NATION

PASSWORD

UK General Election 2010

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

If the UK GE was held today, which party would you vote for?

Labour
106
15%
Conservative
147
21%
Liberal Democrats
223
32%
UKIP
39
6%
Green
33
5%
Nationalist party; SNP, Plaid Cymru, English Democrats, Sinn Féin, etc.
27
4%
Respect – The Unity Coalition
7
1%
BNP
55
8%
Trade Union and Socialist Coalition
25
4%
Other
25
4%
 
Total votes : 687

User avatar
Hydesland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15120
Founded: Nov 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Hydesland » Fri Apr 16, 2010 11:45 am



That seems ridiculously inaccurate.

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Fri Apr 16, 2010 11:48 am

I probably shouldn't have voted in the poll, but, I voted Liberal-Dem anyway, cause that's where I'd go...

User avatar
Hydesland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15120
Founded: Nov 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Hydesland » Fri Apr 16, 2010 11:49 am

North Suran wrote:Somehow, I doubt the accuracy of a chart that puts the Liberal Democrats on the Right-wing of the spectrum.


That's one of the few things accurate about the graph, the Lib Dems have always been free market (the left and right distinction in that graph is purely economic).

User avatar
SD_Film Artists
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13399
Founded: Jun 10, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby SD_Film Artists » Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:14 pm

Natapoc wrote:
SD_Film Artists wrote:
Natapoc wrote:I'm not sure if this has been posted yet or not but political compass has an interesting take on the parties. I'm not sure how it is possible for them to place some of them quite so high the authoritarian scale:

Image

http://www.politicalcompass.org/ukparties2010


And according to that I should be supporting Plaid Cymru rather than the Lib Dems. :eyebrow:


Do you speak welsh?


Not fluently, but I'm quarter Welsh. It might still be a bit hard to vote for them considering that I live in the far east of Britain rather than the far west.
Last edited by SD_Film Artists on Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Lurking NSG since 2005
Economic Left/Right: -2.62, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.67

When anybody preaches disunity, tries to pit one of us against each other through class warfare, race hatred, or religious intolerance, you know that person seeks to rob us of our freedom and destroy our very lives.

User avatar
Volnotov
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1680
Founded: Mar 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Volnotov » Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:17 pm

Natapoc wrote:I'm not sure if this has been posted yet or not but political compass has an interesting take on the parties. I'm not sure how it is possible for them to place some of them quite so high the authoritarian scale:

Image

http://www.politicalcompass.org/ukparties2010


Wtf is that shit?

Are they comparing the BNP with Hitler?

And what the heck?

Labour being extreme-right? Laizzes faire capitalist?

I call... bullshit...
What is your political orientation?
Participate now in the NS Political Orietnation Poll!

Political Spectrum Quiz Results

"There are those people that believe that we are all equal, that every person should recieve an equal piece of the cake regardless of what they contributed to it.
I believe in a fair society, were those that contributed the most to the cake recieve the biggest share. Maybe that is not *equal*, but sure it is fair."

User avatar
Natapoc
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19864
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Natapoc » Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:20 pm

Hydesland wrote:


That seems ridiculously inaccurate.


Some of their placements don't seem quite right to me either. Labour is authoritarian but to consider them "almost" as authoritarian as BNP is just not a fair comparison to me.

I also don't see why they would be quite so far to the right on the economic spectrum. I agree with PC that Labour is a right party but not quite that far.

Where would you place the parties?
Did you see a ghost?

User avatar
Hydesland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15120
Founded: Nov 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Hydesland » Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:20 pm

Volnotov wrote:I call... bullshit...


Indeed, the idea that Hitler is only marginally more authoritarian than Brown is obscene.

User avatar
Natapoc
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19864
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Natapoc » Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:22 pm

Volnotov wrote:
Natapoc wrote:I'm not sure if this has been posted yet or not but political compass has an interesting take on the parties. I'm not sure how it is possible for them to place some of them quite so high the authoritarian scale:

Image

http://www.politicalcompass.org/ukparties2010


Wtf is that shit?

Are they comparing the BNP with Hitler?

And what the heck?

Labour being extreme-right? Laizzes faire capitalist?

I call... bullshit...


Who would you compare BNP with other then Hitler? The comparison seems reasonable to me.
Did you see a ghost?

User avatar
North Suran
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9974
Founded: Jul 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby North Suran » Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:24 pm

Hydesland wrote:
Volnotov wrote:I call... bullshit...


Indeed, the idea that Hitler is only marginally more authoritarian than Brown is obscene.

Although there was that time when Brown kept getting compared to Stalin.

All in all, that graph is constructed from the finest ass and piss of the entire population of Yorkshire.

