by Aboim » Sat Sep 02, 2017 11:01 am
by Thermodolia » Sat Sep 02, 2017 11:13 am
by Dushan » Sat Sep 02, 2017 11:22 am
Aboim wrote:Pot Was Flying Off the Shelves in Uruguay. Then U.S. Banks Weighed In.[/align]
The pharmacies selling pot were doing a brisk business.
After Uruguay became the first country in the world to fully legalize marijuana sales for recreational use last month, some of the pharmacies struggled to keep up with the demand. Then came the stern letters from American banks. The letters immediately sent officials in Uruguay scrambling to make sense of the Patriot Act and other American laws that could doom an essential part of their country’s new marijuana market.
American banks, including Bank of America, said that they would stop doing business with banks in Uruguay that provide services for those state-controlled sales. Afraid of losing access to the American banking system, Uruguayan banks warned some of the pharmacies over the last couple of weeks that their accounts would be shut down, potentially signaling a broader international impasse as other countries, including Canada, set out to legalize marijuana.
“We can’t hold out false hope,” President Tabaré Vázquez of Uruguay told reporters this week, adding that his administration was trying to come up with a solution.
The snag mirrors challenges that such businesses have faced in American states that have legalized medical and recreational cannabis. Under the Patriot Act, which was passed weeks after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, it is unlawful for American financial institutions to do business with dealers of certain controlled substances, including marijuana. The provisions were designed to curb money laundering and drug trafficking.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/25/worl ... banks.html
https://elpais.com/internacional/2017/0 ... 53316.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/th ... 6b4fef1d62
It's a great opportunity to European and Dutch banks start gaining ground in South America and difficult inheritance for Vázquez.
by Greed and Death » Sat Sep 02, 2017 11:59 am
Dushan wrote:Aboim wrote:Pot Was Flying Off the Shelves in Uruguay. Then U.S. Banks Weighed In.[/align]
The pharmacies selling pot were doing a brisk business.
After Uruguay became the first country in the world to fully legalize marijuana sales for recreational use last month, some of the pharmacies struggled to keep up with the demand. Then came the stern letters from American banks. The letters immediately sent officials in Uruguay scrambling to make sense of the Patriot Act and other American laws that could doom an essential part of their country’s new marijuana market.
American banks, including Bank of America, said that they would stop doing business with banks in Uruguay that provide services for those state-controlled sales. Afraid of losing access to the American banking system, Uruguayan banks warned some of the pharmacies over the last couple of weeks that their accounts would be shut down, potentially signaling a broader international impasse as other countries, including Canada, set out to legalize marijuana.
“We can’t hold out false hope,” President Tabaré Vázquez of Uruguay told reporters this week, adding that his administration was trying to come up with a solution.
The snag mirrors challenges that such businesses have faced in American states that have legalized medical and recreational cannabis. Under the Patriot Act, which was passed weeks after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, it is unlawful for American financial institutions to do business with dealers of certain controlled substances, including marijuana. The provisions were designed to curb money laundering and drug trafficking.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/25/worl ... banks.html
https://elpais.com/internacional/2017/0 ... 53316.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/th ... 6b4fef1d62
It's a great opportunity to European and Dutch banks start gaining ground in South America and difficult inheritance for Vázquez.
Sounds like an excellent business opportunity for a Bank specialized on the needs of those customers.
by Shofercia » Sat Sep 02, 2017 1:01 pm
Thermodolia wrote:So i guess the Dutch don't exist then?
by Geilinor » Sat Sep 02, 2017 3:23 pm
by Kanaria » Sat Sep 02, 2017 3:27 pm
by Greed and Death » Sat Sep 02, 2017 3:29 pm
Geilinor wrote:The banks don't have much of a choice, they're probably worried about the Justice Department under Jeff Sessions going after them.
by Geilinor » Sat Sep 02, 2017 4:09 pm
Aboim wrote:Dutch coffeeshops sell cannabis food and other derived things, or not? And I don’t remember any problem with their money.
by Thermodolia » Sat Sep 02, 2017 4:16 pm
by Rio Cana » Sat Sep 02, 2017 4:39 pm
by Ethel mermania » Sat Sep 02, 2017 4:59 pm
by LimaUniformNovemberAlpha » Sat Sep 02, 2017 5:05 pm
Ethel mermania wrote:Greed and Death wrote:The fundamental problem is almost all international wires go through New York.
