What?
That doesn't make any fuckin' sense!
The States have to incorporate it because of the Bill of Rights and the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution. Therefore, any State that is under the Federal gov't must follow the Constitution.
Advertisement
by Valgora » Wed Oct 18, 2017 2:23 pm
MT+FanT+some PMT
Multi-species.
Current gov't:
Founded 2023
Currently 2027
by Keshiland » Wed Oct 18, 2017 2:23 pm
by Galloism » Wed Oct 18, 2017 2:25 pm
Valgora wrote:Keshiland wrote:
The SCOTUS was hesitant as duck to incorporate it to the states it took till 2008 to incorporate the 2nd amendment
What?
That doesn't make any fuckin' sense!
The States have to incorporate it because of the Bill of Rights and the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution. Therefore, any State that is under the Federal gov't must follow the Constitution.
by Galloism » Wed Oct 18, 2017 2:28 pm
by Real Six Flags » Wed Oct 18, 2017 2:28 pm
Galloism wrote:Telconi wrote:
You have no idea what you're talking about...Valgora wrote:
What?
That doesn't make any fuckin' sense!
The States have to incorporate it because of the Bill of Rights and the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution. Therefore, any State that is under the Federal gov't must follow the Constitution.
Well, he's sort of right and sort of wrong.
SCOTUS didn't take a case addressing the issue of incorporation of the 2nd amendment to the states until McDonald vs. Chicago, which was in 2010 (not 2008). So there was no SCOTUS ruling that the 2nd amendment bound the states. It's logical based on the text of the 14th, but SCOTUS had never before broached the issue.
When they did broach it, they ruled that the 2nd applies to the states. Therefore, the 2nd amendment is incorporated to the states... and always was, because this is how Supreme Court rulings work.
by Galloism » Wed Oct 18, 2017 2:30 pm
Real Six Flags wrote:Galloism wrote:
Well, he's sort of right and sort of wrong.
SCOTUS didn't take a case addressing the issue of incorporation of the 2nd amendment to the states until McDonald vs. Chicago, which was in 2010 (not 2008). So there was no SCOTUS ruling that the 2nd amendment bound the states. It's logical based on the text of the 14th, but SCOTUS had never before broached the issue.
When they did broach it, they ruled that the 2nd applies to the states. Therefore, the 2nd amendment is incorporated to the states... and always was, because this is how Supreme Court rulings work.
I've always hated the supreme Court. Wished they'd let me visit them, so I can give em a piece of my mine, but I have to acknowledge that receiving lawsuits wouldn't be the best way at proving a point
by Keshiland » Wed Oct 18, 2017 2:31 pm
Galloism wrote:Keshiland wrote:
You relies since the all the property would be private they could be convicted of armed tress passing. Its all part of the plan to trap gun owners between a rock and a hard place if they try anything in this town/city.
Using a rented property in a manner inconsistent with its lease terms is not trespassing. It's breach of contract, and it's not an arrestable offense.
by Telconi » Wed Oct 18, 2017 2:34 pm
Keshiland wrote:Galloism wrote:Using a rented property in a manner inconsistent with its lease terms is not trespassing. It's breach of contract, and it's not an arrestable offense.
Then a law would be made making it an arrestable offence. If you tried to appeal you would be asked why you went to a town that had a no guns flag had the name freedom from guns and said they did not welcome the 2A if you owned guns. The courts would tell you to deal with it.
by Galloism » Wed Oct 18, 2017 2:35 pm
If you tried to appeal you would be asked why you went to a town that had a no guns flag had the name freedom from guns and said they did not welcome the 2A if you owned guns. The courts would tell you to deal with it.
by Gun Manufacturers » Wed Oct 18, 2017 2:38 pm
Keshiland wrote:Grinning Dragon wrote:Why? What endangerment? Minor in possession of a weapon? pffft, we all had firearms growing up, what are you going to do lock up the whole damn town?
You had guns and ammo accessible to children. Yeah no. If I was the sharif in your town every single parent in that town would have been told to hand over the weapons and either plead guilty and get your sentence in house arrest or go to court and face your sentence in prison.
Natapoc wrote:...You should post more in here so I don't seem like the extremist...
