If you're counting on 6 year olds to defend a free state using their arms then you've failed as a parent. Kids don't need to be able to own guns. Parents can just let them use theirs until they hit they age of majority.
Advertisement

by Fartsniffage » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:18 pm

by Fartsniffage » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:20 pm
Grinning Dragon wrote:A child is still afforded their enumerated Constitutional Rights, and the 2nd Amendment is one of those Rights, as much as their Right to Free Speech.
I myself couldn't wait till my kids showed maturity and were old enough to go to the range with me, till then it was lots of shooting BB guns in the backyard.

by Len Hyet » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:20 pm
Fartsniffage wrote:Len Hyet wrote:A six year old can't understand economic policy. They can understand "this is dangerous, it is not a toy, don't touch it without Mom or Dad around"
If you're counting on 6 year olds to defend a free state using their arms then you've failed as a parent. Kids don't need to be able to own guns. Parents can just let them use theirs until they hit they age of majority.

by Fartsniffage » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:22 pm
Len Hyet wrote:Fartsniffage wrote:
If you're counting on 6 year olds to defend a free state using their arms then you've failed as a parent. Kids don't need to be able to own guns. Parents can just let them use theirs until they hit they age of majority.
Could you just real quick quote me where I said literally anything about defending a free state using arms?
God damn dude chill. When I was a kid I had my own .22. It wasn't for 'protecting the free state' it was for squirrel hunting.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

by Spirit of Hope » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:23 pm
Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!

by Greed and Death » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:24 pm
Telconi wrote:Neutraligon wrote:For those for another recipient, I know that in more rural areas parents by guns for their children, what about those type of purchases? I think if you want to reduce the wait period, you would need more people to do the checking as it can take a lot of time to do that check.
What do you mean open to use by the public? Do you mean you could see your own background check before purchasing?
Gallo same question as above, what about parents who buy guns for their minor children?
For all of you who said background check, what should be included in that. I know mental history and criminal history, anything else?
There's no reason a child needs a gun that is legally theirs. My child "owns" guns, but it's not legally hers, it's mine.
The check takes a handful of minutes, the ten day wait is simply a legally enforced wait period, they know before you leave the store on day one rather you've passed or not.

by Grinning Dragon » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:25 pm
Fartsniffage wrote:Grinning Dragon wrote:A child is still afforded their enumerated Constitutional Rights, and the 2nd Amendment is one of those Rights, as much as their Right to Free Speech.
I myself couldn't wait till my kids showed maturity and were old enough to go to the range with me, till then it was lots of shooting BB guns in the backyard.
Well I just hope you got a warrant before you went in their rooms....


by Fartsniffage » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:27 pm

by Spirit of Hope » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:27 pm
Greed and Death wrote:Telconi wrote:
There's no reason a child needs a gun that is legally theirs. My child "owns" guns, but it's not legally hers, it's mine.
The check takes a handful of minutes, the ten day wait is simply a legally enforced wait period, they know before you leave the store on day one rather you've passed or not.
In rural areas it is common practice for farmers and Ranchers to employ their children and a gun may be needed as part of his work.
Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!

by Grinning Dragon » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:28 pm

by Telconi » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:32 pm
Neutraligon wrote:Telconi wrote:
There's no reason a child needs a gun that is legally theirs. My child "owns" guns, but it's not legally hers, it's mine.
The check takes a handful of minutes, the ten day wait is simply a legally enforced wait period, they know before you leave the store on day one rather you've passed or not.
Hmm, if they know why the 10 day wait?Spirit of Hope wrote:
Yes it would mean that, but it would also mean any sale wouldn't have to go through a FFL, or something similar, who would almost certainly charge and/or would require going to them which could be out of the way.
Not directed at me, but my answer would be that under 18 you can't own a gun, it would have to technically be your parents gun. When you turn 18 your parents do the background check and then they can give it to you.
Not sure I would trust parents to do the background check.

by Greed and Death » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:35 pm
Spirit of Hope wrote:Greed and Death wrote:In rural areas it is common practice for farmers and Ranchers to employ their children and a gun may be needed as part of his work.
The parent can own that gun while allowing the child to use it. I don't think anyone is saying a child can't use a gun, just that legally the gun would not belong to the child and instead would be the parents property. Under most circumstances the ownership of the gun would make little difference here until the child is 18, at which point the child can now take legal ownership.

by Fartsniffage » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:38 pm
Greed and Death wrote:Spirit of Hope wrote:The parent can own that gun while allowing the child to use it. I don't think anyone is saying a child can't use a gun, just that legally the gun would not belong to the child and instead would be the parents property. Under most circumstances the ownership of the gun would make little difference here until the child is 18, at which point the child can now take legal ownership.
If they are working independently for 8+ hours at a time without issue I see no issue with them having legal title to the weapon just like any other piece of personal property.

by Neutraligon » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:39 pm
Telconi wrote:Neutraligon wrote:
Hmm, if they know why the 10 day wait?
Not sure I would trust parents to do the background check.
It's just a thing. They call it a "cooling off period" it''s supposedly intended to prevent someone from getting angry or upset and storming off to the gun store, buying a gun, and In a rage committing homicide, or in a crisis commitng suicide.

by Spirit of Hope » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:40 pm
Greed and Death wrote:Spirit of Hope wrote:The parent can own that gun while allowing the child to use it. I don't think anyone is saying a child can't use a gun, just that legally the gun would not belong to the child and instead would be the parents property. Under most circumstances the ownership of the gun would make little difference here until the child is 18, at which point the child can now take legal ownership.
If they are working independently for 8+ hours at a time without issue I see no issue with them having legal title to the weapon just like any other piece of personal property.
Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!

by Grinning Dragon » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:41 pm
Fartsniffage wrote:Greed and Death wrote:
If they are working independently for 8+ hours at a time without issue I see no issue with them having legal title to the weapon just like any other piece of personal property.
If children are working 8 hours+ at a time then I would hope other laws would come into play.....

by Neutraligon » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:42 pm

by Spirit of Hope » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:44 pm
Neutraligon wrote:Since many seem to think those below 18 should not be able to own a gun but should be able to use one, should they have to go through the training necessary (use, safety all that jazz) to be allowed to use the gun?
Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!

by Grinning Dragon » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:44 pm
Neutraligon wrote:Since many seem to think those below 18 should not be able to own a gun but should be able to use one, should they have to go through the training necessary (use, safety all that jazz) to be allowed to use the gun?

by Telconi » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:46 pm
Neutraligon wrote:Since many seem to think those below 18 should not be able to own a gun but should be able to use one, should they have to go through the training necessary (use, safety all that jazz) to be allowed to use the gun?

by Neutraligon » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:48 pm

by Telconi » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:49 pm
Neutraligon wrote:Since most people are saying parental discretion, does that mean the parent is liable should the child do something?

by Spirit of Hope » Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:50 pm
Neutraligon wrote:Since most people are saying parental discretion, does that mean the parent is liable should the child do something?
Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: -Britain-, Aggicificicerous, American Legionaries, Armeattla, Bradfordville, Dimetrodon Empire, Fahran, Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum, Ifreann, La Xinga, Mukiland, Necroghastia, Northern Seleucia, Phobos Drilling and Manufacturing, Rary, The Black Forrest, Xind
Advertisement