It lists Labour as being even further to the Right-wing than before, even though New Labour has always lurked closer to the centre and, under Brown, is now more inclined to the Left. The Conservatives, even after their "big society" bullshit, are listed as being extreme Right and highly authoritarian. The bloody BNP, a bona-fide Fascist party, is listed on the Right-wing economically and is only marginally more authoritarian than the Democratic Unionist Party.
Neu Mitanni wrote:As for NS, his latest statement is grounded in ignorance and contrary to fact, much to the surprise of all NSGers.


User avatar
Hydesland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15120
Founded: Nov 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Hydesland » Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:25 pm

Natapoc wrote:Where would you place the parties?


Lib Dems are the only party that seem about right. Labour, conservative and UKIP all need to be pushed down closer to the centre but a bit above (hell even BNP could be pushed down a little), conservatives need to be pushed leftwards closer to labour, and both labour and conservative need to shift left a tiny bit but not too much. I'm not too up to speed with the economics of UKIP.

User avatar
Volnotov
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1680
Founded: Mar 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Volnotov » Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:28 pm

Natapoc wrote:
Volnotov wrote:
Natapoc wrote:I'm not sure if this has been posted yet or not but political compass has an interesting take on the parties. I'm not sure how it is possible for them to place some of them quite so high the authoritarian scale:

Image

http://www.politicalcompass.org/ukparties2010


Wtf is that shit?

Are they comparing the BNP with Hitler?

And what the heck?

Labour being extreme-right? Laizzes faire capitalist?

I call... bullshit...


Who would you compare BNP with other then Hitler? The comparison seems reasonable to me.


I would compare hitler with the National Front.

But not the BNP(The new BNP, not the old one).
What is your political orientation?
Participate now in the NS Political Orietnation Poll!

Political Spectrum Quiz Results

"There are those people that believe that we are all equal, that every person should recieve an equal piece of the cake regardless of what they contributed to it.
I believe in a fair society, were those that contributed the most to the cake recieve the biggest share. Maybe that is not *equal*, but sure it is fair."

User avatar
North Suran
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9974
Founded: Jul 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby North Suran » Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:29 pm

Hydesland wrote:I'm not too up to speed with the economics of UKIP.

They have policies beyond Euroscepticism?

Pull the other one!
Neu Mitanni wrote:As for NS, his latest statement is grounded in ignorance and contrary to fact, much to the surprise of all NSGers.


User avatar
North Suran
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9974
Founded: Jul 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby North Suran » Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:30 pm

Volnotov wrote:
Natapoc wrote:Who would you compare BNP with other then Hitler? The comparison seems reasonable to me.


I would compare hitler with the National Front.

But not the BNP(The new BNP, not the old one).

If you look at the BNP's economic and political policies, they are genuine Fascists.
Neu Mitanni wrote:As for NS, his latest statement is grounded in ignorance and contrary to fact, much to the surprise of all NSGers.


User avatar
Hydesland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15120
Founded: Nov 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Hydesland » Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:33 pm

Natapoc wrote:Who would you compare BNP with other then Hitler? The comparison seems reasonable to me.


Look, they definitely have an incredibly radical immigration policy and are mostly a bit racist (although again, not to the same scale that the Nazis were), but they're not going to go institute a national Gestapo, imprisoning people for the likes of listening to swing music, or hanging people simply for being 'counter-culture'. They're certainly not going to attempt to kill off a specific race or group of people in the UK. In all honestly they're only marginally more 'authoritarian' than Churchill was.

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:34 pm

Hydesland wrote:
Natapoc wrote:Where would you place the parties?


Lib Dems are the only party that seem about right. Labour, conservative and UKIP all need to be pushed down closer to the centre but a bit above (hell even BNP could be pushed down a little), conservatives need to be pushed leftwards closer to labour, and both labour and conservative need to shift left a tiny bit but not too much. I'm not too up to speed with the economics of UKIP.

Could be that the traditional Right-Skew of the US is muddying things up there...

Those parties could be that far right in the context of the UK...

User avatar
North Suran
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9974
Founded: Jul 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby North Suran » Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:35 pm

Maurepas wrote:
Hydesland wrote:
Natapoc wrote:Where would you place the parties?


Lib Dems are the only party that seem about right. Labour, conservative and UKIP all need to be pushed down closer to the centre but a bit above (hell even BNP could be pushed down a little), conservatives need to be pushed leftwards closer to labour, and both labour and conservative need to shift left a tiny bit but not too much. I'm not too up to speed with the economics of UKIP.

Could be that the traditional Right-Skew of the US is muddying things up there...

Those parties could be that far right in the context of the UK...

Hell, by US terms, even the God damn Conservative Party would be dismissed as a collection of pinko Communists.
Neu Mitanni wrote:As for NS, his latest statement is grounded in ignorance and contrary to fact, much to the surprise of all NSGers.


User avatar
Natapoc
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19864
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Natapoc » Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:38 pm

Hydesland wrote:
Natapoc wrote:Where would you place the parties?


Lib Dems are the only party that seem about right. Labour, conservative and UKIP all need to be pushed down closer to the centre but a bit above (hell even BNP could be pushed down a little), conservatives need to be pushed leftwards closer to labour, and both labour and conservative need to shift left a tiny bit but not too much. I'm not too up to speed with the economics of UKIP.


