Given that he was fired, perhaps it can.
Advertisement
by Aidannadia » Sun Sep 10, 2017 9:10 pm

by Ifreann » Sun Sep 10, 2017 9:15 pm
Aidannadia wrote:Ifreann wrote:Given that he was fired, perhaps it can.
He "resigned". He also heavily hinted that his firing was purely political, and that he would be a more effective operator at attacking the president's perceived enemies in his own party if he was not a member of the white house staff.

by Clintonburge » Sun Sep 10, 2017 9:17 pm
Aidannadia wrote:Ifreann wrote:Given that he was fired, perhaps it can.
He "resigned". He also heavily hinted that his firing was purely political, and that he would be a more effective operator at attacking the president's perceived enemies in his own party if he was not a member of the white house staff.
by Aidannadia » Sun Sep 10, 2017 9:19 pm
Ifreann wrote:Aidannadia wrote:He "resigned". He also heavily hinted that his firing was purely political, and that he would be a more effective operator at attacking the president's perceived enemies in his own party if he was not a member of the white house staff.
Man can say whatever the fuck he wants, if you're in the White House, and then you're not, then as a political operator you have done something wrong. Your political operation has fucked up.
by Aidannadia » Sun Sep 10, 2017 9:21 pm
Clintonburge wrote:Aidannadia wrote:He "resigned". He also heavily hinted that his firing was purely political, and that he would be a more effective operator at attacking the president's perceived enemies in his own party if he was not a member of the white house staff.
I doubt Bannon has more influence with Trump than Ivanka or Jared, who also may have pressured Bannon to leave.

by Clintonburge » Sun Sep 10, 2017 9:22 pm

by Ifreann » Sun Sep 10, 2017 9:28 pm
Aidannadia wrote:Ifreann wrote:Man can say whatever the fuck he wants, if you're in the White House, and then you're not, then as a political operator you have done something wrong. Your political operation has fucked up.
If you think Bannon isn't still able to influence Trump through backchannels, mutual friends, and political allies in order to further push their vision, you're being a little naïve.
by Aidannadia » Sun Sep 10, 2017 9:30 pm
Clintonburge wrote:Aidannadia wrote:Can you name one thing Ivanka has actually influenced her father on?
Um, the Syria strikes in April?
Ivanka Trump influenced my father to launch Syria strikes, reveals brother Eric

by Clintonburge » Sun Sep 10, 2017 9:34 pm
Aidannadia wrote:Clintonburge wrote:
Um, the Syria strikes in April?
Ivanka Trump influenced my father to launch Syria strikes, reveals brother Eric
Yes, the largely useless strike that served only to get Trump a rise in the polls for... what 3 days?
by Aidannadia » Sun Sep 10, 2017 9:59 pm
Ifreann wrote:Aidannadia wrote:If you think Bannon isn't still able to influence Trump through backchannels, mutual friends, and political allies in order to further push their vision, you're being a little naïve.
If you think Bannon has as much influence from whatever basement he currently inhabits as he had from the literal fucking White House then yada yada etc.
Clintonburge wrote:The fact that Ivanka can sway her "daddy" to launch missiles on another country is pretty fucking influential.
by Cannot think of a name » Sun Sep 10, 2017 10:02 pm
Aidannadia wrote:Clintonburge wrote:The fact that Ivanka can sway her "daddy" to launch missiles on another country is pretty fucking influential.
Your preoccupation with the fact that something exploded misses the fact that almost nothing came of it. It takes no political capital to pull a stunt like that, and had every projected advantage in the short run, other than kinda bothering some of his base whom got over it rather quickly. I don't find that particularly exceptional or influential.
by Aidannadia » Sun Sep 10, 2017 10:11 pm
Cannot think of a name wrote:Aidannadia wrote:Your preoccupation with the fact that something exploded misses the fact that almost nothing came of it. It takes no political capital to pull a stunt like that, and had every projected advantage in the short run, other than kinda bothering some of his base whom got over it rather quickly. I don't find that particularly exceptional or influential.
How effective the action was or was not was not part of the question.

