote:I wouldn't call seeking marriage for the sake of children mysognisitic. There are plenty of women who seek marriage for the sake of women too. And no one is saying that he won't fall in love with a woman and pursue children with them, just that he himself said that he is seeking only the character of a good mother in a woman.
A marriage (edit: solely) for the sake of children is, IMO, very close to mysoginistic. Keshiland doesn't seek that, his fantasies are much, much worse.

by The New California Republic » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:29 pm
Keshiland wrote:The New California Republic wrote:Sources don't matter to Keshiland, he has repeatedly resisted using them before, I doubt he will start using them now. He is content with throwing any "fact" out there that even barely justifies his views, with little or no evidence to back it up.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... e-WW2.html

by Petrolheadia » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:29 pm
Eisen Wolf Reich wrote:The New California Republic wrote:You need to look at the wider context of what Keshiland has been saying, it isn't just a matter of being in a marriage for the sake of wanting children, that is a massive understatement. His views are far deeper and more disturbing than that.
Pls explain as I don't have time to go review all his posts to look at this big picture.
by Segral » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:30 pm
Eisen Wolf Reich wrote:Also, I would just like to say that even though I am totally straight, me and my best friend have a arrangement that after college we will get married for the tax breaks. And when one of us finds a woman we wish to marry we will simply divorce.
Anyone else think this is a good idea?

by Petrolheadia » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:30 pm
Eisen Wolf Reich wrote:Also, I would just like to say that even though I am totally straight, me and my best friend have a arrangement that after college we will get married for the tax breaks. And when one of us finds a woman we wish to marry we will simply divorce.
Anyone else think this is a good idea?

by Eisen Wolf Reich » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:31 pm

by Eisen Wolf Reich » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:31 pm
Petrolheadia wrote:Eisen Wolf Reich wrote:Also, I would just like to say that even though I am totally straight, me and my best friend have a arrangement that after college we will get married for the tax breaks. And when one of us finds a woman we wish to marry we will simply divorce.
Anyone else think this is a good idea?
What have you been smoking?

by Eisen Wolf Reich » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:32 pm
Segral wrote:Eisen Wolf Reich wrote:Also, I would just like to say that even though I am totally straight, me and my best friend have a arrangement that after college we will get married for the tax breaks. And when one of us finds a woman we wish to marry we will simply divorce.
Anyone else think this is a good idea?
Jesus Christ, don't do that. Mairrage is a huge commitment, and if it's not for the long haul, then there's no point.

by Dylar » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:32 pm
Keshiland wrote:The New California Republic wrote:
So you would bar the grandparents, for political reasons, from spending time with your kids??? Keshiland, you are heading for a complete train wreck of a marriage and family life, I actually fear for the future of the children that are brought up in that environment.
Its dire. Generation Z (2000-2019) are going to be the most conservative since the great generation (1920-1939) so we need to make sure generation Alfa (2020-2039) is liberal. I don't want them thinking guns are cool.
St. Albert the Great wrote:"Natural science does not consist in ratifying what others have said, but in seeking the causes of phenomena."
Franko Tildon wrote:Fire washes the skin off the bone and the sin off the soul. It cleans away the dirt. And my momma didn't raise herself no dirty boy.

by Keshiland » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:34 pm
The New California Republic wrote:Keshiland wrote:I don't want my kids hearing any right-wing opinions on issues, so I will do what any parent would do watch them whenever they are with someone who is to the right of me. My parents are on the left so I would not worry about my kids being with them, but if they have any right wing view other then pro life, I need to protect my kids. If I have the money I will send them to a liberal private or charter school, who will assure they don't end up being conservative which is the trend for the younger generations :/
Keshiland, I can tell you right now, unequivocally, that you are not liberal. A liberal would not have the kind of authoritarian and misogynistic views that you hold. That being said, I cannot say precisely what your belief system would be classified as, it is just a random collection of extremely disturbing and contradictory views.

by Twilight Imperium » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:34 pm
Dylar wrote:Keshiland wrote:I said if they did but it's not worry as much as not wanting old time conservatives trying to sway liberal parenting styles
What makes you think they might be conservatives? Hope you know that there were liberals and hippies in their day too and they could be one of them...
Unless you plan on taking an innocent girl raised in a traditional nuclear family to exploit and manipulate her and her family for your own personal gains...then in which case, that's pretty disgusting...

by The New California Republic » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:35 pm
Eisen Wolf Reich wrote:Also, I would just like to say that even though I am totally straight, me and my best friend have a arrangement that after college we will get married for the tax breaks. And when one of us finds a woman we wish to marry we will simply divorce.
Anyone else think this is a good idea?

by Twilight Imperium » Wed Oct 04, 2017 1:36 pm
Keshiland wrote:-snip-.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Achan, Kerwa, Second Peenadian
Advertisement