Tarsonis Survivors wrote:Hakons wrote:
I have a... low opinion of secularism. It has been largely destructive to Christianity as people pushed for secularism beyond its original intent, in my opinion.
It is a Christian duty to help refugees, secular nation or not. The United States is secular, yet we must push for national policy that is suggested by the Gospel. No other nation on Earth has as much capacity to do good works than we.
The gospel doesn't suggest a national policy, Christ had little interest in the affairs of state. Any national policy derived from the Gospel or Christian theology at large, would largely be open to interpretation.
Additionally you're presenting an overly simplistic problem in which the question is "do we help them or not". With no other considerations the obvious answer is A: help them. But in the course of national policy, there is no simple issue.
Consider this thought experiment. You're on a life boat that's almost almost full. There are people in the water who will drown if you do not help them. But if you help too many, the boat will sink and you'll all drown. How do you decide who to help and who not to help? And you've already got all those people on the boat, who already have the perilous task of surviving at sea i na row boat, you're potentially risking their lives to bring on more people, more mouths to feed, let alone the risk of sinking.
What do you do?
An interesting scenario
We would ask for volunteers of who would be willing to parish at sea for the sake of people in the water. Presumably, there wouldn't be very many volunteers, so the people in the water that are the smallest would be rescued. This is because they are most in peril in the water, and they also need less food and water. We would take in as many as we could fit.
Now, I don't think the United States is anywhere close to being full or almost full of refugees. Once again, it is our Christian duty to advocate for refugee programs.