NATION

PASSWORD

Gun Control

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Am I right?

Yeah, mostly, seems agreeable.
223
22%
Dunno/Not sure/Not American and I think that matters
68
7%
Nah, you're crazy. Guns should be more restricted.
204
20%
Nah, you're crazy. Guns should be less restricted.
436
44%
JC Christ CM come back when the meds wear off
71
7%
 
Total votes : 1002

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41244
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:18 pm

Len Hyet wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
Children are denied plenty of rights due to their age. Or do you want 6 year olds voting?

A six year old can't understand economic policy. They can understand "this is dangerous, it is not a toy, don't touch it without Mom or Dad around"


If you're counting on 6 year olds to defend a free state using their arms then you've failed as a parent. Kids don't need to be able to own guns. Parents can just let them use theirs until they hit they age of majority.

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41244
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:20 pm

Grinning Dragon wrote:A child is still afforded their enumerated Constitutional Rights, and the 2nd Amendment is one of those Rights, as much as their Right to Free Speech.
I myself couldn't wait till my kids showed maturity and were old enough to go to the range with me, till then it was lots of shooting BB guns in the backyard.


Well I just hope you got a warrant before you went in their rooms....

User avatar
Len Hyet
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10712
Founded: Jun 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Len Hyet » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:20 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Len Hyet wrote:A six year old can't understand economic policy. They can understand "this is dangerous, it is not a toy, don't touch it without Mom or Dad around"


If you're counting on 6 year olds to defend a free state using their arms then you've failed as a parent. Kids don't need to be able to own guns. Parents can just let them use theirs until they hit they age of majority.

Could you just real quick quote me where I said literally anything about defending a free state using arms?

God damn dude chill. When I was a kid I had my own .22. It wasn't for 'protecting the free state' it was for squirrel hunting.
=][= Founder, 1st NSG Irregulars. Our Militia is Well Regulated and Well Lubricated!

On a formerly defunct now re-declared one-man campaign to elevate the discourse of you heathens.

User avatar
Albrenia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16619
Founded: Aug 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Albrenia » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:22 pm

Isn't all of a child's 'property' technically the parent's property?

Otherwise a kid could take the adult to court for theft if they revoked a toy for misbehaviour...

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41244
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:22 pm

Len Hyet wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
If you're counting on 6 year olds to defend a free state using their arms then you've failed as a parent. Kids don't need to be able to own guns. Parents can just let them use theirs until they hit they age of majority.

Could you just real quick quote me where I said literally anything about defending a free state using arms?

God damn dude chill. When I was a kid I had my own .22. It wasn't for 'protecting the free state' it was for squirrel hunting.


A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

User avatar
Spirit of Hope
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12090
Founded: Feb 21, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Spirit of Hope » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:23 pm

Len Hyet wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
Children are denied plenty of rights due to their age. Or do you want 6 year olds voting?

A six year old can't understand economic policy. They can understand "this is dangerous, it is not a toy, don't touch it without Mom or Dad around"

If they can't touch it without Mom or Dad being around they shouldn't be allowed to own it. Again the parents owning it and then transferring it to the child at 18 produces the same results as your situation.
Fact Book.
Helpful hints on combat vehicle terminology.

Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:24 pm

Telconi wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:For those for another recipient, I know that in more rural areas parents by guns for their children, what about those type of purchases? I think if you want to reduce the wait period, you would need more people to do the checking as it can take a lot of time to do that check.

What do you mean open to use by the public? Do you mean you could see your own background check before purchasing?

Gallo same question as above, what about parents who buy guns for their minor children?

For all of you who said background check, what should be included in that. I know mental history and criminal history, anything else?


There's no reason a child needs a gun that is legally theirs. My child "owns" guns, but it's not legally hers, it's mine.

The check takes a handful of minutes, the ten day wait is simply a legally enforced wait period, they know before you leave the store on day one rather you've passed or not.

In rural areas it is common practice for farmers and Ranchers to employ their children and a gun may be needed as part of his work.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Grinning Dragon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10376
Founded: May 16, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Grinning Dragon » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:25 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Grinning Dragon wrote:A child is still afforded their enumerated Constitutional Rights, and the 2nd Amendment is one of those Rights, as much as their Right to Free Speech.
I myself couldn't wait till my kids showed maturity and were old enough to go to the range with me, till then it was lots of shooting BB guns in the backyard.