I think they overstated the authoritarian nature of all the parties a bit this time. The best way to fix it I think would be to move all the parties in the upper right quadrant down by one and a half squares and left by half a square*.

Move all the parties in the upper left quadrant down the authoritarian axis by half of a square. The lib dems and greens seem about right. I don't know about SDLP.

edit *except BNP. BNP just goes down about 2/3 of a square.
Last edited by Natapoc on Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Did you see a ghost?

User avatar
Angleter
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12359
Founded: Apr 27, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Angleter » Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:40 pm

North Suran wrote:
Hydesland wrote:I'm not too up to speed with the economics of UKIP.

They have policies beyond Euroscepticism?

Pull the other one!


Flat rate income tax, PR, etc. Free-market, self-described libertarians, who somehow support the principles of the NHS too.
[align=center]"I gotta tell you, this is just crazy, huh! This is just nuts, OK! Jeezo man."

User avatar
North Suran
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9974
Founded: Jul 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby North Suran » Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:42 pm

Angleter wrote:
North Suran wrote:
Hydesland wrote:I'm not too up to speed with the economics of UKIP.

They have policies beyond Euroscepticism?

Pull the other one!


Flat rate income tax, PR, etc. Free-market, self-described libertarians, who somehow support the principles of the NHS too.

Free-market libertarians who support government-run healthcare?

Wow.
Neu Mitanni wrote:As for NS, his latest statement is grounded in ignorance and contrary to fact, much to the surprise of all NSGers.


User avatar
Natapoc
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19864
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Natapoc » Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:45 pm

North Suran wrote:
Angleter wrote:
North Suran wrote:
Hydesland wrote:I'm not too up to speed with the economics of UKIP.

They have policies beyond Euroscepticism?

Pull the other one!


Flat rate income tax, PR, etc. Free-market, self-described libertarians, who somehow support the principles of the NHS too.

Free-market libertarians who support government-run healthcare?

Wow.


They probably don't really. I suspect they plan to use a "starve the beast" strategy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starve_the_beast

They can claim to support popular programs while also reducing taxes and funding so that a future government is forced to abandon the program due to costs.
Did you see a ghost?

User avatar
Hydesland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15120
Founded: Nov 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Hydesland » Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:46 pm

Natapoc wrote:I think they overstated the authoritarian nature of all the parties a bit this time. The best way to fix it I think would be to move all the parties in the upper right quadrant down by one and a half squares and left by half a square.

Move all the parties in the upper left quadrant down the authoritarian axis by half of a square. The lib dems and greens seem about right. I don't know about SDLP.


I think the upper right quadrant needs to be moved down by more than that, maybe even by 4 squares. But I just think their system is systematically screwed up, and I don't mean the way it reports your results, but the way the people must have worked out other parties. For instance, when I do the test, I usually get put around where the greens are but about 2 squares to the right, yet I consider myself at least as 'free market' as the lib dems.

User avatar
Hydesland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15120
Founded: Nov 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Hydesland » Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:48 pm

North Suran wrote:Free-market libertarians who support government-run healthcare?


That's mostly how it works in the UK now. It's just a bit weird to think of a privatised system for us, it's like asking for a privatised court system in the US, sure a few lolbertarians want that but they are the minority in general.

User avatar
North Suran
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9974
Founded: Jul 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby North Suran » Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:49 pm

Hydesland wrote:
North Suran wrote:Free-market libertarians who support government-run healthcare?


That's mostly how it works in the UK now. It's just a bit weird to think of a privatised system for us, it's like asking for a privatised court system in the US, sure a few lolbertarians want that but they are the minority in general.

Even so, that seems a pretty blatant contradiction of their political stance. That is akin to a Communist being in support of the privatisation of government services.
Neu Mitanni wrote:As for NS, his latest statement is grounded in ignorance and contrary to fact, much to the surprise of all NSGers.


User avatar
Hydesland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15120
Founded: Nov 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Hydesland » Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:51 pm

North Suran wrote:Even so, that seems a pretty blatant contradiction of their political stance. That is akin to a Communist being in support of the privatisation of government services.


I disagree. I think for some reason people who describe themselves as free market are taken to mean completely unfettered and totally laissez faire in all sectors, but that's not generally how the term is used in economics.

User avatar
Kayliea
Diplomat
 
Posts: 716
Founded: Apr 02, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Kayliea » Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:55 pm

BNP look accurate to me. Scum.
Last edited by Kayliea on Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:57 pm, edited 2 times in total.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bradfordville, Corporate Collective Salvation, Democratic Poopland, Eldorhavn, Galloism, Nantoraka, New Ciencia, Saturn Moons, Shrillland, Techocracy101010, The Astral Mandate, The Jamesian Republic, Uiiop, Valrifall

Advertisement

Remove ads