Liriena wrote:That sounds rather oxymoronic, since communism is by definition stateless.
Not even supporting Социализм в одной стране.
J U S T
Not a very original jab.
A fair enough one, tho.
Advertisement
by Aellex » Mon Aug 14, 2017 3:22 pm
Liriena wrote:That sounds rather oxymoronic, since communism is by definition stateless.
Not a very original jab.
by Hakons » Mon Aug 14, 2017 3:22 pm
Liriena wrote:Hakons wrote:
Communism on a national scale doesn't work.
That sounds rather oxymoronic, since communism is by definition stateless.Hakons wrote:It won't work on a global scale.
Free market capitalism has supposedly managed to work on a global scale, even though mercantilists and physiocrats would have probably thought it impossible.Hakons wrote:I'm sure your leading the way of the Global Revolution by giving all your assets to children in Africa.
Not a very original jab.
by Crazed Pirates » Mon Aug 14, 2017 3:22 pm
by Liriena » Mon Aug 14, 2017 3:22 pm
Crazed Pirates wrote:Liriena wrote:I'd very much rather we rehabilitated all racist scum, but if I see them intimidating others, invading college campuses and city streets, and harassing innocent people online, I have few qualms with someone who decides to deliver a good punch to their faces.
I'd very much rather we rehabilitated all people who call others scum based on their political or social views, but if I see them intimidating others, literally controlling college campuses and city streets 1984-style, and harassing innocent people everywhere, I have few qualms with someone who decides to deliver a good punch to their faces.
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by Cannot think of a name » Mon Aug 14, 2017 3:23 pm
Bannedbytomorrow wrote:Liriena wrote:Except I have explicitly said that I don't want to see them dead, so at this point you're baselessly speculating about my supposedly hidden motives.
Also, I don't see them as "subhuman". They are human. They are people. And people can change for the better.
You're lying to yourself. You typed out that whole thing on how you're not going to tolerate any of these certain beliefs. It's obvious to everyone that you hate them. You can lie to yourself all you want, but you and I both know that you want them all dead.
by Liriena » Mon Aug 14, 2017 3:23 pm
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by Torrocca » Mon Aug 14, 2017 3:23 pm
Hakons wrote:Torrocca wrote:
If those are so limited, then how can so many first world countries waste so much?
We can't both be lacking and capable of wasting what we supposedly lack.
OK, comrade, what is your assuredly precise and feasible solution to this?
by Crazed Pirates » Mon Aug 14, 2017 3:24 pm
Liriena wrote:Crazed Pirates wrote:I'd very much rather we rehabilitated all people who call others scum based on their political or social views, but if I see them intimidating others, literally controlling college campuses and city streets 1984-style, and harassing innocent people everywhere, I have few qualms with someone who decides to deliver a good punch to their faces.
If you're going to defend Nazis, at least be honest about it.
by Liriena » Mon Aug 14, 2017 3:24 pm
Hakons wrote:Liriena wrote:That sounds rather oxymoronic, since communism is by definition stateless.
Free market capitalism has supposedly managed to work on a global scale, even though mercantilists and physiocrats would have probably thought it impossible.
Not a very original jab.
My goodness, communism as an economic system doesn't work.
Free market capitalism has worked on a national level and has largely worked on a global level. Communism, as an economic system, usually fails.
It is not original because globalist communists are mostly hypocrites, and they get called out on it.
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by Torrocca » Mon Aug 14, 2017 3:25 pm
Isentria wrote:Torrocca wrote:
Tell me, what do you define as private property? Because, I'm assuming, it's not what the Communist definition of private property is, nor what it is they actually seized.
Also, proof on the Nazi parade thing?
Private property as in the Communist definition of it: the, currently, privately owned means of production.
By all legal means, the means of production are in their legal owner's hands currently, to try to seize them is theft.
As for the parade thing: German-Soviet military parade in Brest-Litovsk. It is not like you are unaware that Stalin was also feeding Hitler's warmachine with resources while he was rampaging over Western Europe, right?
by Nuevo Libera » Mon Aug 14, 2017 3:25 pm
by Neutraligon » Mon Aug 14, 2017 3:26 pm
Torrocca wrote:Hakons wrote:
OK, comrade, what is your assuredly precise and feasible solution to this?
Improve international efforts to bring wide-scale aid to those countries that do not have the resources that first world nations have a startling overabundance of and, at the same time, work to enact policies within those countries to ensure that, eventually, they can reliably sustain themselves without a wide scale effort to be aided.
by Crazed Pirates » Mon Aug 14, 2017 3:27 pm
Torrocca wrote:Hakons wrote:
OK, comrade, what is your assuredly precise and feasible solution to this?