Well I just hope you got a warrant before you went in their rooms....


I got around that by removing the door to each room. :lol:

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41244
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:27 pm

Grinning Dragon wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
Well I just hope you got a warrant before you went in their rooms....


I got around that by removing the door to each room. :lol:


....i bet that was an experience if you had teenage sons. :D

User avatar
Spirit of Hope
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12090
Founded: Feb 21, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Spirit of Hope » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:27 pm

Greed and Death wrote:
Telconi wrote:
There's no reason a child needs a gun that is legally theirs. My child "owns" guns, but it's not legally hers, it's mine.

The check takes a handful of minutes, the ten day wait is simply a legally enforced wait period, they know before you leave the store on day one rather you've passed or not.

In rural areas it is common practice for farmers and Ranchers to employ their children and a gun may be needed as part of his work.

The parent can own that gun while allowing the child to use it. I don't think anyone is saying a child can't use a gun, just that legally the gun would not belong to the child and instead would be the parents property. Under most circumstances the ownership of the gun would make little difference here until the child is 18, at which point the child can now take legal ownership.
Fact Book.
Helpful hints on combat vehicle terminology.

Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!

User avatar
Grinning Dragon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10376
Founded: May 16, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Grinning Dragon » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:28 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Grinning Dragon wrote:
I got around that by removing the door to each room. :lol:


....i bet that was an experience if you had teenage sons. :D

:rofl:

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:32 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
Telconi wrote:
There's no reason a child needs a gun that is legally theirs. My child "owns" guns, but it's not legally hers, it's mine.

The check takes a handful of minutes, the ten day wait is simply a legally enforced wait period, they know before you leave the store on day one rather you've passed or not.


Hmm, if they know why the 10 day wait?

Spirit of Hope wrote:
Yes it would mean that, but it would also mean any sale wouldn't have to go through a FFL, or something similar, who would almost certainly charge and/or would require going to them which could be out of the way.



Not directed at me, but my answer would be that under 18 you can't own a gun, it would have to technically be your parents gun. When you turn 18 your parents do the background check and then they can give it to you.

Not sure I would trust parents to do the background check.


It's just a thing. They call it a "cooling off period" it''s supposedly intended to prevent someone from getting angry or upset and storming off to the gun store, buying a gun, and In a rage committing homicide, or in a crisis commitng suicide.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:35 pm

Spirit of Hope wrote:
Greed and Death wrote:In rural areas it is common practice for farmers and Ranchers to employ their children and a gun may be needed as part of his work.

The parent can own that gun while allowing the child to use it. I don't think anyone is saying a child can't use a gun, just that legally the gun would not belong to the child and instead would be the parents property. Under most circumstances the ownership of the gun would make little difference here until the child is 18, at which point the child can now take legal ownership.


If they are working independently for 8+ hours at a time without issue I see no issue with them having legal title to the weapon just like any other piece of personal property.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 158981
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:37 pm

Len Hyet wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
Children are denied plenty of rights due to their age. Or do you want 6 year olds voting?

A six year old can't understand economic policy. They can understand "this is dangerous, it is not a toy, don't touch it without Mom or Dad around"

A 70 year old can't understand economic policy. And he's the President.

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41244
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:38 pm

Greed and Death wrote:
Spirit of Hope wrote:The parent can own that gun while allowing the child to use it. I don't think anyone is saying a child can't use a gun, just that legally the gun would not belong to the child and instead would be the parents property. Under most circumstances the ownership of the gun would make little difference here until the child is 18, at which point the child can now take legal ownership.


If they are working independently for 8+ hours at a time without issue I see no issue with them having legal title to the weapon just like any other piece of personal property.


If children are working 8 hours+ at a time then I would hope other laws would come into play.....

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40487
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:39 pm

Telconi wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
Hmm, if they know why the 10 day wait?


Not sure I would trust parents to do the background check.


