Advertisement
by Computer Lab » Sat Aug 26, 2017 3:45 pm
by Jetan » Sat Aug 26, 2017 3:50 pm
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:Jetan wrote:Honestly, BSA has a lot bigger issues than not being co-ed. They could certainly become co-ed, but I don't see it as pressing issue since Girl Scouts exists aswell (don't see why the Girl Scouts would oppose it either though). Most Troops here are co-ed, but not all. Some of especially the older troops are still sex segregated. If anything there should more independent co-ed troops.
Eh, I don't know what kind of camps you've been to but there certainly was no distribution of condoms when I was in the scouts.
Doesn't require them to be given out at the campsite. Only elsewhere and individually packaged to smuggle into the campsite.
by Belle Ilse en Terre » Sat Aug 26, 2017 5:19 pm
by Bombadil » Sat Aug 26, 2017 8:27 pm
The Archregimancy wrote:I've just done a quick scout (ha ha) of the names of the 169 national Scouting organisations, and as far as my language skills allow me to tell, the only national associations that still use the word 'boy' or a gender-exclusive adjective in their title(s) are:
Austria
Bahrain
Barbados
Jordan
Kuwait
Liberia
Luxembourg
Lichtenstein
Pakistan
Philippines
Saudi Arabia (unsurprisingly)
Suriname
Swaziland
United States
by Gim » Sat Aug 26, 2017 8:41 pm
Computer Lab wrote:I don't see a big problem with the BSA becoming co-ed. There is already a pretty large amount of oversight. It isn't like suddenly every scout would start having sex at camp if it was co-ed.
I always thought it was a shame that girls didn't get to do some of the more cool stuff in Scouting. Besides, high adventure camps run fine co-ed.
by LimaUniformNovemberAlpha » Sun Aug 27, 2017 7:28 am
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:1. The PRC is not a Communist State, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
2. The CCP is not a Communist Party, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
3. Xi Jinping and his cronies are not Communists, as they have shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
How do we know this? Because the first step toward Communism is Socialism, and none of the aforementioned are even remotely Socialist in any way, shape, or form.
by Reformed Corea » Sun Aug 27, 2017 7:29 am
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:Jetan wrote:Sigh. They weren't given out elsewhere, individually packaged and smugled into the campsite either.
They're given out in schools, aren't they?
The only thing we don't know is whether or not they're smuggled into the campsite, and we can't be sure they aren't any more than that they are.
by LimaUniformNovemberAlpha » Sun Aug 27, 2017 7:32 am
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:1. The PRC is not a Communist State, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
2. The CCP is not a Communist Party, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
3. Xi Jinping and his cronies are not Communists, as they have shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
How do we know this? Because the first step toward Communism is Socialism, and none of the aforementioned are even remotely Socialist in any way, shape, or form.
by Reformed Corea » Sun Aug 27, 2017 7:33 am
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:Reformed Corea wrote:
Which item are you addressing?
Condoms, and the tradeoff thereof.
I mentioned that Europe just gives out condoms and so has a lower teen pregnancy rate. I was suggesting that taking measures to prevent teen sex more drastic than Europe's or the USA's would reduce it even more than that.
by LimaUniformNovemberAlpha » Sun Aug 27, 2017 7:41 am
Reformed Corea wrote:LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:Condoms, and the tradeoff thereof.
I mentioned that Europe just gives out condoms and so has a lower teen pregnancy rate. I was suggesting that taking measures to prevent teen sex more drastic than Europe's or the USA's would reduce it even more than that.
Are Morning-After pills provided by the school as well?
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:1. The PRC is not a Communist State, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
2. The CCP is not a Communist Party, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
3. Xi Jinping and his cronies are not Communists, as they have shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
How do we know this? Because the first step toward Communism is Socialism, and none of the aforementioned are even remotely Socialist in any way, shape, or form.
by Reformed Corea » Sun Aug 27, 2017 7:43 am
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:-Snip-
by Gauthier » Sun Aug 27, 2017 9:19 am
Reformed Corea wrote:LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:Condoms, and the tradeoff thereof.