Auraelius wrote:If you take the the TITANIC, and remove the letters T, T, and one of the I's, and add the letters C,O,S,P,R, and Y you get CONSPIRACY. oOooOooooOOOooooOOOOOOoooooooo
Maineiacs wrote:Give a man a fish and he eats for a day, teach a man to fish and he'll sit in a boat and get drunk all day.
Luw wrote:Politics is like having two handfuls of shit - one that smells bad and one that looks bad - and having to decide which one to put in your mouth.
by Keshiland » Wed Oct 18, 2017 2:40 pm
Telconi wrote:Keshiland wrote:
Then a law would be made making it an arrestable offence. If you tried to appeal you would be asked why you went to a town that had a no guns flag had the name freedom from guns and said they did not welcome the 2A if you owned guns. The courts would tell you to deal with it.
Well, seeing as your town would still be part of America, and the 2A would apply rather you wanted or not, the court would likely tell you to deal with it.
by Gun Manufacturers » Wed Oct 18, 2017 2:41 pm
Keshiland wrote:I have figured it out. I will just create my own town run under the guise of a business that is free of guns. The only people with guns will be the border guards. The name will be Libertatem Tormenta latin for freedom from guns.
It will be built in a large open place where there are no other cities or town. Have its own flag and consist of thousands of homes. Basically, businesses and people will be free to build houses and apartments incorporating them into the town. All the residents will have a card that they will need to show border guards to get in. It will keep growing until it reaches a max of 5M. We will have our own fully working government with taxes that actually help our residents. Mayor legislature and judges.
The 1st law passed under this town/city will bePossession or sale of a firearm will result in a 20 year minimum sentence in prison.
In the middle of the flag a sentence will readThe 2A is not welcome here!
Since it would be both a town/city and business owned property people would not be able to sue to get the 2A incorporated into our little constitution.
Natapoc wrote:...You should post more in here so I don't seem like the extremist...
Auraelius wrote:If you take the the TITANIC, and remove the letters T, T, and one of the I's, and add the letters C,O,S,P,R, and Y you get CONSPIRACY. oOooOooooOOOooooOOOOOOoooooooo
Maineiacs wrote:Give a man a fish and he eats for a day, teach a man to fish and he'll sit in a boat and get drunk all day.
Luw wrote:Politics is like having two handfuls of shit - one that smells bad and one that looks bad - and having to decide which one to put in your mouth.
by Real Six Flags » Wed Oct 18, 2017 2:42 pm
Keshiland wrote:Telconi wrote:
Well, seeing as your town would still be part of America, and the 2A would apply rather you wanted or not, the court would likely tell you to deal with it.
You would litterally be arrested on this chargeContract Fraud- The purposeful action of lying or breaking a contract, up to 1 year in prison
You would then be a felony and barred from owning a gun
by Greater Redosia » Wed Oct 18, 2017 2:42 pm
Keshiland wrote:Telconi wrote:
Well, seeing as your town would still be part of America, and the 2A would apply rather you wanted or not, the court would likely tell you to deal with it.
You would litterally be arrested on this chargeContract Fraud- The purposeful action of lying or breaking a contract, up to 1 year in prison
You would then be a felony and barred from owning a gun
by Galloism » Wed Oct 18, 2017 2:42 pm
Keshiland wrote:Telconi wrote:
Well, seeing as your town would still be part of America, and the 2A would apply rather you wanted or not, the court would likely tell you to deal with it.
You would litterally be arrested on this chargeContract Fraud- The purposeful action of lying or breaking a contract, up to 1 year in prison
You would then be a felony and barred from owning a gun
by Keshiland » Wed Oct 18, 2017 2:44 pm
Greater Redosia wrote:Keshiland wrote:
You would litterally be arrested on this chargeContract Fraud- The purposeful action of lying or breaking a contract, up to 1 year in prison
You would then be a felony and barred from owning a gun
So tell me then, how is the business going to stay profitable. Just how is it going to not go bankrupt.
by Telconi » Wed Oct 18, 2017 2:45 pm
Keshiland wrote:Telconi wrote:
Well, seeing as your town would still be part of America, and the 2A would apply rather you wanted or not, the court would likely tell you to deal with it.