It's just a thing. They call it a "cooling off period" it''s supposedly intended to prevent someone from getting angry or upset and storming off to the gun store, buying a gun, and In a rage committing homicide, or in a crisis commitng suicide.

I can see a small wait period to prevent things like suicide. 10 days does seem a bit much though.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Spirit of Hope
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12090
Founded: Feb 21, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Spirit of Hope » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:40 pm

Greed and Death wrote:
Spirit of Hope wrote:The parent can own that gun while allowing the child to use it. I don't think anyone is saying a child can't use a gun, just that legally the gun would not belong to the child and instead would be the parents property. Under most circumstances the ownership of the gun would make little difference here until the child is 18, at which point the child can now take legal ownership.


If they are working independently for 8+ hours at a time without issue I see no issue with them having legal title to the weapon just like any other piece of personal property.

Except it comes with the ability to transfer that property to another without parental oversight, and if they can legally own it in my book they should be able to legally buy it, and I am not ok with minors being able to buy guns without parental oversight. If the parents trust them to handle the gun, that is up to the parents. When the child turns 18 they can take legal possession and do with their property as they see fit.
Fact Book.
Helpful hints on combat vehicle terminology.

Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!

User avatar
Grinning Dragon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10376
Founded: May 16, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Grinning Dragon » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:41 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Greed and Death wrote:
If they are working independently for 8+ hours at a time without issue I see no issue with them having legal title to the weapon just like any other piece of personal property.


If children are working 8 hours+ at a time then I would hope other laws would come into play.....

Kids on family ranches/farms put in long hours. Back a 100yrs ago when I was in school, there were quite a few of my classmates that right after school they were out pulling their share of the work load, sometimes during the fall they would be absent from school for a week or two due to harvest time.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40487
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:42 pm

Since many seem to think those below 18 should not be able to own a gun but should be able to use one, should they have to go through the training necessary (use, safety all that jazz) to be allowed to use the gun?
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Spirit of Hope
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12090
Founded: Feb 21, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Spirit of Hope » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:44 pm

Neutraligon wrote:Since many seem to think those below 18 should not be able to own a gun but should be able to use one, should they have to go through the training necessary (use, safety all that jazz) to be allowed to use the gun?

Nope, parental discretion. Accidents with guns are incredibly uncommon, which is why I tend to look down on the idea of requiring training to own/use a firearm. I'm ok with training for hunting though.
Fact Book.
Helpful hints on combat vehicle terminology.

Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!

User avatar
Grinning Dragon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10376
Founded: May 16, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Grinning Dragon » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:44 pm

Neutraligon wrote:Since many seem to think those below 18 should not be able to own a gun but should be able to use one, should they have to go through the training necessary (use, safety all that jazz) to be allowed to use the gun?


I would never pass a firearm to my kids without training and education, ultimately it is my job as a parent to educate and train my kids. I would also like to see firearm training reintroduced back into the school system as well.

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:46 pm

Neutraligon wrote:Since many seem to think those below 18 should not be able to own a gun but should be able to use one, should they have to go through the training necessary (use, safety all that jazz) to be allowed to use the gun?


I'd say parental discretion and responsibility is important. I was allowed to use firearms as a child, by about 10 years old I had access to the guns on my own. My family had effectively trained me when and how to use them by ten though, and I have never even come close to accidentail harming someone.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40487
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:48 pm

Since most people are saying parental discretion, does that mean the parent is liable should the child do something?
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:49 pm

Neutraligon wrote:Since most people are saying parental discretion, does that mean the parent is liable should the child do something?


Yes.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Spirit of Hope
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12090
Founded: Feb 21, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Spirit of Hope » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:50 pm

Neutraligon wrote:Since most people are saying parental discretion, does that mean the parent is liable should the child do something?

Yep.
Fact Book.
Helpful hints on combat vehicle terminology.

Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: -Britain-, Aggicificicerous, American Legionaries, Armeattla, Bradfordville, Dimetrodon Empire, Fahran, Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum, Ifreann, La Xinga, Mukiland, Necroghastia, Northern Seleucia, Phobos Drilling and Manufacturing, Rary, The Black Forrest, Xind

Advertisement

Remove ads