Advertisement
by Thermodolia » Thu Aug 31, 2017 1:48 pm
by Rio Cana » Thu Aug 31, 2017 1:48 pm
by Risottia » Thu Aug 31, 2017 1:49 pm
Kennlind wrote:Risottia wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_c ... ndum,_1978
Over 95% of the Catalan voters approved the 1978 Constitution, which states that the unity of the Spanish Nation is indissoluble.
Section 2. The Constitution is based on the indissoluble unity of the Spanish Nation, the common and indivisible homeland of all Spaniards; it recognizes and guarantees the right to self-government of the nationalities and regions of which it is composed and the solidarity among them all.
Why do you hate the Catalan voters?
In the 1980 elections, over 55% of people voted for nationalist parties. Why do you hate the Catalan voters?
by Thermodolia » Thu Aug 31, 2017 1:50 pm
Rio Cana wrote:So the Catalans want Independence. The only thing I can say is take a number and wait your turn. Puerto Rico is first on line.
Going back, The kingdom of Catalonia was part of the Crown of Aragon which united with the Kingdom of Castile to form Spain. In that relationship, Castile was the main kingdom running things and which changed the way the Crown of Aragon was run. Do not get confused. There was the Crown of Aragon which included the Catalan Kingdom and other kingdoms including the Kingdom of Aragon. The Crown of Aragon was a composite monarchy. The King ruled different regions under those regions laws and rules. Spain was different. It was the same law and rules for everyone.
by Thermodolia » Thu Aug 31, 2017 1:51 pm
Risottia wrote:Kennlind wrote:In the 1980 elections, over 55% of people voted for nationalist parties. Why do you hate the Catalan voters?
Are you even aware of the difference between voting in a Constitutional referendum and voting in a local election called according to that Constitution to elect representatives who are supposed to exert their prerogatives within the limits set by that Constitution while administrating a local autonomy created by that Constitution? Why do you think you're allowed to misrepresent the results of Catalan elections?
Or for short, rule according to higher law. Learn about it.
by Catlander » Thu Aug 31, 2017 1:55 pm
The Archregimancy wrote:Catlander wrote:@The Archregimancy: a veredict look like Slobodan Milosevic
Yes, I understand what you're trying to say. You think there should have been some sort of ICC-like process to bring Franco to trial post-1945 (even though this was 50 years before the ICC existed).
But I'm not sure you fully understand my points. The points I'm making are that A) the UN did condemn Franco in 1946 but that B) there was no mechanism in place in the aftermath of the Second World for bringing to trial the head of government of a sovereign state that hadn't been a belligerent during the Second World War. Attempting to argue for a Milosevic-like process for Franco is to argue for retrospectively applying early 21st-century international legal procedures to the mid-20th century when those procedures hadn't been formed yet. It's not a defence of Franco's human rights abuses to note that you're taking the global community to task for failing to do something that it wasn't capable of doing in the context of the time. Nor were the Nuremberg trials or their Japanese equivalents direct precedents for putting him on trial since Spain was neutral during the Second World War; the United Nations was not about to invade Spain for the specific purpose of deposing Franco.
Though I suppose we could always disinter him from the Valle de los Caidos and hold a modern equivalent of the cadaver synod.
by The Blaatschapen » Thu Aug 31, 2017 2:03 pm
The Archregimancy wrote:Catlander wrote:@The Archregimancy: a veredict look like Slobodan Milosevic
Yes, I understand what you're trying to say. You think there should have been some sort of ICC-like process to bring Franco to trial post-1945 (even though this was 50 years before the ICC existed).
But I'm not sure you fully understand my points. The points I'm making are that A) the UN did condemn Franco in 1946 but that B) there was no mechanism in place in the aftermath of the Second World for bringing to trial the head of government of a sovereign state that hadn't been a belligerent during the Second World War. Attempting to argue for a Milosevic-like process for Franco is to argue for retrospectively applying early 21st-century international legal procedures to the mid-20th century when those procedures hadn't been formed yet. It's not a defence of Franco's human rights abuses to note that you're taking the global community to task for failing to do something that it wasn't capable of doing in the context of the time. Nor were the Nuremberg trials or their Japanese equivalents direct precedents for putting him on trial since Spain was neutral during the Second World War; the United Nations was not about to invade Spain for the specific purpose of deposing Franco.