I mentioned that Europe just gives out condoms and so has a lower teen pregnancy rate. I was suggesting that taking measures to prevent teen sex more drastic than Europe's or the USA's would reduce it even more than that.
Are Morning-After pills provided by the school as well?
by Computer Lab » Sun Aug 27, 2017 10:46 am
by Saiwania » Sun Aug 27, 2017 11:12 am
Gauthier wrote:It doesn't help that sex ed in many states are set up by evangelical fetus fetishists.
by Soldati Senza Confini » Sun Aug 27, 2017 11:19 am
Saiwania wrote:Gauthier wrote:It doesn't help that sex ed in many states are set up by evangelical fetus fetishists.
The very southern states like Mississippi seem to have the more interesting sex ed classes for women. Like that classic one where the class passes around a piece of unwrapped candy and then asking the last person who has it- "You wouldn't want to eat that used and dirty piece of chocolate, do you? Remember girls- its the same with your vagina!"
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.
by Reformed Corea » Mon Aug 28, 2017 1:15 am
Computer Lab wrote:I was given a single condom in high school in a US high school, and the college I go to gives them out for free at the health center. I don't know about morning after pills.
by Mushet » Mon Aug 28, 2017 2:16 am
Cetacea wrote:oh they could do mixed camps with badges for skinny dipping
by Jetan » Tue Aug 29, 2017 5:43 am
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:Jetan wrote:Sigh. They weren't given out elsewhere, individually packaged and smugled into the campsite either.
They're given out in schools, aren't they?
The only thing we don't know is whether or not they're smuggled into the campsite, and we can't be sure they aren't any more than that they are.
by Salandriagado » Tue Aug 29, 2017 6:00 am
Costa Fierro wrote:The Corparation wrote:Because they want the programs Boy Scouts offer? Because girls with brothers in the Boy scouts want to participate?
So why not give them the same programs? Take them camping. Teach them how to skin an animal. Sing campfire songs. Whatever it is the Boy Scouts do.
Gim wrote:Costa Fierro wrote:
So why not give them the same programs? Take them camping. Teach them how to skin an animal. Sing campfire songs. Whatever it is the Boy Scouts do.
Relationships are a problem. What if the boys don't work and do activities as much, because they've fallen in love with the girls there?
Sovaal wrote:The Corparation wrote:Because they want the programs Boy Scouts offer? Because girls with brothers in the Boy scouts want to participate?
They're allowed in both, but it took the threat of a lengthy legal battle for the BSA to allow it. The organization is still very conservative. I blame the Mormons.
Hey, look, I like blaming entire religions as well, but I really doubt the Mormons are the only ones against trans people in the scouts.
Philjia wrote:The Archregimancy wrote: And certainly in the Anglosphere, the US Scouting movement is highly unusual among the larger countries; most have have allowed both boys and girls for years, in some cases decades.
They're weird in plenty of other ways as well. The BSA heavily relies on local groups such as churches for facilities, funding, and organisation, while in the UK most scout groups will have their own hut are run entirely by Scout Association members. The BSA is also way more religious as a result.
Saiwania wrote:There should be no gay or trans people in the BSA, because that runs counter to the values of their founder. And any attempt to bring girls in would be unjustly stepping on the GSA's territory and interfering with their core mission.
Belle Ilse en Terre wrote:The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:Why not merge the two organisations? One united Scouts origination?
Would it not be more efficient pooling resources together?
Why not form a separate coed scouts organisation? Why are we pirating existing organisations and compromising their original nature?
Arumbia67 wrote:Girls don't belong in the boy scouts. They're called the boy scouts for a reason.
