Gun Control

[Poland-and-Lithuania]

Actually having a shotgun is much better for home defense. Pistols are usually harder to aim and hit targets, and they're also way less intimidating if the invader actually has a basic understanding of firearms. A Shotgun not only makes it much easier for you to hit your target (Cause you know, trying to avoid a spread of pellets is kind hard to do), but also the intimidation factor is there too. It's common knowledge, but it's honestly a more safer, and smarter purchase you could make.

Joe Biden?!?! Is.. is it really you?!?!

*It's better to own a shotgun rather than a semi-automatic rifle intensifies*

[Thermodolia]

More like “gee I’m sure glad I’m unarmed.” Said nobody in a mass shooting.

^^

If I was in a mass shooting, I would WANT more guns so we can shoot him/her first.

Or at least shoot back

[Topoliani]

^^

If I was in a mass shooting, I would WANT more guns so we can shoot him/her first.

Or at least shoot back

That as well.

[Washington Resistance Army]

Joe Biden?!?! Is.. is it really you?!?!

*It's better to own a shotgun rather than a semi-automatic rifle intensifies*

This guy gets it, Street Sweepers for all

[Thermodolia]

*It's better to own a shotgun rather than a semi-automatic rifle intensifies*

This guy gets it, Street Sweepers for all

Both of y'all are silly. Mandatory S&W .357 Long Barrel Revolvers for all!!

[Gig em Aggies]

^^

If I was in a mass shooting, I would WANT more guns so we can shoot him/her first.

Or at least shoot back

I found a solution how about robots with guns nothing could go wrong their could it?

[Thermodolia]

Or at least shoot back

I found a solution how about robots with guns nothing could go wrong their could it?

Skynet is that you?

[Gig em Aggies]

I found a solution how about robots with guns nothing could go wrong their could it?

Skynet is that you?

No this is Genisys how may I 'help' you?

[Greater Redosia]

Or at least shoot back

I found a solution how about robots with guns nothing could go wrong their could it?

Watches the large amount of sentrybots and protectrons as they walk down the street.

As long as I get a robot butler.

[Dylar]

Skynet is that you?

No this is Genisys how may I 'help' you?

Well, you can start by making Terminator great again!

[Germanic Templars]

*It's better to own a shotgun rather than a semi-automatic rifle intensifies*

This guy gets it, Street Sweepers for all

No thank you. I choose Saiga.

[Thermodolia]

Skynet is that you?

No this is Genisys how may I 'help' you?

God that was a bad movie. The only saving grace was seeing Jai Courtney naked.

[Elwher]

We do have gun control, despite whatever you think you know.

No we don't mass shootings happen almost every day. A country with gun control does not have an Orlando or a LasVegas

We have gun control. People hit what they aim at, their gun is controlled.

[Germanic Templars]

We do have gun control, despite whatever you think you know.

No we don't mass shootings happen almost every day. A country with gun control does not have an Orlando or a LasVegas

You are right, they have a Nice 2016 and a Paris 2015 (80+ killed by a man with a truck and 130 killed by several men with firearms).

[Len Hyet]

Lets go over the 4 reasons people have said they think we need guns

1. To stop a tyrannical federal government- I would be willing to support the military being split up with about 1% of each state's population being in the armed services and requiring the consent of the state to let them go on federal missions you know like the original intention of the 2A state militias. But there is a 0% chance all 80M armed Americans beating the federal military if they did not defect.

Because as we all know, the only government that could possibly become tyrannical is the Federal Government. There's no possible way that a state government could go along with the Federal Government.

2. Self protection- Why do you need anything more than 10 bullet revolver that does not use a magazine to do that? No semi auto big mag gun is necessary.

Well, each intruder needs three bullets, minimum. Two in their cavity one in their dome. Here is an example of needing, at minimum, 18 rounds of ammunition to do that.

3. Hunting- Why do you need anything more than a 10 mag hunting rifle to shoot a deer and have some food to eat.

What if there's 11 deer?