Though I suppose we could always disinter him from the Valle de los Caidos and hold a modern equivalent of the cadaver synod.
by Rio Cana » Thu Aug 31, 2017 2:04 pm
Thermodolia wrote:Rio Cana wrote:So the Catalans want Independence. The only thing I can say is take a number and wait your turn. Puerto Rico is first on line.
Going back, The kingdom of Catalonia was part of the Crown of Aragon which united with the Kingdom of Castile to form Spain. In that relationship, Castile was the main kingdom running things and which changed the way the Crown of Aragon was run. Do not get confused. There was the Crown of Aragon which included the Catalan Kingdom and other kingdoms including the Kingdom of Aragon. The Crown of Aragon was a composite monarchy. The King ruled different regions under those regions laws and rules. Spain was different. It was the same law and rules for everyone.
PR isn't ever going to be independent. You know that, I know that, hell everyone and their pet knows that. PR is more likely to become a state than independent
by Farnhamia » Thu Aug 31, 2017 2:04 pm
Catlander wrote:The Archregimancy wrote:
Yes, I understand what you're trying to say. You think there should have been some sort of ICC-like process to bring Franco to trial post-1945 (even though this was 50 years before the ICC existed).
But I'm not sure you fully understand my points. The points I'm making are that A) the UN did condemn Franco in 1946 but that B) there was no mechanism in place in the aftermath of the Second World for bringing to trial the head of government of a sovereign state that hadn't been a belligerent during the Second World War. Attempting to argue for a Milosevic-like process for Franco is to argue for retrospectively applying early 21st-century international legal procedures to the mid-20th century when those procedures hadn't been formed yet. It's not a defence of Franco's human rights abuses to note that you're taking the global community to task for failing to do something that it wasn't capable of doing in the context of the time. Nor were the Nuremberg trials or their Japanese equivalents direct precedents for putting him on trial since Spain was neutral during the Second World War; the United Nations was not about to invade Spain for the specific purpose of deposing Franco.
Though I suppose we could always disinter him from the Valle de los Caidos and hold a modern equivalent of the cadaver synod.
Perfect. So I forget ask any support from UN or ICC at all. O.K.
Did you know that Aznar (friend of Geoge Bush) gave 40.000€/year to Franco Fundation (yes it exist yet). Translate it please
http://www.elperiodico.com/es/politica/ ... os-6059558
Rajoy gave 1 million
http://m.publico.es/sociedad/1992746/ra ... acatolicas
So... Now do you agree I can to ask a referendum in Catalonia?
by Gyrenaica » Thu Aug 31, 2017 2:08 pm
Thermodolia wrote:If Spain wants to be stupid and Balkanize themselves I'd say let them. I'd really like to Balkanize Russia and a few other European states.
by Thermodolia » Thu Aug 31, 2017 2:11 pm
Rio Cana wrote:Thermodolia wrote:PR isn't ever going to be independent. You know that, I know that, hell everyone and their pet knows that. PR is more likely to become a state than independent
And that obsolete stuck in the past joke of a nation NK. cannot possibly have ballistic missiles or nuclear weapons. How about this one, and the UK. will never leave the EU. And on and on. Like they say, never say never since you never know.
by Thermodolia » Thu Aug 31, 2017 2:11 pm
by Rio Cana » Thu Aug 31, 2017 2:24 pm
Gyrenaica wrote:If the people in Catalonia wish to go it alone, then they have a right to choose their own path. If that path leads to ruin, they can go running back to mother Spain.
The Basque country and Catalonia are the Spanish economy´s main industrial regions and just five of Spain's provinces (Barcelona, Biscay, Madrid, Navarre and Oviedo, all situated in the north and east) produce over half the country's industrial output. Catalonia, where some 85% of companies are located in Barcelona, is Spain's economic powerhouse and one of Europe's most important industrial regions.