Improve international efforts to bring wide-scale aid to those countries that do not have the resources that first world nations have a startling overabundance of and, at the same time, work to enact policies within those countries to ensure that, eventually, they can reliably sustain themselves without a wide scale effort to be aided.
by Hakons » Mon Aug 14, 2017 3:27 pm
Torrocca wrote:Hakons wrote:
OK, comrade, what is your assuredly precise and feasible solution to this?
Improve international efforts to bring wide-scale aid to those countries that do not have the resources that first world nations have a startling overabundance of and, at the same time, work to enact policies within those countries to ensure that, eventually, they can reliably sustain themselves without a wide scale effort to be aided.
by Torrocca » Mon Aug 14, 2017 3:28 pm
Crazed Pirates wrote:Torrocca wrote:
Improve international efforts to bring wide-scale aid to those countries that do not have the resources that first world nations have a startling overabundance of and, at the same time, work to enact policies within those countries to ensure that, eventually, they can reliably sustain themselves without a wide scale effort to be aided.
So, we should cripple their industry with our cheap goods and their agriculture with our cheap food, then threaten them with withdrawing it the second they show dissent about being basically banana republics. Good work, comrade! You get the Stalin's Medal.
Neutraligon wrote:Torrocca wrote:
Improve international efforts to bring wide-scale aid to those countries that do not have the resources that first world nations have a startling overabundance of and, at the same time, work to enact policies within those countries to ensure that, eventually, they can reliably sustain themselves without a wide scale effort to be aided.
One of the things I think we really need to work on is the transportation of goods. The US has an overabundance of food, but we are really really bad at getting it from point A to point B, so certain areas tend not to get that food, while others have too much.
by Liriena » Mon Aug 14, 2017 3:29 pm
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by Nuevo Libera » Mon Aug 14, 2017 3:29 pm
by Isentria » Mon Aug 14, 2017 3:29 pm
Torrocca wrote:Napkiraly wrote:You want the full list of socialists committing acts of terrorism and then starting civil wars and the numerous atrocities carried out by socialists in pursuit of their goals? I mean because that is a long list. We can start with the Red Terror (USSR), Red Terror (Spain), Cambodian Genocide, St Nedelya Church assault, the Great Terror, assassination of William McKinley, LA Times Bombing, Wall Street Bombing, assassination of Tsar Alexander II. That's a small piece of the pie.
If we say advocating for socialism is violence, can we finally say advocating for capitalism is violence too?
by Torrocca » Mon Aug 14, 2017 3:30 pm
Hakons wrote:Torrocca wrote:
Improve international efforts to bring wide-scale aid to those countries that do not have the resources that first world nations have a startling overabundance of and, at the same time, work to enact policies within those countries to ensure that, eventually, they can reliably sustain themselves without a wide scale effort to be aided.
Currently there are many international efforts that bring large scale aid to countries with limited resources that are not limited in the 1st world, and there are also many efforts to make poor nations more self reliant. Almost all of these efforts come from dirty capitalist nations.
by Hakons » Mon Aug 14, 2017 3:30 pm
Torrocca wrote:Isentria wrote:
Private property as in the Communist definition of it: the, currently, privately owned means of production.
By all legal means, the means of production are in their legal owner's hands currently, to try to seize them is theft.
As for the parade thing: German-Soviet military parade in Brest-Litovsk. It is not like you are unaware that Stalin was also feeding Hitler's warmachine with resources while he was rampaging over Western Europe, right?
And, by law in a communist society, private property wouldn't be legal. Collectivized ownership of all the labor, however, would be.
Give me a source, an actual, linked source.
by Genivaria » Mon Aug 14, 2017 3:30 pm
Hakons wrote:Torrocca wrote:
And, by law in a communist society, private property wouldn't be legal. Collectivized ownership of all the labor, however, would be.
Give me a source, an actual, linked source.
There is no theft because there is no private property.
The Holocaust was not genocide because Jews weren't people.
by Crazed Pirates » Mon Aug 14, 2017 3:30 pm
Hakons wrote:Torrocca wrote:
Improve international efforts to bring wide-scale aid to those countries that do not have the resources that first world nations have a startling overabundance of and, at the same time, work to enact policies within those countries to ensure that, eventually, they can reliably sustain themselves without a wide scale effort to be aided.
Currently there are many international efforts that bring large scale aid to countries with limited resources that are not limited in the 1st world, and there are also many efforts to make poor nations more self reliant. Almost all of these efforts come from dirty capitalist nations.
by Torrocca » Mon Aug 14, 2017 3:31 pm
Hakons wrote:Torrocca wrote:
And, by law in a communist society, private property wouldn't be legal. Collectivized ownership of all the labor, however, would be.
Give me a source, an actual, linked source.
There is no theft because there is no private property.
The Holocaust was not genocide because Jews weren't people.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Almighty Biden, Australian rePublic, Minoa, Nu Elysium, Philjia, Statesburg, Stellar Colonies, The Two Jerseys, Tungstan, Valrifall, Zetaopalatopia
Advertisement