The Fields of Asphodel wrote:As a female Venture Scout, I think Girl Scouts is overlooking something important. When you have boys and girls together at a Boy Scout camp, you have to have at least two adult leaders of each gender for every howevermany scouts of that gender. Girls and boys may not share tents, under 18 and over 18 may not share tents, and I don't think married adult leaders are allowed to share tents. In Girl Scouts, there are no boys, so they have almost no experience with dividing the sexes, not that most girl scouts camp anyway. As an example, our local baseball team (Go Flying Squirrels!) offers both Boy Scout and Girl Scout Night at the Diamond, where you camp on the outfield after the game is over. Boy scout camp was a fun family activity, much like Cub Scout campouts. I should probably clarify that Cub scouts is generally more of a family activity that revolves around the scouts but includes both parents and often siblings. I have fond memories of designing pinewood derby cars and going to fishing fun day at one of our council's camps. Girl Scout night was different. First of all, there were a lot more taj matents, but that wasn't even the problem. It was basically one big pajama sleepover party, and it was like the whole thing had been designed by a preteen. My family had planned to camp together, like we had at Boy Scout night, but my dad and brother had to leave because, while technically boys were allowed, they had to camp on the other side of the diamond and we only brought one tent. It wasn't even fun. Never on any other camping trip have I seen so many pajamas and stuffed animals and 12-person tents. That was the only time I ever went camping as a girl scout, and it wasn't even with my troop. As for my troop, we had one for three, maybe four years then had to cave because you can't have brownies and juniors in the same troop. It was ridiculous. We did do some fun things, and thankfully I was too old to be required to earn the "Social Butterfly" award, because, honest to god, while Cub Scouts are getting belt loops and earning their Bobcat Badges, Daisies are learning how to be Social Butterflies. At some point after my troop fell apart, I was at my brother's AOL Ceremony or maybe his crossover into his Boy Scout troop, I don't remember, one of the adult leaders told me about Venture crews, and I waited eagerly for two years to be able to do the same things my brother was doing: camping, hiking, and doing cool things with his troop, like going to the spy museum and whitewater rafting. Once I was old enough, I joined a local crew, earned my bronze award before they discontinued that program, then started working towards the new awards. I've backpacked sections of the AT, kayaked in the Chesapeake Bay, cooked in a dutch oven, and helped volunteer at scout camps, where I met some of my closest friends. None of that would have been possible in Girl Scouts. Well, maybe dutch oven cooking, but still. Girl Scouts isn't threatened by Boy Scouts, they're threatened by their own shortcomings.
The Black Forrest wrote:The Corparation wrote:As someone from a camp which used to serve what is probably one of the more diverse councils in the nation, I don't see any reason why the BSA can't do both.
Not suggesting they can't but the point remains. Many aren't diverse and should work to eliminate that. After that sure don't see why girls can't join. Some may prefer that over GSA. Don't think they will see the numbers though.
Maybe this council thinks they can get their hands on the GS cookies.
Des-Bal wrote:The girl scouts were organized as and have persisted as an answer to the boy scouts. If the boy scouts let in girls then the girl scouts cease to exist.
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:Empire of Narnia wrote:Never been a fan of gender-segregated groups with a few exceptions. It just seems weird to me and just not how the world works. The country isn't gender segregated, neither is school or the workplace so it is important that kids learn how to work with the opposite sex.
School and the workplace are better supervised to keep teen sex to a minimum.
There's only so much you can watch at a camp.
by Costa Fierro » Tue Aug 29, 2017 6:16 am
Bombadil wrote:The Archregimancy wrote:I've just done a quick scout (ha ha) of the names of the 169 national Scouting organisations, and as far as my language skills allow me to tell, the only national associations that still use the word 'boy' or a gender-exclusive adjective in their title(s) are:
Austria
Bahrain
Barbados
Jordan
Kuwait
Liberia
Luxembourg
Lichtenstein
Pakistan
Philippines
Saudi Arabia (unsurprisingly)
Suriname
Swaziland
United States
America, in fine company as ever..
by Sovaal » Tue Aug 29, 2017 6:19 am
by Salandriagado » Tue Aug 29, 2017 6:48 am
by Bombadil » Tue Aug 29, 2017 7:57 am
by Cetacea » Tue Aug 29, 2017 10:13 am
by Kathmandue » Tue Aug 29, 2017 10:17 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Almonaster Nuevo, Corporate Collective Salvation, Delitai, Duvniask, Elejamie, Herador, Jewish Partisan Division, Kerwa, Likhinia, Naui Tu, Relmont, Statesburg, Tiami
Advertisement