Spain has been transformed in the last three decades from a rural, backward, agricultural country into a nation with a diversified economy with strong manufacturing and service sectors. However Spain's bureaucracy remains firmly rooted in the 1950's.
by Catlander » Thu Aug 31, 2017 2:32 pm
by Rio Cana » Thu Aug 31, 2017 2:47 pm
Thermodolia wrote:Rio Cana wrote:
And that obsolete stuck in the past joke of a nation NK. cannot possibly have ballistic missiles or nuclear weapons. How about this one, and the UK. will never leave the EU. And on and on. Like they say, never say never since you never know.
The popular support for independence isn't there. Nobody said that NK would never get them just that it would take a long damn time to do so. But when it comes to PR the support just isn't there. More people support the status quo than anything else.
by Thermodolia » Thu Aug 31, 2017 2:49 pm
Rio Cana wrote:Thermodolia wrote:The popular support for independence isn't there. Nobody said that NK would never get them just that it would take a long damn time to do so. But when it comes to PR the support just isn't there. More people support the status quo than anything else.
Read - https://waragainstallpuertoricans.com/2 ... 1st-state/
by Farnhamia » Thu Aug 31, 2017 3:08 pm
Catlander wrote:@farmhania
When you read Hamlet don't forget ask yourself after: "What does have to do with Hamlet's dilemma (revenge or suicide) if Claudius killed Hamlet"s father and he f***d her mother?"
Cause and Effect. Action & Reaction.
by Nanatsu no Tsuki » Thu Aug 31, 2017 3:11 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Catlander wrote:@farmhania
When you read Hamlet don't forget ask yourself after: "What does have to do with Hamlet's dilemma (revenge or suicide) if Claudius killed Hamlet"s father and he f***d her mother?"
Cause and Effect. Action & Reaction.
So ... the current Spanish government is run by a crypto-Falangist who is thwarting the desire of the peace-loving Catalan people for freedom? Those same people who voted for the 1978 constitution which, as it's been pointed out to you, says the union of Spain in indissoluble?
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGsRIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria
by The Grene Knyght » Thu Aug 31, 2017 3:13 pm
[_★_]
(◕‿◕)
Currently
Reading
2015: x=-8.75,y=-6.56
2016: x=-8.88,y=-9.54
2017: x=-9.63,y=-9.90
2018: x=-9.88,y=-9.23
2019: x=-10.0,y=-9.90
2020: x=-10.0,y=-10.0
2021: x=-10.0,y=-10.0
FULLY AUTOMATED LUXURY GAY SPACE COMMUNISM
Portal Nationalist | Proletarian MoralistPRO: Socialism, Communism, Internationalism, Revolution, Leninism.
NEUTRAL: Anarchism, Marxism-Leninism.
ANTI: Capitalism, Liberalism, Nationalism, Fascists, Hyper-Sectarian Leftists.
by Farnhamia » Thu Aug 31, 2017 3:14 pm
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:Farnhamia wrote:So ... the current Spanish government is run by a crypto-Falangist who is thwarting the desire of the peace-loving Catalan people for freedom? Those same people who voted for the 1978 constitution which, as it's been pointed out to you, says the union of Spain in indissoluble?
It's like trying to drink a cacti smoothie, Farn, with the barbs and all.
by Nanatsu no Tsuki » Thu Aug 31, 2017 3:16 pm
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGsRIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria
by Risottia » Thu Aug 31, 2017 4:06 pm
Thermodolia wrote:Risottia wrote:Are you even aware of the difference between voting in a Constitutional referendum and voting in a local election called according to that Constitution to elect representatives who are supposed to exert their prerogatives within the limits set by that Constitution while administrating a local autonomy created by that Constitution? Why do you think you're allowed to misrepresent the results of Catalan elections?
Or for short, rule according to higher law. Learn about it.
You are talking to someone who wants Scotland to be free from the British right?
by Risottia » Thu Aug 31, 2017 4:08 pm
Farnhamia wrote:What does people giving their money to the Franco Foundation have to do with a Catalan independence referendum?
by Greed and Death » Thu Aug 31, 2017 4:43 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Herador, ImSaLiA, Ineva, Kostane, Likhinia, New Temecula, Rusozak, Sarolandia, Statesburg, The Two Jerseys, The Vooperian Union, Trollgaard, Uniara, Verkhoyanska
Advertisement