You would litterally be arrested on this chargeContract Fraud- The purposeful action of lying or breaking a contract, up to 1 year in prison
You would then be a felony and barred from owning a gun
by Real Six Flags » Wed Oct 18, 2017 2:45 pm
Galloism wrote:Keshiland wrote:
You would litterally be arrested on this chargeContract Fraud- The purposeful action of lying or breaking a contract, up to 1 year in prison
You would then be a felony and barred from owning a gun
Cool. Then all I'd have to do is get the business to break the contract for a bullshit reason not covered by the contract, and I could put the business owner in prison.
This might get even more fun. People who can read contracts will then extort the business for money by doing things completely not envisioned in the contracts, and when the business finally breaks the contract, can extort the business for money under threat of jail time if they press charges.
by Valgora » Wed Oct 18, 2017 2:46 pm
Keshiland wrote:Greater Redosia wrote:
So tell me then, how is the business going to stay profitable. Just how is it going to not go bankrupt.
Taxes. It would be the body of the town/city. The government would collect taxes and then the 4th branch the business would be given the money to carry out government policies.
MT+FanT+some PMT
Multi-species.
Current gov't:
Founded 2023
Currently 2027
by Real Six Flags » Wed Oct 18, 2017 2:46 pm
Keshiland wrote:Greater Redosia wrote:
So tell me then, how is the business going to stay profitable. Just how is it going to not go bankrupt.
Taxes. It would be the body of the town/city. The government would collect taxes and then the 4th branch the business would be given the money to carry out government policies.
by Telconi » Wed Oct 18, 2017 2:47 pm
Keshiland wrote:Greater Redosia wrote:
So tell me then, how is the business going to stay profitable. Just how is it going to not go bankrupt.
Taxes. It would be the body of the town/city. The government would collect taxes and then the 4th branch the business would be given the money to carry out government policies.
by Keshiland » Wed Oct 18, 2017 2:48 pm
Galloism wrote:Keshiland wrote:
You would litterally be arrested on this chargeContract Fraud- The purposeful action of lying or breaking a contract, up to 1 year in prison
You would then be a felony and barred from owning a gun
Cool. Then all I'd have to do is get the business to break the contract for a bullshit reason not covered by the contract, and I could put the business owner in prison.
This might get even more fun. People who can read contracts will then extort the business for money by doing things completely not envisioned in the contracts, and when the business finally breaks the contract, can extort the business for money under threat of jail time if they press charges.
by Telconi » Wed Oct 18, 2017 2:49 pm
Keshiland wrote:Galloism wrote:Cool. Then all I'd have to do is get the business to break the contract for a bullshit reason not covered by the contract, and I could put the business owner in prison.
This might get even more fun. People who can read contracts will then extort the business for money by doing things completely not envisioned in the contracts, and when the business finally breaks the contract, can extort the business for money under threat of jail time if they press charges.
Since it would be the 4th branch of this government it would be given immunity by the legislature from being preyed on by "outside predators" aka gun owners trying to destroy the gun free safe haven
by Valgora » Wed Oct 18, 2017 2:50 pm
Telconi wrote:Keshiland wrote:
Taxes. It would be the body of the town/city. The government would collect taxes and then the 4th branch the business would be given the money to carry out government policies.
So basically "I'm going to corrupt a goverent I situation to enforce my dystopia" is the new Keshi-scheme. I guess it''s better than literally creating the SS...
MT+FanT+some PMT
Multi-species.
Current gov't:
Founded 2023
Currently 2027
by Galloism » Wed Oct 18, 2017 2:51 pm
Keshiland wrote:Galloism wrote:Cool. Then all I'd have to do is get the business to break the contract for a bullshit reason not covered by the contract, and I could put the business owner in prison.
This might get even more fun. People who can read contracts will then extort the business for money by doing things completely not envisioned in the contracts, and when the business finally breaks the contract, can extort the business for money under threat of jail time if they press charges.
Since it would be the 4th branch of this government it would be given immunity by the legislature from being preyed on by "outside predators" aka gun owners trying to destroy the gun free safe haven
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Alvecia, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Bienenhalde, Celritannia, Cerula, Christian Legion of America, Deblar, Duvniask, Eahland, El Lazaro, Emotional Support Crocodile, Ethel mermania, Galmat, Hrstrovokia, Hurdergaryp, Kerwa, Tiami, Tungstan, Umeria, UMi-NazKapp Group, Valyxias, Western Theram, Zurkerx
Advertisement