4. Shooting at the range- Why do you need anything more then a 10 bullet revolver that does not use a magazine? You could allways reload on the spot. No military style semi auto's nessisary.

Because they're fun.

Hopefully you can come up with a better reason then its "your 2A right"

We have. We've listed them. I've decided because fuck you that's why.

Non-specific you, don't mean to be aggressive. Like, fuck you in general, not fuck you, specifically.

[Grinning Dragon]

I see keshi has perpetrated another drive by posting and doesn't stick around to address points against his latest vacuous iterations of mindlessness.

[Paddy O Fernature]

I see keshi has perpetrated another drive by posting and doesn't stick around to address points against his latest vacuous iterations of mindlessness.

It's pretty much SOP at this point, though I suspect that Keshi is still around, even when offline.

[Len Hyet]

I see keshi has perpetrated another drive by posting and doesn't stick around to address points against his latest vacuous iterations of mindlessness.

Well yeah, but it's kinda fun.

I mean, it makes him a bad poster and it's poor etiquette.

But I like the target practice.

[Greater Redosia]

I see keshi has perpetrated another drive by posting and doesn't stick around to address points against his latest vacuous iterations of mindlessness.

Well yeah, but it's kinda fun.

I mean, it makes him a bad poster and it's poor etiquette.

But I like the target practice.

Introducing the new Greater Redosia brand Keshiland target™!

Order now and you can get two for the price of one! Only $29.99 if you order right now!

plus shipping and handling.

[Len Hyet]

Well yeah, but it's kinda fun.

I mean, it makes him a bad poster and it's poor etiquette.

But I like the target practice.

Introducing the new Greater Redosia brand Keshiland target™!

Order now and you can get two for the price of one! Only $29.99 if you order right now!

plus shipping and handling.

Not as good as free "Ban Assault Weapons" target stickers

[Euslavia]

What about completely banning civilian ownership of any firearms altogether? The only persons permitted to carry firearms would be active duty military and police forces. If you’re not on active duty in the police or the military, you will arrested simply for possession of a firearm. All civilian firearms would be confiscated. Those that don’t comply face arrest. Sure, such plans go against all American ideas (2nd Amendment), but these plans are the only solution that works. Rights should not stand in the way of goals (ends>means).

[Len Hyet]

What about completely banning civilian ownership of any firearms altogether? The only persons permitted to carry firearms would be active duty military and police forces. If you’re not on active duty in the police or the military, you will arrested simply for possession of a firearm. All civilian firearms would be confiscated. Those that don’t comply face arrest. Sure, such plans go against all American ideas (2nd Amendment), but these plans are the only solution that works. Rights should not stand in the way of goals (ends>means).

Should I be surprised the communist wants to disarm the people?

[Wysten]

What about completely banning civilian ownership of any firearms altogether? The only persons permitted to carry firearms would be active duty military and police forces. If you’re not on active duty in the police or the military, you will arrested simply for possession of a firearm. All civilian firearms would be confiscated. Those that don’t comply face arrest. Sure, such plans go against all American ideas (2nd Amendment), but these plans are the only solution that works. Rights should not stand in the way of goals (ends>means).

You're an idiot.

[Euslavia]

What about completely banning civilian ownership of any firearms altogether? The only persons permitted to carry firearms would be active duty military and police forces. If you’re not on active duty in the police or the military, you will arrested simply for possession of a firearm. All civilian firearms would be confiscated. Those that don’t comply face arrest. Sure, such plans go against all American ideas (2nd Amendment), but these plans are the only solution that works. Rights should not stand in the way of goals (ends>means).

Should I be surprised the communist wants to disarm the people?

Not a communist (horizontal/egalitarian collectivist). I adhere to the Vysovnik principles of vertical (hierarchical) collectivism. Group>individual.

[Len Hyet]

Should I be surprised the communist wants to disarm the people?

Not a communist (horizontal/egalitarian collectivist). I adhere to the Vysovnik principles of vertical (hierarchical) collectivism. Group>individual.

That just sounds like communism with more steps.

Anyway, doesn't matter, not the topic.