by Clintonburge » Sun Sep 10, 2017 10:13 pm
Aidannadia wrote:Clintonburge wrote:The fact that Ivanka can sway her "daddy" to launch missiles on another country is pretty fucking influential.
Your preoccupation with the fact that something exploded misses the fact that almost nothing came of it. It takes no political capital to pull a stunt like that, and had every projected advantage in the short run, other than kinda bothering some of his base whom got over it rather quickly. I don't find that particularly exceptional or influential.

by Clintonburge » Sun Sep 10, 2017 10:15 pm
Aidannadia wrote:Can you name one thing Ivanka has actually influenced her father on?

by Gauthier » Sun Sep 10, 2017 10:16 pm
Clintonburge wrote:Aidannadia wrote:
Your preoccupation with the fact that something exploded misses the fact that almost nothing came of it. It takes no political capital to pull a stunt like that, and had every projected advantage in the short run, other than kinda bothering some of his base whom got over it rather quickly. I don't find that particularly exceptional or influential.
The influence is on Trump and his decision making process, not on the outcome of the chosen action. What matters is if Ivanka can cause Trump to make a decision, the outcome of that decision is irrelevant.
by Aidannadia » Sun Sep 10, 2017 10:17 pm
Clintonburge wrote:Aidannadia wrote:
Your preoccupation with the fact that something exploded misses the fact that almost nothing came of it. It takes no political capital to pull a stunt like that, and had every projected advantage in the short run, other than kinda bothering some of his base whom got over it rather quickly. I don't find that particularly exceptional or influential.
The influence is on Trump and his decision making process, not on the outcome of the chosen action. What matters is if Ivanka can cause Trump to make a decision, the outcome of that decision is irrelevant.

by Corrian » Sun Sep 10, 2017 10:17 pm

by Clintonburge » Sun Sep 10, 2017 10:18 pm
Corrian wrote:So how much do you think Democrats will try to take advantage of the fact that Trump seems to semi want to work with them because it "Makes him look good"?
by Aidannadia » Sun Sep 10, 2017 10:19 pm
Corrian wrote:So how much do you think Democrats will try to take advantage of the fact that Trump seems to semi want to work with them because it "Makes him look good"?

by AiliailiA » Sun Sep 10, 2017 10:31 pm
Aidannadia wrote:Clintonburge wrote:
The influence is on Trump and his decision making process, not on the outcome of the chosen action. What matters is if Ivanka can cause Trump to make a decision, the outcome of that decision is irrelevant.
The projected outcome of an action goes into effect when you decide to do something. Pointing out an obvious move that was being forced by every side, regardless of whether Ivanka wanted it or not, still is not influential in the slightest. Ivanka didn't need to be a part of the equation for the strike to happen, and I definitely don't need to here Eric's take on it considering all that buffoon's been through.
Cannot think of a name wrote:"Where's my immortality?" will be the new "Where's my jetpack?"
Maineiacs wrote:"We're going to build a canal, and we're going to make Columbia pay for it!" -- Teddy Roosevelt
Ifreann wrote:That's not a Freudian slip. A Freudian slip is when you say one thing and mean your mother.

by Corrian » Sun Sep 10, 2017 10:33 pm
Aidannadia wrote:Corrian wrote:So how much do you think Democrats will try to take advantage of the fact that Trump seems to semi want to work with them because it "Makes him look good"?
Timing lines up with Sander's medicare plan, but that'll die so nothing good'll come of that.
Perhaps infrastructure/budgetary squabbles.

by Gauthier » Sun Sep 10, 2017 10:37 pm
by Aidannadia » Sun Sep 10, 2017 10:42 pm
Corrian wrote:In before Trump endorses the medicare plan and Republicans heads explode.

by Clintonburge » Sun Sep 10, 2017 10:45 pm

Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Alvecia, Canarsia, Canchungo, Eternal Algerstonia, Kubra, La Xinga, LeasI, Maineiacs, Oneid1, Pizza Friday Forever91, RedBrickLand, Soviet Haaregrad, The Archregimancy, Xinisti, Yasuragi
Advertisement