So if the American banks shut you out you are shut out from global banking.
Pretty much what Putin and xi are bitching about. The clearing systems go through thr US. I don't see this ending well for anybody. Congress needs to write an exception to the rule for legality. ( an executive order could do it, but I hate rule by executive order).
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:1. The PRC is not a Communist State, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
2. The CCP is not a Communist Party, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
3. Xi Jinping and his cronies are not Communists, as they have shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
How do we know this? Because the first step toward Communism is Socialism, and none of the aforementioned are even remotely Socialist in any way, shape, or form.
by Ethel mermania » Sat Sep 02, 2017 5:10 pm
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:Pretty much what Putin and xi are bitching about. The clearing systems go through thr US. I don't see this ending well for anybody. Congress needs to write an exception to the rule for legality. ( an executive order could do it, but I hate rule by executive order).
Or they could put pressure on the US government to admit they were wrong about weed, and promote it as an alternative to harder drugs.
Including tobacco and alcohol.
by The Serbian Empire » Sat Sep 02, 2017 6:33 pm
by Fauxia » Sat Sep 02, 2017 6:44 pm
by Greed and Death » Sat Sep 02, 2017 7:34 pm
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:Pretty much what Putin and xi are bitching about. The clearing systems go through thr US. I don't see this ending well for anybody. Congress needs to write an exception to the rule for legality. ( an executive order could do it, but I hate rule by executive order).
Or they could put pressure on the US government to admit they were wrong about weed, and promote it as an alternative to harder drugs.
Including tobacco and alcohol.
by Bakery Hill » Sat Sep 02, 2017 7:39 pm
by Greed and Death » Sat Sep 02, 2017 7:40 pm
Ethel mermania wrote:LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:Or they could put pressure on the US government to admit they were wrong about weed, and promote it as an alternative to harder drugs.
Including tobacco and alcohol.
Which has nothing to do with the topic and would effectively be the result of what I am saying.
As an fyi Domestic banking in states where weed is legal is affected by this as well.
http://kdvr.com/2017/05/26/colorados-u- ... -industry/
by Ethel mermania » Sat Sep 02, 2017 7:49 pm
Greed and Death wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:
Which has nothing to do with the topic and would effectively be the result of what I am saying.
As an fyi Domestic banking in states where weed is legal is affected by this as well.
http://kdvr.com/2017/05/26/colorados-u- ... -industry/
Obama used his discretion to not enforce Anti money laundering rules but once Trump selected Sessions as Attorney General I knew that was gone and I suspect any bank that relied on Obama's discretion continuing is about to get burnt.
by Saiwania » Sat Sep 02, 2017 7:57 pm
by Greed and Death » Sat Sep 02, 2017 9:28 pm
Ethel mermania wrote:Greed and Death wrote:Obama used his discretion to not enforce Anti money laundering rules but once Trump selected Sessions as Attorney General I knew that was gone and I suspect any bank that relied on Obama's discretion continuing is about to get burnt.
absolutely. one of my biggest bitches about obama is his rule by decree (executive order). and once sessions was appointed AG, I agree with you, clearing marijuana transactions is dangerous territory. Yes i know other Presidents used executive orders, but not on as sweeping issues as obama did.
Obviously i think marijuana should be legal, but unfortunately it is a federal issue not a state one. either we need a "we really mean it" clause in the 10th amendment, or this should have been dealt with at the federal level.
to the topic at hand, the banks dont have a choice in the matter, they have to do what the AG says.
by Great Minarchistan » Sat Sep 02, 2017 9:29 pm
Saiwania wrote:I'm in favor of this, I've seen what pot can do to people- that it makes them stupider than they were before and does that permanently with prolonged use. For that reason alone, I'm in favor of keeping it illegal. But I also recognize that its a huge waste of money to keep too many people in prison over just that, so I favor decriminalization at most.
by Neo-Cristo » Sat Sep 02, 2017 9:33 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Big Eyed Animation, Dimetrodon Empire, Emotional Support Crocodile, Europa Undivided, Free Stalliongrad, Keltionialang, Kostane, Plan Neonie, So uh lab here, The H Corporation, Tungstan, Vanuzgard
Advertisement